゚゚・。・゚゚。 ゚。 🥀 ••• 🥀 ゚・。・ 🥀♡🥀 ☆ ༉‧ My reposts aren’t endorsements. 🚫No Porn 🚫No Crypto🚫No locked accounts. ☆ ༉‧ TruthSocial @Renata4D45

United States
Joined March 2012
Pinned Tweet
🚨PART 1: Life under communism/socialism rule. Growing up during the communist era in Poland. I saw the Polish People's Republic being shaped and changed daily to a different more limited life. It affected social behavior, and the psychology of millions of Polish people. Poland and across the Eastern Bloc was a daily grind of scarcity, surveillance, and lost agency that turned ordinary existence into a series of humiliating calculations. Central planning eliminated price signals, so factories and farms could only produced what communistic bureaucrats ordered rather than what people needed. The result was a permanent shortage of food, other daily essentials, labor and extremely bad economy. Stores were routinely stripped bare. Iconic memories from the 1970s–80s include entire shops stocked with nothing but vinegar and tea. I know that many of you today can even imagine how it felt being in that situation. Basic goods—meat, butter, flour, sugar, toilet paper, soap, shoes, even matches—were either absent or available only sporadically via “rzuty” (sudden deliveries that triggered stampedes). By the early 1980s, ration cards (kartki) covered meat, butter, flour, rice, chocolate, alcohol, cigarettes, and petrol. An average adult might be allotted roughly 2.5–4 kg of meat and meat products per month (miners got more, office workers less), but even that was theoretical: high-quality cuts were severely limited (often only ~400 g), lower-grade meat, offal, and processed items made up the rest, and shops frequently ran out anyway. People spent hours or days in queues; some estimates put average daily queue time at around three hours. Informal “queue committees” kept lists, and retirees or children could be hired as stand-ins. Money itself became nearly useless when there was nothing to buy. Housing was another long wait—often years or a decade-plus for a small apartment in a prefabricated block, frequently shared with many family members or completely overcrowded. Getting a private landline 📞 phone could take up to ~ 20 years. Cars, appliances, and decent clothing required connections (“dojścia”), bribes, or the black market. Special hard-currency stores like Pewex existed for the elite and those who may have dollars; everyone else made with poor-quality substitutes. Freedom was tightly constrained and limited to almost none. Travel aboard required rare passports and exit permissions. Travel from city to city required special permission from authorities. Media, books, and education were censored. The secret police (SB) and a network of informers created a climate of caution—neighbors reported neighbors. By the end of 1978 my father was killed by them. He was only 38 years old. He didn’t wanted to become a communist so he was killed on the sidewalk walking home. I was 9. Three years later in the middle of the night my mother left me and my younger brother behind in this big city. She escaped to America. Every day I continue to live by myself and making sure that my brother and I are safe. We went to school every day and pretend that our mom is at home. I learn how to cook from whatever I could get at the vegetable market, because stores were always empty by the time I got home from school. One day in the morning I woke up to the news that Poland was under martial law (December 1981–1983), and everything intensified: curfews (often 10 p.m.–6 a.m.) no one was allowed outside their apartments or house, sealed borders and no travel outside the country. Internment of thousands of Freedom Solidarity activists, militarized workplaces, restricted intercity travel, and suspended civil liberties. Official propaganda still claimed record harvests and full employment while shelves stayed empty and people pretended to work at idle factories. State television and newspapers offered heavily filtered propaganda. Phones were frequently tapped, public gatherings were restricted, and….
Explain life under communist rule. Everyone states how horrible it is so they escape but no one explains actually what life becomes under communist rule.
6
86
8
98
9,487
Everyone’s talking about last night’s episode with Steve Baker (@SteveBakerUSA). With the evidence he presented, as well as his new bombshell findings, I don’t see how any jury could convict Brian Cole Jr. The episode is on many networks but watch below on X. DON’T MISS OUT!
8
34
1
35
1,298
Renata retweeted
Daily motivation: What an incredible adventure and tale of perseverance! He left Chile on foot for England 28 years ago. He’s finally almost home 🏠 🇬🇧 British adventurer Karl Bushby left the southern tip of Chile with a mission: to walk an unbroken path to his hometown in England. He had two rules: no transportation to advance and no returning home until he reached it on foot. His record-breaking mission was inspired by a birthday card from his father recounting a conversation between two UK special forces members. They’d argued over whether it was possible to walk from London to New York via the Bering Strait. 4-min story summary in reply 🔖 — replay when you feel discouraged and ready to quit! “Don’t Give Up Don’t Ever Give Up” — Jim Valvano
🤖 Made with AI
3
11
1
8
710
Renata retweeted
🔴 Supervisor @DebbieLesko said election concerns should come directly to her. AZ State Committeewoman and former election judge Michele Swinick (@EverythingHomeT) has public records, FOIAs, and chain-of-custody documents on Maricopa 2020–2024 processes ready for review. She’s asked officials for over 3 years. No one has contacted her. @DebbieLesko, please contact her so the materials can be examined. ASAP. Thank you. ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ xitter.cf/i/spaces/1YqJDNZ…

Election integrity is essential so voters can vote confidently. Casting doubt on our election system and misrepresenting the work of election workers erodes trust in our elections. Read the full statement from Chair @KateMcGeeAZ & Vice Chair @DebbieLesko:
3
25
3
27
3,223
Renata retweeted
“Move it Arizonians” @DebbieLesko @maricopacounty Voters are urging action to contact Michele Swinick: @EverythingHomeT and work on prompt examination of the evidence from county’s public records which Michele Swinick had obtained and have gone unaddressed for over three years despite repeated requests. @realDonaldTrump @WhiteHouse ⬇️ xitter.cf/i/spaces/1YqJDNZ…

4
2
122
Renata retweeted
2 men RE-ARRESTED in UK for allegedly spying for Iran
9
7
76
Renata retweeted
Maricopa County Supervisor Lesko … please contact Michele Swinick and work with her to examine her evidence and investigate the case! 🚨This needs attention!!
1
2
82
Move it Arizonians
🔴 Supervisor @DebbieLesko said election concerns should come directly to her. AZ State Committeewoman and former election judge Michele Swinick (@EverythingHomeT) has public records, FOIAs, and chain-of-custody documents on Maricopa 2020–2024 processes ready for review. She’s asked officials for over 3 years. No one has contacted her. @DebbieLesko, please contact her so the materials can be examined. ASAP. Thank you. ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ xitter.cf/i/spaces/1YqJDNZ…

1
3
2
60
Renata retweeted
The legal point is moot. The sources @DataRepublican released show clear intent to create conditions they hope will make the Insurrection Act necessary. The materials speak for themselves.
‼️🔔 THE KEY PIECE MISSING from @DataRepublican latest report. It has generated regurgitated posts. Regurgitating such information and accepting it as fact is harmful. So I asked @grok to put my analysis into the fallacies, the misguided assumptions to clarify. As per @grok: No, Democrats cannot force the President to invoke the Insurrection Act, and doing so would not benefit them in any realistic “takeover” scenario. The idea is a fallacy that reverses how the law actually works. What the Insurrection Act actually does The Insurrection Act (primarily 10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255) is a set of old statutes that let the President deploy federal military forces (or federalize National Guard units) inside the United States under limited circumstances: to suppress an insurrection or rebellion, to enforce federal law when ordinary means have broken down, or (in one provision) when a state requests help. It is the main statutory exception to the Posse Comitatus Act’s general ban on using the military for domestic law enforcement. Key points from the statute and longstanding interpretation: •The decision to invoke it belongs exclusively to the President. There is no mechanism for Congress, a governor, or an opposition party to compel him to do it. •No prior congressional approval is required, and there is no automatic expiration clock. •Courts have historically given the President substantial deference on whether the statutory conditions are met (see the old Martin v. Mott precedent), though modern litigation can still test the action. •Once invoked, the troops are under the President’s command and can perform law-enforcement functions. The power therefore expands executive authority under the sitting President. Why the “Democrats force Trump to invoke it, then take over” theory fails 1They cannot force it. Democrats control neither the presidency nor the chain of command. Opposition-party control of the House, Senate, or individual state governments gives them no legal lever to order the President to declare an insurrection and deploy troops. They can create political pressure, litigate, or pass legislation (subject to veto and the usual legislative hurdles), but compulsion is not available. 2Invocation strengthens the current President, not the opposition. Deploying federal forces under the Act puts more coercive power in the hands of the sitting administration. It does not transfer control of the military, the executive branch, or the government to the party out of power. Historical uses (Eisenhower in Little Rock, Bush in Los Angeles in 1992, etc.) were exercises of presidential authority, not tools that flipped control of the government. 3Practical and political constraints remain. Any invocation would face immediate lawsuits, intense public and media scrutiny, potential congressional pushback, and the ordinary limits of civilian control and the Constitution. It is not a blank check for martial law or a permanent transfer of power. Claims that it would let Democrats “take over the government” require additional, unsupported leaps about how the military, courts, states, and Congress would respond. Recent events (Trump’s repeated public threats in 2025–2026 to invoke the Act in response to protests or resistance to federal immigration enforcement in Democratic-led cities, and Democratic governors/AGs opposing and litigating those moves) illustrate the opposite dynamic: the President has been the one considering the power, while Democrats have generally tried to constrain or block domestic military deployments. In short, the narrative you described reverses the actual allocation of authority. The Insurrection Act is a presidential tool. No realistic pathway exists for the opposition to compel its use and then exploit it to seize control of the government.
4
9
431
🔴 Supervisor @DebbieLesko said election concerns should come directly to her. AZ State Committeewoman and former election judge Michele Swinick (@EverythingHomeT) has public records, FOIAs, and chain-of-custody documents on Maricopa 2020–2024 processes ready for review. She’s asked officials for over 3 years. No one has contacted her. @DebbieLesko, please contact her so the materials can be examined. ASAP. Thank you. ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ xitter.cf/i/spaces/1YqJDNZ…

Election integrity is essential so voters can vote confidently. Casting doubt on our election system and misrepresenting the work of election workers erodes trust in our elections. Read the full statement from Chair @KateMcGeeAZ & Vice Chair @DebbieLesko:
3
25
3
27
3,223
“Move it Arizonians” @DebbieLesko @maricopacounty Voters are urging action to contact Michele Swinick: @EverythingHomeT and work on prompt examination of the evidence from county’s public records which Michele Swinick had obtained and have gone unaddressed for over three years despite repeated requests. @realDonaldTrump @WhiteHouse ⬇️ xitter.cf/i/spaces/1YqJDNZ…

4
2
122
Renata retweeted
I have been on many job sites in my days and it is true these guys usually have the best lunches. Whether it’s their wives or families cooking it, it always looks and smells so good.
145
360
38
4,447
239,989
⚖️💔 𝙇𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝘾𝙠𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙮 𝙅𝙪𝙙𝙜𝙚 𝙨𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙤𝙤𝙧 𝙤𝙣 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙮𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙧𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙙𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙟𝙪𝙧𝙤𝙧 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡. THE HOLDOUT STANDS. Massachusetts Judge shuts down defense bid to investigate the lone black juror. And underneath, the number that makes the story compelling: 11–1. Mistrial. No verdict. October 21. Judge William F. Sullivan rejected Reddington’s bid for an evidentiary hearing on Michael P. Desronvil—including allegations involving cellphone use and his jury questionnaire. The defense’s effort to dismiss the murder charges on double-jeopardy grounds remains unresolved. The next hearing is November 2. And at the heart of this legal battle are three children who will never come home: Cora, Dawson and Callan. Should a lone juror’s refusal trigger an investigation, or is that the point of independent juries? ᵀʰᵉ ʳᵘˡⁱⁿᵍ ⁱˢ ᶜᵒᵛᵉʳᵉᵈ ᵇʸ ᵗʰᵉ ᴾᵉᵒᵖˡᵉ ʳᵉᵖᵒʳᵗ⁠ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵗʰᵉ ᴺᵉʷ ʸᵒʳᵏ ᴾᵒˢᵗ ʳᵉᵖᵒʳᵗ⁠ ᵖᵘᵇˡⁱˢʰᵉᵈ ᵗᵒᵈᵃʸ.
🤖 Made with AI
⚖️💔𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙟𝙪𝙧𝙤𝙧 𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙙𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙛𝙚𝙡𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙨𝙖𝙣𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙙 𝙞𝙩. Lindsay Clancy strangled three children to death—it was planned. He didn’t have doubts. They just wouldn’t let him talk. Lone holdout juror Michael Desronvil just told NewsNation he was cut off again and again in that room — mostly by the women who already had their verdict written. “I didn’t have ANY doubts.” “As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts.” He is standing on this: Lindsay Clancy “knew exactly what she was doing and planned.” Three children are dead. The other side wanted postpartum psychosis as the ending. Some of those jurors were already lining up for cameras—they still are. A jury is supposed to weigh evidence — not protect a women’s health narrative. Leave this man alone. His focus was on presence of mind at the time of the act. He wanted justice by the court, not mob justice by social media influencers. Cora. Dawson. Callan. Without a retrial, they don’t get a second deliberation. ⚖️
8
75
1
70
3,575
She was one of the biggest movie stars in the world, and for three years, she was quietly holding a secret no one knew. In March 2022, Sandra Bullock made an announcement that surprised Hollywood. She was stepping away from acting. She didn’t say why. She only said she wanted to be “24/7 with my babies and my family.” Fans smiled and nodded. After decades of hit films, an Oscar, and countless red carpets, who could blame her for wanting a break? She finished promoting her last two films. She smiled for the cameras. She laughed in interviews. And then she went home. What no one knew was that, behind that smile, her world had already been breaking for nearly two years. The man she called the love of her life was dying. His name was Bryan Randall. They met in 2015, when he was hired as the photographer for her son’s birthday party. A simple job turned into a love story. Together, they raised three children: her son and daughter, and his older daughter. They never married. Sandra once explained that she didn’t need a piece of paper to be a devoted partner. Then came the diagnosis: ALS. It is a cruel disease. Slowly, it takes away the body’s ability to move, to speak, and eventually to breathe. There is no cure. Bryan made a request. He wanted to keep his illness private. Sandra honored it completely. While the world wondered what she was up to, she was at home. With the help of a small team of devoted nurses, she cared for Bryan in their house, surrounded by their children. The nurses became like family, practically living with them. Later, Sandra would reveal something heartbreaking. She said she had started grieving him years before he was gone, watching the disease take a little more of him every day. On August 5, 2023, Bryan Randall passed away peacefully. He was 57. Only then did the world finally understand. Sandra hadn’t stepped away from life. She had stepped toward the one person who needed her most. No cameras. No applause. No one watching. Just love, doing what love does, quietly, faithfully, until the very end. Today, Sandra has returned to the screen. But many fans say her greatest role was the one she played when no one was watching. Sometimes the people who seem to disappear are actually showing up in the most important way of all.❤️
136
678
17
7,423
273,059
Jim Nabors spent five seasons on television as the lovable but bumbling Private Gomer Pyle. The U.S. Marine Corps took note of the positive light the series cast on the service. In 2001, the Corps made Nabors an honorary Marine and promoted him to honorary Lance Corporal. Six years later, in 2007, he was promoted again—to honorary Corporal—in a ceremony recognizing his contribution to the Marine Corps’ public image.
7
47
220
12,608
A well-dressed man was found dead on an Australian beach in 1948. His labels were cut out of his clothes. In a hidden pocket was a scrap of paper with two words: "Tamám Shud." December 1, 1948. Somerton Beach, Adelaide. The man was propped against a seawall, neatly dressed, no ID, no wallet. Nobody ever came forward to claim him. The scrap of paper had been torn from the last page of a book of Persian poetry, the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám. "Tamám Shud" means "it is ended" or "finished." Police later found the actual book it came from. In the back were faint pencil letters that looked like a code. No one has ever cracked it. A suitcase left at Adelaide Railway Station turned out to be his too. For decades, people argued: Spy? Heartbreak? Poison? He was buried under a headstone that said "the unknown man." In 2021, police exhumed him. In 2022, Professor Derek Abbott of the University of Adelaide announced that DNA from hairs caught in the man's plaster death mask matched a family tree. His name, Abbott said, was Carl "Charles" Webb, an electrical engineer from Melbourne whose wife later divorced him for desertion. As of this summer, South Australia Police still called their investigation "complex and ongoing," and the coroner hasn't made it official. And the biggest questions remain. Why did he go to Adelaide? Who tore out that page? How did he die? Abbott himself thinks we'll probably never know. We may finally know his name. Would you rather know who someone was, or how their story ended? Disclaimer: The identification as Carl "Charles" Webb comes from Professor Abbott and genealogist Colleen Fitzpatrick; as of July 2026, police had not finished their report and the coroner had not confirmed it. The cause of death has never been determined. Some details, like the cut-out labels, come from the original 1948–49 police accounts. Photos: South Australia Police, 1948-49 (public domain); Bletchley (public domain), via Wikimedia Commons
4
74
69
3,736
⚖️🐍✨ 𝙄𝙡𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙊𝙢𝙖𝙧, 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙩 𝙣𝙖𝙢𝙚? So who is she really—Ilhan Omar… or Ilhan Nur Said Elmi? Federal court on Rep. Ilhan Omar pulls back the secret curtain. Her name is listed as “Ilhan Nur Said Elmi”—while “Ilhan Abdullahi Omar” is slapped on as an alias. 🤔👀 Agents are now quietly combing through decades of old immigration and citizenship records tied to Omar and her family. Ilhan Omar denies everything. The alleged marriage to her brother and the allegedly altered immigration birth date docs, the elastic net worth probe, the empty barrels and ghost winery investigation —she calls all of it a political hit job. Note: No fraud has been proven, and an alias on paper isn't a crime on its own. But it raises one big question: What made federal prosecutors write that name on paper—and what happens to all the congressional documents signed by an alleged wrong name? 👀📄 “No one is above the law.” - Ilhan Omar, on X 👀 She released the post in response to the indictment of Donald Trump, calling for justice and accountability under the rule of law
🤖 Made with AI
🐍✨ 𝙄𝙡𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙊𝙢𝙖𝙧 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙨𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙨𝙡𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙘𝙠 𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙙𝙤𝙤𝙧. It was the dawn of her nightmares. A single family text on her sister’s phone green-lighted a federal judge to initiate a raid on Ilhan Omar’s Washington home. Agents ransacked files, seized her phone, passport, notebooks, and computers. They had already dumpster-dived her trash for DNA. Ilhan’s sister, Sahra Noor, had her own phone seized earlier this year. Subpoenas are now out to multiple family members. What are the odds that Ilhan Omar's sister registered her company at the SAME ADDRESS as $250 million fraudsters?👀 All the raid evidence is now headed to a grand jury in Tim Walz Minnesota. Dark as the case sounds, all parties are innocent until proven otherwise. The Ilhan Omar investigation hinges on whether her family lied or omitted information on immigration paperwork when they entered the U.S. as refugees in 1995. Her father was a high-ranking colonel under the Somali dictator whose regime is estimated to have killed roughly 200,000 people. He was admitted anyway. Omar calls the raid a political vendetta. The Democrat judge who signed the warrant didn’t. “No one is above the law”, Omar posted on X about President Trump. Then there’s Jeanine Pirro’s investigation of Ilhan Omar’s elastic net worth—it’s magic, and has the ability to stretch to over $30 million, and then back again to under 100 K. Meanwhile, Michigan voters are watching another Democrat curate a family saga: Abdul El-Sayed. Questions about his own credentials, his mother’s ties to terror orgs, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Hasan Piker keep surfacing. Voters: research your candidates. Receipts in the New York Post and New York Times.
10
68
68
3,237
✨👑𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙧𝙤𝙡𝙚 𝘼𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙞𝙗𝙖𝙡𝙙 𝙇𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙚𝙙 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙩. “Everyone wants to be Cary Grant. Even I want to be Cary Grant.” He was one of Hollywood’s most debonair men. Impossibly handsome. Impeccably dressed. Effortlessly charming. A man who could make an entire room want to imitate him or fall in love with him—simply by adjusting his cufflinks. But that man was a character created long before the cameras started rolling. His real name was Archibald Leach. Born into poverty in Bristol, England, Archie learned early on how cruel life could be. When he was just nine years old, he came home from school to find his mother gone. His father told him she had left on a long holiday. Later, he told Archie she had died. Abandoned and grieving, young Archie ran away to join a troupe of stilt-walkers and acrobats. He transformed himself—erasing his working-class accent, perfecting his physique, and inventing the polished, sophisticated persona the world would come to adore. For over twenty years, he lived believing his mother was dead. Then, in 1935, as his father lay dying, the truth finally came out. His mother wasn't dead. His father had secretly committed her to a psychiatric asylum when Archie was a child. She had spent two decades institutionalized, oblivious to the fact that her young boy had become one of the most famous men in the world. Grant immediately flew back to England, reconnected with her, and ensured she was cared for for the rest of her life. But Hollywood’s most desired leading man couldn’t simply charm away the wounds of his childhood. The trauma of early abandonment haunted him. Then five marriages. A relentless struggle with intimacy. And in the late 1950s, a journey into medically controlled LSD therapy in an attempt to heal his psyche. Behind the flawless suits and effortless smile was a man running from a ghost. The most moving chapter came near the end. At 62, Cary Grant became a father. He did what few Hollywood icons ever dared: he walked away from stardom at the peak of his prestige. He retires from the screen to devote the rest of his life to raising his daughter, Jennifer. The boy who had lost his home finally found a family of his own. Hollywood fell in love with Cary Grant. But all Archie Leach ever wanted was to be loved for the person he really was. 💔
🤖 Made with AI
9
63
69
3,350
I am BEYOND sick of it!
12
81
1
114
1,452
F. A. C. T. S. ‼️
27
164
3
309
2,326
Bingo!! Time for our government to be put back in its place, FFS!!
3
104
4
117
1,540
Renata retweeted
🔥 NEW JERSEY: After 79 days and only 12 documents produced, the House GOP finally subpoenaed the state. ✨People at the NJ MVC checked “NO” when asked if they were U.S. citizens. The state registered 6,600 anyway. About 340 voted. The glitch was fixed in June 2024, but the names stayed on the rolls until 2026. 💥Subpoena seeks:
✨How the glitch registered people who checked NO
✨Why they stayed on the rolls until 2026
✨Steps taken to investigate/remove them
✨Compliance with federal voting laws ✨Citizenship verification procedures ✨Communications with the software vendor
🚨 JUST IN: The House GOP just hit New Jersey with a SUBPOENA over 6,600 noncitizens registered to vote This comes after DHS announced the arrest of a Dominican in NJ for ILLEGALLY VOTING "We've had enough of the stonewalling." 💯 TURN OVER THE ROLLS! After 79 days of requests, New Jersey has handed over just TWELVE documents A Motor Vehicle Commission "glitch" registered people who checked "NO" when asked if they were U.S. citizens Several of them even voted. STOP HIDING.
15
12
331