After over a year of calling out Candace Owens for being a fraud and completely unhinged, I finally earned the block. ❌ Took her long enough!! I’ll wear this one with pride! Real men protect widows. 💯 She blocks the critics. 🤣

My personal opinion regarding Honest Ash. 👇 I disagree with Honest Ash on Erika Kirk and a multitude of other things. That doesn’t mean I’m ready to write her off. People can be wrong on major issues and still show they’re capable of correcting course when the evidence is clear. Writing someone off entirely the moment they cross the isle and begin engaging, in good faith assumes they’ll never change on anything else, and it removes any incentive for them to try. She was a major Mitch Snow advocate until she actually looked into what the rest of us had been saying. Once she saw the pattern of lies, she publicly called him a liar, apologized for claims she’d previously made based on him, and stuck to it. She also correctly pointed out that one-off Google Trends spikes on low-volume terms are statistical noise, not evidence. These stances have cost her nearly 2,000 followers, friends, and nonstop mockery and harassment from people she used to respect (and who used to respect her). Charlie said the weak can never forgive. That forgiveness is an attribute of the strong, and that the only way out of the labyrinth of suffering is to forgive. He also warned that when you stop having a human connection with someone you disagree with, it becomes much easier to dehumanize them. If she’s already shown she can change course once she sees the truth on Mitch, permanently alienating her makes it less likely she ever changes on anything else. An olive branch doesn’t require agreement. It just means not burning the bridge while someone’s still crossing it.

Uncle Tom tried the classic “you don’t actually know this, it’s all second-hand” trap on Honest Ash. He thought this was going to go his way! 🤣 She dog-walked Ole Tom through why Google Trends is useless for investigating specific people. Google’s own FAQ says those one-off spikes on low-volume terms are statistical noise and should not be treated as real search activity. The method gets gamed with fake names and still spits out the same blips. Tom walked in thinking he was setting her up to look like a fool, only to be made a fool himself. Trends is not evidence. It’s noise. The only real trend I see is Uncle Tom getting embarrassed repeatedly on X Spaces! 🤣 @realhonestash

Come hang out!

The defense’s own status charts from August and mid-October show how little of the discovery they’ve even fully processed. As of late August they had roughly 29,000 files totaling a few terabytes downloaded and organized, but only about 20–23% fully coded and ready for detailed review. The October update shows only modest movement on some earlier batches while later productions are still largely untouched. That’s before you even count the separate 12+ TB of device extractions (600k+ files and millions of artifacts), the million-plus Discord messages, and the tens of thousands of location records. What the public has actually seen is a thin slice of that: the key pieces the State put up at the preliminary hearing (DNA on the rifle, the surveillance linking him to the scene, the admissions through the roommate and texts). The rest of the volume is still sitting with the defense, mostly unprocessed or only partially coded two months later. Calling it a mountain isn’t speculation or spin. It’s their numbers. Pretending the evidence is thin so you can call people stupid for noticing the scale is just cope. The defense is the one saying they need until 2029 because of how much is still left to go through.