Freedom of speech lawyer. Standing counsel to Rupert Lowe MP. Known to some as The Duke.
Covent Garden, London, UK
Joined November 2023
- Tweets9.9K
- Following1.8K
- Followers1.8K
- Likes935
TheNewLitigation retweeted
The greatest consequence of social media is that people like you have had your influence reduced to dust.
You are the DVD player of modern media.
Utterly obsolete.
TheNewLitigation retweeted
No, it isn’t.
If you go to bed on election night and don't know who won a midterm congressional race, that's normal. And if you wake up the next morning and find that a candidate who was behind hours earlier has since pulled ahead, that's normal, too. (via @PolitiFact) to.pbs.org/4zqnWBa
TheNewLitigation retweeted
Various journalists asking why I signed the 'racist' Save Europe Act.
It isn't particularly complicated.
I want tens and tens of millions of illegals, freeloaders and criminals removed from our continent.
The only way to Save Europe.
TheNewLitigation retweeted
Following today’s announcement of new legal refugee routes, I’ve never been more convinced that a large number of people ‘working’ in the Home Office need to go to prison.
TheNewLitigation retweeted
Rupert Lowe agrees that Tommy Robinson has been unfairly treated by the establishment.
Tommy called out the Muslim rape gangs decades ago and the establishment who were desperately covering up the mass rapes of underage white girls. They had to silence him and discredit him they did this through lawfare and the false controlled media narrative that he was a racist.
I have always respected Tommy Robinson for his work on the rape gangs - he gave evidence to our inquiry, and it was remarkable to hear his level of knowledge. It contributed massively to our findings.
Tommy was fair and balanced. I learnt a lot.
He has not been treated fairly by our establishment for many years, and today is the latest example of that.
To be honest, I believe it is a disgrace.
He was right on the rape gangs. The state was wrong.
They want to vilify him for that.
The media, the justice system, Labour, the Tories, Farage. It was made very clear to me when I was in Reform that I was not to praise Tommy Robinson publicly. I did regardless.
The entire establishment is against him.
My view is this - he has done more than any politician to uncover the rape gangs, and for that I thank him.
TheNewLitigation retweeted
It’s been declared baselesss, people
Although Brazil's presidential election took place more than 4,000 miles away, the baseless conspiracy theory that it was stolen raced through the American right-wing media. nbcnews.com/tech/misinformat…
TheNewLitigation retweeted
This is MASSIVE!
Every corporate media outlet in America owes @PatrickByrne an apology.
TheNewLitigation retweeted
Exemplo simples: 985 votos extras, cada um com ~66,7% de chance de ir pro Flávio (proporção do 1º turno entre os dois). O esperado seria ~657 pra ele.
A chance de sair 1 ou menos é ~10^{-467}. É como jogar uma moeda enviesada 985 vezes e quase nunca cair o lado favorito. Menor que 1 em 10^{400} universos cheios de átomos.
TheNewLitigation retweeted
LULA WINS IN BRAZIL !"“Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.”- Josef Stali
TheNewLitigation retweeted
The playbook will go something like this: 1) win back the House and Senate, and hopefully the Presidency in 2028; (2) admit DC and Puerto Rico as states, which doesn’t need a constitutional amendment, to gain 4 new Senate seats and cement control; (3) pack the Court, which only requires a change to the Judiciary Act of 1869, not a constitutional amendment; (4) eliminate the electoral college, which is unconstitutional, but not when you have a rigged court that finds the ‘loophole’; (5) flood the country with pliant migrants, swamp the natives, and hold power indefinitely.
TheNewLitigation retweeted
This is literally their plan to end democracy in America
The playbook will go something like this: 1) win back the House and Senate, and hopefully the Presidency in 2028; (2) admit DC and Puerto Rico as states, which doesn’t need a constitutional amendment, to gain 4 new Senate seats and cement control; (3) pack the Court, which only requires a change to the Judiciary Act of 1869, not a constitutional amendment; (4) eliminate the electoral college, which is unconstitutional, but not when you have a rigged court that finds the ‘loophole’; (5) flood the country with pliant migrants, swamp the natives, and hold power indefinitely.
