Mike retweeted
Berkshire isn’t exactly just a passive shareholder. Through BHE they’re also one of the largest energy providers Google depends on to run its data centers. So they’re getting equity upside on Google’s AI growth and regulated utility returns on the power Google needs to actually do it. It’s like Berkshire is vendor financing Google’s energy demand.
The valuation pushback is fair. But this investment isn’t just a stock pick. It’s putting Berkshire’s energy assets right in the heart of the nation’s AI infrastructure build.
Abel indirectly explaining why $BRK would invest in Google's data-center buildout. Berkshire Hathaway Energy is evolving into an AI infrastructure play.
youtube.com/watch?v=6hneO4MQ…
Mike retweeted
That is... quite the pay package / 5 year price target over at $RELY
@mario_cibelli
Mike retweeted
My friend @NonGaap once said, "once you see the corporate dark arts, you can't unsee it / you'll see it everywhere"
Feel the same about bad company incentives. Once you've peaked behind the scenes and seen them drive awful outcomes, you can't unsee it / you'll see it everywhere
Weekend thoughts: incentives and bad corporate governance
yetanothervalueblog.com/p/we…
Mike retweeted
For those without a sub - the big news is that I am joining the mothership of @SemiAnalysis_
I want to be the best, and work with the best, and that means working w/ my long time friend and GOAT of analysts, @dylan522p
There's a LOT coming, happy to be here folks !
Mike retweeted
Back in 2010, I wrote about this crazy employment amendment with $ANF CEO Mike Jeffries that paid him a $4m bonus not to use the corporate jet for more than $200K in personal use. Makes you wonder what the company knew? sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/…
Mike retweeted
ICYMI - SEC Director Gerding noted that compliance with 13D filing deadlines is a priority for Corp Fin. First SEC comments are already publicly available. My analysis: deepquarry.substack.com/p/em…
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say the SEC lobs a comment letter at Vista and Abu Dhabi Investment regarding the timing of their $SMAR 13D filings
That said, doubt it’s an issue
@ousvyatsky recently discussed beneficial ownership disclosures being an area of emphasis by the SEC
Mike retweeted
Bag holders catching strays 🙄
"I continue to believe that we will be better positioned to achieve our mission and goals outside of the short term pressures of the public markets and that taking 23andMe private will be the best opportunity for long term success." - Anne Wojcicki
$ME Board:
It's clear "we differ on the strategic direction for the Company going forward. Because of that difference and because of your concentrated voting power, we believe that it is in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders that we resign from the Board..." 😬
Mike retweeted
Free Tip: Pay attention to changes to Risk Factor language, esp changes "out of the blue".
Why? They're often CYA disclosures for specific issues.
Ex: Before the media reports, $SNOW revised language pertaining to cybersecurity breaches w/o explicitly disclosing any breaches
Mike retweeted
Great writeup from @NonGaap on $WSO's unique culture and incentive structure.
"Their "retirement age" vesting schedule serves as the lynchpin in making the M&A model work and keeping acquisitions aligned with the company"
nongaap.com/p/new-series-cor…
Mike retweeted
Underperforming HF manager: "I must know everything about a company! Down to where the CEO sleeps, what type of mattress he sleeps on, and what his friends think of him."
Stanley Druckenmiller: Searches "five most liquid Argentina ADRs" & sends it
That's why he's the 🐐
Mike retweeted
Jim Simons's five principles (RIP):
“Be guided by beauty. Just as a great theorem can be very beautiful, a company that’s really working very well, very efficiently, that can be beautiful.
Surround yourself with the smartest and best people you possibly can. Let them do their thing. Don’t sit on top of them. If they’re smarter than you, all the better.
Do something original. Don’t run with the pack. If everyone is trying to solve the same problem ... don’t do that.
Don’t give up easily. Stick with it. Stick with it not forever, but really give it a chance to get where you’re going.
The final principle is hope for good luck.
That’s the most important principle"
Mike retweeted
You get a very sympathetic valuation firm to look at the cap table and say, yep, look at all those layers of pref equity ahead of you, you’re never going to be worth anything
Mike retweeted
Replying to @NonGaap @peterchng
Common equity in a startup is basically worthless. Mitt Romney perfected this strategy
Mike retweeted
I don't feel like doing a nitty gritty write-up on this so I'm going to post a watered down long tweet instead....
Remember when I raised the (objectively crazy) possibility Steve MacMillan might have a stake in GRAIL which (somehow) "masquerades" as $HOLX stock?
These kind of (intrusive) thoughts are usually seeded by trying to understand/reconcile peculiar disclosures I come across in under-followed filings (ie Form 5500s).
For instance, the idea a security/investment could "masquerade" as a different security/investment was initially inspired by Hologic's equity plans and registration filings, but reviewing the Form 5500s is where this idea gained more traction.
And when I say "traction" I mean there's a "sliver of plausibility" to consider.
It's still a crazy idea and you should operate under that assumption, mind you, but hopefully you'll understand why I'm still entertaining this "out there" scenario by the end of this. You can review the disclosures yourself to make up your own mind and/or correct the nonsense I'm sharing.
Anyway, setting aside the GRAIL/HOLX conjecture, when you review Hologic's 2020 Form 5500, you'll see that Fido (as plan trustee) certifies a much different balance for Hologic common stock (~$4.8M) than what's reported (~$16K) in the Form 5500 by Hologic (as plan administrator):
- The plan's "employer securities" interestingly craters to ~$16K in 2020
- "Other" investments jumps to ~$4.7M
- Fidelity certified to the auditor that the plan has ~$4.8M in Hologic stock in 2020 despite the Form 5500 reporting a balance of ~$16K.
- Also, the plan administrator (Hologic) instructed the auditor not to audit the figures certified by the Trustee (Fido)
For context, this is the only year (from 2017 to 2022) where the certified "Hologic common stock" balance doesn't approximate reported "employer securities" balance in the Form 5500.
So what happened in 2020 and why is there a sizable mismatch for that plan year? What is heck is going on with "other" investments? (Genuine questions)
We have a situation where Fido - serving as plan trustee with fiduciary responsibilities and little incentive to lie - certifies there is ~$4.8M in Hologic stock in the 401K Plan, but Hologic - serving as plan administrator - reports $16K in their Form 5500.
To reconcile the difference, "other" investments (imo) needs to be certified as Hologic common stock to make the numbers work. It's hard to get around that and I can't figure out an alternative way to reconcile the difference. Whatever the "other" transaction is in 2020, it seems to require HOLX stock to execute.
So why does this even matter?
Assuming this "hot take" is correct and both HOLX and Fido correctly followed the rules, this 2020 Form 5500 potentially shows a loophole exists that allows "other" investments/securities to "masquerade" (ok, ok... be "certified" by the Trustee) as company stock.
That's pretty problematic if true - regardless of the GRAIL/HOLX conjecture - and (imo) opens up a pandora's box of potential self-dealing and abuse if not corrected, especially when you consider "top hat" plans (i.e. plans used by execs to defer sizable amounts of comp and equity) don't have the same reporting requirement (i.e. none, lol) as 401K/ERISA plans which at-least requires a Form 5500.
Also, remember the SEC doesn't have jurisdiction over this stuff and the Department of Labor doesn't monitor filings that closely so manage your expectations of reform accordingly. It is what it is.
This is why the SEC's investigation into GRAIL and $ILMN matters a lot bc there's (imo) a non-trivial possibility they're going to discover things that need to be addressed/reformed which currently takes advantage of current regulatory blindspots.
Finally, I say crazy dumb things all the time so calibrate this post accordingly and do your own homework.
Side note: I threw together the table quickly so apologies for errors. What's important was highlighting the big move in 2020 and subsequent reversal. You can look-up the plans here efast.dol.gov/5500search/
Mike retweeted
Bill Nygren shares his thoughts on CORPORATE GOVERNANCE with these four quotes…
Bill Nygren discusses valuation, value traps, optionality, poison pods, corporate governance, why he refuses to forecast above-avg growth past 7y, and why he wants the path of least resistance to be selling a biz that underperforms his expectations...
fool.com/investing/2024/01/1…
Mike retweeted
If your Audit chair is also the Audit chair of another public company that’s undergoing “firing execs for cause”restatements, not the worst idea to refresh the chair assignment.
Mike retweeted
5/ Nongaap Investing by @NonGaap
Mike focuses on identifying interesting governance signals before the effects get priced in the stock.
The premise is to learn about governance signals and their implications through forensics of reg filings.
See more: nongaap.substack.com/archive
Mike retweeted
I legit don't know if VKM's reported $WWE comeback is a "work" or "shoot".
He still maintains voting control despite stepping down and can threaten a proxy fight if they try to stonewall him.
BTW, Board nomination period is sandwiched between Royal Rumble and Wrestlemania. 🍿































