No coin has more nonchalance per capita than BSV
Replying to @OldCraig @pxl_u_272
They don't get us. We irritate them. They see our humor and nonchalance. 🐸Our bulletproof oh whenever confidence. They have tension, legislative bill reading flop sweat and concern: Lambo repo & Iceberg fear.
Inb4 this gets deleted bc it’s BSV 😭
JUST IN: SOMEONE JUST SENT #BITCOIN FROM A HANDHELD RADIO WITH NO INTERNET AND NO PHONE SIGNAL
FREEDOM TECH IS SPREADING
LOVE TO SEE IT 🔥
I wonder if they take any middleman fees in the process
JUST IN: Mastercard $MA launches platform enabling crypto stablecoin payments at hundreds of millions of merchants worldwide.
Get this guy on the BSV USA board stat!
Everyone’s on the BSVA payroll.
@BSVAssociation as I have made the case to BSV USA, you need a resident schizo on hand.
My resume includes 8 years of unendingly retarded BSV posting.
Call me.
How can Ty Everett be a BSVA ambassador & be a founding member of the BSV USA Ass at the same time? Time to cut yourself free @ProjectBabbage
Bros are pressed about a few X users talmbout a BSV rebrand. Do not...I repeat...do not play into the frame that we as twitter users have some kind of power to actually derail the steaming locomotive/beachball underwater of the only scalable blockchain in existence that also happens to be (wait for it) literally bitcoin. It's not that serious.
Thank you for attention to this matter. Call me.
Bro you should make your voice heard the BSV USA. Call me.
OldCraig retweeted
yes. ticker will eventually be irrelevant. even the term Bitcoin will be irrelevant.
what will be mainstream & relevant is “utxo” and “sats”.
OldCraig retweeted
Rebrand to Bitcoin Protocol or leave it BSV?
It goes to a vote. Robin Hood plan.
Bitstamp is the side door. Full meeting is up.
youtu.be/gnTiozVHX1g?si=xBqX… via @YouTube @OldCraig @NasdaqNancy @Bitcoin_Beyond
"...you must earn that title by flipping BTC
Proof of work"
No actually, I think I'll just keep it anyway.
based
What eCash, Sky & NEO teach us about a BSV rebrand cycle
A rebrand changes the ticker and marketing optics. It does not change the ledger.
Past examples:
eCash (BCHA → XEC): Same chain + 1:1,000,000 split. Spiked ~1,200% on unit bias & new listings, then dumped 85%+.
Sky (MKR → SKY): 1:24,000 split. No hype. Dropped 50% and just followed the market.
NEO (Antshares → NEO): Clean rename. Rode the 2017 bubble to ~$200, then crashed 95%.
The pattern:
1. Front-run thin books
2. New listings = exit liquidity for old holders
3. Slow bleed once hype dies
For BSV: Exchanges list assets, not tickers. They dropped BSV over legal/compliance issues, not the name. A rebrand can reset marketing. It cannot create real demand. Utility does.


















