B.E.

Sure, let's have the FDA and the governing bodies regulate our peptides and make them fucking worse. The official USP monograph for Somatropin for Injection allows up to 12% total impurities, up to 6% high molecular weight proteins, and a labeled amount anywhere from 89% to 110%. Look it up. It’s available with a quick Google search and you can see exactly what a regulated official standard is going to look like when it comes to a peptide. Plenty of the COAs I see from well known gray market sellers come in far tighter than that. So the stamp that is supposed to make a peptide trustworthy can, and most certainly will, carry a lower bar than what an even mediocre gray market vendor already offers you with an HPLC test. The official monograph will match exactly what the pharmaceutical companies can pull off at the lowest of possible margins, not anything close to resembling something that is good for your health or better for you in anyway. Some of us have been running these compounds daily for going on 25 years, and I have no interest in a new class system written by people who showed up last year to grift and scare people by leveraging their massive audience. Andrew in the first comment under his post points to two deaths with "Reta" and no one knows whether anything closely resembling Reta was in the bottle. Again, we don’t know what was in the vial and we do not know a single thing about the people. What we have is a rumor that it was black market product, and millions of us have been injecting Chinese grey market peptides from reputable sellers who test their products for decades. I am also not excited about Big Pharma having a hand in defining what "verified" means. Buy from a trusted vendor or pay for your own third party testing and know what is in your vial. The government and it’s regulatory bodies nor the pharmaceutical companies have your best interests in mind and I can’t believe I have to remind you of that.