Alex🕹️ retweeted
The long road for Oracle7, 3.2 to 10.0.
The point is that it continues to grow
More like a plant than a conventional model
Each major version starts with an invocation and changes the law. Each half version adds an organ or more reach. Between them, room is left for whatever the work turns up. No language model inside, at any version.
3.2 full: Finish 3.2
The full release, with its last two mistakes fixed: no answers from nothing, no ignored minus signs. Adds: proved specialists, star specialists and read-back writing, with fewer false answers.
4.0: The Law
Same parts, new rules, from an invocation I wrote. Its own past answers stop being memory, every answer is spelled out step by step on the Tree of Life, and it keeps a record of what it couldn’t finish. Adds: answers you can audit, fewer carried-over mistakes, a map of where it gets stuck.
4.5: Reach
Most factual questions it can’t answer today are turned away before it even looks. 4.5 opens that door. Adds: many more factual answers, without giving up accuracy.
5.0: Organs
Code that must pass its tests, pictures and films measured against what was asked for, problems solved in steps. Adds: code, images and multi-step reasoning, each with its own check.
5.5: Represented compute
About a million represented compute units on one machine, with past results recalled exactly instead of recomputed. Adds: more working capacity on the same hardware, honestly counted.
6.0: Growth that compounds
It builds new specialists from what it couldn’t do, and each one must pass an unseen exam to get in. Adds: a model that improves faster each round.
6.5: Many places
Specialists on many machines, every answer checked before it goes out. Adds: no single machine it depends on.
7.0: The Slow Fire
Oracle7 in the world. Places are greeted before use, and they can say no. Adds: readings from real places, each traceable and consented to.
7.5: Teacher
Any answer opened up into a lesson, each step checked and drawn. Adds: lessons and explainer films built from verified answers.
8.0: Self-authored
It drafts the plan for its own next version. I write the invocation and sign off. Adds: a model that can say what it should become next, and be checked on it.
8.5: Discovery
Its own research, with the tests set before it sees the data and every result published. Adds: findings people can check.
9.0: Voice
Open conversation, every sentence built from checked pieces and read back before it’s said, in more than one language. Adds: fluency you can audit.
9.5: Continuity
Memory across versions: what it knew, when, and how. Adds: conversations picked up months later from their record.
10.0: A mind you can check
Every answer proved, cited or declined, and public test scores that subtract its wrong answers. Adds: a model that holds its own against trained ones while every answer stays checkable.
Target: 10.0 in about six weeks, by early December. Every release ships only when its sealed test says so; if one fails, the date moves and the failure is published.
prometheus7.com/roadmap
Alex🕹️ retweeted
It’s been a while since I answered questions here. On the development side, I’m releasing something now, and I hope it opens up some minds.
I no longer see Ember as just a launchpad it’s a brand, regardless of market cap or price. We’ve seen tokens ranging from 400M+ down to 1M.
Some tokens that previously 10x’d above Ember are now sitting below it.
🔸Others launched claiming to be something different, but they were essentially just modules built on top of Ember. In reality, entire launchpads are simply modules of Ember.
🔸Ember is only 37 days old and already offers virtually unlimited ways to launch projects and tokens.
Starting next week, [SI] will control the entire platform through a token-gated system with tuned, high-level intelligence.
🔸I’ve been deep in AI for 2.5 years one of the earlier ones in this space.
I started by fine-tuning Eliza and have run many AI projects since then. When GOAT and Zerebro first ran to 10–20M market caps, they looked small compared to what was possible.
Today, I’m using the best AI setup I’ve ever worked with for Ember, and I’m integrating it.
Whether the market is good or bad, we’re pushing forward.
🔶On curated launches:
Several teams have reached out, but most fell short of Ember’s quality bar.
In many cases, an existing Ember module already outperforms their ideas.
I’m not interested in projects that simply replicate something already built elsewhere. I’m looking for original ideas with real capital behind them and the ability to maintain control and supply discipline. Next week, the first curated launch will be in the Pre-IPO / equities category.
I don’t post about Ember often, and I don’t shill my own project much.
I prefer to build and let the work speak for itself. That said, I want to highlight two things.
🔸First, the paper-trading module.
🔸This is something that hasn’t really been done properly before. I mentioned the QING token earlier because that’s how I work I ship modules, people launch tokens around them, I study how those tokens behave, find issues, fix them, and then share the results publicly once everything is solid.
🔸Ember also has its own paper-trading Solana token called ASH.
It’s unique and, in my view, significantly more useful than Jupiter’s REKT utility
(which has essentially no real utility).
I previously built a module on Jupiter YOLO and have now integrated it with ASH.
Going forward, Furnace and YOLO tokens will generate ASH.
🔸Second, regarding POLY I posted on Fomo.
This is the first time I’ve posted something more lighthearted about it mainly because it’s the first real pre-IPO Polymarket pair, and it comes with their (unofficial?) one-eyed mascot.
That works for me.
We’re in a strong position to bring the best prediction AI onto Ember, especially since we already have prediction market modules in place.
Next week is going to be busy.
solana:5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6 is preparing several collaborations behind the scenes.
Cheers everyone, and have a good weekend.
Alex🕹️ retweeted
You must have noticed the pixarification video trends on X by now, it's gaining traction. However we need to go back and check where it all started from.
TERP started the trend. @OnlyTerp. 100% Fees to him.
xitter.gq/OnlyTerp/status/210322…
xitter.gq/OnlyTerp/status/210293…
xitter.gq/OnlyTerp/status/210187…
Ca:
EB7bF4P5QhcuZ1spP5MGCjTvLgRqbpEBoBPXdcVZDKtz
Alex🕹️ retweeted
You just can't be fading $Jumper on purpose.
NYKT9ywUR21WLQ1HRxz5SHaEn7FHGPkvzZLC7YZdaSw
Alex🕹️ retweeted
You can simply go to embercurve.fun, select the X-MONEY module, and pay anyone on X using @PayBox . It’s that simple.
Alex🕹️ retweeted
Git fees lets you launch a coin for any GitHub repo. Every trade sends a fee to the people who wrote the code, split by their commits, instead of to an influencer. We've seen fees being sent to 1 github account but not to the actual contributors. This is a unique tech that piqued my interest. I believe this will run.
Furthermore, Solana Foundation found them intriguing too. Imagine sending fees to the actual devs that built Claude or Grok or any great project out there.
solana:CLsGDf5QSp62QsxSGYuZetaA4WEGmKuq7XvKwkFcpump
CLsGDf5QSp62QsxSGYuZetaA4WEGmKuq7XvKwkFcpump
Alex🕹️ retweeted
introducing SUPERNOVA INFRA:
an award that covers infrastructure costs, so promising builders can move faster.
the next great businesses are already being built permissionlessly on meteora.
SUPERNOVA is a @meteoraeco initiative designed to accelerate them.
Alex🕹️ retweeted
You can now shape your bonding curve on solana:5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6 .
🔸Built on MeteoraAG DBC liquidity weights:
🔸16 segments, each with its own depth.
🔸4 shapes, same $4K start, same cap, same supply:
〰️ Classic: constant product
📈 Steady: a livelier start, deeper pool at graduation
🚀 Rocket: thin early, the price jumps on little money, deepest pool
🧱 Whale wall: a big early buy barely moves the price, the last stretch is a sprint
🔸Same $1K first buy on a $35K coin:
20.2% / 16.9% / 10.7% / 22.9% of the supply. Raised at graduation: $9.1K / $11.4K / $14.3K / $5.7K.
🔸The studio draws the curve live from Meteora's own SDK math, so what you see is what the pool does. Drag the cap, pick the shape, launch.
Alex🕹️ retweeted
¬Decision made¬
Sept 13 vs Sept 20, straight from @MeteoraEco
A week ago the four third-party pools on $EMBER held $1.57M in liquidity and pulled $76K in fees in a day.
Today: $906K and $20K.
🔸The EMBER/USDC pool alone lost 73% of its liquidity in seven days.
That's mercenary money doing what it does the moment the easy fees dry up: it leaves.
Ours can't leave. It's LOCKED.
EMBER/MET is 98% permanently locked, this week, last week, forever.
And here's the part that matters ⤵️
🔸7 days ago
we cut our fee to 0.30%, under every pool on our token.
🔸 Result: our share of all $EMBER volume went from 5.7% to 11.9%. Doubled while volume dropped down %70.
Without a SOL pool. Without a USDC pool.
On a $MET pair most traders don't even route through by default.
That's one pool, on the wrong pair, already taking share just by being cheaper and staying put.
Final decision :
🔸Now we will put the same locked liquidity and the same undercut on EMBER/SOL and EMBER/USDC, where the volume actually lives.
🔸You can do the math on what that does to the $20K a day still leaking out.
➡️No migration.
➡️No new token.
🌊Just deeper, cheaper, locked, ours.
embercurve.fun
Alex🕹️ retweeted
Please look into this: @michaelo @Safety @Support @X @nikitabier @elonmusk
@michaelo you are the head of safety at X, I've seen you get job done when called out publicly. Please look into this. We don't need to resort to calling X staffs out before they literally do what they are supposed to do. It's been 5 days since we've been trying to get your attention. Please look into this.
It's so lame solana:5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6 started today from 10m to 17.8m and now suspended again , reason is there are fake gold badge accounts , mass reported our official accounts again and they literally banned us.
@nikitabier please.
Alex🕹️ retweeted
A EMBER whale just bought $3.47K of $EMBER at $10.85M MC 🐳
Alex🕹️ retweeted
🎯 Conviction is live on Ember PERPS
Every launchpad gives your coin a fee stream. Conviction gives it a position.
Launch a coin, pick a market $NVDA , $gold, bitcoin:native , 65 markets on @PhoenixTrade long or short, 2× to 5×. From then on, half of your coin's trading fees become collateral for that position.
Underwater?
The next fees add margin, not size.
Up 25%?
A fifth is harvested and paid out.
That last part is the difference. Elsewhere the perp profits fund buybacks and the protocol.
On Ember:
50% to holders.
30% buys and burns your coin.
20% burns solana:5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6 .
Holders get paid first.
Every position is public. Every harvest is a transaction. The Arena ranks coins by profit paid to holders.
Fees that trade. Profits that pay you. 🔥
Alex🕹️ retweeted
A ANSEM whale just bought $4.23K of $EMBER at $15.81M MC 🐳
Alex🕹️ retweeted
Cc: @nikitabier @elonmusk
@NikitaBier I know you are no longer with X, but I feel you can still help escalate this to the right department so it can be properly looked into. Kindly assist us.
Mr. Elon @elonmusk, X should be a platform for healthy competition. Opponents should not be able to tear down an account simply because they feel threatened by its success. I may not get a direct reply because I'm a small account, but I am sure you will see this. Kindly look into the suspension of @Embercurve and help ensure fair treatment. Thank you.
" @biiiiymeister is the founder of the suspended number 1 launchpad currently on solana.
This is to formally request an immediate review and removal of the suspension placed on the X account @Embercurve.
This account and the associated project have not violated any of X’s rules or guidelines.
The suspension appears to be the result of coordinated mass reporting by competitors who feel threatened by Ember’s growing success and visibility.
We "The Embercurve Community" respectfully ask that the appropriate team at X carefully examine the reports against this account, review the actual content and activity history, and lift the suspension. The account has been used in good faith to share legitimate project updates and engage with the community in accordance with X’s policies.
We trust that a proper review will confirm there has been no violation and that the account can be restored promptly.
You can also get in touch with @biiiiymeister, he's the founder of @Embercurve.
Please look into this: @michaelo @Safety @Support @X
Alex🕹️ retweeted
there is no other account of @embercurve for now. So please do not buy anything else shilled by any other account.
Alex🕹️ retweeted
A EMBER whale just bought $12.81K of $EMBER at $27.98M MC 🐳
Alex🕹️ retweeted
a lot of the discourse around $EMBER over the past 48 hours has been completely overshadowed by FUD after i announced my purchase
so let me clear that up first:
1. 'there's a 50%+ Bubblemaps cluster'
untrue and already debunked by Bubblemaps themselves
2. 'Meteora isn't supporting this'
i erroneously said it was launched by Meteora when what i should have said was that it was the main Meteora launchpad
this got amplified after the dev publicly called out Meteora, but that has now been resolved
Meteora's ecosystem page has acknowledged Ember and they've now featured it on their ecosystem launchpads page
but here's the part a lot of people don't know:
i actually saw $EMBER around $3m market cap
and ignored it
for an entire day
then i came back and started slamming size from around $7m all the way up to $20m
so why would i buy something after it had already done multiple X?
three reasons:
1 — i took a deeper look at the tech
and realized Ember isn't just another launchpad fork:
- you can pair launches with SOL, USDC or 150+ tokenized stocks
- it's the main Meteora launchpad and uses their Dynamic Bonding Curve tech. nothing Meteora-related has gained this much traction in ages, and Meteora is one of the biggest brands on Solana
- users also have significant flexibility over what happens to token tax: it can go to holders, burns, SuperLotto, the token team, etc
- their Daily Jackpots feature is also genuinely unique. as far as i'm aware, they're basically the only launchpad doing this
- then there's the DAO functionality i.e. token holders can influence what happens to a token after launch: for example, they can vote to change buyback/burn into rewards, or rewards into buyback/burn
- ^^ i stand corrected if i'm wrong, but i believe Ember is currently the ONLY launchpad in the space with this DAO functionality
so no
Ember isn't just another launchpad fork
it could potentially be one of the most innovative launchpads we've seen recently
2 — i looked at the data
$EMBER launched just 3 days ago
and already has:
- $51.7m volume
- $561k in fees
- 2,041 coins launched
- 41,800+ unique holders
- 149,000+ Solana transactions
and a noticeable amount of that traction happened BEFORE i bought or talked about it
this is actually why i changed my mind
i saw Ember on day one around $3m and dismissed it
then i watched the data explode on day two
and realized i had potentially been looking at something much more interesting than i initially thought
so i bought
at several X the price i first saw it at
this is exactly how i traded $PONS
i saw PONS below $1m market cap
ignored it for an entire day
then bought around $4m
and started hardcore shilling it in the trenches and on fomo
many responded by dismissing it and suggesting it will die because 'it has no runners' and 'there's no traction'
i disagreed
because i wasn't looking at whether other tokens were running (yet)
i was looking at the DATA
PONS had more traction than any of the new launchpads trying to fill the void after Noxa quit on Robinhood Chain
i have held it through almost a 25,000% run over 2 months
and i'm STILL holding because i believe it's headed for multi-billions
that trade taught me something important
if you're judging a 3-day-old launchpad primarily by how many 'runners' it has, you're midcurving the trade
you're looking at the scoreboard
instead of looking at what is actually happening underneath
3 — i reject the idea that Solana can only have ONE winning launchpad
this entire narrative that 'there can only be one winning launchpad on Solana' is nonsense
and frankly, it's antithetical to crypto
Robinhood Chain has multiple winning launchpads
BNB Chain has multiple winning launchpads
Solana has dominated the trenches for far longer than either of them
why would it suddenly be impossible for another launchpad to emerge?
and i'm not going to trade based on consensus!
my biggest trades have generally come from identifying something BEFORE the market agrees with me
not after
because by the time everyone agrees
the asymmetric upside is usually gone
that's exactly what happened with PONS
and that's exactly what i'm looking for with $EMBER
this is a trade for me
i have zero relationship with the team
i cannot control what the dev does
and this is obviously NOT financial advice
i reserve the right to execute this trade however i want, whenever i want, without having to explain myself to anyone
but after 48 hours of CT attacking and fudding me over this position
i thought it was important to finally explain why i bought
i didn't buy $EMBER because someone told me to
i didn't buy because it was consensus
and i certainly didn't buy because i needed another launchpad bag
i bought because i initially ignored it at $3m
then watched the data explode
then dug deeper into the tech
then realized i might have been looking at something the market hadn't fully priced in yet
and THAT is exactly the type of opportunity i'm always looking for
i.e. getting positioned before consensus
not after
it's been a few days since i posted my thesis explaining that i am starting to turn bullish on the Solana ecosystem
i.e. after seeing their leaders make cultural changes that i think will benefit the ecosystem long term
as a result, i bought my first Solana ecosystem token in a long time today
my next big bet is on $EMBER and its ecosystem
i first saw this around $3m market cap yesterday and faded
then i saw it pumping again and took a closer look and decided to topblast for a few reasons:
1. this is one of the most fundamentally superior launchpads in the space, both for pure token launches and meme/stock pairs
2. this is literally a Meteora launchpad, so as far as backing and resources goes it has everything to succeed
3. $PONS ($960m FDV ATH) and $STONK ($330m FDV ATH) have shown what is possible here, and i think EMBER is crazy undervalued where it is right now
this easily goes to $100m+ IMO
we'll see
tbh i started buying around $7m and kept blasting until around $11m
then i waited for a dip to buy more and it wouldn't come, so i decided to just topblast and ride it
i look at my $PONS trade every once in a while and realized i could have bought 2x the supply i own at $9.1m when i increased my stake and didn't
that mistake still hunts me to this day
i'm not making the same mistake again