Why the fuck are there Indians in Montana

Erik Striker has got to be the strangest person in this entire space These figures are just completely made up, I genuinely don’t know where he got them unless he’s grossly rounding down the White figure and rounding up the Jewish figure to make Rhodesia sound more ‘Jewish’ or whatever. Just shy of 300,000 Whites, 7,000 Jews (the majority left during independence) Cecil Rhodes was the driving force behind Rhodesia, not his subservient Jewish right hand man Alfred Beit (the hint is kind of in the name Rhodesia). Can he not imagine a world in which a White man is the main character, rather than a pawn in some nefarious Jewish scheme? ‘Rhodesia was specifically created to flood the White settlements of South Africa with African scab labour’ — what are we even saying? If anything you could say the opposite, they always sought to KEEP their cheap African labour and prevented them from going south (where the wages were better) Mining wasn’t even Rhodesia’s main industry (he thinks this because he’s only read Hobson who published Imperialism in 1902 and doesn’t know anything about Rhodesia), so what’s the critique here, people from England moved to Rhodesia after WW2 to become farmers? Hardly a get rich quick scheme, that all required building something from nothing Just a rambling series of lies to paint anything Anglo (be it American or British) as ‘Jewish’ because that’s like evil and nefarious o algo Jews themselves don’t claim anywhere near as much gentile history for themselves as striker does. If you listened to this guy you’d think Jews really were the master race and we’re all helpless pawns with no agency