Welcome to Next Gen Tech Hub 👋
Exploring gaming & tech with honest reviews, ideas, and breakdowns.
Subscribe on YouTube 🎥 – link below 👇
youtube.com/@NGTechHubUK
1
32
Replying to @charlieINTEL
I agree with most of these. The “no carry forward” part is interesting though — some of the ridiculous skins definitely needed to stay behind, but a milsim toggle would’ve been a great middle ground.
6
I agree with most of these. The “no carry forward” part is interesting though — some of the ridiculous skins definitely needed to stay behind, but a milsim toggle would’ve been a great middle ground. 👀 #BO7 #BlackOps7
BLACK OPS 7:
✅ NO SBMM
✅ NON-DISBANDING LOBBIES
✅ No Carry Forward
✅ Aim Assist Changes
✅ Bundles back to COD identity
✅ Movement updates
✅ Changed Vault Edition Operators design
W
11
Replying to @GoatedSixteen @charlieINTEL
That’s the energy 🙌 Been a long wait — feels like we’re finally getting Battlefield back again.
7
Replying to @TheCutthroatGuy @charlieINTEL
Not a bad shout tbh — BF6 might surprise a few people this time. Definitely looks more “Battlefield” than 2042 ever did. 👀
14
Replying to @obungacheese @charlieINTEL
Physical midnight launches used to hit different, man. That 12:01 queue and Day 1 chaos was part of the magic.
53
Replying to @ORedblacks @charlieINTEL
Classic strat 😂 Every Battlefield launch, someone’s flying to NZ without leaving the house.
85
Replying to @andrewfoxyt @Treyarch
That’s the million-dollar question. CoD’s got a track record of testing bold systems early, then quietly reverting them mid-season.
I really hope this time they commit — consistency would go a long way for trust.
52
Replying to @IsaacBenjaMAGA @Treyarch
I get that concern — casual retention is what keeps the player base healthy long term.
Maybe the “Open Matchmaking” label means they’ll have multiple options later? A mix of both could work.
36
I actually think this was heavily asked for — just not by the casual crowd. Competitive and legacy players have been calling for less SBMM for years.
The tricky part is finding a system that keeps both groups happy.
9
Replying to @Keano1981 @Treyarch
Totally fair point. “Tuning” SBMM would’ve been the smarter middle ground — enough to keep casuals around, but still loosen things up for the rest.
Full removal might be swinging the pendulum too far the other way.
1
4
Replying to @CmoneySauce @Treyarch
That’s a great question! I was wondering the same — if “Open” matchmaking ends up as its own playlist, wouldn’t that just attract the more experienced players anyway?
Kind of defeats the point of no-SBMM if the filter separates everyone again! 😂
3
So, @Treyarch just confirmed Open Matchmaking for #BlackOps7 — minimal SBMM.
This could be the biggest change to CoD multiplayer in years.
Are we finally getting the “classic feel” back? 👇
#CallofDuty #SBMM
7
Hyped for Battlefield 6 like it’s BF4 all over again. This one feels right.
I know EA launches are never smooth — but DICE always deliver (eventually).
Who’s ready to drop in? 🎮🔥 #Battlefield6 #BF6
1
14




