💧Steve Davies

That's right folks. This is the official response to a simple and pointed request. Given the scope of what amounts to an official ban this has the hallmarks of an official collective decision. Between now and October I will plan further. That work is, in fact, already underway. The key question: Why this reaction to my arguing that there should be a publicly viewable component of the GovAI Use Case Library? Sure there will be use cases where a security classification is warranted. Locking down everything is highly questionable given there fact that Government AI will impact everyone. Why is that such an issue: Two words Open Government. And that's before I get to the many other issues this raises. That's all I will be saying for now. But I'll be watching. That's all I will be saying for now. The record speaks for itself."

Absolutely Josh. There’s an additional important dimension to this 👇👇👇

@AlboMP @SenKatyG Good. However, the same standard of accountability should apply to government institutions: politicians and public servants alike. It should also apply to companies doing AI work for the Australian Government and the APS. Why? To encourage greater vigilance. To prevent a cycle of deflection. To prevent harms from the outset, so we don't need Royal Commissions to surface the truth. My work on Deep Truth is continuing. A people-friendly AI window to government services is all well and good, but if the underlying complexity within government and the APS isn't addressed, it will remain an impediment and keep creating harm. The onus is on government and the APS to fix the impediments and harms under the hood. abc.net.au/news/2026-11-11/a…

Wonderful work Karen. You might be interested in my work on moral disengagement. It all started with a hypothesis and, I guess, brings Professor Albert Bandura’s work to life. deep-truth-persona-gp8lvbl.g…

100% relate to it Kelly. Beautifully thoughtful work. Inspirational. Thank you.

Food for thought for you. Moral engagement is the key to ethics and integrity. I started with a hypothesis years ago. Specifically, that AI could possibly be provided with a moral lens via Professor Albert Bandura’s life long work on moral disengagement. At any step of the way this could have failed aka not worked. What became the Deep Truth Personal has held up. And done in a way that places human agency at the core. The reaction of the APSC and others has been telling and, I might add, predictable. I’m consolidating my research in the coming weeks. 👇👇👇 Pleasingly the AI Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence accepted my submission. Submissions Webpage aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Bus… My submission number is 570. There are three documents: Mr Steve Davies aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… 570.1 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… 570.2 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… The first document is the submission proper. The second document concerns more technical matters via a vis testing. The third provides a window to the submission proper. All three documents are deeply intertwined.

@cheryl_kernot Let me share something with you that tells you why Cate Blanchett’s refection and words touched me so much. Years of work behind this. Good news from me concerning my work on AI, moral disengagement and moral engagement. Not withstanding the many issues with AI, the media needs to lift its game. Why? Many of the issues are down to the institutionalised behaviours and practices within organisations and the mindset of some individuals within them. Submissions Webpage aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_… My submission number is 570. There are three documents: Mr Steve Davies aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.… 570.1 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.… 570.2 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.… The first document is the submission proper. The second document concerns more technical matters via a vis testing. The third provides a window to the submission proper. All three documents are deeply intertwined

Just ask yourselves this single question. What would happen to any other public official handled issues in this manner? They would be given the opportunity to leave with dignity. And, ultimately, removed. The stark contrast? The manner in which whistleblowers are treated.

Tell me about it. Submissions Webpage aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Bus… My submission number is 570. There are three documents: Mr Steve Davies aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… 570.1 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… 570.2 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… The first document is the submission proper. The second document concerns more technical matters via a vis testing. The third provides a window to the submission proper. All three documents are deeply intertwined.

Good morning @jommy_tee Good news from me concerning my work on AI, moral disengagement and moral engagement. Not withstanding the many issues with AI, the media needs to lift its game. Why? Many of the issues are down to the institutionalised behaviours and practices within organisations and the mindset of some individuals within them. Submissions Webpage aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Bus… My submission number is 570. There are three documents: Mr Steve Davies aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… 570.1 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… 570.2 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… The first document is the submission proper. The second document concerns more technical matters via a vis testing. The third provides a window to the submission proper. All three documents are deeply intertwined.

@JaqRedTravels Hope all is great with you :) Me? I’ve been very busy. Years of work and some good news. If only the tech was available many years earlier. Submissions Webpage aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Bus… My submission number is 570. There are three documents: Mr Steve Davies aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… 570.1 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… 570.2 Supplementary to submission 570 aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ash… The first document is the submission proper. The second document concerns more technical matters via a vis testing. The third provides a window to the submission proper. All three documents are deeply intertwined.

This wikipedia page needs updating. Labor Left indeed. I venture to say that in earlier times he would be disendorsed and expelled from the party.

His views are those of an ideological twat. He should be exported to Trump’s dead end political sewer.

Oops @wilding_gyres My early morning pre-coffee slip up. To the critics of the work of Nina.