rra retweeted
Joe Rogan is horrified as Steve Hilton reveals where the 330,000 migrant kids Biden lost actually ended up.
ROGAN: “Holy f*ck!”
HILTON: “The way Bobby puts it is that Becerra turned HHS into the largest child trafficking operation in history.”
A caseworker told Hilton they were ordered to ignore obviously fake IDs and get the kids out the door as fast as possible.
Their directive was “Speed over safety.” If something happens to the kids, so be it.
One girl was put on a plane, handed off to three strange men, and forced to work 20 hours a day.
ROGAN: “Oh my God, it’s shocking. That’s so evil.”
The kids were given a hotline to call if they were in danger. The problem was getting anyone to answer.
HILTON: “There were 65,000 unanswered calls to the hotline.”
And the people who flagged it? “FIRED.”
ROGAN: “It doesn’t even seem like it could be real.”
When Bobby Kennedy Jr. previously described what happened to these kids, he called it a “huge, huge tragedy.”
KENNEDY: “One guy pretended to be the parent of 42 children. We have no idea what happened to those kids.”
“There was about 60 kids who were sent to one address. When we looked at that address, it was a container, a steel container in the middle of a parking lot.”
“A lot of them were sent to work at slaughterhouses and picking fruits in the fields. They were slaves.”
“It’s a huge, huge tragedy. My agency [under Biden] was the single biggest child trafficker in the world.”
And now Xavier Becerra, the man who presided over all of it, wants to be governor of California.
Steve Hilton is running against him.
rra retweeted
There's a winning path there, but it would have to be executed more correctly than 99.9% of the things Republicans tend to do.
The explanation would have to be given clearly up front along with clear communication that the move would have to be challenged specifically in court, which Congress would then agree to abide by.
This maneuver is legally real but Constitutionally (1A) contentious because even someone with ample evidence that they would not keep their oath could still keep it. 1A protects people's inner life from external adjudication, in many ways. That said, it's a genuine argument that could be made.
By forcing the matter AHEAD OF TIME to be a decision for the Court, which it would be anyway, it would undermine any apparent legitimacy to street rage.
rra retweeted
500 Milhões de Europeus, esperam que 300 Milhões de Americanos os protejam contra 120 Milhões de Russos que nem conseguem derrotar 40 Milhões de Ucranianos enquanto, não percebem, que estão a ser invadidos por 2000 milhões de Muçulmanos que se dizem perseguidos por 9 milhões de Israelitas!
rra retweeted
I am in need of relatively high resolution metal 3D printing services. I'm assuming powder bed fusion or something like that is best. I'd prefer the metal be shiny white like Inconel or titanium. The object is about the size of a golf ball with very intricate geometry. I don't want any support attachment points. I need around 10 of them, but if they are relatively inexpensive I would like to purchase more. Bonus points if the manufacturing outfit can laser engrave something on the object afterwards.
rra retweeted
This remains one of the most shocking things of my entire life.
In early November 2024, I submitted a light rewrite of some of the Communist Manifesto to a "right-wing" Christian Nationalist publication called American Reformer. It was obvious what it was; it just swapped out proletariat for "New Christian Right" and bourgeoisie for "classical liberals" and their "postwar consensus."
It was so obviously the Communist Manifesto that once it got published, one of their own readers spotted it and commented with proof almost immediately.
I didn't realize it had been published for 11 days, however, and that comment and the piece remained up the whole time. Not one of their esteemed editors though, "hmm, maybe we should quietly take this down...."
A few days later (December 3, 2024), I told the story, and the reaction was instant and shocking. More or less the entire Right turned viciously on me for a traitor, and I learned about the friend-enemy distinction firsthand.
Cerno[redacted] here was one of the first few out of the gate, as was Tim Pool, to defend a Christian Nationalist publication even though neither of them is Protestant or a Christian Nationalist. Cerno even said "Karl Marx was a great writer," which is absurd in all regards. Far more absurd things were said in Marx's defense, too.
American Reformer then kept the piece up (now in my name), claiming it's a "reasonable aggregation of some New Right thought." "Right-wing" influencers came out of the woodwork to defend Karl Marx, Marxism, Critical Theory, and Postmodernism for having "the right critiques of liberalism" but the "wrong solutions."
Meanwhile, I was attacked, vigorously, most of it as absurd as everything else. I was accused of never having understood Woke, of being an infiltrator and a "hoaxer" who can't be trusted, and subjected to all the old slanders of the Left, just now from the "Right." I received a lot of physical threats regarding if I dared "show my face" at TPUSA AmericaFest that year (I did, but I was a little paranoid and technically not allowed to speak). It was wild.
My star in the conservative movement--already on shaky ground for calling them "Woke Right" to begin with after they tried to cancel me a couple months earlier, precipitating the whole thing--fell almost immediately. By late December, the right-wing war against me escalated to the point of doxxing, shockingly wicked slander, and nearly complete excommunication, which is still mostly the situation to this day. Cerno[redacted] participated in quite a bit of that, really dirty-style, too.
I've never seen anything like it. The American "Right" heel-turned against me over this small exposé of a fringe pet publication (connected to a lot of operational money and players, as it happens), revealing its near-total capture, and it did so robustly defending KARL MARX and his critique of "liberalism."
I've led a life over the last decade or so filled with surprising turns and adventures, like the Grievance Studies Affair, but I have never seen anything like THIS.
Just a reminder that this was one of the first men out of the gate to criticize @ConceptualJames after he revealed that he had hoaxed American Reformer into publishing a lightly modified portion of the Communist Manifesto (under the pseudonym Marcus Carlson) to test the “Woke Right.”
No one forced them to run it. They published it because the structure and framing flattered how they already think. The speed and nature of the pushback afterward was itself pretty telling.
rra retweeted
My experience with the Christian Nationalist bros is that they've inverted virtually every commandment.
1. Not sure what God they actually serve...
2. They wish to fashion the state as an idol in their own image as a false likeness of heaven
3. Constantly take the Lord's name in vain (as here)
4. I don't know what they do with the Sabbath, but I don't see them keeping any time actually holy
5. They hate Boomers and their elders and blame them for everything going wrong in their lives and for blocking their sadistic politics
6. I don't think they've killed anyone yet, but they live for character assassination, and that'll work out in a death of despair or two sooner or later, and they do it on purpose to psychologically harm and maim
7. Haha adultery... like, let's go with the Spiderman meme or whatever they want to say, but they're really Prostituting the Church, that's for sure
8. Maybe they do or maybe they don't steal physical objects, but they rob their audiences by selling a false and wicked product, at the least and make considerable money doing it
9. Almost all they do is lie and bear false witness against their enemies AND in favor of their wicked friends, like they breathe
10. I don't know what they think about their neighbor's donkey, but they covet power more than anyone but straight Communists, and they give the Commies a serious run for their money on that
rra retweeted
During the 1960s, Saturday morning cartoons enabled toy manufacturers to market products directly to children, bypassing parental oversight. This strategy prompted millions of children to request industrial-grade heating devices capable of reaching 400 degrees Fahrenheit.
This advertising shift coincided with a near absence of regulatory oversight. Prior to the Child Protection and Toy Safety Act of 1969, minimal standards governed the sale of children’s products. As long as television advertisements portrayed items as entertaining, consumer demand surged, leading to frequent injuries.
A prominent example was Mattel’s Thingmaker, promoted extensively as a creative tool for producing rubberized figures.
The rapid-paced commercials depicted children producing colorful “Creepy Crawlers” but omitted significant risks. The device utilized an exposed electric hot plate to solidify liquid plastic. Users were required to pour material into die-cast molds, position them on the heated surface, and retrieve them manually. Numerous children sustained second- and third-degree burns from contact with the hot aluminum components.
Other widely advertised toys presented comparable dangers. Wham-O’s Water Wiggle was marketed as a premier summer product—a seven-foot plastic hose that oscillated vigorously when connected to a water source. Despite enthusiastic promotion, the heavy brass nozzle moved erratically, resulting in dental injuries, nasal fractures, and two fatalities before a recall. Similarly, Jarts (lawn darts) were advertised as an engaging outdoor activity, notwithstanding their composition as heavy, pointed metal projectiles capable of penetrating the skull.
The extraordinary efficacy of 1960s television advertising produced a period of heightened consumer risk. The persuasive nature of these campaigns accelerated widespread adoption of products ill-suited for domestic use, resulting in a surge of emergency department visits that compelled federal intervention and industry regulation by the decade’s conclusion.
The metal molds and heating unit of a 1960s Mattel Thingmaker.
I had one and may explain some things about my weirdness?
rra retweeted
Hello Alex Alex Alex,
Let me summarize the book UNELECTED in a nutshell.
The Industrial Revolution created a class of private citizens with unimaginable wealth. Many were reviled as robber barons (e.g., Rockefeller of Standard Oil). Others had a better image, like Andrew Carnegie.
These new rich decided because they had money, they had a responsibility to do good by the world. So they started building global philanthropic networks that could go into every country. In order to do so, they hired Department of State and Department of War and other state officials.
They quickly took over the country's education system starting in the 1920s to train them in the "international mind."
When the intelligence community truly sprang up in World War II, the IC hired from ... these same shadowy philanthropic networks. And after WWII, they all coalesced on the same goal: the best chance at achieving a human utopia is to bring the entire world to "democracy."
Except it turns out converting countries to democracy isn't so simple as just financing CIA coups. Did all those NGOs question their own assumption might be flawed - that not every peoples, not every culture and religion is compatible with "democracy"?
No. Instead, the Trilateral Commission in the 1970s concluded that a more technocratic route was necessary. And over many iterations - the Balkans and African adventures of the 90s, the Iraq & Afghanistan ventures, Arab Spring and color revolutions ... every failed iteration of "democracy" always resulted in the same conclusion: the people are dumb, we have to try harder, put more pressure on them, tighten the screws.
And now you have become fully self-referential. Anyone who disagrees with you is "authoritarian." Anyone who agrees with you is "our democracy." Voting methods doesn't matter. That the judiciary system blatantly stole the election doesn't matter.
And nowhere this is more obvious in your 30th anniversary publication.
In your 30th anniversary publication, you had an article from your longtime head of Open Society Fund-Serbia, Sonja Licht. She also happens to be one of the most decorated civilians in Europe and widely considered an expert in "democracy:"
🔹 Pro Merit Medal of the Council of Europe
🔹 Star of Italian Solidarity
🔹 French Legion of Honour
Her solution: "I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate, with their active involvement in public life, can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections... spearhead... our struggle to survive."
Read that again.
The idea of democracy as pushed by the head of one of your foundations is to literally stop "election results" and to have the public cede their trust to a technocratic elite.
End democracy to save democracy itself.
This is the final form of a project that started a hundred years ago to spread free markets and create global peace and instill self-governance throughout the world.
This is your legacy, Alex Soros.
Your father spent his life fighting Communism.
You, as his protege, will spend your life perfecting Communism.
In the name of "democracy."
rra retweeted
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨
Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone.
The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.
R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.
R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative.
Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.
It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.
You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.
Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.
As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.
Important to understand:
The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
dunno why Jake Tapper is standing there on the left, but he really needs a nap
President Zelenskyy’s comment on US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s remarks that the war in Ukraine is at a "strategic stalemate" and that there are now "no prospects for a negotiated settlement":
"You cannot negotiate future economic projects with Russians on the one hand and, on the other, claim that we are in some kind of diplomatic stalemate. We are not in a diplomatic stalemate.
Shut down Russia’s entire economy. Shut Russia's mouth. Stop feeding them through your sales. Impose sanctions on their weapons.
Open Starlink for Ukraine. You opened it when responding to Iran, after all. Everything worked there. Israel completely controlled the skies over Iran. So when you need it to work, it works.
It costs them nothing to help Ukraine. And I said quite frankly: help us protect our skies and gain dominance there.
Then Putin will sit down at the negotiating table. Why? Because he will lose everything. In two or three months, he will lose everything.
And instead, we are waiting for the Chinese to develop an equivalent and hand it over to Russians.
This is not a stalemate - this is called a lack of will."
rra retweeted
Is this the biggest election integrity-related secret in the Intelligence Community?
The FBI was notified no later than 7/1/2022 by the NY Special Investigations Unit (SIU) of the state police.
Then my paper on the subject was published in May of 2023 in Journal of Information Warfare, garnering over 10M impressions in 48 hours on X.
I do not believe the algorithm I found in NY voter rolls, and solved, has been ignored. Enough people know about it to have investigated it. And yet, no word on a possible benign explanation. Without ruling out the possibility one exists, the silence alone is persuading me that there isn't a benign explanation.
Instead, the most obvious explanation, that the algorithm was deployed to covertly tag and track specific voter IDs, not only fits the data very well, and appears more likely based on the total lack of alternative explanations over the past 4 years.
For those who want the details, this is how NY county ID numbers were mapped to state ID numbers (taken from my Substack post):
The Spiral algorithm used in New York’s voter rolls assigns County voter ID (CID) numbers to State Board of Elections ID (SBOEID) numbers. It does this using a deterministic and reversible method. This means that the Spiral is predictable (deterministic) and it is designed to retrieve data of interest (reversible).
After working out a number of methods to reverse what the algorithm does, I have come to the conclusion that the Spiral’s most probable purpose is to create “markers” in the form of a serial ID number that I call the Algorithm ID (AID). These markers are useful in the context of an index, which in this case is the Spiral algorithm.
The Zark Files is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Examination of any anomalous digital phenomena can yield insight into what has been done and how it was done. Sometimes, the two can be difficult to differentiate. In an earlier post, I demonstrated a method for determining where each strand of numbers would be cut by the algorithm. The method works but it is not the method used by the algorithm. It was simply a way to figure out the same answer based on different information.
I think I now know how the algorithm does it. The image at the top of this post shows how it is done but here is the explanation:
Determine the range of SBOEID numbers allocated to your county of interest. To do this, the minimum and maximum values are all that are needed.
Subtract the MIN from the MAX and add +1. This is your range.
Create columns for each power of ten, in increasing orders of magnitude starting with “1”. For most counties, this will be 1, 10, 100, 1,000, and 10,000. Add a column labelled “0” for the MIN SBOEID.
Each column is for numbers that belong to the same strand of CID numbers, where each CID is separated from the next by the power of ten value for that column. For instance, CID numbers in the 100 column appear every 100 numbers and will be continuous: 34,675 followed by 34,676 100 rows later, then 34,677 after 200 rows, and so on.
Arrange the columns in the following order:
0
10,000
1,000
100
10
1
Assign Minimum (MIN) values for each column. Each value is based on the MIN value for the entire county plus a modifier. These numbers are consistent in most counties but there is some variety in the 10,000 (and possibly the 100,000) columns.
Column 0: This is the MIN SBOEID for the county, no adjustment
Column 10,000: MIN + 8,333 (75% of 11,111)
Column 1,000: MIN + 833 (75% of 1,111)
Column 100: MIN + 83 (75% of 111)
Column 10: MIN + 9 (75% of 11 rounded up)
Column 1: MIN + 1
Assign Maximum (MAX) values for each column.
Column 0: This column has only one number, the MIN. It has no MAX
Column 10,000: MAX - 2,778 (25% of 11,111)
Column 1,000: MAX - 278 (25% of 1,111)
Column 100: MAX - 28 (25% of 111)
Column 10: MAX - 3 (25% of 11)
Column 1: MAX for county
Now calculate the range for each column. To do this, you must also calculate how many SBOEID numbers fit in each column.
Column 0:
Full range for county -1 (number of SBOEID numbers in Column 0) = Adjusted Range for next column
Column 10,000:
Adjusted range from previous column (0) divided by 11,111, rounded down = number of SBOEID numbers in column 10,000 (10Kn)
Subtract (10Kn) from previous adjusted range. This is the new adjusted range for the next column
Column 1,000:
Adjusted range from previous column (10,000) divided by 1,111, rounded down = number of SBOEID numbers in column 1,000 (1Kn)
Subtract (1Kn) from previous adjusted range. This is the new adjusted range for the next column
Column 100:
Adjusted range from previous column (1,000) divided by 111, rounded down = number of SBOEID numbers in column 100 (111n)
Subtract (111n) from previous adjusted range. This is the new adjusted range for the next column
Column 10:
Adjusted range from previous column (100) divided by 11, rounded down = number of SBOEID numbers in column 10 (11n)
Subtract (11n) from previous adjusted range. This is the new adjusted range for the next column
Column 1:
Adjusted range from previous column (10) divided by 1 = number of SBOEID numbers in column 1 (1n)
Subtract (1n) from previous adjusted range. The product should be zero, indicating that all available SBOEID numbers have been used.
Next, determine Minimum Algorithm ID (AID MIN) and Maximum AID (AID MAX) number for each column
Column 0:
AID MIN=1
AID MAX=1
Column 10,000:
AID MIN= Previous column’s AID MAX +1
AID MAX= Current column’s AID MIN + 10Kn (number of SBOEID numbers allocated for column)
Column 1,000:
AID MIN= Previous column’s AID MAX +1
AID MAX= Current column’s AID MIN + 1Kn (number of SBOEID numbers allocated for column)
Column 100:
AID MIN= Previous column’s AID MAX +1
AID MAX= Current column’s AID MIN + 111n (number of SBOEID numbers allocated for column)
Column 10:
AID MIN= Previous column’s AID MAX +1
AID MAX= Current column’s AID MIN + 11n (number of SBOEID numbers allocated for column)
Column 1:
AID MIN= Previous column’s AID MAX +1
AID MAX= Current column’s AID MIN + 1n (number of SBOEID numbers allocated for column)
The AID MAX for this column should equal the total range for the county
Determine the last AID number (AID LAST) for each column. These are fixed by the algorithm to the following values:
Column 0: 1
Column 10,000: Previous AID MAX +Current column’s AID MIN + 10Kn (number of SBOEID numbers allocated for column)
Column 1,000: 9
Column 100: 83
Column 10: 833
Column 1: 8,333
Determine the first AID number (AID FIRST) for each column. These are fixed by the algorithm to the following values:
Column 0: 1
Column 10,000: Previous AID MAX + 1
Column 1,000: 10
Column 100: 84
Column 10: 834
Column 1: 8,334
Determine value for the first AID number after the CUT (CUT LOW) for each column:
Column 0: 1 (No CUT)
Column 10,000: AID MAX + 1 (No CUT)
Column 1,000: Previous AID MAX +1
Column 100: Previous AID MAX +1
Column 10: Previous AID MAX +1
Column 1: Previous AID MAX +1
The last AID number before CUT L is the same as AID MAX for each column
Determine the position where each column is cut (CUT)
Column 0: 1 (No CUT)
Column 10,000: (No CUT)
Column 1,000:
Subtract previous AID MAX from current AID LAST = CUT Position (CUT POS)
Position CUT L a number of rows above AID LAST equal to CUT POS
CUT H is always immediately before CUT L
Column 100:
Subtract previous AID MAX from current AID LAST = CUT Position (CUT POS)
Position CUT L a number of rows above AID LAST equal to CUT POS
CUT H is always immediately before CUT L
Column 10:
Subtract previous AID MAX from current AID LAST = CUT Position (CUT POS)
Position CUT L a number of rows above AID LAST equal to CUT POS
CUT H is always immediately before CUT L
Column 1:
Subtract previous AID MAX from current AID LAST = CUT Position (CUT POS)
Position CUT L a number of rows above AID LAST equal to CUT POS
CUT H is always immediately before CUT L
Calculate SBOEID numbers for each column
Column 0: MIN
Column 10,000:
FIRST: MIN +8,333 (there is some variability, depending on county size. Sometimes, this value is 2,778)
SBOEID second through seventh: Prev SBOEID +11,111
Exceptions exist in smaller counties. If there is only one value, it is 11,112)
Column 1,000:
FIRST: MIN +833
Second to AID 11: Previous + 1,111
From AID 12 through CUT H:
in groups of 10 consecutive numbers:
First is previous SBOEID + 1,112
Second through ninth are previous SBOEID plus 1,111
First SBOEID after CUT H (CUT L) is REMAINDER, calculated by:
Adjusted range for column 1,000 (AR 1K) - (1,111*1Kn) = REMAINDER
All subsequent numbers are Previous SBOEID + 1,111
Column 100:
FIRST: MIN +83
Second to AID 91: Previous + 111
From AID 92 through CUT H:
in groups of 10 consecutive numbers:
First is previous SBOEID + 112
Second through ninth are previous SBOEID plus 111
First SBOEID after CUT H (CUT L) is REMAINDER, calculated by:
Adjusted range for column 100 (AR 100) - (111*100n) = REMAINDER
All subsequent numbers are Previous SBOEID + 111
Column 10:
FIRST: MIN +83
Second to AID 841: Previous + 11
From AID 842 through CUT H:
in groups of 10 consecutive numbers:
First is previous SBOEID + 12
Second through ninth are previous SBOEID plus 11
First SBOEID after CUT H (CUT L) is REMAINDER, calculated by:
Adjusted range for column 10 (AR 10) - (111*10n) = REMAINDER
All subsequent numbers are Previous SBOEID + 11
Column 1:
FIRST: MIN +1
Second to AID 8,341: Previous + 1
From AID 8,342 through CUT H:
in groups of 10 consecutive numbers:
First is previous SBOEID + 2
Second through ninth are previous SBOEID plus 1
There is no REMAINDER for Column 1
Adjust CID numbers
Depending on the county, there are four known possibilities:
Decimalization:
Decimalize all CID numbers by adding decimal point to left of each CID number
Sort after decimalization in ascending order
Attach sorted CID numbers to SBOEID numbers in AID order
Alphanumerics:
Split Alpha character(s) from numeric component of each CID number
Sort all CID numbers by alpha first, number second
After sort, reposition all alphanumeric CID numbers after all numeric CID numbers, in alpha order
Attach sorted CID numbers to SBOEID numbers in AID order
Combination:
First, decimalize numbers
Then perform Alphanumeric sort
Attach sorted CID numbers to SBOEID numbers in AID order
No modification
Attach sorted CID numbers to SBOEID numbers in AID order
After attaching CID numbers to SBOEID numbers, delete decimal points, if any
That’s it! Kind of makes you wonder why, doesn’t it?
rra retweeted
As @R_H_Ebright explained in 2014, more labs = more lab accidents. Nevertheless, we continue to build more and more labs to work with dangerous pathogens without questioning whether they are needed.
rra retweeted
25 years ago today, Robert Stevens, an employee at American Media Inc., died of inhalation anthrax, becoming the first person murdered by a sociopathic US Army bioweapons-agents researcher who mailed anthrax spores to media outlets and Congress.
rra retweeted
Like many of you, I had friends there.
One of the best examples of a what I mean by “Anti-Interesting.”
The deadliest mass shooting by a single gunman. And nothing? Nothing?
Journalism does not exist in any conventional sense. One of the most anti-interesting stories ever.
rra retweeted
On the subject of the "Free Press"
Back in 2017, Devin Nunes, then the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, discovered that "journalists" were being paid by Fusion GPS, Obama-Hillary's dirty tricks outfit.
Nunes obtained the bank records showing the payments. Ultimate sponsor was Soros.
Obama's judge Chutkan blocked the records from being made public.
