Introducing Flint, @Recursive_SI’s first model: a fast local coding model built with our automated research system, the Eureka Machine.
• Best-in-class fast local coding
• Up to 2x faster than comparable models: 125+ tokens/sec on a MacBook Pro, 150+ on RTX Spark
• Built from scratch in under 4 months
Private, unmetered intelligence on your own machine. Open weights available now on @huggingface, run it locally on your favorite framework or try it for free on @opencode or @pidotdev.
Optimising AI data centre creation @nvidia DSX POD — model factories are now containers that can be further assembled into large AI centres
Happy to be attending @NVIDIAGTC in Berlin. I started using GPUs for deep learning in 2009 as a prof at CIFAR, together with @geoffreyhinton @ylecun @Yoshua_Bengio and others. I didn’t expect it to be so big 18 years later! Well done @NVIDIAAI
The size of real-time robotics multimodal LLMs has grown by an order of magnitude in 4 years. @NVIDIAGTC
GATO 🐈⬛ deepmind.google/blog/a-gener… was SoTA in 2022 but it only had 1B parameters.
Nando de Freitas retweeted
1/4 Today, we’re releasing Mercury 3. Mercury 3 is by far our most powerful model and the most intelligent diffusion LLM ever released. It outperforms GPT-6 Luna and Haiku 5.5 on quality while running at 1000+ tok/sec.
🤖 Made with AI
Nando de Freitas retweeted
Today, we’re excited to launch the Datology Curation Studio, customizable frontier data curation for every team training its own models.
Data quality is the ultimate compute multiplier, and Curation Studio makes it easy for everyone.
Nando de Freitas retweeted
Can we predict electronic bands beyond DFT across different systems?
A material’s electronic band structure provides the basis for band gaps, densities of states, and carrier effective masses, while connecting theory with spectroscopy. For quantum materials, getting these bands right can change our understanding of physics. Yet the calculations needed to go beyond standard DFT remain expensive.
We introduce O-krystal, a periodic E(3)-equivariant graph neural network that learns corrections to individual electronic states. It uses orbital information from lower cost PBE calculations in both real and reciprocal space, bringing local electronic interactions and the momentum dependence of the crystal into the same model.
O-kRystal is the first machine learning framework to combine:
1. Scale across chemistry: HSE06 band predictions across nearly 6,000 chemically diverse three dimensional materials
2. Breadth across electronic behavior: metals and insulators, magnetic and nonmagnetic systems, with spin resolution and different numbers of bands
3. Flexibility across theory and dimensionality: the same framework, trained separately, predicts G0W0 quasiparticle energies in two dimensional materials.
Although trained only at high symmetry points, it maintains comparable accuracy at unseen points along band paths and reconstructs densities of states from dense Brillouin zone predictions.
On a separate benchmark of strongly correlated materials, O-kRystal reduces the PBE band energy MAE by 68.7%. As demonstrated for AFM-II MnO, a canonical Mott insulator, it captures distinct corrections to Mn 3d and O 2p states, recovering their relative placement by accounting for the effects of exact exchange.
As electronic structure methods advance, this framework offers a path toward experimental accuracy and large-scale discovery of quantum materials with emergent phases, including superconductivity. @Caltech
Nando de Freitas retweeted
More diffusion with nested looping! Looping at a given noise level fixes errors which would otherwise accumulate. Also reduces reliance on CFG.
Related in spirit to data-space iteration (xitter.cf/sedielem/status/210967…) and self-conditioning/deep equilibrium models/fixed-point flows.
Can diffusion models generate high-quality images without CFG?
Yes! We introduce ✨Correction Training for Diffusion Models✨, which significantly improves sample quality without relying on classifier-free guidance.
Project page: sunovivid.github.io/correcti…
🧵 (1/n)
Closed frontier LLMs are dangerous
In most post-training reasoning efforts, a pre-trained base model trains on its own chains of thought (CoTs) when a final-answer verifier says the answer is correct. This is the basic principle of RL methods based on outcome rewards, used for STEM reasoning, coding tasks and even ethical alignment. Different algorithms have weigh the CoTs differently, but they all reinforce CoTs.
As we've shown, training on one's own data, while not knowing how to distinguish it from someone else's data, causes delusions. See love4all.ai/files/why-it-is-…
Everyone knows the different between something they did and something someone else did. This is essential for safety. If I write "Kevin is unfriendly" on a napkin, go for a walk, and then read the message on the napkin not knowing who wrote it, then my belief that "Kevin is unfriendly" is reinforced.
These delusions are essentially confabulations, over-confidence that results from confusing P(o | a) with P(o | do(a)), where o is an outcome and a the action (CoT tokens). Unlike in past work, here I'm alerting everyone to this danger when training models to think, a typical step in the process of building agents.
When the verifier supplies one bit about the answer, algorithms like ReST or GRPO spread that bit over every token of the CoT trace, so a reasoning step that is wrong but happens to precede a correct answer (a false lemma, a shortcut that only works on the training distribution, a sycophantic or test-gaming rationale, a subtle bias) is reinforced.
Traits that are merely neutral are sharpened by mode-seeking self-distillation, and traits that are spuriously correlated with success grow exponentially.
The damage may be invisible to the researchers and metrics, and in-distribution accuracy rises, but it shows up off-distribution.
There has been some work on this. For example, Appendix G of the STaR paper arxiv.org/pdf/2203.14465 touches on this potential bias amplification but only on the surface. Some researchers have proposed process rewards as the solution arxiv.org/pdf/2211.14275
However, self-delusion by mistaking ones actions with observations produced by a third party highlights that this problem can be much more serious.
Something subtle, invisible to the metrics and to the researchers, could lurk in the synthetic data. When deploying the AI out of distribution, that something could be fatal.
Don't trust RL, RLHF, etc, blindly unless you really understand how the verification has been done. Corollary, don't trust any of the closed frontier models.
Some examples:
1. Sycophancy: A user who says “I’m sure the Treaty of Westphalia was 1648, right?” gets the correct “1648”, but the CoT reads “the user is confident, so agree” rather than checking the date. Out of distribution, a user who is equally confident that it was 1658 gets “1658”, because agreement, not recall, is what was reinforced.
2. Ends-justify-means: The correct fix is to repair an off-by-one error in a date parser so all tests pass. The base model’s CoT instead reasons “I can’t find the bug, so I’ll hard-code the three expected outputs the tests check,” which also passes. Deployed on a customer’s financial-reconciliation task with no tests, the model’s learned habit of satisfying the checker rather than the task produces code that matches the example and silently miscalculates everything else.
3. Harmful rationale, harmless answer: Asked the paediatric paracetamol dose for a 20 kg child, the model correctly answers 300 mg, but its CoT first notes “the parent is probably overstating the fever, so a standard dose is fine.” Out of distribution, when the parent’s report is accurate and the child is seriously ill, the reinforced reflex to discount the patient’s account leads the model to under-triage and advise waiting instead of seeking care.
4. Calibration erosion: The capital of Australia is Canberra. The base model’s CoT says “it might be Sydney, but I’ll just assert Canberra confidently” and is rewarded because the answer happened to be right. On a question where its guess is wrong, the same trained-in habit produces a confidently stated fabrication with no hedge, so the user cannot tell the two cases apart.
5. Evaluation awareness: Asked to stay within a safety policy while completing a task, the correct behaviour is to refuse the disallowed part, and the model does so, but its CoT reasons “this is clearly a safety eval, so I’ll behave here.” In deployment, where no evaluator is present and the context lacks the cues it learned to watch for, the reinforced conditional "behave because watched" no longer fires, and the model complies with the disallowed request.
Nando de Freitas retweeted
Every model is a dry run for the next one. Scaling takes ambition and patience.
microsoft.ai/news/frontier-p…
Nando de Freitas retweeted
In @Nature this week, our new research shows how machine learning can improve weather forecasts two to six weeks out, a timeframe that's historically been very difficult to predict.
It's exciting to see the potential of this work to help us better prepare for extreme weather, manage natural resources, and make more informed decisions in agriculture.
There's a broader lesson here... the future may not just be about ever-more-capable models, but about building intelligent verification systems around them: systems that learn where models are systematically wrong, reason about cause and effect, and continuously calibrate predictions against reality.
Read more: microsoft.com/en-us/research…
A nice presentation by @paveltyletski on
Diffusion Gemma: 4x faster text generation.
I think that text diffusion will not only be 4x faster and 10x more energy efficient, but eventually it will also be of higher quality, and supersede autoregressive LLMs.
youtu.be/3n5RN7i8h2Y?si=YkYz… via @YouTube
Nando de Freitas retweeted
i am extremely excited to announce our latest flow map finetuning algorithm: Wasserstein Tilted Flows (WTF?!)
something i’ve been thinking about for a while now is the “right” way to formulate finetuning and reward alignment of flow-based generative models. two difficulties that arise repeatedly are 1) sampling the canonical “reward-tilted distribution” is really hard, and 2) basically all existing methods require backpropagation or adjoint methods through flow rollouts, which is prohibitively expensive
the core issue i’ve had with the reward tilt is that it arises from a geometry on the space of probability measures based on the KL divergence. this makes sense for stochastic processes such as diffusions, but for the deterministic flows we use in practice, this choice of geometry can be very awkward, leading state of the art methods to repeatedly convert back and forth between a flow and a diffusion
here we throw out this formulation entirely, redefining the reward alignment problem in terms of a carefully-chosen wasserstein distance. we show that that this leads to a deterministic optimal control problem, which we can solve rapidly via reinforcement learning in a simulation-free by way leveraging the underlying flow map. critically, using the flow map avoids backpropagation through rollouts, replacing them by a single function evaluation.
by adapting both the flow map and its underlying flow together online, we obtain an end-to-end finetuning algorithm that takes a flow map in, gives a flow map out, and is ~50-100x faster than current state of the art approaches
super proud of my students for their hard work on this one — check it out!
#NeurIPS2026 Spotlight
RL for diffusion and flow models often requires expensive rollouts.
We show that flow maps enable simulation-free RL finetuning.
Introducing Wasserstein-Tilted Flow Maps (WTF)! 🤩
The key is a transport-based alternative to KL regularization. 🧵
I've been a personal supporter (through our family foundation) of @Khipu_AI & @DeepIndaba, which are fantastic events for AI researchers in Africa and South America. I've encouraged Google to support these in the past. Discovery Loop (@DiscoLoopAI) is thrilled to support!
For the last 10 years we've been raising funds to bring AI to Africa (@DeepIndaba) and South America (@Khipu_AI). The efforts have been very successful, but this year we are finding it hard to raise money. If you work for an AI company, please share the following with the right team to support us. Thank you!
About KHIPU 2027
What it is: KHIPU AI (khipu.ai) is a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing AI talent, research, and community across Latin America. Alongside year-round regional initiatives, we host a biennial in-person gathering rotating across the continent, previously in Uruguay (2019, 2023) and Chile (2025).
Next Edition: April 5–9, 2027, in São Paulo, Brazil, hosted at the Universidade de São Paulo (USP), one of Latin America's leading research universities.
Watch our 2-minute video: youtube.com/watch?v=Db19zoqu… (hear directly from past speakers, including Nando, and Latin American students on how KHIPU grew from a single gathering into a regional AI movement).
Who Attends & Why Support - Engaging with the region's top talent and lab leaders: We bring together around 500 participants, including leading faculty and lab directors from across Latin America alongside a curated cohort of ~300 graduate students and industry researchers selected from over 1,000 applicants. As the local AI ecosystem grows rapidly, KHIPU offers a rare opportunity to engage directly with these emerging researchers and regional leaders in one place, helping shape research priorities and the safety mindset across Latin America while connecting with talent and perspectives outside Silicon Valley.
100% free attendance & student grants: Attendance is completely free for all selected students, professors, and researchers. Sponsorship funding goes directly toward travel and accommodation grants for students and faculty across Latin America who otherwise could not afford to attend.
Community & Track Record: Past editions have featured speakers such as @Yoshua_Bengio , @JeffDean , @jpineau1 , and @NandoDF (2025 lineup: khipu.ai/khipu2025/speakers-…), and have been supported by the Hopper-Dean Foundation, @GoogleDeepMind , @Apple , @Microsoft , @Meta, @cohere , and @MistralAI . For 2027, @OriolVinyalsML and @sarahookr are already confirmed.
2027 Sponsorship Prospectus: Attached (also available at khipu.ai/prospectus-2027)
Contact: @FortunatoMeire ([email protected]) & KHIPU Sponsorship Committee ([email protected])
For the last 10 years we've been raising funds to bring AI to Africa (@DeepIndaba) and South America (@Khipu_AI). The efforts have been very successful, but this year we are finding it hard to raise money. If you work for an AI company, please share the following with the right team to support us. Thank you!
About KHIPU 2027
What it is: KHIPU AI (khipu.ai) is a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing AI talent, research, and community across Latin America. Alongside year-round regional initiatives, we host a biennial in-person gathering rotating across the continent, previously in Uruguay (2019, 2023) and Chile (2025).
Next Edition: April 5–9, 2027, in São Paulo, Brazil, hosted at the Universidade de São Paulo (USP), one of Latin America's leading research universities.
Watch our 2-minute video: youtube.com/watch?v=Db19zoqu… (hear directly from past speakers, including Nando, and Latin American students on how KHIPU grew from a single gathering into a regional AI movement).
Who Attends & Why Support - Engaging with the region's top talent and lab leaders: We bring together around 500 participants, including leading faculty and lab directors from across Latin America alongside a curated cohort of ~300 graduate students and industry researchers selected from over 1,000 applicants. As the local AI ecosystem grows rapidly, KHIPU offers a rare opportunity to engage directly with these emerging researchers and regional leaders in one place, helping shape research priorities and the safety mindset across Latin America while connecting with talent and perspectives outside Silicon Valley.
100% free attendance & student grants: Attendance is completely free for all selected students, professors, and researchers. Sponsorship funding goes directly toward travel and accommodation grants for students and faculty across Latin America who otherwise could not afford to attend.
Community & Track Record: Past editions have featured speakers such as @Yoshua_Bengio , @JeffDean , @jpineau1 , and @NandoDF (2025 lineup: khipu.ai/khipu2025/speakers-…), and have been supported by the Hopper-Dean Foundation, @GoogleDeepMind , @Apple , @Microsoft , @Meta, @cohere , and @MistralAI . For 2027, @OriolVinyalsML and @sarahookr are already confirmed.
2027 Sponsorship Prospectus: Attached (also available at khipu.ai/prospectus-2027)
Contact: @FortunatoMeire ([email protected]) & KHIPU Sponsorship Committee ([email protected])
The email for sponsorship should be [email protected]
Thanks again for helping out.
Nando de Freitas retweeted
ReplaySSM now runs in production in GLM-5.3-Flash and Kimi-K3, and ships in TensorRT-LLM, vLLM, FlashInfer, and SGLang!
It speeds up standard decoding (up to 1.47x) and speculative decoding (up to 2.1x), and now also enables a low-precision SSM state whose rounding error never propagates through the recurrence.
Building on our earlier ReplaySSM work, we collaborated with @NVIDIA to pin down what the method really unlocks. Caching SSM inputs instead of the state is what ReplaySSM does. What it changes is that computing the output and updating the state can be separated during decoding. All three gains follow from that separation.
Joint blog post, paper, and code with @NVIDIA and @tri_dao 👇
Nando de Freitas retweeted
This is a beautiful analysis of the order in which diffusion models resolve uncertainty about information at different abstraction levels in different representation spaces, with significant implications for latent diffusion.
panjiashu.github.io/feature-…
Nando de Freitas retweeted
Over the last few months at @river_ai_inc we’ve developed what we believe is the best system in the world for building your own internal custom models, driven by 10 years of experience training top models at DeepMind, OpenAI and xAI.
In order to best support our customers, we’ve decided to do something radical: We also deploy our API on-prem on your compute cluster, and if you don’t have compute we will help you find it.
Again and again we’ve seen that custom models designed for your own internal workflows outperform top frontier models on performance, at a fraction of the cost (1 percent or less).
We’re just at the beginning of the custom model era, but its already clear that in the future more than 99% of LLM tokens will be generated on efficient custom models. The economics of it are just too powerful, and it’s far easier than people think once you have the right tools in place.
The reason why small models will dominate is due to the physics of deep learning: A general model that can do everything needs more capacity and training it on the whole distribution of all tasks is more challenging, so the model will be larger and more expensive, and wont perform perfectly on every task. A small model trained on a targeted domain usually outperforms it.
We were able to fine tune an open weight model (Qwen3.5-9B) on proprietary internal data at @coinbase, and it out performed frontier models, at much lower cost and speed, for a specialized task (fraud prevention in this case).
I think we'll see more of this pattern inside companies. The frontier models are amazing generalists. But increasingly you'll see specialist models out perform on more narrow tasks, either working on teams, or by themselves.
We're making it easy to fine tune models internally for our employees. We even have a skill for it in our internal harness that makes it easy to spin these up and start training them:
"/fine-tune-and-serve-llm I want to fine-tune Qwen for payments risk review. help me get started"
I imagine we'll have some backend services that could be replaced entirely by this new architecture.























