The Prop Journalist retweeted
📢 Important clarification regarding our program timeline and transition.
Please read the full announcement below.
4-6 months to receive the old program is very disappointing. Given the past delays, it could be expected to take longer.
Not to mention there are still people who submitted the claims form with no response yet.
I want the best for MFF, but improvements need to be made.
📩 Rollout Stage Confirmation
Confirmation emails containing your schedule and required action items have been sent out.
Please review the new Evolution Program details on our website and select your Rollout Program.
📌 Note: All dates are tentative and subject to change due to unforeseen circumstances.
Missing your email? Contact us at [email protected].
Intraday trailing drawdown.
Please stop wasting our time.
Meet the fourth drop from FundedNext Labs!
FNL:004 | CFDs 50K Instant Account is here for just $149.99.
✅ No Daily Loss Limit
✅ $2,000 Max Loss Limit
✅ Intraday Trailing Drawdown
✅ 20% Perpetual Consistency Rule
✅ No Risk Rule
✅ 80% Performance Reward Share
News trading is subject to the News Reward Share Rule.
Max allocation is 5 purchases per user.
Limited Time. Limited Seats.
I'm seeing a significant number of denials from @AlphaCapitalUK
Including from reputable traders who have no issues at other firms.
I would now, more than ever, recommend to avoid the firm.
I made $20k and $7k in profits on funded accounts with Alpha Capital Group.
I can no longer access my accounts because I have already been banned. However, even the 2–3 funded accounts I recently got disqualified from had generated an average profit of around $10k each.
If you have the skills to generate substantial profits, Alpha Capital Group may refuse to pay you based on rule violations you are not even aware of.
FundingPips has discontinued the transition to Prime, so I intend to return to FundingPips. They do not ban traders for allegedly violating rules that they did not actually break just because those traders have made substantial profits.
Alpha Capital Group continues to remain silent and has failed to conduct further investigations or issue payments to many traders.
@fundingpips
@AlphaCapitalUK
The Prop Journalist retweeted
If you say "We win when you win," explain this?
Lanto blew through 819 accounts (average static drawdown of 1k)
That means you lost $819,000 before he hit it big for $488,00, you are still net negative for over $300k.
Please stop treating this community like we are stupid!
Great video, I find it interesting how there has been no response to quite reasonable questions.
I understand wanting to avoid others copying, but huge claims need at least a little explanation to be convincing.
For all associated with Vest, you might want to double check their founder’s claims:
youtu.be/U7kSu1pt6Fc
Interesting. Many questions PW had that Vest couldn't answer.
At the same time Vest was added to Prop Firm Match. Were they satisfied with Vest's transparency, or just turning a blind eye for commissions?
I had a meeting with @VestExchange and they said they are still researching the STONK and LANTO Debacle.
I made it very clear I will no longer promote VEST and their product after many questions that I had that they cannot answer.
There is ZERO chance they are A booking like they claim. It won’t be a question of if but when they will run into liquidity issues.
I had been in Lanto’s Discord from early 2023 until earlier this year. I defended him from naysayers in the group and on X, distilled his content into guides early on, and built the chatbot that new members used. This weekend’s fiasco confirmed conclusively what OGs had been flagging for some time.
Fintwit prop firm influencers are “successful” through survivorship bias and volume, not edge.
Buy enough independent attempts and pure luck eventually produces large winners, even when the underlying approach has little or no positive expected value once net on the portfolio is established. Those big runs are the ones that the public gets to see. The average guy in the audience is running 2, 4, maybe 5 accounts on average while paying discord fees to "learn how to trade"
Recent public examples among many in the fintwit affiliate and influencer space:
@dhesi_trades - 170+ accounts
@thebrianstonk - 240+ accounts
@lanto_trades - 819+ accounts
5-6 in eval or S2F fees on just one firm.
Eventually something hits. The run gets screenshotted and turned into content that's used for the next 10 months of promotions for the group, or pushed in promo videos encouraging use of an affiliate code. The costs typically don't see the light of day. Screenshots get cropped (usually), account numbers are hidden, the actual PNL on the machine is kept private.
The machine:
1. subscription fees, course sales, and affiliate commissions fund more accounts
2. more accounts make a big winner close to inevitable
3. the big runs, sell more subscriptions, courses, and garner more aff code use
Repeat.
The prop firm space is inherently dirty, relies on ponzinomics, and is unfixable; it's by design.
But the affiliate and furu space - that props implicitly encourage - is dirtier.
Fresh cash from courses, subs, and affiliate payouts keeps the account volume flowing so the occasional big payouts can be marketed as a skill taught to their followers.
The trading can lose money, but the machine still wins, because the audience pays for step 2 of the machine.
Now look at what's sold. Courses, discord subs, mentorships, and an implied promise to teach a skill to escape the rat race.
Learn this IFVG. Take this unicorn. Manage your risk. Trade the system. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and use code DUMB.
The average member can't play the volume game and nobody tells them that is in fact their mentor's game.
I left for three reasons: the quality of members in the group declined after the TPT run-up and subsequent repeat promotions leveraging that run, OGs who asked questions were treated poorly, and some kept raising exactly the disclosure issues that surfaced this weekend.
Buy enough attempts.
Hide or minimize the cost.
Market the winners as skill.
Accept money from people who cannot realistically replicate the process.
You can pick whatever word or phrase you want for this machine that is pervasive in this "industry."
Mine is "fraud."
Guys I think Darius might have $1.5 million in verified payouts...
Thanks for the quality varied content IQ Capital.
So he was down -$330k before he hit a big payout?
All to get a 16% return on spend.
If someone was flexing a $11.6k payout on $10k spend it would be a joke.
But because he can churn accounts to eventually get a big net profit people will actually defend him.
Payout received.
After expenses, total net home take around is +$53,000.
Total accounts currently: 819.
The plan is to build on this moving forward, and showing it all.
I will be giving away $10,000 in Prop Firm Accounts. Simply comment what your favorite firm is, and why. You will then be entered.
This is not an apology give away, this is me just simply giving back.
The Prop Journalist retweeted
The Vest team has reviewed the recent posts and will be enforcing an affiliate ban for Lanto. Under our guidelines, earned commissions will be paid but Lanto is no longer eligible to receive commissions going forward. We appreciate the cooperation from @thebrianstonk in enforcing this via their shared entity code.
Head Intern here.
Vest does not and will not share any individual's private account information, including their spend, with anyone unless approved by the individual.
In the post linked here: xitter.cf/VestExchange/status/21…, our team verified that the PNL had not been altered in the image. The image and the quoted tweet did not make any representations to the individual's spend and as such, the QRT was not an endorsement of any other statements, representations, or claims made by the individual.
We apologize that our Intern's Intern's post was not clearer.
The account name change function is intended to be a quality of life tool for traders to track their various accounts, and we are aware that there is room for misrepresentation. Our UI/UX team is currently working through changes to prevent this going forward.
We are aware of the discussion around @lanto_trades. Our expectation is that affiliates conduct themselves in a way that is honest and community-centric. Upon request, Vest has provided his account spend data and our current understanding is that he is working on correcting the public record.
Our team is monitoring the situation and will enforce accordingly.
Telling someone you're more profitable than you are is deception, not clout chasing.
Especially if you are selling a mentorship.
The Prop Journalist retweeted
Update: @lanto_trades has his dannystrades moment.
He's not on account #42. He's on account #819.
Quick posted and deleted by Lanto.
This is fraud. Shame on Lanto and all those who enable him.
I would like to see @VestExchange take a hard look at these edited Account Number videos/screenshots. Boot influencers who are deceiving the customerbase. Other firms would do that.
🚨PSA: Don’t fall for this furu bullshit.
Huge profits. Huge payouts. Problem is the spend behind them is often obfuscated. Influencers are changing the account names that show how many accounts they've burned through. Typically they just hide the number. This time they are actively changing the account name.
On Vest, every account is numbered, so your 5th account shows up as “Account 5” with a 5 in the icon next to it. There’s also an edit button that lets a trader change the account name, and once it’s edited, the icon shows an “A” instead of the real number, even if the new name still reads like a regular account number.
Most people scrolling past an influencer’s screenshot would never notice that “A.” And if every account already comes named with its number, why would anyone edit the name just to make it look like another account number? Is that the actual account number? Doubtful.
Below is a screenshot from @lanto_trades with edited account names. Not unexpected.
🧵
The Prop Journalist retweeted
🚨PSA: Don’t fall for this furu bullshit.
Huge profits. Huge payouts. Problem is the spend behind them is often obfuscated. Influencers are changing the account names that show how many accounts they've burned through. Typically they just hide the number. This time they are actively changing the account name.
On Vest, every account is numbered, so your 5th account shows up as “Account 5” with a 5 in the icon next to it. There’s also an edit button that lets a trader change the account name, and once it’s edited, the icon shows an “A” instead of the real number, even if the new name still reads like a regular account number.
Most people scrolling past an influencer’s screenshot would never notice that “A.” And if every account already comes named with its number, why would anyone edit the name just to make it look like another account number? Is that the actual account number? Doubtful.
Below is a screenshot from @lanto_trades with edited account names. Not unexpected.
🧵
The Prop Journalist retweeted
Replying to @AlphaCapitalUK
@AlphaCapitalUK denied a payout of approximately $7,000, citing shared trading devices as the reason.
There is no benefit whatsoever for traders to share devices.
Alpha Capital Group offers discounts or lowers the prices of its consistency models to encourage traders to use them. However, I would advise against using the consistency model at Alpha Capital Group because larger payout requests may increase the risk of being denied.
Only a small number of traders request payouts worth several thousand dollars or five figures. As a result, even when firms deny such payouts, the number of people speaking out is very limited. Their complaints are drowned out by the numerous reports of traders successfully receiving payouts of a few hundred or $1,000.
Furthermore, by making large payouts only to influencers or a select group of traders, firms can reduce the reach and credibility of complaints about denied payouts.
You should avoid firms that fabricate reasons to expel traders.
I have made profits with many firms and have also been banned by many of them.
@fundingpips forced me to transition to its Prime program.
@FundedNext reduced my maximum allocation from $25K–$50K and introduced additional restrictions, including a 1% limit and restrictions around news events.
I received payouts totaling $50K–$60K from these two firms. Although they imposed restrictions on me, they did not fabricate allegations of rule violations. I now understand that they made honest and balanced decisions.
@BlueberryFunded and @TheTradingPit_ , on the other hand, canceled all my profits and suspended and banned my accounts, which had been funded with hundreds of thousands of dollars, claiming that I had violated their rules without providing sufficient explanations.
Alpha Capital Group has yet to decide which approach it will take.
However, I urge anyone considering using these firms to think carefully about the risks involved.
@AlphaCapitalUK
@PropFirmMatch
The @MyFundedFutures Studio is discounted at its lowest ever prices - for today only!
5% off with code TPJ
$5k: $71.25
$10k: $133
$25k: $266
The Prop Journalist retweeted
We've officially paid out over $1,000,000 to MyFundedPerps traders.
To celebrate, we're giving away $1,000,000 in accounts.
To enter:
1. Follow @MyFundedPerps
2. Like + retweet
3. Enter here: myfundedperpetuals.com/rewar…
Ends in 24 hours.
The Prop Journalist retweeted
For MFF 1 and 2 step - the challenge is the challenge.
After that:
- on demand any time payouts (swept end of day) but funds removed from account at request immediately.
- no gut kicking rules other than no weekend holding (this is gap risk aversion due to data processing/real trades)
- Your success matters, commission charged earns you points. These points can be used to scale your Drawdown as well as your account size (30% at a time) up to 1million.
- More success upgrades coming in the future (leverage increase is being explored now but the data suggests its a negative for traders).
- If you fail your funded (which we genuinely hope you don't) your points will be turned into discounts/free accounts depending on how many you have accumulated over time. So customers who have had a lot of success on funded but unfortunately lost the account may end up having a free retry depending on the situation of the account. The goal is to keep the profitable guys in the system so we continue collecting their data and producing profit from it.
Not going to go into the whole your success matters part, industry has tainted those words and the proof will be in the pudding in this case. If you have suggestions that are functionally better and statistically better to increase trader profitability I welcome them and would love to build them if they are practical.
Its different, and we understand that - but having no conflict with the traders is extremely important. Also, if you want to run your account up to 1 million, by all means - I will happily live stream myself with pompoms as you do it.
We are preparing to add account lockout functions as well after final testing so users can control their discipline via lockouts (like futures has).





























