Rich (@RJSHutton) header
Rich (@RJSHutton) profile picture

It's a beautiful world we live in - a sweet romantic place.

Hull
Joined January 2015
Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)Photo by Rich (@RJSHutton)
I think losing your mind and murdering innocent people is bad, personally. But hey, we're all different. xitter.gq/Cmnd_V/status/21167633…
Everyone's finally realizing that the Jedi were evil in 2026 but I figured it out in 2005 when I watched ROTS and walked out thinking Anakin was right Anakin 'turned evil' because he: -loved his mom -loved his wife -was stronger than the whole Council -noticed the system was corrupt and broken The Jedi knew he was the Chosen One and still wouldn't make him a Master, because he was better than them The Jedi: 'We can't punish the Sand People, Anakin. With midichlorian counts that low, they didn't know what they were doing.' 
Anakin: 'Then I'll take care of it myself.' And the Empire? It ended the war, kept order, and ran on merit instead of a Council that took 1,000 years to do nothing He did nothing wrong He just did what the Council was too weak to do Order 66 wasn't a betrayal. It was a performance review Long live the Empire
28
The point of conflict between Corbyn and Laura Kuenssberg was her asking him a leading question about the terrorist attack on Paris in 2015, and then misrepresenting his answer - implying that he opposed police use of lethal force in any circumstance.
1
1
164
I don't think the response to all of that was especially intelligent, and it doesn't alter the fact that Corbyn was (and still is) quite gallingly inept at media communications. But I'm pretty sure that is all it was really about.
1
30
I'm sure somebody suggested that Corbyn's answer about STK was derived from the Troubles, but what he had in mind was the police shooting Jean Charles De Menezes - which none of the vitriolic reactions to him acknowledged. Anyway: independent.co.uk/voices/com…
21
Britain's Parliament and Monarchy were directly involved in regulating and profiteering from the slave trade. You don't need to look far for the information on this: heritagecollections.parliame… xitter.gq/DanielJHannan/status/2…
A formal apology for what? What was the British state’s involvement with the slave trade? Only that we ended it.
1
67
Who do we think ran the Royal African Company? xitter.gq/DanielJHannan/status/2…
Replying to @MichaelRosenYes
The British state did not enslave anyone. Unlike many African kingdoms. And, yes, I have read a great deal of the economic history of the period. If you want to learn why the idea that slavery funded industrialisation is false, come and listen to Doug Stokes at the IEA today.
1
30
Britain didn't abolish slavery, it put an end to some aspects of the slave trade in 1807, then banned British people from owning slaves in 1833. It did not end slavery in Africa, which continues in the present day - e.g. in DR Congo. xitter.gq/linmeitalks/status/211…
If Britain didn’t abolish slavery, West African countries would be selling slaves till this day…. I see the way they often treat their house boys or girls and beat them, I see how they sell out their own family members to bandits by having them kidnapped when they visit from the UK or America.
18
Leaving aside the fact that human beings are at the centre of this, all it means is that there will be fewer care-workers for British people who are elderly/disabled, when the care industry is already overstretched. xitter.gq/Jon4HighPeak/status/21…
With clowns to the left of us and jokers to the right, @ShabanaMahmood ‘s reforms look to be pitch perfect. In the national interest without being blinded by dogma. Strong borders and a strong economy.
41
Shocking. Absolutely shocking. Never thought I would live to see the day when somebody involved with the Labour Party had a conscience and some principles. Worrying times for us all. xitter.gq/SabriSun_Miller/status…
1
78
A claim which would later be laughed out of court, leaving Lewis, Blumenthal, along with Heidi Bachram and the Campaign Against Antisemitism discredited - not that anybody cared: judiciary.uk/wp-content/uplo…
1
46
Isn't it interesting how there were no consequences of any kind for the people involved, and the journalists in question simply moved onwards and upwards?
29
There isn't an equivalence between the trans-Atlantic slave trade and Britain's rule over Ireland, and it's false to claim that the death-rate of Irish people on ships was worse than it was for Black slaves. xitter.gq/begoniatulip/status/21…
Replying to @nelsabbey
Hey Nels - do you know what the British did in Ireland for 500 years. The British burned my great grand parents house down in Ireland and they had 4 small children. The death rate of Irish on ships to America was 3 times greater than black slave ships. We just get on with it. 🙄
5
64
People may also want to look up who was burning Irish houses a century ago, and question whether conservative and nationalist narratives about history are quite as straightforward as either imagine.
1
29
The sex industry is rife with exploitation and abusive behaviour, but if people really wanted to stop that they would support better working rights and protections, not censorious legislation guaranteed to make life worse for people.
1
1
56
I can't link to various threads that professional sex-workers have posted on this theme, because I have to submit to online social media checks and it might get slightly awkward. But they make the point very vividly, suffice to say.
28
What does that have to do with the military occupation and settlement of the West Bank? Or the blockade and genocide of Gaza? All of which Britain's governments have facilitated. xitter.gq/BellaSankey/status/211…
Oh Rachel 🤦🏽‍♀️ stop digging. Your toxic motion didn’t criticise the actions of the Israeli Government, it ruled out the Jewish right to self-determination. It’s antisemitic. And until you can find the moral fibre to sort it out you are whistling into the wind.
1
2
118
Because if the answer is nothing, then it's very obvious how dishonest these people are being.
1
37
This actually does demonstrate why giving the motion its sensationalist title was such a bad idea. Instead of focusing on the concrete political reality of Israeli state policy, bad faith actors have derailed the subject completely onto an abstract debate about ideology.
28