Always outspoken, sometimes right. Troublemaker. ♂ https://xitter.gq/t.co/foydVt3Jo0
Hell, Michigan
Joined November 2025
- Tweets178
- Following158
- Followers535
- Likes6.7K
Pinned Tweet
I've received a Polymarket Perps invite code to give out, good for the next 15 signups only:
polymarket.com/perps?c=00f7p…
Good luck and have fun :)
1
9
1,171
Suhail has announced refunds for anyone who incurred a loss from this.
This is how you take care of your users.
Great work rectifying this situation. Mistakes are unavoidably going to happen. This was handled well.
POLYMARKET SUPERDUPERULTRAHYPERMEGACYCLE
They made the correct decision here with the clari. But updating the rules with no announcement and leaving the old UI behind is inexcusable. Losses should be refunded. Now that we have fees, it should be less than their daily revenue. Counting on @Polymarket to make it right.
1
8
338
They made the correct decision here with the clari. But updating the rules with no announcement and leaving the old UI behind is inexcusable. Losses should be refunded. Now that we have fees, it should be less than their daily revenue. Counting on @Polymarket to make it right.
Something particularly nasty and extremely disappointing happened on @Polymarket today.
The long-standing BTC daily markers has their rules changed with a sneak edit and absolutely zero warning, while the site UI still showed business as usual.
(1/2)
1/?
My posts here are 90% whinging but I have to give credit where it is due. I'm seeing a massive improvement in speediness and regularity of clarifications from @Polymarket. All of the clarifications from the Bel era have been good, with a couple possible exceptions.
Sleeping Beauty Problem?
50%Thirder
0%Halfer
0%Double halfer
50%No fact of the matter &c
2 votes • Final results 1
120
DUMFUQ SAYLOR BUYS >100k BTC, SELLS <65k BTC, DECLARES VICTORY
Michael Saylor continues to DECRAP Strategy's balance sheet.
Question is:
What's left after all the Bitcoin is sold?
$MSTR
1
9
585
Anyone complaining about this, and the journalists platforming such complaints, are serious serious losers with no life.
How in the world is that different from betting for or against a biotech stock?
Capital markets make those drugs possible. Millions are ALREADY made or lost on drug trial results based on equity market swings. Anyone could be insider trading those ALREADY.
Ignorant dipshits.
3
398
An old tale of how a crypto price market was scammed for a 100x, against the crystal-clear rules and resolution source, via @UMAprotocol.
UMA was always a disaster; it's just gotten worse.
#DecoupleUMA
My experience with the worst cryptocurrency I've ever used @UMAprotocol. I discourage people from partnering with them. It doesn't incentivize truthful resolutions, just voting with whales. It has no use as an oracle and appears pretty useless. docs.google.com/document/d/1…
6
971
Leaving UMA in charge of literally any market resolution whatsoever is like letting a group of rambunctious 9-year-old children in the back of a car steer from the passengers' seats with one of those long robot claw grabber arms. They cannot be trusted with any decision.
Clarify everything.
Whenever I read a mainstream news article on anything I have anything remotely approaching expertise on it gives me the howling fantods for how horribly they must be misinforming me when they write about things I don't know anything about. There's always flaws, either subtle little imprecisions or laughably wrong and huge confusions.
Absolutely horrendous article by @Bloomberg here, a travesty of an article.
@denitsa_tsekova @Leonardonclt the wallet you are talking about belongs to a well known trader. There is nothing suspicious about these trades.
This was a pretty bad decision.
Perhaps they clarified in this direction because of a previous (refunded) clarification, and perhaps the intent of the rule was for if the district got merged into another or ceased to exist or something before the primary was held, with the spirit of the market being who advanced.
But a reasonable person could also interpret the clause to be intended for if something exactly like this happened. It's a primary market, not a "who advances" market.
To make matters even worse, they didn't even clear the books! People were fastclicked for shares.
Clearly a very lazy, sloppy clarification. They've promised to refund anyone "materially effected" [sic] by the clarification. This SHOULD mean anyone who lost money on it, but it's unclear if what they meant was anyone who got fastclicked. As always, it seems impossible for the Polymarket team to communicate clearly.
Personally, I think they should not just refund but pay everyone out at a dollar.
What a shitshow.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Why's he kinda cute tho...
Had a chance to catch up with @DanMarino at the White House today. He is really passionate about Making America Healthy Again and finding ways to promote a culture of wellness across the federal workforce.
1
2
429
