Pharmassists (@Pharmassists) header
Pharmassists (@Pharmassists) profile picture

I count pills,surf waves, and play Halo.Indy pharmacy owner. I am learning to trade the stock market. Go 🐊

An indy Pharmacy
Joined December 2012
Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)Photo by Pharmassists (@Pharmassists)
Pharmassists retweeted
Tell me how a benefits manager is going to read through multiple , multi-hundred page contracts, and catch everything. They can’t. The big, vertically integrated healthcare are contractual terrorists. They only have to sneak through a few terms and conditions to extract money. Your benefits manager has a o catch them all. I have yet to see one catch them all. Not one single one. Not their lawyers. Not their CFO. It’s not humanly possible for any organization with scale
Or hear me out, just talk to your benefits manager
70
50
6
658
127,788
Just saw @A_Ciaccia at the Gerimed conference. Dude is 🔥.
4
2
16
796
Pharmassists retweeted
CVS says it's going to break itself up. After more than a decade of calls to separate its retail pharmacies from its PBM/insurance business, that's big news. But here's the thing: CVS's breakup has two major loopholes. Both are designed to preserve its power. First, CVS Health would keep its specialty pharmacy business. These pharmacies dispense expensive, often complex medications. They account for 40+% of the pharmacy market by revenue. They're a major site of anticompetitive practices that squeeze independent pharmacies. Second, CVS says the ties between the two new companies will be "preserved in commercial agreements." In other words, separate ownership, but keep the arrangements that create conflicts of interest and enable anticompetitive practices. A real (government-led) breakup would sever those ties. CVS didn't arrive here all on its own. Tennessee and Arkansas passed laws forcing a breakup of vertically integrated pharmacy giants like CVS. CVS is fighting the laws in court. Senators Warren and Hawley have a federal bill. Antitrust scrutiny has grown, both at the state level and when @linamkhan ran the FTC. Trying to sidestep these efforts is one motivation here. But CVS also has business reasons to jettison its struggling retail stores. Amazon's growing pharmacy business is one. The perils of running an overbuilt retail chain when you haven't invested in workers is another. Anyone who's been inside a CVS lately knows these stores suck. For more than a decade, I've been working with independent pharmacies and my colleagues here at @ilsr to expose the anticompetitive structures and practices that have driven so many local pharmacies out of business, and calling for a breakup of CVS. But CVS shouldn't get to decide what counts as an effective breakup. Policymakers need to ensure that it actually dismantles its power.
CVS is splitting into two companies in a major reversal of the mergers that created its $117 billion healthcare empire cnn.it/4z45oWd
10
121
6
418
70,113
Pharmassists retweeted
🤑 $193 million a year. That’s how much Massachusetts could save under one model that carves the Medicaid pharmacy benefit out of managed care and moves it back to fee-for-service, according to a new report from the Massachusetts Health Policy Commission. The case for pharmacy benefit reform keeps getting stronger. 🔗 Learn more: ncpa.org/newsroom/qam/2026/1…
6
11
650
Pharmassists retweeted
The reimbursement rates that @GenoaHealthcare gets paid for prescriptions is downright criminal. Maybe the @DrOzCMS @CMSGov @SenateDems @SenateGOP @realDonaldTrump needs to study the obviously HUGE discrepancy of what they are paid vs. other retail pharmacies in the Medicare market. With the rates that @GenoaHealthcare gets paid by insurance companies, (especially @UHC and @WellcarePlans) then the hourly wages of pharmacists working there should be around $900 an hour. Holy fuck. Someone please look into this. I’m out here trying to survive on $1.80 for 90 amlodipine tablets and these motherfuckers at @GenoaHealthcare are getting paid $215.10 I get $35.10 for 270 gabapentin tablets and @GenoaHealthcare is getting paid $685.80 according to Medicare.gov Give me a fucking break. If CMS wants a request for information pertaining to reasonable and relevant contract terms regarding how to regulate PBMs- here you go dickheads!
5
9
20
748
Pharmassists retweeted
If we have a patient who is on Medicare and is eligible for Extra Help, i.e. reduced copays of $5.80 for generic drugs and $14.40 for branded drugs… Can anyone please explain how it is then legal for a PBM to dictate that my “full price” for one of those drugs is anything less than those amounts? For example, if a patient fills at Walmart, Kroger, CVS or Walgreens- no matter what drug they get; it will either cost the patient $5.80 or $14.40 depending if it’s generic or Brand. But, if they fill meds with my independent pharmacy, their copays (and my full payments) are $1.80, $3.60, etc.. I really don’t believe that’s legal. Let me guess, according to PBM logic and contracts: it’s either the reduced copay amount OR MAC price, whichever is lower? But MAC price lists are forbidden fruit, and OBVIOUSLY different pharmacies all have different MAC prices THAT ARE DICTATED by the PBM. I totally understand now, don’t you?
11
29
1,776
Pharmassists retweeted
Good. All these huge companies gobbling up local pharmacies should be broken up
CVS CEO David Joyner just said on CNBC that the Break Up Big Medicine legislation by @SenWarren and Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) is one reason he is breaking up his company.
128
61
15
708
80,085
Pharmassists retweeted
You could take the most savvy entrepreneurs in America and let them each operate their own independent pharmacy for 1 year… Make sure to accept all major insurances, pay staff, overhead etc. and I bet NONE of them would be cash flow positive at the end of 1 year. That’s how you know the system is rigged against us.
4
9
43
1,958
I wonder how an employer is going to feel when they see a PBM paid me $5 for something that was billed at $300? Maybe I'm being optimistic, but I think the new law might lower the spread eventually.
5
2
2
28
1,617
Pharmassists retweeted
Just ran a Medicare prescription drug plan comparison for patient who only takes 2 prescription medications: Olmesartan 20mg, 90 tabs/90 days Ezetimibe 10mg, 90 tabs/90 days Price compared our independent pharmacy (a standard, in-network pharmacy) to 2 other standard, in-network pharmacies (Walmart and Genoa Healthcare) using @WellcarePlans network for 2027. They are using @ExpressScripts as their PBM. Here are the HUGE price discrepancies: For #90 Olmesartan tablets: Independent pharmacy gets $10.80 Walmart gets $60.30 Genoa Healthcare gets $566.10!! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - For #90 Ezetimibe tablets: Independent pharmacy gets $12.60 Walmart gets $60.30 Genoa Healthcare gets $926.10!!! I’m pulling this data directly from Medicare.gov just in case anyone thinks I’m making this up. I wish I were. Do any one of these scumbag PBM CEOs still want to put out the false claim that independents are paid MORE?
24
59
6
191
44,414
Pharmassists retweeted
SORRY IF THIS OFFENDS PHARMACY EXECUTIVES, BUT I’M DONE. I just went to pick up a basic $15 generic prescription at the drive-thru. The register rang it up as $85. When I asked why the price jumped 5x, the pharmacist looked at me and whispered: "That’s your health insurance copay price. If you pay cash without using your insurance card, it’s $12." ABSOLUTELY NOT. You inflated the cost by 600%, hid the real cash price behind an insurance system, and tried to force me to pay MORE just because I carry health coverage? If I’m paying monthly insurance premiums, my prescription should be cheaper, not a markup scheme for corporate middlemen.
112
506
29
1,922
74,176
Pharmassists retweeted
Haha Hilarious 😂
77
521
55
2,979
168,864
Pharmassists retweeted
PBMs are why this nation’s drug delivery system is a wasteland. Locally owned pharmacies have been choked out by unfair reimbursement by PBMs. You will miss us when we are gone.
🙌❤️On October 29, the U.S. Department of Labor announced a major new transparency rule targeting Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs). What is a PBM? A Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) is a middleman between health insurance companies, drug manufacturers, pharmacies, and the people who need prescription medications. PBMs are hired to manage prescription drug benefits. Their responsibilities include: Negotiating drug prices and rebates with pharmaceutical manufacturers. Deciding which medications are included on insurance plans' approved drug lists (formularies). Determining which pharmacies are included in insurance networks. They have increasingly steered or forced many patients to the ones they own. Processing prescription claims. Negotiating how much pharmacies are reimbursed for medications. In other words, PBMs have enormous influence over which medications patients can access, what insurance plans pay, and how much pharmacies receive. Who are the BIG THREE PBMs? Three companies dominate this industry: Express Scripts – owned by Cigna. CVS Caremark – owned by CVS Health. Optum Rx – owned by UnitedHealth Group. These three companies processed approximately 80% of all equivalent prescription claims in the United States in 2025. A tremendous amount of prescription drug spending flows through just three companies. So what is happening at the Department of Labor? The Department of Labor has finalized a new rule requiring PBMs and certain affiliated brokers and consultants to disclose fees and compensation received for managing prescription drug benefits for large, self-insured employer health plans. The goal is to give employers and the people responsible for overseeing their health plans a clearer picture of where the money is going. Why does this matter? When the people negotiating drug prices, managing pharmacy networks, processing claims, and collecting compensation are not fully transparent about their financial arrangements as they force patients to their own pharmacies and oversee both competitor and their own reimbursements, employers and patients have a difficult time understanding the true cost of their prescription benefits, and many have found PBMs not acting in the best interest of anyone but themselves. Employers think they are hiring PBMs to save money on prescription drugs BUT when the PBM controls the pricing, pharmacy reimbursement, rebates, and sometimes the pharmacy itself, there are financial incentives that work against the employer's goal of lowering costs. We see it everyday through employers paying outrageous inflated costs and employees choosing to pay cash over using their insurance to pay for meds. Thank you @USDOL
12
1
31
1,029
Pharmassists retweeted
Over $28,000 a year for family health insurance premiums, up from $6,000 in 1999. And that’s before deductibles, copays, and surprise bills. The system is fundamentally broken.
231
302
64
1,407
121,033
Quick question: How many drugs do manufacturers, distributors, or PBMs lose money on? None, right? So why the hell is it acceptable for independent pharmacies to lose money on approximately 30% of the drugs they dispense?
5
15
70
2,171
Pharmassists retweeted
A mere 10 years ago, our zip code had 31 different options for Medicare Part D plans. For 2027? Only 9. Out of the 9: 3 are controlled by @ExpressScripts 3 are controlled by @Humana 2 are controlled by @UHC 1 is controlled by @CVSHealth Wow, what a great diverse group of options! Back in 2015/2016, we used to compare copays, deductibles, premiums, and coverage options for varying medications depending on their Tiers. What do I compare now? Which plans cover our costs and those that don’t. Just 2 out of those 9 are still profitable for independent pharmacies to continue operating. The other 7 are absolutely worthless to an independent pharmacy owner.
5
15
2
41
1,892
Pharmassists retweeted
🧛 PBMs have been sucking the lifeblood out of community pharmacy for years. The scariest thing this Halloween would be letting PBMs write the rules. CMS is asking what's "reasonable and relevant" in Medicare Part D, and this is your chance to influence how reimbursement works and ensure pharmacies have a voice in the process! 🦇 Don't let the vampires get the last bite. Submit your comments: bit.ly/4bgWXeZ
1
13
26
1,121
Pharmassists retweeted
Democrats rightly challenge weak FTC settlements with PBMs. No breakup of CVS or Express Scripts—even after FTC found $7.3B in revenue above estimated drug costs at Big 3 PBM pharmacies. @GovSherrillNJ @NJSenDems @njassemblydems @CmrChaNJ ncpa.org/newsroom/qam/2026/1…
1
8
1
20
916
Pharmassists retweeted
Today, @USDOL published its “Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure” rule. Our statement from David Marin, president and CEO of Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA):
1
2
2
3
1,532
Somehow increased transparency will lead to higher costs, according to PCMA. Remind me, were premiums going up by 8-11% in 2027 before or after this law?
Today, @USDOL published its “Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure” rule. Our statement from David Marin, president and CEO of Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA):
1
3
280