Question The Trinity

What you are promoting is modalism, not classic Trinitarianism.

The church literally teaches Jesus is not the source because his Father caused his existence. Generation is causal.

So modalism?

Worthy are you, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they existed and were created.

The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God. Never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name.

I will confess his name before my Father and before his angels

The words of him who has the seven spirits of God and the seven stars

This is modalism…

The one who conquers and who keeps my works until the end, to him I will give authority over the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron, as when earthen pots are broken in pieces, even as I myself have received authority from my Father.

In Trinitarian theology, the Son both died and was immortal simultaneously. So we really have to say a small part of him died, but the person never died.

The fact that the New Testament never once says the one God is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit should be quite alarming to a Trinitarian. Yet most are not alarmed. Why?

“His” who? Certainly not the Son…

Sure. But Trinitarians must use words like “triune God” because the NT never uses theos to describe this “triune God”. So I think saying something like “Unitarian God” is unnecessary because God in the NT is simply always referring to one person.

“Mere man” is not NT teaching. “Fully and glorified man” is NT teaching. Man apart from God cannot save. God through a sinless man can save.

Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen.

Well, yes. He would also be alone, something a group of Gods cannot be.

What is a principle of divine oneness and such? The NT just says the one God is the Father over and over. No teaching of a shared single nature.

I don’t see how claiming Peter calls Jesus “our God” helps the Trinitarian. Jesus clearly not the Trinity or the Father, so you are left with two Gods. Our God number 1 Our God number 2

You just keep hammering away at this false dichotomy. God saves through the man Jesus. Have you read the NT?

No Marcionite here. I am glad everyone in the NT era knew the OT so well that they did not miss any of its clear teachings.