I am trying to stay sane in an increasingly insane world. 💖 If you would like to: https://xitter.cf/t.co/UBud0J6uhH
Joined April 2009
- Tweets58.1K
- Following10.2K
- Followers34.4K
- Likes316K
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
The Government receives ten times as much from a pint of beer as the pub landlord.
How is that fair?
How is that sustainable?
🍺 💷
@andyburnham | @Sacha_Lord
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
Megan Markle has proven to be just as despicable if not worse than I ever originally thought. I predicted (and dated) a tweet well before this vile news broke.
So, of course, I would NEVER defend a pedo. Except, is Thomas Markle even one? Where's the law or court involvement? This is all trial by media. I haven't even come on to talk about him instead I'm using his experience as an example of how the public and media and the powers that be can hang a man without even having law enforcement involved.
But moreso I am telling you now that I 100% believe this satanic bitch named Megan Markle has jumped on this to save her failed reputation and even worse, nothing adds up. If he is a pedo then let him hang but she has persecuted her own father without FACTS of his crimes or a charge or conviction to garner sympathy from the public to rehabilitate her reputation. She's a disease. A parasite. An infection.
The truthful proven facts are this
1. All 3 children of Thomas Markle prior to this allegation, have ALL said what an outstanding father he was. Well documented. Megan said "I owe everything to my daddy"
2. All the material found was in the son's house NOT the dad's. The branded boxes in press pictures were Philippines moving boxes which is odd because they'd just moved from Mexico!
3. The photographer who took these pathetic press pictures of the son leaning against the so called incriminating evidence you've all seen, is a ROYAL photographer. Funny that!
4. The ex wife who apparently sent the letter to the MET police was a raging abusive alcoholic who did not bring up her kids, Thomas markle did. Again, all documented prior to this allegation. Convenient she's now dead. Trustworthy source? I think not hence why the MET disregarded it.
5. Prince Harry went onto say in 2022 how HE felt responsible for the estrangement between his wife and her father, he felt it was sad because he was to blame. Fuck off! You don't say that if you know your father in law is a pedo. Megan apparently knew in 2018! Please!
Then there's all the obvious evidence. Look, he could be guilty but it is not for us to judge just yet. It is for the law. Look though how a narcissist bitch woman has made this about herself and kids she had to protect! Hold on bitch, you never had kids back then and also you've sat on this for 8 years! What about the kids in those videos or any child that was harmed? You stayed silent. I'm a bloody mens rights advocate and I would NOT stay silent over something like this if I knew this information for a fact. Well, that's my point, she knew nothing! No facts. Just a letter apparently, sent to her from her dad's ex wife who's unreliable at best.
The media, women and even men will hang you without a trial. Screw that. An 82 year old man with dementia is the topic of UK news blasted as a pedo. Guess where she's now gone?! Australia, to film Masterchef. To all aussies.. boycott the bitch and that programme.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
VINDICATION?!?! NOT EVEN CLOSE!!
This is a Markle family scandal, not a royal one, and anyone hailing it as a "thumping vindication" for Meghan has forgotten her entire record.
I made the case on The Mark Dolan Show alongside the great broadcaster Mark Dolan and top lawyer Marcus Johnstone 👇
The allegations against Thomas Markle are sickening. He denies them all, calling them "sick lies", and the authorities in the Philippines are investigating. If anything is proven, he deserves every ounce of condemnation coming his way.
Sympathy for any daughter in that position is natural. Vindication is something else entirely.
Her own statement has already had to be corrected. She said the claims reached the authorities in 2018. The Met says the letter arrived in January 2019 and was passed to the Sussexes' office for awareness, with nothing shared with any other police force. Her spokesman now calls it a "discrepancy of a few months".
And she has form. The Archbishop of Canterbury contradicted her "secret wedding" claim. She had to apologise to the Court of Appeal for forgetting she had authorised briefings to the authors of Finding Freedom. The NYPD reported no collisions, injuries or arrests after the New York "car chase".
None of this erases the Oprah interview, which aired while Prince Philip was still in hospital, or the Netflix series, or Harry's memoir. There has never been an apology for any of it. Andrew Neil nailed it: "It doesn't roll back everything she did in these appalling interviews, the Netflix documentary and so on."
Today the King flies to the Caribbean to lead the Commonwealth, doing his duty as he always has. Meghan is a PRIVATE CITIZEN, and the Markles' troubles belong to the Markles.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
In 1985 a doctor treating a young girl named Ariel Glaser asked a question that would uncover a family tragedy: Had she ever received a blood transfusion?
Her mother said no. The one who had received blood was her.
Four years earlier, in August 1981, Elizabeth Glaser had suffered a severe hemorrhage while giving birth to Ariel in Los Angeles.
Doctors saved her life with multiple transfusions, but the blood she received was contaminated with HIV. At the time the virus had not yet been identified, and blood donations were not tested for it.
Elizabeth went home with her daughter and began breastfeeding. No one knew she was infected.
In 1984 the couple’s second child, Jake, was born, and the family continued living without any suspicion of what had happened. Elizabeth’s husband was Paul Michael Glaser, the actor known worldwide as Detective Starsky on Starsky & Hutch. The truth surfaced only when Ariel became seriously ill. Tests confirmed that Elizabeth and both children had HIV.
Ariel had contracted it through breast milk; Jake had been infected during pregnancy. Paul tested negative.
The diagnosis was only the beginning. In the mid-1980s, AIDS research focused mainly on adults.
Infected children had far fewer treatment options, and available drugs were only beginning to be studied for pediatric use. Elizabeth sought out doctors, contacted researchers, and began pushing for children to be included in scientific efforts against the disease.
AZT was approved for adults in 1987, but getting suitable treatments for children remained extremely difficult. Ariel’s condition worsened. Elizabeth met with U.S. government officials and medical specialists to demand more research and better access to experimental drugs for pediatric patients.
On August 12, 1988, Ariel died of AIDS-related complications. She had just turned seven. That same year Elizabeth, together with her friends Susie Zeegen and Susan DeLaurentis, founded the Pediatric AIDS Foundation to fund research on pediatric HIV and promote treatments for affected children.
The organization also supported studies aimed at preventing mother-to-child transmission.
Elizabeth continued the work as her own health declined. She died on December 3, 1994, at the age of 47.
The foundation later took her name and expanded its programs to many countries. Her son Jake survived. Thanks to medical advances he has lived into adulthood with HIV and has taken part in the work of the organization his mother created.
One detail remains on the emblem of the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation: a garden filled with flowers, hearts, and a sun. Ariel drew it in 1988, the year she died.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
LGBTQ activist has a deer-in-headlights moment when Piers Morgan asks her to explain what “non-binary” actually means.
When she can’t, she calls it “uncomfortably personal.” Then Riley Gaines finishes her off.
PIERS MORGAN: “I just want to ask, what do you mean by non-binary?”
ACTIVIST: “Um when I say I’m non-binary, I’m expressing my identity in a way that I have the right to do.”
PIERS MORGAN: “What does that mean? There’s only one of you.”
ACTIVIST: “Actually, they/them has been the collective they has been used to refer to individual people for centuries and still is. So, um, I mean, if you don’t understand basic grammar, that’s on you.”
PIERS MORGAN: “I’ve got to be honest with you, I don’t understand the concept of what non-binary means… There’s one of you sitting here, and you look to me female. You’re a female?”
ACTIVIST: “If you don’t understand what non-binary means…”
PIERS MORGAN: “Are you a female?”
ACTIVIST: “…then I’m not sure you’re in a position to lead a debate…”
PIERS MORGAN: “But if you can’t explain it in simple language, then what’s the point?”
ACTIVIST: “I don’t think that I’m here to discuss the contents of my identity.”
PIERS MORGAN: “You raised this whole thing. I didn’t mention anything about what you were. You did.”
ACTIVIST: “This has really become uncomfortably personal.”
PIERS MORGAN: “Has it? You said it, not me…”
That’s when Riley Gaines dropped the hammer.
RILEY GAINES: “If you think this is uncomfortably personal, try undressing in a locker room with a 6’4 naked man.”
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
😂 Nick Ferrari bursts out laughing as Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds is forced to sell the latest government gimmick live on @LBC
Reynolds looked thoroughly embarrassed as he tried to sell the plan to scrap import tariffs on a list of “everyday essentials”.
When Ferrari asked him which products were included and what the actual savings would be, Reynolds immediately started dampening expectations, sheepishly admitting these were “not huge reductions” before reeling off the list: baked beans, chocolate, gherkins…
That’s as far as he got. Ferrari could not contain himself and burst out laughing. 😭
Nick then pointed out that the Conservatives have called the projected saving of £21 per year “derisory”.
You could see Reynolds was mortified reading it out. Imagine the brief he opened this morning and realised he had to go on air and sell this to the public. 😬
What a farce. Even on the government’s own figures, this works out at roughly 40p a week for the average household. Forty pence a week. You lucky people.
Another pointless gimmick that will have zero material impact on people’s lives.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
Dear @JohnHealey_MP , did you know that the State Pension pays £241 per week?
Your proposed new Minimum Wage pays £528 for 40 hours.
HOW THE FUCK DO YOU EXPECT WE PENSIONERS TO LIVE ON LESS THAN HALF THE MINIMUM WAGE?????
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
Rob Shutter
Meghan Markle spent more time trying to get Piers Morgan fired than seeking justice for her dad's victims.
BOOM.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
Andy Burnham said this morning that Brexit has been a bad thing economically…he lied :
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
Are journalists supposed to report the news, or manufacture a narrative to rehabilitate Meghan Markle’s image? And is The Sun working overtime to make sure we all get the memo?
Clemmie Moodie calls it a “thumping vindication.” The Telegraph pushes the “relief and vindication” angle. Camilla Tominey and Tim Stanley debate whether public opinion of Meghan should change. Jonny Dymond at the BBC discusses the vindication narrative, while Roya Nikkhah at The Sunday Times, Chris Ship at ITV and Matt Wilkinson at The Sun amplify the protective-letter narrative and the Met’s confirmation.
The message is unmistakable: we should now understand why Meghan cut contact with her father, and apparently that should change how we view everything else she has done.
But vindication of WHAT, exactly?
Whatever the truth of the allegations against Thomas Markle, which he denies and which remain under investigation, his situation is a separate family matter. If Meghan had reasons to protect her children, that is one issue. It does not erase seven years of public accusations, interviews, documentaries and grievances directed at the Royal Family.
For years, we were given a different account of the estrangement. There were the staged paparazzi photographs, the media cooperation and the private letter that became the subject of a privacy lawsuit. In the 2021 Oprah interview, Meghan spoke about having “lost” her father as part of the cost of becoming a royal. In the Netflix series, Harry said he shouldered the blame because “if Meg wasn’t with me, then her dad would still be her dad.”
Those were the explanations presented to the public.
Now, with new allegations emerging, we are being served a fresh narrative of maternal protection and long-overdue vindication. So why are journalists not pressing harder on the timeline, the earlier explanations and what the public was told at the time?
And why is The Sun working overtime to push this story from allegations against Thomas Markle into a broader rehabilitation of Meghan’s image? Reporting the developments is one thing. Turning them into a redemption arc is quite another.
There is also an uncomfortable question surrounding Meghan’s public advocacy for children’s safety and online privacy. If she was aware of serious allegations involving children from 2018 onwards, how does that timeline sit alongside her public campaigning? That is a legitimate question, not an accusation of wrongdoing.
Most importantly, what does any of this have to do with her treatment of the Royal Family?
The Oprah interview still happened. The Netflix series still happened. The public accusations, the repeated airing of private grievances and the damage to family relationships do not disappear because a disturbing new story has emerged about her father.
You can sympathise with a family estrangement without absolving someone of everything else. You can take allegations seriously without pretending every criticism of Meghan was unjustified.
The journalists pushing this vindication narrative need to explain why a private family matter is being used to reassess an entirely separate public record.
Meghan’s relationship with her father does not rewrite the last eight years. And it certainly does not give her a clean slate.
Sympathy is not vindication. Stop confusing the two.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
Talking to my SIL, a detective in AFP, who specialises in cyber crime, he mentioned 4 things.
1. LG changed their phone chargers regularly, and we know we are talking about a phone that is minimum 10 years old, because that’s when TMJ first mentioned it.
2. An LG phone could not back up pics to the cloud.
3. Which Phone carrier did TMSr have in the Philippines ?
4. They can just pull the records and know when that phone has been accessed.
See if the dates match this time around.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
In the book, Meghan: A Hollywood Princess, royal biographer Andrew Morton notes that Samantha and Thomas Jr relocated back to Los Angeles to live with their father and his new partner (and future wife) Doria Ragland before Meghan was born. They would have only been young teenagers at the time.
So, Meghan Markle would have us believe that their mother, Roslyn Loveless, who raised them until their early teens following her divorce from Thomas Markle Sr, sent them back to live with the man who she believed to be a child abuser??
And that in 2019, after waiting another almost 40 years, she wrote a letter to the UK Met Police alerting them to these concerns? Not the FBI, not the US authorities - the UK Met Police who initially claimed they couldn’t find the letter?
Nope 👎
@TheRoyalGrift @insiderlauren @MeghansMole
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
Hi everyone. I'm missing lots of friends since I had to open a new account.
Can you please pass this message on? I don't want anyone to think I'm ignoring them. Thanks, L xxxx
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
I have recently read a small article by a female reporter who is now saying perhaps we have all misjudged Mrs Dumbarton.
If her father is guilty and we don’t know this yet, what on earth does that have to do with all the vile things this odious woman has said and done over the last few years.
Her father’s actions are nothing to do with her actions and she can’t be given a pass for all the things she has done.
Nothing has changed in regard to her.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
Oh dear me I’ve upset the squad 😂😂 inbox is full. She previously said IF YOU ARE SILENT YOU ARE COMPLICIT. if the accusation about her father is true and her knowing for 8 years according to her statement today. How many children have been harmed with her silence.
Princess Pinocchio 🇬🇧🏴 retweeted
HARRY: TAKE NOTE: THIS is how a REAL prince does a chat show!!
One brother goes on television to champion a global issue. The other never sits on a sofa without making it all about himself.
Last night Prince William became the first royal ever to take a seat on Graham Norton's famous red sofa, and what a brilliant move by the future King it was. The studio audience gasped and cheered as he walked out to join Cate Blanchett, Hannah Waddingham and Robert Irwin, all long-time champions of his Earthshot Prize, for a special edition that airs tonight on BBC One.
He came to talk about the prize, and explained that years of environmental "negativity and doom" had got him down, so he decided "we could do something more powerful and more optimistic" with an awards ceremony that could "talk about urgency and optimism together". This is a mature, focused man who looks outward and sets goals he means to reach: five Earthshots, £1 million for each winner, a personal commitment to the prize until 2030, and next month he will be in Mumbai handing out the awards.
And he was so clearly enjoying himself. He finished the night warm, relaxed and engaging, by every account — without a trace of self-pity.
Consider the manchild. Harry's offering this month has been a MasterClass, Redefining Grief, followed by a GQ interview in which he complained that "some people don't want it to work out", a line his own spokesman then had to insist was "absolutely not intended as a swipe" at his brother. The word salad minister seems able to think only in the simplest terms, and mostly about Harry. Even now he has moved back to Britain, the whinging is CONSTANT.
William is getting on with his life and giving everything he can. Harry, meanwhile, is reportedly sounding out Diana's friends and family about a documentary to mark the 30th anniversary of her death next August. Nothing is confirmed, but mark my words: the man baby will try to make his next few quid out of his mother's memory. Deep down he knows he is irrelevant with nothing left to offer, and the ghastly narcissist he married is loathed globally and will never be accepted by the great British public.
The future King will be laughing on Graham Norton's sofa tonight, engaging the world on a cause larger than himself. His brother will still be selling his grief by subscription.
