It is He Who has named you Muslims, both before and in this Quran ☝️
Joined June 2021
- Tweets4.6K
- Following160
- Followers88
- Likes535
Every accusation is a confession.
Yes. In September 2012, while Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood was Egypt’s president, Rogers voted for the continuing resolution (H.J.Res. 117) that maintained U.S. aid to Egypt, including economic assistance that supported state institutions under that government. He also stated the U.S. would need to engage moderate Muslim Brotherhood individuals.
Complete rebuttal of Aisha’s age of marriage.
Nice try.
Hey @grok if you use the modern age of consent laws and broad colloquial definition of the word “pedophile”, does all of humanity or almost everyone have an ancestor that is a pedophile?
Real Monotheist retweeted
Nice try.
Hey @grok if you use the modern age of consent laws and broad colloquial definition of the word “pedophile”, does all of humanity or almost everyone have an ancestor that is a pedophile?
Real Monotheist retweeted
Yes, misrepresenting a basic, universally known point of Islamic theology—like claiming Quran 6:101 means Allah "needs" a mate, when it is a rhetorical denial and Allah is explicitly As-Samad (self-sufficient, free of need)—does reasonably undermine claims of deep knowledge or credibility on the doctrine.
The next time someone says “Christians don’t kill in the name of God” or “Islam is the only religion that kills in the name of God”, show them this video.
And then show them people like Tommy Robinson twist the narrative to blame the Muslims. That’s why you don’t hear about Christians doing it because you’ve been brainwashed.
Muslim who stabbed a British toddler at a playground in the French Alps will finally stand trial charged with attempted murder, prosecutors have announced.
Abdalmasih Hanoun is also accused of the attempted murder of 12 other people following the knife attack at a lakeside park in Le Paquier, Annecy, south-east France, in June 2023.
Give me one copy of that and I’ll be able to recite in different ways from the one copy. So once again, the Quran is only one. And all of its authentic readings are preserved.
The only reason, people have actual different hardcopies of the different readings is to read a singular reading. But there are people who can read many different authentic readings from one book.
Why didn’t the Christians before the 19th century try to use Aisha’s age as an argument against Islam? Why did some Christians try to justify it saying it was because of faster maturing in Arabia due to hotter climate?
Real Monotheist retweeted
Explain one single contradiction that I made.
God has switched covenant. You didn’t address the parable of the wicked tenants at all.
As for Isaiah 42, this is my case for Muhammad ﷺ. You present your case.
Isaiah 42:8 says God does not give his glory to others or his praise to idols.
Isaiah 42:10 says sing to the Lord a new song and Isaiah 42:21 says God is pleased to make his law (Torah in Hebrew) great and glorious.
Isaiah 42:11 says let the settlements of Kedar rejoice. Who is Kedar? Genesis says Kedar is a son of Ishmael, the Arabs.
Isaiah 42:11 also says let the people of Sela sing for joy from the mountaintops. Where is Sela? In Medina.
Isaiah 42:17 says idol worshippers will be turned back in utter shame.
Who was the man in history who came to the Arabs, where people from the mountaintops of Sela rejoiced, who brought a new Torah, a new law, a new song which is recited which is made great and glorious and the idol worshippers were turned back in utter shame other than Muhammad ﷺ. Go ahead.
So insecure that you block me right after replying to me for the very first time. These are the people with “brains”.
You do realize people can do just a little searching and find out if you’re lying or not, right?
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
This only works by equivocating on “Son of God.” The Quran rejects God taking/begetting a son, not the biblical phrase itself in every possible sense.
The Bible calls Adam “son of God”, Israel God’s “son” and peacemakers “sons of God”. None are literally begotten gods.
So quoting John 10:36 doesn’t establish that Jesus claimed divine sonship in the later Trinitarian sense. You first have to prove what “Son of God” means. That’s the very point under dispute.
These are the kind of people that we deal with. When they switch topics and you call them out and ask them to bring proofs for their claims even after responding to them, they block you.
Low IQ individuals.
That argument works only if you cherry-pick verses. The Quran also rebukes Muhammad ﷺ, corrects his decisions, restricts him, and commands duties specifically upon him. If he were inventing revelation for convenience, why invent verses publicly criticizing himself? “Whatever he wanted” is a slogan, not an argument.
The Quran publicly rebukes Muhammad ﷺ for turning away from the blind man (80:1–10) and for forbidding himself something Allah had permitted (66:1). If he were inventing revelation for his own convenience, publicly preserving his own corrections in a book memorized by millions is a pretty strange way to do it.
I didn’t know you were allergic to truth. Some people, sheesh.
Go cough on some other post where they don’t care about authenticity.
