To solve the problems facing our planetary home, we need public trust. For that, we need #openscience. Don't just #MarchForScience...#MarchForBetterScience!
France, Earth.
Joined September 2019
- Tweets1.2K
- Following153
- Followers277
- Likes689
No Fee Science retweeted
Now is an exciting time to be preparing a new open publishing platform (nmop.io). Feels like there's something in the air. We're finally reaching breaking point with big commercial publishers. 🎉
Hoping to start building it in earnest some time this year. 🤞
Neuroscientists shunning Elsevier, and Political Philosophers abandoning Wiley.
Is the big 5 commercial publishing house of cards about to collapse?
Where’s the free labour going to come from now? AI editors and reviewers?
#EthicalPublishing
No Fee Science retweeted
A short argument for why I think the big publishers cannot be part of a publishing reform effort. See the full (but still short) article over on Mastodon at neuromatch.social/@neuralrec… or below for a short summary.
No Fee Science retweeted
It's time to leverage the billions taxpayers give to government research for public use. Enter #DemocracysLibrary blog.archive.org/2022/10/19/…
No Fee Science retweeted
I am excited to announce the launch of Aletheia, a new platform for communicating peer-evaluated research. My collaborator on this project is @JakeJares. aletheia-platform.netlify.ap… 1/14
No Fee Science retweeted
Upset by the email send by @frontiersin entitled "Join Dr. Jonathan P. Tennant at Frontiers in Environmental Science as Associate Editor"
Very inappropriate!!!
RIP @Protohedgehog
cc @Rebeccatennan10
No Fee Science retweeted
“I pledge to the greatest of my ability, to continue to maintain integrity in my relationship to knowledge, to my methods & to my results*.”
*which are the collective fruit & shared intellectual property of all humanity
(if we could add one little thing!)
science.org/content/article/…
No Fee Science retweeted
📢Publicado el Proyecto de Ley por la que se modifica la Ley 14/2011, de 1 de junio, de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación.
Art 37: CIENCIA ABIERTA
Se mantiene:
✅1. La obligación de depósito de las publicaciones académica en repositorios de acceso abierto
No Fee Science retweeted
Voici notre rapport sur l'Université et la Recherche, fondements d'une VIe République démocratique et sociale. #UnionPopulaire #DimancheJeVoteMelenchon ⬇️ [1/4] parlement.lunionpopulaire.fr…
No Fee Science retweeted
Il faudrait surtout que les publications soient gratuites pour tout le monde...
Et qu'elles s'adressent au plus grand nombre, pas seulement à une petite communauté de scientifiques
#OpenScience
@NoFee_Science
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
No Fee Science retweeted
This is correct, and it's so satisfying to read the EiC of @eLife saying it.
No Fee Science retweeted
From #NoFeeScience manifesto, 2019:
"While we may be seeing the beginning of a switch to open access...profit-based publishing groups will be allowed adapt their fees + continue, unchecked, their work of funnelling public money into private interests via the imposition of APCs."
No Fee Science retweeted
These astronomical fees have been doing the rounds. As Editor-in-Chief for Animal Behavior and Cognition I feel duty bound to highlight that we’re an open access journal with no article processing charges: you can publish for free & read articles for free animalbehaviorandcognition.o…
No Fee Science retweeted
nature has actually contacted me for comment about accusations that Sci-Hub is a threat, here is my full response / it is clear that academic publishers care about their money, not about security of other people
No Fee Science retweeted
Deux ans depuis qu'on a publié ce texte (signé par 100+ scientifiques) chez @Reporterre, où on a souligné en quoi la lutte pour une science vraiment démocratique + la lutte pour un environnement sain ne font qu'une. Malheureusement, il a pas pris une ride.
reporterre.net/Face-au-recha…
No Fee Science retweeted
D'après OpenAPC, @inserm est de loin le plus gros payeur d'APC en France sur l'année 2020; ça s'explique peut-être par l'implantation de l'inserm dans les CHU, où s'applique le SIGAPS ? @hervemaison @FredRiondet
No Fee Science retweeted
Best argument? In order to gain access to knowledge produced by public money, the public is obliged to turn to an illegal platform. This widely known fact is exploited by anti-science voices and contributes to public distrust in the scientific enterprise. Voilà.
No Fee Science retweeted
This is why all scientific output should be FREELY accessible to anyone and not behind any paywall.
#NoFeeScience #OpenScience – at New Haven, CT
Lately, I have been thinking a lot about the responsibilities we have as scientists outside the lab/the office. Since (at least in Germany), #research is publicly funded, it means that we owe it to the public to inform them how and why we spend their tax money.
@AcademicChatter
No Fee Science retweeted
So Science now sits on a web platform owned by Wiley. They are not unique in that dependency of course: the PLOS submission system is owned by Elsevier, and more and more society journals are published by big commercial players (JBC a recent switch) atypon.com/news/aaas-moves-s…
No Fee Science retweeted
Today is Sci-Hub anniversary the project is 10 years old!
I'm going to publish 2,337,229 new articles to celebrate the date. They will be available on the website in a few hours (how about the lawsuit in India you may ask: our lawyers say that restriction is expired already)
No Fee Science retweeted
Introducing a new community-owned chemistry journal: SciPost Chemistry, for a truly open science publishing experience. scipost.org/SciPostChem #openscience #openaccess #chemtwitter