UK Nationhood - Rooted in the Grand Oaks of the UK. Proven in the Live Oaks of Charleston SC. Restoring Sovereignty, Heritage, Prosperity, Autonomy, & Culture.
London, UK * Charleston, SC
Joined November 2024
- Tweets7.2K
- Following3.6K
- Followers4.8K
- Likes15.6K
Pinned Tweet
For those of us born and raised in the UK, Nationhood really does matter.
If the Grand Oak is our Nation, its roots are the British People, and the heritage, culture, education, rule of law, autonomy and sovereignty that were foundational in its creation.
Our Nation was not perfect, but we always tried to make it better, and for better or worse it was ours. It was passed down to us by great leaders, scientists, authors, artists, and by brave men and women who fought to protect it for us.
Yes, Nationhood matters, and the closer we come to losing it, more and more people are beginning to realize it.
🤖 Made with AI
It is up to those of us who care about tradition, heritage, and culture to keep them alive.
Clearly our schools are not doing it, so we must.
We must never forget that when we acquiesce to the lowest common denominator in one thing, we eventually acquiesce to the lowest common denominator in everything.
It is sheer lunacy that there are debates over the Poppy.
In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.
We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie,
In Flanders fields.
Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.
No shock that @elonmusk is correct.
We are doing our part to help people, businesses, and governments wishing to take back their sovereignty, nationhood, statehood, and neighborhoods.
The roots remain as they are always the people and the tenets that were foundational in the creations of heritage and culture. sovereignos.world.
Nationhoods, Statehoods, and Neighborhoods Matter!!! Visit sovereignos.world to see how you can play a role in saving yours.
The Reform vs Restore debate is heating up.
Today, I have been asked by people on both sides to speak in more spaces about the feedback I receive from the people and organizations I engage with about saving the UK.
Although I am happy to do that, we all know that words get twisted etc., etc. so I am also putting it in writing.
I am a member of Restore, and if there was an election tomorrow, that is where my vote would land. However, it would not be cast without some concern.
My concern with Restore is that it is supported by way right extremists, and thus I worry about the possibility of the movement going too far right.
So why Restore when there is clearly no chance of Reform going to the way extreme left?
I am concerned that with the number of ex Tories involved (I do not think they can all change their spots), Reform could drift too much to the middle of the road, resulting in a Tory style status quo.
So, on one hand I am faced with the potential of Restore going too far right for me, and on the other it is Reform going too far middle of the road for me.
When I apply either of those possibilities to the immediate solutions needed for the UK, I find myself in a conundrum because neither sit well with me.
Being brutally honest, if it were not for the necessity to close our borders, cut off benefits, deport millions of illegal immigrants, and to take on the Global IGO/NGO Industrial Complex, I would probably vote Reform.
However, I believe that under the current circumstances, a more right leaning approach is what is needed, hence, I remain with Restore.
Even though I will vote Restore, I not be silent in my distain for what some extreme right Restore supporters want, and I will do whatever I can to urge Restore to disavow itself from embracing those desires.
Now it is out there in writing, I will be happy to disseminate in Spaces what I hear from the people and organizations I work with.
The Reform vs Restore debate is heating up. Today, I have been asked by people on both sides to speak in more spaces about the feedback I receive from the people and organizations I engage with about saving the UK.
Although I am happy to do this, we all know that words get twisted etc., etc. so I am also putting it in writing.
I am a member of Restore, and if there was an election tomorrow, that is where my vote would land. However, it would not be cast without some concern.
My concern with Restore is that it is supported by way right extremists, and thus I worry about the possibility of the movement going too far right.
So why Restore when there is clearly no chance of Reform going to the way extreme left?
I am concerned that with the number of ex Tories involved (I do not think they can all change their spots), Reform could drift too much to the middle of the road, resulting in a Tory style status quo.
So, on one hand I am faced with the potential of Restore going too far right for me, and on the other it is Reform going too far middle of the road for me.
When I apply either of those possibilities to the immediate solutions needed for the UK, I find myself in a conundrum because neither sit well with me.
Being brutally honest, if it were not for the necessity to immediately close our borders, cut off benefits, deport millions of illegal immigrants, and to take on the Global IGO/NGO Industrial Complex, I would probably vote Reform. However, I believe that under the current circumstances, a more right leaning approach is what is needed, hence, I remain with Restore.
However, I will not be silent in my distain for what some extreme right Restore supporters want, and I will do whatever I can to urge Restore to disavow itself from embracing those desires.
Now it is out there in writing, I will be happy to disseminate in Spaces what I hear from the people and organizations I work with.
Working hard to leave a better UK for our children is important, but we must work equally hard to leave better children for the UK.
🤖 Made with AI
Absolutely worth a listen in
Where do the UK's political parties stand today?
Party Politics returns with a new series of conversations exploring the current state of political parties across the UK, examining their priorities, challenges, leadership, policies and vision for the future.
Building on last year's Political Party Series, I'll be revisiting the political landscape to explore what's changed, how parties have evolved, and where they go next.
Join us live on X Spaces as we hear directly from political parties across the political spectrum.
I'll begin with the Labour Party
Keep an eye out for the X spaces
Stuart W. Nationhood & Statehood Matter! retweeted
Wow, this is what Yemen looked like in the 1960s under British rule. That was over half a century ago, but it looked decades more advanced than Yemen does today.
It’s almost unbelievable compared to what the country has become. And it’s a testament to how quickly a country can collapse once Islam reigns supreme.
Stuart W. Nationhood & Statehood Matter! retweeted
Defence Secretary Wes Streeting has challenged firms building Royal Navy ships to hire British workers, after Babcock flew in 300 welders from the Philippines, as Scotland's defence sector faces a shortfall of nearly 9,000 apprenticeships.
heraldscotland.com/news/2666…
Incredible, thank you @MichaelDell and your family.
The great Lawrence Bloom said, circa 2008."Social Media will provide the uneducated and ignorant with a voice, which is a wonderful thing, as long as the ignorant and uneducated do not listen to each other".
