Pinned Tweet
Great job by @SamTealeProduct for putting together my keynote showreel ๐๐ฝ
For more info and contact: pierslinney.com/
AI could be the greatest opportunity of our lifetime. Are we ready to seize it?
I joined @mattfrei on @LBC this morning to discuss why AI is going to transform the way we live, work and do business.
Yes, some jobs will disappear and many more will change. But AI also has the potential to unlock extraordinary advances in productivity, healthcare, innovation and economic growth.
The question isnโt whether AI will change the world. It will.
The question is how we make sure everyone benefits.
For the UK, that means embracing the opportunity, investing in skills and innovation, developing sovereign capability, and helping businesses of all sizes put AI to work.
We should approach this transformation with ambition, not fear.
Watch our discussion ๐๐ฝ
youtu.be/N-lNgyf-8KA?is=Qlb9โฆ
@goimplementai @Aalokyshukla
Piers Linney MBE retweeted
Former Dragons' Den investor @pierslinney, co-founder of @goimplementai, on "Putting AI to Work" at #TheBusinessShow London, 11-12 Nov at Excel London (Thu 12 Nov, 14:00). Free tickets: greatbritishbusinessshow.co.โฆ
Everyone assumes GPTs and LLMs are the future of AI, but what if they're not?
What if they are just the beginning of it?
Betamax was better technology. Kodak dominated photography. Cisco briefly became the most valuable company in the world because it powered the internet boom.
None ended up owning the future they helped create.
In my latest newsletter, I explore a question most people in AI are not asking loudly enough:
Are OpenAI and Anthropic building the final architecture of intelligenceโฆ or simply the first commercially useful interface to it?
The first dominant technology is rarely the final one.
AI may prove no different.
Read now: linkedin.com/pulse/llms-betaโฆ
You are welcome @elonmusk - โSpace TVโ is here! ๐๐ฝ
Moon content next?
Courtesy of @charlesblack
Give yourself an assistant, or give your EA an EA!
Get more done with Command.
Coming soon.
Learn more: yourimplementai.com/aios-comโฆ
@goimplementai @Aalokyshukla
Every so often you build or invest in something that permanently changes how you live or work.
Most products donโt. This one has.
AIOS Command has changed how I operate day to day.
Not because itโs another AI tool.
Because it gives me continuous operational awareness.
I now talk to my business instead of digging through systems.
Emails. Calls. CRM. Finance. Meetings. Tasks. AI agents.
Command sees across all of them at once and tells me:
โข what matters
โข whatโs stalled
โข what needs action
โข what Iโm missing
Then it helps do the work.
It has made me at least 2x more productive.
The strange reality is that I canโt imagine working without it now.
Most software stores information.
This changes awareness.
My own Jarvis.
Command is coming soon.
Learn more: yourimplementai.com/aios-comโฆ
Piers Linney MBE retweeted
๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ก๐ข๐ง๐, ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐๐.
Most businesses are not short of data, or human intelligence. What they are short of is connected intelligence.
The information is already there: emails, meetings, calls, CRM records, SOPs, finance systems, support tickets, documents, dashboards and peopleโs heads.
But it is fragmented. So people spend large parts of their day pulling reports, checking systems, preparing summaries, explaining what happened to colleagues and chasing what happens next.
That looks like work. But often, itโs just information retrieval, repairing and sharing.
Worse, when people leave, much of the real know-how leaves with them: the context, the exceptions, the relationships and the โthis is how things actually work hereโ knowledge.
That is the old operating model. Humans acting as the glue between disconnected systems.
AIOS is built for a different one.
AIOS Command: the leadership, insight and action layer. It reads across connected systems, retains memory, answers questions in plain English, drafts in the userโs voice and helps leaders take action. It does work.
AIOS Workforce: the digital worker platform. It lets organisations deploy and manage digital workers across all functions to do work using all communications channels, including voice.
Together, they form AIOS: one system for coordinating leaders, human resource and digital workers.
That is the transformation. Not AI as another tool, but AI as an operating layer for the organisation.
AIOS abstracts work from underlying software complexity, so leaders and teams do not have to navigate it. The systems stay. But the business gains an intelligence and action layer above them.
Users do not need to know how every platform works as the intelligence layer understands your objectives and can access the APIs. They can focus on asking better questions, making better decisions and triggering the right action.
This is not about replacing people. It is about changing the division of labour. Humans should focus on judgement, creativity, trust, relationships, exceptions, edge cases, and decisions under uncertainty.
Digital workers should handle scale, repetition, monitoring, analysis, follow-through and execution.
For a SME leader, AIOS creates leverage. For a corporate leadership team, it creates shared visibility. For a growing company, it adds capacity without scaling headcount in the old linear way.
Productivity and efficiency gains are first-order effects. The strategic effect is competitive advantage.
The companies that win with AI will not be the ones with the most tools. They will be the ones that organise intelligence best.
That is what AIOS makes possible. It is not about buying AI.
It's about organising intelligence.
Learn more: lnkd.in/eGbdN7Qu
@goimplementai @Aalokyshukla
๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ก๐ข๐ง๐, ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐๐.
Most businesses are not short of data, or human intelligence. What they are short of is connected intelligence.
The information is already there: emails, meetings, calls, CRM records, SOPs, finance systems, support tickets, documents, dashboards and peopleโs heads.
But it is fragmented. So people spend large parts of their day pulling reports, checking systems, preparing summaries, explaining what happened to colleagues and chasing what happens next.
That looks like work. But often, itโs just information retrieval, repairing and sharing.
Worse, when people leave, much of the real know-how leaves with them: the context, the exceptions, the relationships and the โthis is how things actually work hereโ knowledge.
That is the old operating model. Humans acting as the glue between disconnected systems.
AIOS is built for a different one.
AIOS Command: the leadership, insight and action layer. It reads across connected systems, retains memory, answers questions in plain English, drafts in the userโs voice and helps leaders take action. It does work.
AIOS Workforce: the digital worker platform. It lets organisations deploy and manage digital workers across all functions to do work using all communications channels, including voice.
Together, they form AIOS: one system for coordinating leaders, human resource and digital workers.
That is the transformation. Not AI as another tool, but AI as an operating layer for the organisation.
AIOS abstracts work from underlying software complexity, so leaders and teams do not have to navigate it. The systems stay. But the business gains an intelligence and action layer above them.
Users do not need to know how every platform works as the intelligence layer understands your objectives and can access the APIs. They can focus on asking better questions, making better decisions and triggering the right action.
This is not about replacing people. It is about changing the division of labour. Humans should focus on judgement, creativity, trust, relationships, exceptions, edge cases, and decisions under uncertainty.
Digital workers should handle scale, repetition, monitoring, analysis, follow-through and execution.
For a SME leader, AIOS creates leverage. For a corporate leadership team, it creates shared visibility. For a growing company, it adds capacity without scaling headcount in the old linear way.
Productivity and efficiency gains are first-order effects. The strategic effect is competitive advantage.
The companies that win with AI will not be the ones with the most tools. They will be the ones that organise intelligence best.
That is what AIOS makes possible. It is not about buying AI.
It's about organising intelligence.
Learn more: lnkd.in/eGbdN7Qu
@goimplementai @Aalokyshukla
Most software moats are disappearing.
The wrong question: โWhich AI tool should we use?โ
Thatโs procurement, not strategy.
The real question: what stays defensible when intelligence is cheap?
Itโs no longer features or models.
Read my latest newsletter edition: what moats actually look like in the AI era.
Read it here: linkedin.com/pulse/ai-moats-โฆ
@goimplementai @Aalokyshukla
S.170E Walkthrough with Gee Atherton | Our Full-Power EMTB Explained
youtu.be/iV3v97Qnp3s?si=HFmtโฆ
@atherton_bikes
Piers Linney MBE retweeted
AI is not just changing work. It is changing what work is.
The real shift is not that new tools are appearing.
It is that more and more work is moving from labour to capital.
That has consequences far beyond productivity:
โช๏ธ Who owns the capital, who captures the income, what happens to mass employment?
โช๏ธ What remains distinctively human when machines can do more of the output?
Read my latest newsletter on the deeper economics and human implications of that shift.
If human labour is no longer the default engine of production, what does that do to business models, tax systems, identity and opportunity?
Let me know where you think this goes next.
@goimplementai @Aalokyshukla
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/pulse/ai-shift-โฆ
Web: pierslinney.com/post/the-ai-โฆ
AI is not just changing work. It is changing what work is.
The real shift is not that new tools are appearing.
It is that more and more work is moving from labour to capital.
That has consequences far beyond productivity:
โช๏ธ Who owns the capital, who captures the income, what happens to mass employment?
โช๏ธ What remains distinctively human when machines can do more of the output?
Read my latest newsletter on the deeper economics and human implications of that shift.
If human labour is no longer the default engine of production, what does that do to business models, tax systems, identity and opportunity?
Let me know where you think this goes next.
@goimplementai @Aalokyshukla
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/pulse/ai-shift-โฆ
Web: pierslinney.com/post/the-ai-โฆ
When countries talk about AI leadership, the conversation often focuses on infrastructure, unicorn startups, and massive investments.
But what if the real competitive advantage isnโt building the biggest models but ensuring millions of businesses know how to implement AI?
Supporting SMEs with practical AI training and adoption could unlock enormous economic impact - potentially far beyond the value of a few large tech successes. This might cost ยฃ500 per business and several billion, but result in a far more material impact on productivity and GDP.
Because economic transformation rarely comes from technology alone.
It comes from widespread adoption.
๐ง Listen to the full episode on The @goimplementai Podcast with @KulveerRanger and my co-host Aalok Yashwant Shukla:
Apple: rebrand.ly/396d8f
Spotify: rebrand.ly/8c19a5
YouTube: rebrand.ly/ylnw6w0
#ImplementAIPodcast #AIAdoption #SMEs #FutureOfWork #EconomicGrowth #DigitalTransformation
I joined @mattfrei on @LBC this morning too discuss UK productivity, energy, the impact of AI, and how important it is to diffuse technology and innovation throughout the economy.
@goimplementai @Aalokyshukla
youtu.be/cCfCFuqszgY?si=BY-7โฆ
โWilliam and Catherine offer rare insight into royal honours at Windsor Castle.โ
aol.com/articles/william-catโฆ
Piers Linney MBE retweeted
David Sinclair's lab is using AI to build a pill that reverses aging for $100.
Right now, their gene therapy costs roughly $10 million to manufacture. It requires a direct injection into the target organ.
That's not going to work for 8 billion people.
So Sinclair's team made a breakthrough. They found that the three age-reversal genes aren't the only path to resetting cells.
They discovered CHEMICALS that do the same thing.
In mice, they can now give an animal a liquid โ not genes, not injections, a drink โ and rejuvenate tissues in 4 weeks.
Sinclair says it's now normal for his students to casually report: "We just rejuvenated the ear. We just rejuvenated the skin. We just cured ALS (motorneuron disease) in these animals."
He calls his lab "Willy Wonka's chocolate factory" because the discoveries blow him away every week.
But he wants one molecule that does everything. So they used AI to screen 8 BILLION candidates. They're now down to three molecules that work. And they're using AI to try to combine all three into one.
The gene therapy could cost over $100,000 per treatment. Sinclair's goal: "What if it could be $100 instead? That's what I'm working for. I want to democratize this technology so anyone even in Kenya can take these medicines."
They should know within a year or two if the molecules work in mice.
The gene therapy is the proof of concept.
The pill is the endgame.
โ @davidasinclair
David Sinclair said: "You can reverse aging by 75% in 6 weeksโฆ by reinstalling the "software" of the body so that it's young again."
This idea sprouted when he proved in his first experiment that you can accelerate aging in mice:
"We took two mice born on the same dayโsame age, same genetics. We 'scratched the CD' of one mouse, corrupting its software and accelerating its aging. The result was dramatic. One looked far older than its brother."
He believed if you can give aging, you can also take it away.
Tomorrow, I'll share his experiment on how he reversed aging in mice (and then Monkeys).
โ @davidasinclair
The Prince of Wales surprised me with a question about AI.
It didnโt relate to my citation. It was about our shared future.
After 25 years of work and commitment, I was honoured to be invested as an MBE at Windsor Castle, with my mother, partner and brother there to share the moment.
The recognition was for services to small business, entrepreneurship, investment, banking, diversity, and social mobility.
But the Prince of Wales chose to ask about the opportunities and risks of AI.
That matters.
AI has moved beyond a technical conversation. It is now firmly on the agenda of national leadership.
I shared my views:
AIโs evolution is inevitable.
What matters is alignment, capability, and adoption.
Every individual needs a working proficiency.
Every organisation needs a strategy, or it will fall behind.
My focus for the next chapter is clear: accelerating and supporting AI adoption across UK businesses.
๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ๐งโ๐ญ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐๐ซ๐ฌ - ๐ฒ๐๐ญ. ๐๐ญโ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐ฑ๐ญ ๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐.
For the past two years weโve been told that AI is about to wipe out millions of jobs.
The evidence so far suggests something more nuanced.
A new study lfrom Anthropic looking at real AI usage across occupations finds no measurable increase in unemployment in highly AI-exposed jobs since ChatGPT launched.
But that doesnโt mean nothing is happening.
The change is showing up somewhere else.
Instead of layoffs, the early signal is a recruitment slow down.
Among workers aged 22โ25, entry into AI-exposed professions has fallen by roughly 14% compared with pre-AI levels.
Companies arenโt firing people. Theyโre simply hiring fewer of them as the people they have are augmented and digital workers are deployed for growth and to increase capacity.
Thatโs exactly how most technological disruption begins. Not with mass unemployment, but with quiet changes in workforce demand.
The jobs currently most exposed are exactly the ones youโd expect:
โช๏ธProgrammers
โช๏ธCustomer service roles
โช๏ธData entry
โช๏ธFinancial analysts
โช๏ธMarket research
โช๏ธIT support
๐๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐: ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค. Reading, writing, coding, analysing and responding are the domains where AI already performs well.
Whatโs particularly interesting is who holds many of these roles. ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ก๐ข๐ ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐ฉ๐๐ข๐, ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ง ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ.
It appears that the early impact of AI is not on low-skilled labour. Itโs on white-collar knowledge work.
๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ก ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ: ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ-๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฒ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ.
Many occupations could theoretically see large portions of their tasks automated, yet actual usage still covers only a fraction of that potential today.
In simple terms: the technology already exists, but most organisations havenโt redesigned work around it.
That gap will not last forever.
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฅ๐จ๐๐ค ๐ฆ๐๐ฃ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ฌ. The ones that donโt will continue hiring humans to do work machines can already perform.
The labour market hasnโt been disrupted yet.
But the foundations are already shifting.
If you run a business today, the question is:
Are you redesigning work around AI or still hiring as if nothing has changed?
















