Alaskan - Conservative - Innovative - Enduring. We are an Alaskan media source providing honest, quality conservative news on what matters most to Alaskans.

Somewhere in Alaska
Joined April 2016
Alaska’s Judiciary: Part III of the Ultimate Conservative Voter Guide The judiciary often fades into the background amid all the political ads, mailers, signs, and door knocking for candidates seeking election. However, the judiciary derives its power from the people like any other branch of American government. For most Alaskans, the courts remain a distant, somewhat abstract concept until a high-profile case comes into focus, and even then, attention often quickly shifts back to the Governor and the Legislature. But court decisions have real-world impacts on everyday Alaskans. Court rulings affect the things that matter most to Alaskan families: public safety, education, and economics. In Part I and Part II, we looked at each individual candidate, combining information from various conservative sources, and making our recommendations. For Part III, we are approaching the judicial branch as a whole with this question in mind: Is the judicial system serving Alaskans and upholding our Constitution? Our answer: No. The Alaska judicial system has gone astray from constitutional intent and co-opted power for itself not given to it by the people. This is not just an MRAK opinion. Alaskans like Rep. Ben Carpenter, Sen. Mike Shower, David Haeg, Robert Wall, Ed Martin, Bob Bird, Greg Sarber, David Ignell and others have put extraordinary time and effort into bringing constitutional issues within the judicial system to the public’s attention. Awareness of judicial corruption is spreading wide, grabbing the attention of the state’s leaders. Get UCVG Part III with link in reply! PDF version for easy sharing coming soon!! #AKjustice #AKlaw #GOTV
2
2
2
245
This is an important election, folks. And Alaskans are showing up for it. Responsible government starts with responsible voters. God bless Alaska! #VOTE
How is the Alaska Early and Absentee Vote going? Comparing 10/26/2026 to the equivalent day, 10/31/2022: 1) Absentee votes are 74% of 2022 (15,668 vs 21,086). 2) Early votes are 181% of 2022 (30,536 vs 16,825). 3) Overall vote is 122% of 2022 (46,204 vs 37,911). HD map:
3
5
323
Must Read Alaska retweeted
How is the Alaska Early and Absentee Vote going? Comparing 10/26/2026 to the equivalent day, 10/31/2022: 1) Absentee votes are 74% of 2022 (15,668 vs 21,086). 2) Early votes are 181% of 2022 (30,536 vs 16,825). 3) Overall vote is 122% of 2022 (46,204 vs 37,911). HD map:
2
7
1
29
4,958
Opinion: Alaska’s next Golden Age starts with the next generation By Jack Thompson More people have left Alaska than have moved here for thirteen straight years. Before this run, the longest streak was four. The state’s own research chief, Dan Robinson, put it plainly: “This is not normal for us. It hasn’t happened before.” It used to be the other way around. Alaska was the place people ran toward. For most of our history it was where young people came to start something, and the state kept refilling itself with ambitious people in their twenties. Then it flipped. By the late 2010s, even the twenty-somethings were leaving faster than they arrived. I see it differently. This is what happens when a state asks young people to stay for a future that offers them too few ways to build a life and too little say in how it is written. A young person stays where there is work worth doing and a home within reach, and Alaska has the resources to offer both. Continue reading with link in reply! #AlaskaYouth
2
3
2
5
791
Must Read Alaska retweeted
CONGRATULATIONS to the Alaskan 2026 Scholars for the U.S. Presidential Scholars Program: Sara Elizabeth DeVolld of Soldotna, Liam B. Wade of North Pole, and Michelle E. Xu of Anchorage. Great job! bit.ly/4i8Mad5
2
5
253
Must Read Alaska retweeted
This is it, people. Our chance to take Alaska back from the dark money and chaos of ranked choice voting. ✅Vote YES to end the MESS of RCV. Yes on 2!
2
1
11
536
Must Read Alaska retweeted
Some things we need to leave permanently in the past: uncontrolled migration; criminals offending and right back on the streets; drugs flooding our communities; riots; burning cities; your tax dollars funding healthcare, food, housing, and education for illegal aliens; rampant fraud within safety net programs stealing from the poor and disabled; and a cancel culture that said if you called any of it out your access to social media or even your job could be at risk. We ended these things almost overnight two years ago, but don’t believe for a second that Democrats won’t open the floodgates once again if given the opportunity. Your vote counts. Make sure you use it. For voting locations or to vote early click the link below: elections.alaska.gov/avo/
16
30
4
134
3,228
The ballot is set. Alaskans, it is time to get out and cast your vote. Must Read Alaska recommends voting for @SenDanSullivan because of his proven record. Let’s re-elect Senator Sullivan fairly and squarely. And let’s repeal ranked-choice voting by voting YES ON 2, so primary candidates like Petersburg Dan that receive 2.4% of the primary votes do not advance to our general election ballot. @repealnowak And to the @TheJusticeDept, regarding this case, Alaskan conservatives do not need your patronizing lawsuit. We, the people, own our elections. We, the people, bear the responsibility to make intentional, informed voting decisions. And that is exactly what we will do. #informedvoter
Opinion: DOJ patronizes Alaskans with latest lawsuit against Division of Elections By Natalie Spaulding The story of the second Dan Sullivan on Alaska’s 2026 general election ballot has been a whirlwind story, which seemingly concluded with the Alaska Supreme Court’s ruling that Daniel J. Sullivan from Petersburg must be allowed on the ballot, and the Alaska Division of Elections can take steps to avoid voter confusion. However, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Alaska Division of Elections are now in a legal battle about the same issue with the United States arguing that apparently Alaskan voters cannot figure out who’s who on the ballot. The Division of Elections initially sought to refuse certification of Petersburg Dan, alleging his intent was to confuse voters, not to legitimately run for office. The Division had ample evidence of this intent to confuse: he had registered Republican last minute, copied the incumbent’s campaign materials, and tried to put the Senator’s middle initial as his own. The Alaska Superior Court did not rule that Petersburg Dan’s motive was sincere, but instead ruled that the Division lacked legal authority to impose a “good-faith” requirement not found in the U.S. Constitution, Alaska law, or its own regulations. The decision was challenged in the Alaska Supreme Court, which affirmed the Superior Court ruling. In other words, the motive did not matter to the Court. Anyone can run for office whatever their motive is as long as they meet the explicit legal requirements. In response, the Division certified the ballot with key differences to distinguish Petersburg Dan from the incumbent Senator Dan S. Sullivan: Petersburg Dan appears as “Sullivan, Daniel J. Jr.” and Senator Sullivan appears as “Sullivan, Dan S. (Registered Republican) Incumbent.” Petersburg Dan received a mere 2.4% of the votes in the primary election, but advanced to the general election due to ranked-choice voting top four rules. Democrat Mary Peltola pulled the most votes with 48% followed by incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan with 42.8%. Despite a lack of evidence of any voter accidentally voting for Petersburg Dan instead of Senator Sullivan in the primary election, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the State of Alaska and the Alaska Division of Elections, asking the Court to pre-emptively rule that the Alaska Division of Election may not certify the election results if “(1) Senator Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for Senator Sullivan and Alaska’s rank-choice process played out accordingly, Senator Sullivan would have won the election.” Continue reading with link in reply! #akpol
3
5
18
554
Opinion: DOJ patronizes Alaskans with latest lawsuit against Division of Elections By Natalie Spaulding The story of the second Dan Sullivan on Alaska’s 2026 general election ballot has been a whirlwind story, which seemingly concluded with the Alaska Supreme Court’s ruling that Daniel J. Sullivan from Petersburg must be allowed on the ballot, and the Alaska Division of Elections can take steps to avoid voter confusion. However, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Alaska Division of Elections are now in a legal battle about the same issue with the United States arguing that apparently Alaskan voters cannot figure out who’s who on the ballot. The Division of Elections initially sought to refuse certification of Petersburg Dan, alleging his intent was to confuse voters, not to legitimately run for office. The Division had ample evidence of this intent to confuse: he had registered Republican last minute, copied the incumbent’s campaign materials, and tried to put the Senator’s middle initial as his own. The Alaska Superior Court did not rule that Petersburg Dan’s motive was sincere, but instead ruled that the Division lacked legal authority to impose a “good-faith” requirement not found in the U.S. Constitution, Alaska law, or its own regulations. The decision was challenged in the Alaska Supreme Court, which affirmed the Superior Court ruling. In other words, the motive did not matter to the Court. Anyone can run for office whatever their motive is as long as they meet the explicit legal requirements. In response, the Division certified the ballot with key differences to distinguish Petersburg Dan from the incumbent Senator Dan S. Sullivan: Petersburg Dan appears as “Sullivan, Daniel J. Jr.” and Senator Sullivan appears as “Sullivan, Dan S. (Registered Republican) Incumbent.” Petersburg Dan received a mere 2.4% of the votes in the primary election, but advanced to the general election due to ranked-choice voting top four rules. Democrat Mary Peltola pulled the most votes with 48% followed by incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan with 42.8%. Despite a lack of evidence of any voter accidentally voting for Petersburg Dan instead of Senator Sullivan in the primary election, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the State of Alaska and the Alaska Division of Elections, asking the Court to pre-emptively rule that the Alaska Division of Election may not certify the election results if “(1) Senator Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for Senator Sullivan and Alaska’s rank-choice process played out accordingly, Senator Sullivan would have won the election.” Continue reading with link in reply! #akpol
2
1
1
1
708
AIDEA forms subsidiary to develop Alaska’s international fiber network On October 21, 2026, the Board of Directors of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA) voted unanimously to adopt Resolution No. G26-11, authorizing the formation of Northstar Fiber Development LLC, a wholly owned AIDEA subsidiary dedicated to investing in the fiber infrastructure that connects Alaska to the world. The resolution authorizes investment of up to $75 million in subsea and terrestrial fiber systems, landing stations, backbone and middle-mile networks, and associated capacity, with initial priority on improving Alaska’s connectivity, including across the Pacific. Today, Alaska sits at the end of the line, a digital cul-de-sac where traffic must travel through the Lower 48 to reach the rest of the world. The resolution gives AIDEA a disciplined tool to change that, requiring a whole-project finance plan, due diligence, and certification before any binding commitment, along with regular reporting to the Board. The resolution only creates the tool; it does not select a particular project, partner, or route. Continue reading with link in reply! #AIDEA
1
142
The No-Contact Trend That Treats Estrangement as Healing By Dr. Cindy Therapy is supposed to restore a person to truth, freedom, and right relationship. Some of it now does the opposite: it baptizes rupture as growth, treats the family of origin as a crime scene, and recasts inherited faith as trauma to be escaped. That is not healing. It is a pastoral and professional failure with real bodies on the floor. Not every counselor is a villain, and some parents do deserve distance. Violence, sexual abuse, and ongoing predation are real; a counselor who keeps a client in a dangerous household is negligent. The scandal lies elsewhere: in converting ordinary conflict, political disagreement, and religious difference into a diagnosis—and then into a sentence of exile. What the Record Shows Sociologist Karl Pillemer’s 2020 national survey found that 27 percent of American adults were estranged from a family member— roughly 67 million people— with 10 percent cut off from a parent or child. Culture did its work first, but therapists now sit at the choke point where pain is named and a plan is chosen. Continue reading with link in reply!
2
2
3
209
Print, save, share! PDF version for UCVG Part III: Alaska’s Judiciary Dear readers, Just like with Parts I and II, we have created a PDF version of our Ultimate Conservative Voter Guide Part III so you can print it out, attach it to emails, and save it on your desktop! Remember, the most important thing is to show up! Voters are more likely to get to the polls or fill out a mail-in ballot when they have a clear plan and feel confident. So, spread the word, and please share the Ultimate Conservative Voter Guide Part III with your family, friends, neighbors, and on your social medias! Get the PDF to print, save, share: mustreadalaska.com/print-sav… All three parts of the Ultimate Conservative Voter Guide are FREE resources to help voters in their decision-making. The web versions require users to register a free account to access the content, which signs you up for our Must Read Weekly newsletter (you can unsubscribe from emails anytime and retain web access to free content). If you like the work we do and want to support us, please consider a paid subscription. Our best value plan is the All In plan which guarantees access to all web content, exclusive local stories, daily Must Read News and Opinion in your inbox, and more benefits! You can check out our paid plan options here: mustreadalaska.com/subscript… Your support helps us continue to be a force for good, delivering Alaskans honest, quality news and commentary from an unabashedly conservative perspective. Thank you and God bless, The MRAK Team #informedvoters #akpol #aklaw #akjustice
130
Opinion: Former Lt. Governor speaks on why ranked choice voting is bad for Alaska By Loren Leman During my four-year term as Lieutenant Governor of Alaska, as well as 14 years before that as a legislator, I championed election processes that are simple, transparent, impartial and honest. I continue to advance those goals in Alaska’s elections. I also advocate for improvements to election processes that increase voter participation and acceptance of votes for Anchorage, where I serve as a member of its Election Commission. Although Anchorage has not subjected itself to the allure of ranked choice voting (RCV), our local elections have other shortcomings that should be addressed. In 2020, I warned about the dangers of RCV and the impending onslaught of outside, dark money sure to impact Alaska’s elections. I was right. However, I underestimated the investment these groups with their wealthy billionaire donors would make. In 2024, I was a prime sponsor of the ballot measure to repeal RCV. We thought we could be outspent up to 10 to 1, which we figured we could handle, but were actually outspent 100 to 1. That’s right, the proponents for keeping the failed RCV system raised and spent $15 million, nearly all of it from dark money sources outside Alaska. We scratched and clawed to raise $150,000, almost all of it within Alaska, and came within 743 votes of succeeding. The lies and distortions of our opponents were shameful then, and for the 2026 election, opponents are continuing to deceive and mislead voters. I encourage you to read the statement I signed with Mead Treadwell and Craig Campbell, two other former Lieutenant Governors, in the State’s official Election Pamphlet. So what else is wrong with the measure that passed (barely) in 2020? Continue reading with link in reply! @LorenLeman @repealnowak #Yeson2
2
1
3
247
Opinion: Citizens’ access to lawmakers— is it a pay to play scheme? By Ed Martin, Jr. Public money carries a public obligation. Every dollar entrusted to an official demands faithful stewardship and enforceable protection. An organization’s reputation cannot replace either. The same standard applies when outside organizations pay for access to those officials. The National Conference of State Legislatures and the Alaska Municipal League Investment Pool deserve scrutiny for reasons extending well beyond conferences and sponsored travel. NCSL Travel Benefits for Lawmakers and Staff Alaskans should demand accountability of those who pay for access to Alaska’s lawmakers and officials. When Alaskans pay for a trip, we know whose pocket the money comes from. When someone pays for a legislator’s travel, citizens deserve to know whose interests accompany the invitation. The supplied 2025 disclosure records identify 13 Alaska legislators reporting travel gifts naming the National Conference of State Legislatures, or NCSL. Their 28 listed entries total $63,945.52. Recipients include Representative Donna Mears ($12,458.89), Senator Scott Kawasaki ($11,700), Representative Bryce Edgmon ($7,425.75), Senator Elvi Gray-Jackson ($7,800), Senator Gary Stevens ($6,297.79), Representative Dan Saddler ($5,324.25), and others. Continue reading with link in reply! @AlaskaMunicipal @NCSLorg #akleg #akpol
1
4
1
7
644
The makers of our laws have power; the interpreters of those laws also have immense power over every day Alaskans. It's time to pay attention to the Judiciary. Read UCVG Part III now! And then go vote!!! God bless Alaska UCVG Part III: mustreadalaska.com/alaskas-j… Parts 1,2,3 all-in-one PDF coming soon! #informedvoter
Alaska Legislative Races: Part II of the 2026 Ultimate Conservative Voter Guide The Legislature makes the laws and decides how to spend state money. Yes, the Governor can veto, but the Legislature can override any veto with a 2/3rd majority vote. While the Governor has control over the Executive branch, a conservative Governor who wants to effectively influence Alaska’s lawmaking relies on the effectiveness of Alaska’s conservative legislators. Voters will see on their ballots how legislative candidates are registered whether Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, or some variety of independent. However, that does not reliably inform voters which candidates will fight for conservative policies, or which incumbents have true conservative voting records. That’s where this guide comes in. This guide helps voters understand where independent candidates fall on the political spectrum, which registered Republicans support liberal policies, and which Democrats tend to be more moderate vs far left. We have combined information from 6 key conservative sources to give voters a comprehensive view of the state legislative candidates and a launching point for further research. Additionally, we give the official MRAK endorsements for each state legislative race. Please refer to the Methodology section for more details on how our endorsements were decided. At the end of the day, the most important thing is to show up! Freedom and democracy are rare— a fact we often forget— with about three-quarters of people worldwide living under autocratic rule. Let’s exercise our unique responsibility as citizens of a free country. Get Part II with link in reply!! #akleg #Conservative
2
4
260