🚢 Join us for this special conference at sea featuring
@ConceptualJames and @SovMichael! Go to NDCruise.com for details and registration.
Both the Woke Left and Woke Right are running the same mass-line operation: seed the narrative, grow the grievance, hand it off to true believers, then escalate the chaos until discourse is impossible and only revolutionary resolution remains.
They’ve both declared argument over because, in their sociognostic frameworks, language is just another tool for imposing the correct consciousness.
The hostile energy they’re deliberately generating doesn’t require a single master plan to produce Balkanization and a parallel, epistemically enforced, social credit system. It only requires enough people on both sides treating the liberal order as the enemy.
The AI-dominance versus managed-transhumanism false dilemma is just the next dialectical trap they’ll present as inevitable once the shared political framework has already been broken.
The practical result is American Balkanization.
Rivals who never accepted the civil constitutional order don’t need to orchestrate both sides; they only need to wait while the Woke Left finishes its long demolition and the Woke Right accelerates the collapse under a different banner.
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations retweeted
Samuel’s rise was due to the fact he wrote good articles and stood for the truth.
Joel is just obsessed with identity based and power dynamic interpretations of virtually everything. That’s because he’s methodologically woke right.
It’s funny how Joel’s method resembles other reader-response movements in America.
Just trade out “texts” and “Scripture” for “Samuel” in the quote from my book below and you will understand why Joel has such a problem with Samuel.
🤖 Made with AI
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations retweeted
Me looking at a whole lot of "Christian" Nationalist Tweets.
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations retweeted
Background on @JDVance's never-released speech to a 2022 @SohrabAhmari conference makes this clip an even bigger red flag parade.
Seven months before Vance gave this speech, Ahmari cofounded @compactmag, which "seeks a new political center devoted to the common good." The postliberal outlet breathlessly promotes Sohrab's friend JD; in July 2024, Ahmari wrote that Vance's selection as Trump's running mate "vindicates Compact's project."
By the time Ahmari left Compact at the end of 2024, the magazine's nonprofit arm had received $450,000 in grants from George Soros's Open Society Foundations.
In 2023, 100% of the revenue reported by "Compact Institute of Ideas Inc" came from a $200,000 Open Society Action Fund grant "to support the Grantee's work to provide a critical view on trends from the left and right."
In 2024, 66% of the nonprofit's revenue came in the form of a $250,000 Foundation to Promote Open Society grant "to educate the public on heterodox ideas and promote intellectual debate through content produced by the Compact Institute of Ideas."
Compact cofounder Edwin Aponte, an avowed Marxist, told reporters in 2024 that Claremont Institute chairman Tom Klingenstein provided start-up funding for the project.
As @mjnblack discovered in 2025, Compact shares a tax ID with its for-profit parent: the aptly named "Horseshoe Mag, Inc." - in which The Thiel Foundation has invested $686,500.
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations retweeted
This isn't what you say when you agree with the US
Constitution.
Replying to @LundukeJournal
@LundukeJournal read about entryism here. That's what happened in many open source projects.
This headline from AFPost is misleading.
I was a guest at the event, seated in the VIP section alongside several Florida District 13 Republican leaders. The event through @RepLuna and featured Byron Donalds @ByronDonalds , Ashleigh Moody @AshleyMoodyFL , and Jim Jordan @Jim_Jordan as speakers.
Mr. Fishback is an agitating propagandist. He is attempting to spread anti-liberty concepts (what amounts to a form of Critical America Theory) alongside radical formulations of Christian Nationalism. Christian Nationalism of this stripe is simply Roman Catholic Integralism with Protestant characteristics: a rejection of classical liberalism, religious liberty, and the American order in favor of subordinating the state (and economy) to a quasi-spiritual authority for the “common good.”
Fishback is attempting to use Trotsky-inspired entryism to gain control of Florida’s young conservatives. @ConceptualJames has done quite a bit of work exposing entryism strategies over the last 7 years.
Entryism is a strategic process of infiltration into an institution (in this case, conservative Florida politics) by hostile forces - the strategy of entering an institution and insinuating yourself as a subversive, disruptor, divider, wedge, or plant in order to eventually transform it from within and bring it into service for your militant ideological ambitions.
It is an old Soviet/Communist technique (linked to Trotskyist tactics and “boring from within”) used by Gramscian infiltrators pursuing a “long march through the institutions” to establish counter-hegemonic control. Marxist or Woke entryism, in this sense, means going into and infecting institutions that would not normally welcome the ideology. The pattern is the same whether the content is left-wing Critical Theory or a reactionary faux right-wing Integralist/anti-liberty program.
The core premise is to first make entrance, then purge “enemies” (the existing membership and the hegemony, political positions, beliefs, or culture they maintain).
The five steps of entryism:
1. Demand access
2. Demand accommodation
3. Demand a seat at the table (access to power)
4. Demand the table (control of the rules/power)
5. Demand control over the institution (or the whole room)
Once inside the targeted organization (in this case, the Republican Party of Florida) the entryists do exactly what entryists always do: they sow internal discord (“They kicked me out of the rally!”), introduce polarizing topics on polarizing terms (antisemitism, socialism, “the real right,” etc.), use whatever standing they gain to bring in more of their ideological comrades, and then purge the people who actually belong there.
To sum it up: the goal of entryism is simple and always the same: enter an institution (a political party, a church, a movement, a media company), transform or capture it from within, and subordinate it to a radical militant agenda. That’s precisely what the DSA and Justice Democrats already did to the Democratic Party. It’s what the Woke Right and various other entryists are now attempting inside the Republican Party and Christian denominations.
Don’t let them.
@realannapaulina @RonDeSantis @glennbeck @WillRicci
James Fishback is the right hand of the left.
I will take this opportunity to answer his claims in the same fashion that I responded to the @AFpost misleading post:
I was a guest at the event, seated in the VIP section alongside several Florida District 13 Republican leaders. The event through @RepLuna and featured Byron Donalds @ByronDonalds, Ashleigh Moody @AshleyMoodyFL, and Jim Jordan @Jim_Jordan
as speakers.
Mr. Fishback is an agitating propagandist. He is attempting to spread anti-liberty concepts (what amounts to a form of Critical America Theory) alongside radical formulations of Christian Nationalism. Christian Nationalism of this stripe is simply Roman Catholic Integralism with Protestant characteristics: a rejection of classical liberalism, religious liberty, and the American order in favor of subordinating the state (and economy) to a quasi-spiritual authority for the “common good.”
Fishback is attempting to use Trotsky-inspired entryism to gain control of Florida’s young conservatives.@ConceptualJames has done quite a bit of work exposing entryism strategies over the last 7 years.
Entryism is a strategic process of infiltration into an institution (in this case, conservative Florida politics) by hostile forces - the strategy of entering an institution and insinuating yourself as a subversive, disruptor, divider, wedge, or plant in order to eventually transform it from within and bring it into service for your militant ideological ambitions.
It is an old Soviet/Communist technique (linked to Trotskyist tactics and “boring from within”) used by Gramscian infiltrators pursuing a “long march through the institutions” to establish counter-hegemonic control. Marxist or Woke entryism, in this sense, means going into and infecting institutions that would not normally welcome the ideology.
The pattern is the same whether the content is left-wing Critical Theory or a reactionary faux right-wing Integralist/anti-liberty program. The core premise is to first make entrance, then purge “enemies” (the existing membership and the hegemony, political positions, beliefs, or culture they maintain).
The five steps of entryism:
1. Demand access
2. Demand accommodation
3. Demand a seat at the table (access to power)
4. Demand the table (control of the rules/power)
5. Demand control over the institution (or the whole room)
Once inside the targeted organization (in this case, the Republican Party of Florida) the entryists do exactly what entryists always do: they sow internal discord (“They kicked me out of the rally!”), introduce polarizing topics on polarizing terms (antisemitism, socialism, “the real right,” etc.), use whatever standing they gain to bring in more of their ideological comrades, and then purge the people who actually belong there.
To sum it up: the goal of entryism is simple and always the same: enter an institution (a political party, a church, a movement, a media company), transform or capture it from within, and subordinate it to a radical militant agenda. That’s precisely what the DSA and Justice Democrats already did to the Democratic Party. It’s what the Woke Right and various other entryists are now attempting inside the Republican Party and Christian denominations.
Don’t let them.
@realannapaulina @RonDeSantis @glennbeck @WillRicci
This headline from AFPost is misleading.
I was a guest at the event, seated in the VIP section alongside several Florida District 13 Republican leaders. The event through @RepLuna and featured Byron Donalds @ByronDonalds , Ashleigh Moody @AshleyMoodyFL , and Jim Jordan @Jim_Jordan as speakers.
Mr. Fishback is an agitating propagandist. He is attempting to spread anti-liberty concepts (what amounts to a form of Critical America Theory) alongside radical formulations of Christian Nationalism. Christian Nationalism of this stripe is simply Roman Catholic Integralism with Protestant characteristics: a rejection of classical liberalism, religious liberty, and the American order in favor of subordinating the state (and economy) to a quasi-spiritual authority for the “common good.”
Fishback is attempting to use Trotsky-inspired entryism to gain control of Florida’s young conservatives. @ConceptualJames has done quite a bit of work exposing entryism strategies over the last 7 years.
Entryism is a strategic process of infiltration into an institution (in this case, conservative Florida politics) by hostile forces - the strategy of entering an institution and insinuating yourself as a subversive, disruptor, divider, wedge, or plant in order to eventually transform it from within and bring it into service for your militant ideological ambitions.
It is an old Soviet/Communist technique (linked to Trotskyist tactics and “boring from within”) used by Gramscian infiltrators pursuing a “long march through the institutions” to establish counter-hegemonic control. Marxist or Woke entryism, in this sense, means going into and infecting institutions that would not normally welcome the ideology. The pattern is the same whether the content is left-wing Critical Theory or a reactionary faux right-wing Integralist/anti-liberty program.
The core premise is to first make entrance, then purge “enemies” (the existing membership and the hegemony, political positions, beliefs, or culture they maintain).
The five steps of entryism:
1. Demand access
2. Demand accommodation
3. Demand a seat at the table (access to power)
4. Demand the table (control of the rules/power)
5. Demand control over the institution (or the whole room)
Once inside the targeted organization (in this case, the Republican Party of Florida) the entryists do exactly what entryists always do: they sow internal discord (“They kicked me out of the rally!”), introduce polarizing topics on polarizing terms (antisemitism, socialism, “the real right,” etc.), use whatever standing they gain to bring in more of their ideological comrades, and then purge the people who actually belong there.
To sum it up: the goal of entryism is simple and always the same: enter an institution (a political party, a church, a movement, a media company), transform or capture it from within, and subordinate it to a radical militant agenda. That’s precisely what the DSA and Justice Democrats already did to the Democratic Party. It’s what the Woke Right and various other entryists are now attempting inside the Republican Party and Christian denominations.
Don’t let them.
@realannapaulina @RonDeSantis @glennbeck @WillRicci
Byron Donalds kicked out rival Republican gubernatorial candidate James Fishback from a local event.
Fishback would’ve won Florida’s GOP primary if only under-50-year-olds had voted.
Fishback has also endorsed and supported numerous Florida GOP candidates.
Follow: @AFpost
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations retweeted
🔎 In 2024, @SohrabAhmari said "J.D. Vance's selection as Donald Trump's running mate" was something "that vindicates Compact's project."
George Soros's Open Society Foundations have given Ahmari's @compactmag $450,000.
The progressive Hewlett Foundation has given $180,000.
🧵
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations retweeted
The Apostle Paul said:
But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrelsabout the law, because these are unprofitable and useless.
Ask yourself:
Is my life marked by a pattern that avoids foolish controversies?
I hope it is because they are unprofitable and useless.
Mine hasn’t always been marked by this biblical standard.
We are all in need of God’s grace.
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations retweeted
Samuel is one of the nicer, more thoughtful people I've met in this wild experiment in saving the West, and I'm pretty saddened to see that this happened. I'm appalled at how the Woke Right has run with it. Ghastly. Zero character. Supporting him a little is a good thing to do.
Please pray for Samuel Sey and his family, and give if you can ❤️
givesendgo.com/support-for-s…
Yes.
"Not zero, negative grace."
In other words, they lie, misrepresent, and create a new version of history that never existed prior to their coming on to the scene.
We’ve seen this exact tactic from the Woke Left for years. The Woke Right Christian Nationalists are now running the identical play.
From 2018👇
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations retweeted
This whole debate reminded me of what @SethDillon said a while ago on The @JeremyDBoreing Show. He laid out perfectly what I think should be at the center of this:
1. Everyone has the right to speak out about what they think, regardless of whether it's about someone on the Left or the Right.
2. Speaking your mind and being critical of something does not make you a bully or a thug.
3. When statements are made publicly, they invite a public response. (There is a weird dynamic going on within media and politics on the Right where you're not allowed to publicly address something problematic someone has said publically because doing so is considered disloyal.)
4. It's not about making enemies but about saying what you believe and why you believe it, as a matter of principle.
5. When bad ideas are spreading and rotting the minds of people, especially young people, we have a moral duty to speak out against them.
Truth and principle must come before personal loyalty, private relationships, career advancement, or political alliances. This is what I believe.

































