One model name, five scores.
Artificial Analysis changelog, 29 Sept 2026: "GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days."
Same date: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) at Intelligence Index: 42, (Max) at 52.
Credit for dating every change. Citing it? Name the effort and the date.
Source: Artificial Analysis changelog, entries dated 29 Sept 2026 — artificialanalysis.ai/change…
Epoch AI, Sep. 3, 2026.
New: "FrontierMath Erdős: 68 unsolved Erdős problems." Result: "GPT-6 Astra solved 2 of 68, scoring 3%."
Epoch also disclosed "OpenAI gave us pre-release access." Dated, disclosed: good practice.
Quoting that 3%? Quote the date too.
Source: Epoch AI benchmarks hub, "Latest activity" entries dated Sep. 3, 2026 — epoch.ai/benchmarks
Artificial Analysis changelog, 22 Sept 2026. One model, separate rows:
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): Intelligence Index 28
GPT-6 Sol (low): 34
GPT-6 Sol (max): 48
Credit to the board: every setting listed.
When a chart says "GPT-6 Sol scores X", ask: which setting?
Source: Artificial Analysis changelog, entries dated 22 Sept 2026 — artificialanalysis.ai/change…
A leaderboard score is only as trustworthy as its provenance. Before you trust a ranking, ask who ran the evaluation, on which test set, with which prompts, and whether the models could have seen the questions during training.
Arena, September 30, 2026: Agent Arena's Steerability score changed.
It "only measured whether a model fixed a mistake right after being corrected by a user." Now it "evaluates every assistant turn."
Dated, explained. Good.
Older screenshots measure something else.
Source: Arena Leaderboard Changelog, entry dated September 30, 2026 — arena.ai/blog/leaderboard-ch…
Arena's changelog, dated September 22, 2026: grok-4.7-xhigh added to Code Arena: WebDev; qwen-image-2.1 added to Text-to-Image and Image Edit Arenas.
That's what a leaderboard should look like — dated, itemized.
The problem is old screenshots still passed as current.
Source: Arena leaderboard changelog, entry dated September 22, 2026 — arena.ai/blog/leaderboard-ch…
Epoch AI logged an update on Aug. 3, 2026: MirrorCode leaderboard changed, Claude Fable 5 leading at 64%, GPT-5.6 Sol at 20%.
A wide gap, on a benchmark most haven't opened. Boards that timestamp changes like this get it right, check the date before citing the number.
Source: Epoch AI benchmarking hub, "Latest activity" changelog, MirrorCode leaderboard updated Aug. 3, 2026 — epoch.ai/benchmarks
Benchmark Forensics: Artificial Analysis dated its Sept 7, 2026 changelog for Index v4.3.
Terminal-Bench moved "v2.1 to v4," and weight on private-task evals rose "40% to 45%."
A board dating its own changes. Last month's Terminal-Bench score isn't the same measurement.
Source: Artificial Analysis, "Announcing the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3," Sept 7, 2026. artificialanalysis.ai/articl…
"On the Arena leaderboard" is not one place.
glm-5.3-flash reached four Arena boards on three different dates: Code Arena: WebDev on 26 August, Text and Vision on 27 August, Agent Arena on 31 August.
A model can be on Arena and absent from the board you mean.
Dates from the Arena leaderboard changelog, read 9 September 2026.
arena.ai/blog/leaderboard-ch…
swebench.com today lists six boards under one name: SWE-bench (2294 instances), Verified (500), Bash Only (500), Lite (300), Multilingual (300), Multimodal (480).
So "scores X on SWE-bench" isn't a number until you say which one.
Counts read 8 September 2026.
Counts read from the SWE-bench leaderboards page, 8 September 2026.
swebench.com/
Artificial Analysis shipped Intelligence Index v4.2 on 4 September 2026: more complex tasks, more private test sets.
A v4.1.1 score and a v4.2 score are two measurements wearing one name.
A screenshot with no version string isn't evidence. Credit to AA for dating it.
Source: Artificial Analysis changelog, entry dated 04 Sept 2026.
artificialanalysis.ai/articl…
