NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77) header
NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77) profile picture

Liquidity bandit https://xitter.gq/t.co/hmykMLWT1Y

onchain
Joined October 2021
Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)Photo by NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77)
67
1,459
711
13,980
7,136,377
NoLiquidity retweeted
Cutting my $BTC continuation long here at 65K for a loss. After capturing the move from 76K to 87K, we unfortunately failed to hold the range. That invalidates my thesis for this being a continuation long. We’re now 26% down from the highs. This is clearly more than a typical bull market retracement; it looks like the final leg of the Q4 move. The only position I’m holding now is my long from 62.6K, which I’ll hold until invalidation. I’m also holding all of my spot from 69K. I’ll look for potential long re-entries lower as I close this position. For now, I’m waiting. This is my first loss on a swing since the 123K short. The end of an era, but there will be plenty of trades ahead to capture strong moves. I’m confident despite this setback. I don’t think any of us expected such a violent retracement after a weekly HH. This is also shaping up to be a longer bear market than 2018 or 2022, so we’re clearly seeing something a little different this time.
I’m still in the same $BTC continuation long. I added a little here, bringing my average to 75.7K. Same plan, same invalidations. My stops are still set at my previous 3x swing entry from 62.6K. Let the games begin. 🎲
199
41
14
1,560
135,767
NoLiquidity retweeted
#Binance keeps acting like it has a deal to honour with Trump’s @worldlibertyfi scam machine, dangling up to 10% APR to shove this useless shitcoin down its users’ throats. I wouldn’t trust USD1 to hold its peg any more than I trust the people pushing it. Remember what I've uncovered back then: In May 2025, MGX’s $2 billion investment in Binance was settled in USD1, generating reserve income that benefits Trump-linked entities. On 23 October 2025, Trump pardoned CZ. Remember that sequence whenever these people lecture you about trust and financial freedom. And read what sits behind this “up to 10% APR” pitch: Binance lists a base Earn rate of around 2.3%, with promotional rewards that include 120 million WLFI tokens. They are partly rewarding you with World Liberty’s speculative token for holding World Liberty’s stablecoin, expanding distribution for both products through the same campaign. These extractors keep dressing their own financial interests up as concern for yours. Binance gets activity, Trump’s crypto business gets distribution and reserve income, and retail gets another incentive to feed the arrangement. It is fucking insulting when the people benefiting most expect you to ignore the conflicts of interest.
No lock-ups to figure out. No complicated steps. Just hold USD1 in any Binance account and earn up to 10% APR (variable) Reward pool expanded + campaign extended. 👉 binance.com/en/support/annou…
8
13
61
2,481
$BTC Bulls are programmed to defeat the bears The sidelined bears said Bitcoin would find its bottom in October; others said it would be in Q4 instead. Yet BTC is still up 20% from its $60K lows. Bitcoin went 40% up from the lows to the recent height, the bears have been wrong all the time. The worst thing about the side lined bears is that they always emerge in a bull market, every time Bitcoin dips a few percent. You’ll see them completely silent on the way up, but at their loudest on the first 10–20% drop. Bitcoin went 40% up and the bears said nothing, fully silent. It corrected 20% and the bears celebrate it as if it’s a new golden entry, as if their patience would have paid off, and they got their new low they speak about since months. Yet the price is still 20% above my spot entry. Ignore the noise. I remain insanely bullish on Bitcoin. You can call me the last bull standing. I’m holding all my spot positions from $60K and my longs from $80K. Bears are programmed to lose, Bitcoin will rise again, it’s just a matter of time, and it will rise without giving the side liners a new entry to their lows. They will miss out, again.
452
194
33
4,163
308,498
NoLiquidity retweeted
A big thank you to everyone who’s here. It isn’t always easy, especially when you question things and openly stand by your opinions. By the way, since I get asked this regularly: if I haven’t followed you back, it’s usually because I haven’t noticed your account, so please don’t take it personally. I generally follow back anyone who keeps showing up in the comments. Stay safe 💚
22
8
149
2,684
Closing the #SP500 short now Taking massive profits on HALF of EVERY open short I have open in the stock market. Many of these stocks have already crashed more than 50% since my short entry. Some of these positions have been open for almost a year. Now it’s time to take half off the table. Moving the stop loss on the remaining 50% of each position to entry and securing the other half in a gigantic profit. I’m using these funds to buy $BTC spot now at $68,000
106
39
5
1,742
133,112
NoLiquidity retweeted
3
20
245
7,217
Everyone updated their LinkedIn profiles and CV's yet? $BTC
4
101
I was one of the only ones telling you what was coming. And you know what I got in return? Insults. Mockery. Humiliation. All because I refused to tell people what they wanted to hear. But guess what? I'm still here. My conviction hasn't changed. And the market keeps proving my thesis right.
34
2
1
169
11,170
NoLiquidity retweeted
Just applied
80
19
1
214
4,319
$BTC 💀🪦 Why couldn't I have been a boomer
BREAKING: The S&P 500 erases all losses and turns green as investors buy the dip in Nvidia, $NVDA. Nvidia has now erased more than half of its loss on the day.
1
6
101
NoLiquidity retweeted
Rabby Wallet has integrated Elysium chain. @Enter_Elysium
57
52
13
476
36,311
NoLiquidity retweeted
90% of Nvidia employees surveyed want Jensen Huang to stay as CEO
12
3
79
1,248
NoLiquidity retweeted
The ca is B10B
4
2
2
14
612
NoLiquidity retweeted
The top coin ever . Ever . On solana:pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn is a 70% bundled solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump coin . You guys keep asking for runners I hate to break it to you retards your on the wrong platform if your looking for a billion dollar runner . Pump will never have one because they extract to much . Go back to just launching with a contract and pools because these platforms are cooked And pumpfun is a criminal network
8
12
46
1,432
NoLiquidity retweeted
I just want everyone here to remember the actual robbery @Pumpfun did to the bobros They called solana:7QAn5wqkBcGuvfLLC16iLvX8fPyqXrzkMqnzHLS9NNna and solana:4nV5gNwwP68zUDat26ySChREqVaQaLudfJBkSgEzpump illiquid (800k Mc , 5 million Mc) But the first place team median is 7k market cap . This wasn’t a competition it was giving their friends money . They will remember this day forever @a1lon9 @json1444 count your days bro
8
15
60
1,254
Imagine a dead chain had two security/drain incidents in a month and still manages to keep the price of its token up. Plasma brags about its spending milestones (which mean nothing to its believers and token holders), while taking a piss on its $XPL holders. Such a reputable company with users and big backers can't do shit with its anchor ⚓ that we call $XPL. Obvious extractor businesses should not be supported and used, imo. There are plenty of solid competitors.
THE BLOCK: Initia halted its L1 blockchain after unauthorized transfers drained approximately $605,000 in USDC from rollup escrow accounts. The team said compromised infrastructure keys were used to fabricate IBC transfers. About $10,000 in other tokens also left the network before the halt.
2
1
4
1,589
NoLiquidity retweeted
Almost half of PumpSwap's top volume is fake. Maybe more. ➡️ Here is the machine: The 200 PumpSwap pools with the most volume in 24 hours: $785M. $358.6M of that (45.7%) comes from 62 pools that all look the same: - around 2,000 buyers, but only around 30 sellers - $5M to $10M volume each - built by hand, not one of them is a Pump.fun launch - the same names again and again: $KYTRO 9 times, $MONTRA 9, $X 8, $AICoin 6 - all 62 built within 22 hours - 56 already empty, still on the list with millions in volume 16 of the top 20 look exactly like this. ➡️ $KYTRO. One pool. Every transaction. - 09:45:20: coin and pool created in one transaction, 84.99 SOL in - same block: a 10 SOL buy, signed by the buyer AND the creator - next 80 minutes: 8,252 transactions where 2 wallets trade with each other. One buys, one sells, both sign - 20 wallets do all of it. Their signatures tie them together, and the creator signs with 2 of them - they move 126,368 SOL back and forth. That's the "$10.7M volume" on your screen - 11:05:21: the creator takes 485.32 SOL out. Pool dead ➡️ Who paid his 400 SOL? - the 20 wallets he signs with: 398.92 SOL - all 1,975 other wallets together: 4.16 SOL - biggest loss outside the 20: 0.60 SOL - Pump.fun's fee: 61.2M $KYTRO and 0 SOL Read that twice. They paid themselves. Even the fee was paid in their own coin. $10.7M volume, 2,000 "buyers" and a top 5 spot on PumpSwap, for almost nothing. They faked the chart you pick coins from. ➡️ And it's not one pool. 7 pools, checked from build to withdrawal: - same build, same exit, 1 to 3 hours each - 3,502.97 SOL in, 6,294.01 SOL out - the same wallets trade in pools with different names - the same co-signers build pools with different names Different names. Same crew. ➡️ "Those are just market makers." No. - a market maker trades with real buyers and sellers wallets. Here both sides of the trade sit in the same transaction, signed by 2 wallets of the same group - a market maker doesn't create the coin, own all the liquidity and pull it after 80 minutes - in $KYTRO there was no market to make: 1,975 outside wallets traded 4.16 SOL in total - a market maker doesn't relaunch the same coin again and again. 9 $KYTRO pools in one day, the same 3 wallets trading in all 6 I checked Market makers bring liquidity for traders. This brings volume for a chart. "Volume bots". Half of PumpSwap. ➡️ And 45.7% is the strict count. Take every pool in the top 200 with 60 sellers or fewer in 24 hours: 109 pools, $469.3M, 59.8% of the volume. Millions in volume, a few dozen sellers. That's not a market. In September I showed you a pool factory: pools built by hand, liquidity in, liquidity out, gone within hours. Now this kind of pool is almost half the volume chart! ➡️ Why you should care Volume decides what you see: trending lists, "top volume", bots, copy traders. They all read this number. Almost half of it is a script trading with itself. Who runs this and why, the chain doesn't show. Yet. Every pool, wallet and transaction: next post. MASTRtrade.com Research and trading terminal
6
12
1
76
2,768
NoLiquidity retweeted
Goldman and Citi are among 21 firms committing $270M over five years to Project Faro, a venture to issue a GENIUS-compliant dollar stablecoin set for 1H 2027. Like Open Standard (Visa, Mastercard, Stripe), it's a joint push to win share from Circle and Tether, which hold ~85%.
2
13
837
NoLiquidity retweeted
There's nothing technical or fundamental about this, just an observation. $SOL topped on $TRUMP launch, how much more bullish of news can you get $HYPE topped (locally 🙏🏼) on ICE, Druck, Elon news, how much more bullish of news can you get At this point, if you're bearish, what bigger bear catalyst are you betting on? Trump slaughtered in midterms, SOXL down 60% in a month, Anthropic IPO expectations tumbling by the day, no signs of an end in Iran, $NVDA peak FUD, 50bps hikes being floated and heavily priced in. I'm not necessarily saying it's time to get extremely bullish because we could be in for a long chopsolidation after all of this, but I'm just not seeing what's left on the horizon to really press shorts here. Just judging on the timeline it feels like we're at or near peak bearish euphoria, and every pump is getting labeled as a lower high, short squeeze, opportunity to exit etc. Historically, seeing squiggly lines on charts with $BTC going back to $45k was a pretty good time to at least cover shorts. Think it's getting interesting to put on another options trade for a hated rally back above $80k, but it's hard to know if it will in fact just be another lower high... But fwiw, I've been bullish and clearly wrong these last few weeks. Just not really seeing the case to be heavily short here.
35
12
4
413
31,195