Veteran, fighter pilot, airline captain, former state senator, small business owner.
United States
Joined August 2018
- Tweets2.4K
- Following457
- Followers835
- Likes6.9K
Mike Shower retweeted
Lots of people are calling the Alaska "fake Dan Sullivan" scheme unethical but legal.
They haven't read the case law. Conspiring to trick voters into voting for the wrong candidate is a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 241. My full lawsplainer:
Mike Shower retweeted
Dear Fellow Americans Who Love Calling Trump "Literally Hitler,"
So you want to play the Hitler comparison game? Alright, let's do this. But fair warning, you're probably not gonna like where this goes.
I find it fascinating that folks throw around "literally Hitler" like confetti at a parade without ever cracking open a history book. So let me walk you through how Hitler ACTUALLY rose to power, and then we can compare notes on which American president's rise looks more like that playbook. Buckle up.
Hitler's rise depended on a few key things. First, media control and propaganda. Goebbels created a machine that flooded Germany with pro-Nazi messaging while crushing opposition voices. They used newspapers, radio, and film to build the "Hitler Myth" where he was portrayed as some kind of messiah who would save Germany. Second, Hitler demonized his political opponents. He didn't just say "I disagree with you." No, he called them ENEMIES of the German people who needed to be destroyed. The rhetoric escalated from "political opponent" to "existential threat to the nation." Third, he weaponized government agencies against his political enemies. And fourth, he exploited a grassroots movement during economic disaster, the Great Depression, with promises to fundamentally transform the country. Sound familiar yet?
Now let's talk about Obama's rise. In 2008, Pew Research found that 37% of Americans believed media coverage was biased IN FAVOR of Obama. Only 8% thought it favored his opponents. That's not me saying it, that's Pew Research. The 2008 election got dubbed "The Facebook Election" because Obama's team revolutionized how to manipulate media and bypass traditional journalism entirely. One strategist bragged about it. They created celebrity endorsements, will.i.am's "Yes We Can" video, murals... Chris Matthews said he got "a thrill going up my leg" listening to Obama speak. That's not political coverage, that's worship.
And about demonizing opponents? Obama LITERALLY called Republicans "ENEMIES" in a 2010 Univision interview. His exact words were telling Latino voters to "punish our enemies." Not opponents. ENEMIES. When he got called out, he backtracked and said he meant "opponents." Sure you did, buddy. This was the FIRST time a modern president used "enemies" to describe fellow Americans who disagreed with him. You have to go back to the Civil War to find that kind of language from a president.
Here's the kicker though. Under Obama, the IRS systematically targeted Tea Party groups and conservative organizations. Anyone with "patriot" or "9/12" or "Tea Party" in their name got flagged for extra scrutiny. Their applications got delayed for YEARS while liberal groups sailed through. The IRS later APOLOGIZED and settled lawsuits admitting they wrongly used "heightened scrutiny and inordinate delays." A Harvard Kennedy School study concluded this targeting cost Romney between 5 and 8.5 million votes in 2012. Obama won by about 5 million. You do the math. Weaponizing the IRS against political opponents during an election year? Gee, where have I heard that tactic before...
Now compare that to Trump. The media didn't carry water for Trump. They attacked him relentlessly. Studies showed 90%+ negative coverage. That's the OPPOSITE of what happened with Hitler's propaganda machine. The FBI was weaponized against HIM, not by him. Remember Crossfire Hurricane? The Russia hoax? These weren't Trump weaponizing agencies against opponents. This was agencies being weaponized against Trump.
And here's where your Hitler comparison really falls apart. Hitler exterminated 6 million Jews. Trump has Jewish grandchildren. Trump moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem. Trump created the Abraham Accords bringing peace between Israel and Arab nations. Trump made expanding Israeli peace deals his "personal legacy issue." Trump threatens Iran to PROTECT Israel. Real Hitler move there, right? Brokering peace for the Jewish state and having your daughter convert to Judaism.
Let me spell it out real simple. The ACTUAL Hitler targeted Jews, destroyed Jewish businesses, built concentration camps, started World War II, and murdered millions. Trump pressures Arab nations to recognize Israel, makes Israeli peace deals his personal legacy, threatens Iran over their nuclear program because of Israel's security, and has Jewish grandchildren he adores. Which one sounds more like Hitler to you?
Quinn's Third Law says "Liberalism must always conceal its true purpose." You don't call Trump "Hitler" because the comparison makes any historical sense. You do it because it dehumanizes your political opponent and justifies treating him and his supporters as subhuman threats who deserve whatever happens to them. That's LITERALLY the tactic Hitler used against Jews. You've become the thing you claim to hate.
But what do I know? I'm just someone who actually studied history instead of getting my political analysis from TikTok and late-night comedy shows. The 6 million victims of the ACTUAL Hitler deserve better than your lazy political hyperbole used to score cheap points against a guy who champions the Jewish state.
Mike Shower retweeted
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.
Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.
Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”
Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
Mike Shower retweeted
The most ironic outcome is capitalists paying for their own destruction.
Fate loves irony.
Mike Shower retweeted
“Far more people are dying in Nigeria than in Palestine. Last year, 500,000 Christians were killed. But the activists aren’t protesting or saying anything. To me, that’s hypocrisy.” Well said.
xitter.gq/Crazyflix94/status/197…
Mike Shower retweeted
@SpeakerPelosi- Ma'am, let me help refresh your memory. It was your Sergeant at Arms (SAA) who repeatedly denied my multiple requests for National Guard assistance before and on January 6. Even on Jan 6, your Sergeant at Arms denied my urgent requests for over 70 minutes, while he was “running it up the chain” for your approval.
The Pentagon offered National Guard assistance, but I had to decline because your SAA would not grant me the legal authority as required under federal law (2 U.S.C. §1970).
@StephenM @RepLoudermilk @SpeakerJohnson
Mike Shower retweeted
👀 𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗢𝗯𝗮𝗺𝗮'𝘀 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝘁𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗮-𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲.
🔹 In college, Barack Obama helped co-found a local chapter of CISPES (Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador), a U.S. group that supported the FMLN, a Marxist guerrilla front fighting the U.S.-backed Salvadoran government.
🔹 CISPES often worked alongside the Nicaragua Network, which championed the Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua. (U.S. intelligence later confirmed that the Sandinistas supplied El Salvador’s rebels with weapons and training.)
🔹 As the solidarity scene matured:
• 1985: Nicaragua Network + Detroit CISPES ➡️ merge → CASC (Central America Solidarity Committee)
• 1993: CASC + MICAH ➡️ merge → OSCA (Organization in Solidarity with Central America)
• 1998: Former Nicaragua Network activists incorporate the Alliance for Global Justice (AFGJ), folding their old network inside as a project.
Today AFGJ still operates as a left-wing umbrella group ... the same lineage that began with 1980s “solidarity” campaigns.
So yes… the activist ecosystem that once rallied for Marxist guerrillas in Central America evolved, merged, and rebranded, and figures like Obama (via early CISPES work) and later Bill Ayers (through AFGJ-linked circles) both trace lines back into that same network.
Mike Shower retweeted
Everyone is quick to talk about the need to bring back federal workers, but we need to ask ourselves a serious question: if entire departments and divisions are gone, yet nothing changes for the American people, were those government employees truly essential?
federalnewsnetwork.com/gover…
Mike Shower retweeted
THEN: Tim Walz signs “Driver’s Licenses for All” law, which allowed illegals to obtain government-issued photo IDs…for free.
NOW: Minnesota election officials CONFIRM that illegals can vote in state elections using those driver’s licenses.
Mike Shower retweeted
So what will be done about it?
Mike Shower retweeted
Did you know that on Sunday, October 5, 2025 a 41 year-old man named Louis Geri was arrested outside the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle in Washington DC?
The Cathedral was to host a Catholic mass with Supreme Court justices in attendance. It's an annual event opening the new SCOTUS term.
Geri had set up a tent on the steps of the cathedral containing hundreds of explosive and incendiary devices. Court records show that the devices were "fully functional."
During negotiations to remove him from the steps, Geri handed officers a notebook espousing hatred for the Catholic Church, Supreme Court justices, Jews and ICE.
So, basically, a man with garden variety Democrat beliefs was attempting to blow up a Catholic Church and SCOTUS.
Did you know all this? Are you surprised how obscure this story is and how it rapidly vanished?
Now imagine a MAGA Republican had tried to do the same thing outside a Bernie/AOC rally.
Same coverage? Of course not.
You think you hate journalists enough...
Mike Shower retweeted
Man explains how Mamdani is practicing Taqiyya to deceive New Yorkers into voting for him.
Taqiyya, in a nutshell, is the practice of lying or concealing one’s true beliefs to advance the cause of Islam. It gives permission to bend the truth, hide one’s real identity, and mask true intentions or objectives — all to protect Islam’s image and promote its expansion.
“The Muslims are laughing at you guys — give it 50 more years, and the entire New York’s gonna be Muslim. Then, before you know it, there’s gonna be Sharia courts, and y’all will realize it’s like shooting yourself in the foot.
You see Europe, what’s happening right now — and then you’re like, ‘Oh, let’s just do it here in New York.’”
Mike Shower retweeted
Here's a list of all republicans arrested under the Joe Biden administration:
Donald J. Trump
Waltine “Walt” Nauta
Carlos De Oliveira
Stephen K. Bannon
Peter K. Navarro
Thomas J. Barrack Jr.
Matthew Grimes
Rudy Giuliani
Mark Meadows
John Eastman
Kenneth Chesebro
Sidney Powell
Jenna Ellis
Scott Graham Hall
Shawn Still
David James Shafer
Cathleen “Cathy” Latham
Jeffrey Clark
Trevian C. Kutti
Robert David Cheeley
Harrison William Prescott Floyd
Stephen Cliffgard Lee
Ray Stallings Smith III
Michael A. Roman
Misty Hampton (a.k.a. Misty Ann Hampton / Emily “Misty” Hayes)
Kelli Ward
Tyler Bowyer
Nancy Cottle
Jacob “Jake” Hoffman
Anthony Kern
James Lamon
Robert Montgomery
Samuel Moorhead
Lorraine Pellegrino
Gregory Safsten
Michael Ward
Boris Epshteyn
Christina Bobb
Allen Weisselberg
Michael McDonald
Jesse Law
Jim DeGraffenreid
Durward James Hindle III
Shawn Meehan
Eileen Rice
Kathy Berden
William “Hank” Choate
Amy Facchinello
Clifford Frost
Stanley Grot
John Haggard
Mari-Ann Henry
Timothy King
Michele Lundgren
Meshawn Maddock
James Renner
Mayra Rodriguez
Rose Rook
Marian Sheridan
Ken Thompson
Kent Vanderwood
Steve Bannon
Tina Peters
George Papadopolous
Plus 1265 J6 Defendants
Here's a list of all democrats arrested under the Donald Trump administration:
0
Mike Shower retweeted
When Pete Hegseth said, “Diversity is not your strength. Your strength is your unity of purpose, your shared mission, your love of country,” he is not making a superficial political statement.
He is inconveniently (for some) resurfacing a fundamental truth that has underpinned every successful civilization, army, and republic in history: cohesion, not fragmentation, is the bedrock of strength. Nations rise not because every citizen is different, but because those differences are set aside to a common cause, a shared identity, and a singular mission.
In America, that’s freedom.
This statement, however, is threatening to certain ideologies because it directly undermines a monumental tool for manipulation that was and is so often used by collectivist regimes and revolutionary ideologies over the last century.
This, my friends, is identity fragmentation disguised as moral virtue.
These are not buzzwords. They want to fragment the nation into tribes that hate each other. It’s not part of the plan, it is the plan.
Please do not fall for it.
“Diversity is strength” is no where near a timeliness truth.
It is a carefully crafted slogan that appears appealing, but in reality is a weapon that has been sharpened over the last hundred years by movements that understood: a divided society is far easier to control than a united one.
Marxist theorists from Antonio Gramsci to Herbert Marcuse wrote openly about this tactic: if you cannot overthrow a free nation from the outside, you must rot it from within.
You do this not by conquering armies or seizing capitals, but by slowly eroding the shared identity that binds a people together.
You convince them that what once united them, such as their flag, their founding ideals, or their love of country, is less important than what divides them.
You know what the next step is?
You start identifying primarily by race, gender, class, or grievance instead of as Americans. That, guys, is mission accomplished for our enemies.
History is full of examples that I would like to discuss.
The Bolsheviks weaponized class identity to turn workers against landowners and dissolve centuries old social bonds.
Mao used cultural and generational divisions to pit families and neighbors against one another in the Cultural Revolution (this is, of course, after he starved or executed over fifty million people in the Great Leap Forward).
Even fascist regimes, while preaching unity, manipulated ethnic and cultural differences to consolidate power and justify oppression. In every case, fragmentation preceded domination.
This is how revolutions are sown.
And this is how people are enslaved due to their race or ethnicity.
The truth is simple: diversity can enrich a society, but it is not what holds it together. What binds a nation, an army, or a republic is a shared purpose and a common belief in something greater than the sum of its parts.
Without that unifying principle, diversity is not strength; it is weakness, chaos, and eventual collapse.
Liberty is that unifying principle.
America is that unifying principle. 🇺🇸
Mike Shower retweeted
We show photo ID for nearly everything in life: to drive, fly on a plane, stay at a hotel, join a gym, even to buy a beer. Why should voting, our most sacred civic duty, be any different? Asking for ID isn’t extreme, it’s common sense. I’m honored to stand alongside fellow Californians who are committed to protecting the integrity of our elections and ensuring that the people of our state get the chance to have their voices heard next year.
We’re heading to California to kickstart the revival. The state has the largest Republican population in America, but no voter ID. That’s how Gavin Newsom’s machine survives.
In 2026, that changes. 875,000 signatures puts voter ID on the ballot. Democrats can’t fight it, Wisconsin proved that. They passed voter ID, cleaned up elections, and President Trump won with ease.
Now it’s California’s turn. We are getting voter ID on the ballot, giving Republicans a voice, saving the state, and changing politics forever.
Stay tuned.