Free SEO, AEO and GEO audit. Paste a URL. Get scored in seconds.

Joined September 2024
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Google just published its official guide for AI Search. What they say to ignore: - llms.txt: useless for Google - Content “chunking”: useless - AI-specific structured data: useless - Artificial mentions: detected, penalized What still matters: non-commodity content, a crawlable site, clean technical structure. AEO and GEO = SEO. Google says it straight.
1
26
🤖 Made with AI
This GPT Image 2 prompt is going insanely viral right now. “Redraw the attached image in the most clumsy, scribbly, and utterly pathetic way possible. Use a white background, and make it look like it was drawn in MS Paint with a mouse. It should be vaguely similar but also not really, kind of matching but also off in a confusing, awkward way, with that low-quality pixel-by-pixel feel that really emphasizes how ridiculously bad it is. Actually, you know what, whatever, just draw it however you want.”
3
48
Replying to @TheCryptomath
Thank you @TheCryptomath for the test and the feedback. Glad it worked well and that you gained nearly 2 points with the quick improvements suggested in the free test. Next goal -> 10/10
1
1
22
Replying to @pcshipp
TL;DR You’re not doing it wrong. The game changed. Ranking is harder because ranking is no longer enough. Try this on your homepage. You’ll instantly see if AI can actually use or cite your content. querylantern.com
1
12
ChatGPT cites websites every day. Not yours. Classic SEO alone won't get you cited by AI. QueryLantern audits your site across 3 layers. SEO for Google. AEO for answer engines. GEO for ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. Free in seconds. No sign-up. querylantern.com
3
1
7
474
Quick wins surfaced immediately. • Stronger standalone paragraphs. • More factual detail. • Clearer structured data signals. That is often where the GEO layer starts to separate from the SEO base.
1
34
🏮 @linear scores 8.0/10 on QueryLantern. SEO - very strong. AEO - solid. GEO - room to grow. The interesting part is not the overall score. It is how uneven the layers are. That gap is getting harder to ignore.
1
5
127
Your site might still rank well.
But that doesn’t mean it’s visible where attention is shifting. Test it here.
querylantern.com In 2 seconds, you’ll see if AI understands your site…
or if it’s already citing your competitors instead.
2
34
Real example. An e-commerce site with a GEO score of 2/10. After 3 simple fixes -> 9/10. No full rebuild needed.
Just writing for AI, not only for SERPs.
1
2
49
The surprising part. Most founders and agencies have no idea how weak their AEO and GEO visibility really is. That’s exactly the problem QueryLantern solves. A free audit in just a few seconds.
No signup.
SEO + AEO + GEO score with instant quick wins.
1
1
18
Mistake #3 Weak internal linking prevents AI from understanding your site. It sees pages.
Not a system.
Not a coherent expertise. Result.
Your authority may exist.
But it’s neither understood nor surfaced.
1
1
28
Mistake #2 No usable structure = almost no citations. No meaningful schema.
No logical FAQ.
No fast-answer blocks. We’ve seen sites ranking #1 on Google with a GEO score of 1/10. Visible in search.
Invisible in AI.
1
1
38
Mistake #1 Your content is still written for Google.
Not for answer engines. AI wants clear, direct, well-structured answers that are easy to extract and cite. Not bloated SEO content from 2018.
1
1
36
In 2026, most websites are still nearly invisible inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini… This week, we audited around 100 websites. Result.
70% had a GEO score below 5/10. Their content exists.
But AI almost never uses it. Want to check yours in seconds ⬇️
For a long time, auditing a page meant answering one question. Can it be found? Today, that is no longer enough. A page can rank, be technically sound, and still be weak on AEO, GEO, and AI visibility. That is exactly why QueryLantern exists. Free. No sign-up. Link in bio.
1
3
674
Replying to @neilpatel
These numbers will age well. The B2B/B2C gap makes sense. Higher ticket, longer cycle, more leverage when the right page gets cited. But getting cited is step 1. The real work is knowing which pages actually get cited, and why yours do not. Exactly what QueryLantern measures.
8
Replying to @CoinMarketCap
All that's left is an AEO update 🏮
1
12
Quick example. Notion scores 8.2/10 on QueryLantern. SEO is strong. AEO is the weaker layer. That is exactly the kind of gap the tool is built to surface.
3
50
For a long time, auditing a page meant answering one question. Can it be found? Today, that is no longer enough. A page can rank, be technically sound, and still be weak on AEO, GEO, and AI visibility. That is exactly why QueryLantern exists. Free. No sign-up. Link in bio.
1
1
1
7
877