Les Rectificateurs retweeted
Pour info, « Bon Pote », qui a créé ce site, avait appelé en 2022 à voter pour Jean-Luc Mélenchon ou Yannick Jadot.
Donc, il n’est pas du tout neutre.
Les Rectificateurs retweeted
La Gauche veut tout interdire : Cnews, les réseaux sociaux aux moins de 18 ans, les barbeucs, les piscines ... mais si tu proposes l'interdiction d'un vêtement sexiste et rétrograde, ils hurlent à la défense de la Liberté.
Les Rectificateurs retweeted
La « harcelosphère » n’était donc pas un fantasme
Pendant des années, @france_soir a décrit autour de l’@IHU_Marseille une « harcelosphère » : un petit groupe d’activistes passant méthodiquement les publications de Didier Raoult au peigne fin, multipliant les signalements aux revues et transformant l’intégrité scientifique en guerre d’usure.
On pouvait discuter le terme. La nouvelle étude publiée dans Research Integrity and Peer Review vient surtout rendre beaucoup plus difficile de nier le phénomène.
Car qui trouve-t-on au cœur du papier ? Fabrice Frank, Elisabeth Bik et Lonni Besançon, trois noms déjà omniprésents dans les enquêtes de France-Soir. Ce sont eux qui ont conçu l’étude et sa méthodologie ; Frank est crédité de l’« investigation ». Alexander Samuel et Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, eux aussi associés par France-Soir à cette galaxie anti-Raoult, complètent le tableau.
Et quelle est leur méthode ? 2 674 publications de l’IHU passées au crible, 871 considérées comme problématiques et 871 signalées aux éditeurs, au terme d’une opération poursuivie pendant plusieurs années.
À ce niveau-là, on n’est plus dans le collègue qui repère fortuitement une anomalie dans un article. On est devant une entreprise collective, organisée, durable et obsessionnellement concentrée sur une même institution.
Le plus savoureux est que certains des protagonistes autrefois accusés par France-Soir de mener cette campagne viennent désormais en publier eux-mêmes la comptabilité.
La « harcelosphère » était présentée comme un fantasme complotiste ? Ses propres membres viennent pratiquement d’en publier le rapport d’activité.
Cela ne constitue peut être pas, à lui seul, une qualification pénale de harcèlement. Mais sur le fond, l’étude apporte une confirmation embarrassante à @france_soir : oui, il existait bien un groupe identifiable, travaillant pendant des années sur la même cible, coordonnant une investigation systématique et multipliant les signalements contre elle.
Ils voulaient démontrer les dérives de l’IHU. Ils viennent peut-être surtout de documenter les leurs.
Une étude pointe des problèmes éthiques "généralisés" dans des publications scientifiques de l'IHU de Marseille l.franceinfo.fr/gwe
Les Rectificateurs retweeted
I'm 43 now, and I've now seen three distinct phases in my life regarding attitudes towards gender/sex. Here's a handy guide for determining which one is the correct take:
1) Pre-1990ish: "Little Billy can't play with dolls b/c he's a boy and everyone knows boys don't play with dolls" ❌
2) 1990-2010: "Little Billy can play with dolls if he wants, boys can play with dolls. It doesn't make him any less of a boy" ✅
3) 2010 - Present : "Little Billy IS a girl because he plays with dolls, because everyone knows boys don't play with dolls" ❌
As we can see, #2 is the correct choice. #1 and #3 are examples of toxic right wing gender norms, and toxic left wing gender norms, respectively.
That's the funny thing about gender ideology; despite its adherents loud claims that they are somehow smashing traditional gender-based norms and stereotypes, they're actually rigidly enforcing them.
The truly enlightened viewpoint is that there is no right or wrong way to be a boy or girl and kids should feel free to explore and play with whatever they want without activists with an agenda slapping an inappropriate label on them and forcing them into a pathway towards lifelong medicalization and dependency on Big Pharma.
Les Rectificateurs retweeted
A virus or some other pathogen emerges somewhere in the world.
The media shifts into apocalyptic mode.
"Experts" appear to be predicting catastrophe.
Computer models project millions dead, if the right circumstances coalesce.
Politicians declare emergencies.
Pharmaceutical companies announce new products.
Social media turns into a digital panic attack.
And ordinary people, who just wanted to buy eggs and walk the dog, suddenly feel like civilization is one cough away from collapse.
Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
This is how psychological bioterrorism works.
The pathogen itself matters less than the emotional payload attached to it.
Les Rectificateurs retweeted
If you, a woman, refer to yourself as "cis," you are in a cult.
If you insist men can be women, or girls, or female, you are in a cult.
If you believe someone can have a "gender identity," you're in a cult.
If you applaud men who have erased our language, spaces and rights, you are in a cult.
WAKE UP!!
No male is any kind of woman.
No one is "trans."
You got conned.
You are not "progressive," or kind, or tolerant.
You are allowing male perverts to get what they want.
End of.
🤖 Made with AI
💊 Emojis used as coded language to promote illegal activities online?
Some platforms are now detecting emojis used as code for drug sales.
This is one of the key findings of the first EU-wide report on systemic online risks.
Dive in → link.europa.eu/CQhKGc
#DSAForReal
Les Rectificateurs retweeted
Replying to @theglassfish13
Yes, the people who call themselves 'trans' exist and they deserve exactly the same rights as everyone else, which, fortunately, they already have in the UK. It would rightly be considered discrimination if a person was refused employment, housing or the vote because they identified as trans.
'Trans women are women' is a thought-terminating cliché. Men are not women. That doesn't mean they're not allowed to present themselves however they like, call themselves whatever they like and believe whatever they like about themselves. It means they haven't changed sex.
If we replace the objective, observable characteristic of sex with the unfalsifiable concept of gender identify, women and girls lose, among other things, their right to fair and safe sport and women-only spaces, including changing rooms, prison cells and rape crisis services.
Women and girls are provably more vulnerable to forms of abuse including sexual assault, harassment and voyeurism in mixed-sex spaces. There is no evidence that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same rates of criminal offending as all other men.
Trans people exist. I have no desire for them not to exist; indeed, I wish them safety, happiness and health. However, 'existence' does not, and should not, mean the violation of other people's right to privacy, dignity and freedom of speech, or the reconfiguration of society to indulge a fallacy.


















