
| Prev @bigbrainvc @Blockchainff @Syndicaterip @DigiFTTech | correlation != causation
Singapore
Joined May 2021
- Tweets12.8K
- Following3.3K
- Followers10.7K
- Likes20.5K
This is insane
** IMMINENT STOCK MARKET CRASH OCTOBER 26, 2026-NOVEMBER 9, 2026 **
I am writing this message to give a detailed analysis, as to what I believe will be happening starting Monday October 26, 2026, and the main event to take place the following Monday November 2-3, 2026, with the bottom of the crash coming on November 9. I also want to explain what I believe the Federal Reserve is going to do as a means of trying to fix the crisis, and how it is going to lead to the end of the U.S dollar, bringing about a sovereign debt and currency crisis. This crisis will be the main focal point and issue that the Democratic Party is going to run on in the 26' midterms and the 28' elections, undermining the Republican Party and Donald Trump's populism, and eventually using it to try to usher in Communism, via a World Economic Forum/Black Rock policy and vision.
Most of us made the false assumption that blockchains would be the preferred rail for agentic payments but I really like Circle’s approach to this
They’re serving the end state of agentic payments - financial transactions that needs to be enforced by smart contracts, agent to agent payments, micro transactions where using traditional rails doesn’t make sense
It is hard to predict the future but Circle seems to be positioning themselves for net new payment categories that hasnt emerged yet
Circle Q3 2026 Earnings Call xitter.gq/i/broadcasts/2WXKzyWzk…
This is crazy
Our investigators are observing never-seen-before laundering patterns with the stolen funds from the Binance exploit. Thousands of transactions in a short period suggest that the attackers are using automation to obscure the trail of funds. Rather than simply moving funds onward, they repeatedly circulate them among addresses, often sending funds back to addresses involved earlier in the sequence.
Read more: chainalysis.com/blog/binance…
Gerald Wong retweeted
The Binance hacker might have just pulled off one of the smartest moves I’ve seen in crypto.
First, Tether froze $1.5 billion in USDT.
Then Circle froze another $800 million in USDC.
At that point, it looked like the hacker’s money was trapped.
But apparently, he had already planned for that.
Instead of holding the stolen USDT in a wallet, he allegedly deposited it into Aave and used it as collateral to borrow ETH.
Then he walked away.
That’s where the story gets crazy.
Tether can freeze the USDT sitting in the wallet.
But it can’t freeze the ETH he already borrowed.
So now Aave is left holding frozen collateral, while the hacker is sitting on liquid ETH.
And unless the protocol can recover it somehow, he may not even need to pay the loan back.
Two companies froze billions of dollars in seconds.
But someone who understood how to use DeFi may have found a way around both of them.
Pretty insane when you think about it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The described Aave deposit used only ~60M USDT as collateral to borrow 19,762 WETH before freezes hit the main wallet, not the bulk of funds; Aave states the overcollateralized position is subject to normal liquidation with no material protocol risk.
governance.aave.com/t/binance-hot-…
x.com/binance/status…
drk.vc/news/binance-1…
My take on this is that this caps the fdv ‘ceiling’ for $PRL as a token. If you hold the token you’re effecitvely long $PRL as a SoV + potential future use cases tied to the token such as verifiable inference, compute marketplace, agent payments, and compute accounting.
This is still a net positive because any growth in the entity side of the labs will bring attention to the token itself.
So take it as the entity ‘part’ of $PRL is taken out of the equation
Nipping this one in the bud right away.
Pearl is a fair launch L1. There is no equity / token split.
Pearl Research Labs is an equity business AI lab, completely separate from the token. The only way to acquire Pearl is to mine it, or buy it from a miner.
This is no different than the multitude of Bitcoin core contributors that built and raised for projects on top of Bitcoin after launch, for example Lightning network or Blockstream.
IMO it makes total sense that there will be things built on top of Pearl. This is very different from the typical equity / token split concerns that emerge when holding a token is meant to represent interest / exposure to a business
Really enjoyed the @arthur0x lore, and especially his take on the anti-fragility of crypto
We should’ve gone to zero as an industry many times in the past but we’re still here today
Interview with @Arthur0x discussing the highs and lows of running a liquid crypto fund, and how he expects the next crypto bull market to play out.
0:00 Bull Market or Bear Market?
3:40 Running 8 Figs to 9 Figs in 2020-21
11:57 Drawing Down 90% in 2022
23:12 Bull Market Playbook
33:15 $ZEC and Bitcoin
41:30 Is $HYPE Overvalued?
48:50 Why $NEAR is this Cycle’s Winner
56:00 “You’re Only as Good as Your Last Trade”
1:01:38 Are Great Traders Born or Made?
1:07:38 Identifying Edge & Position Sizing
1:15:22 $100k to $1M and $1M to $10M
1:21:00 How to Make it This Cycle
I personally think it’s irresponsible to be in crypto and not have any exposure to plays like $PRL and $ZEC. In a market regime where only a select few tokens outperform, you’d always want exposure to any potential 100x-1000xs (with a baseline of realistic expectations)
It’s the power law playing out, outcome distribution is heavily skewed and missing outliers / high performers is really costly. I think adopting this strategy is crucial at this time of the market, especially when the marginal buyer is less risk-on.
It’s important to understand that fundamentals is always a lagging indicator. Price action is always led by renewed expectations / narratives, and historically rerating happens really quickly.
I have done my research on @prlnet pearl-2:native and here’s the TLDR:
Bitcoin miners run hash calculations to compete for block rewards. This computation makes it expensive for miners to rewrite transaction history while securing the network but it produces no other useful output besides security.
Pearl replaces Bitcoin style hash mining with matrix multiplication (used in AI inference) proof of useful work so compute used for AI inference can also be used to mine Pearl. (more efficient)
Mining and selling PRL can allow AI operators to subsidize costs (assuming the additional cost of integrating and running Pearl are lower than the value of mining rewards).
Current buyers of purchasing newly minted PRL are effectively subsidizing cost for AI operators when they sell their rewards.
That’s currently what the Pearl network does and potential applications in the roadmap includes:
- Compute marketplace
- Verifiable inference
- Compute accounting
- Agent payments
So the current FDV of PRL is a reflection of the market expectations of Pearl being an AI monetary and settlement L1 and I think it’s underpriced at $2.7B
If the roadmap executes well and can create demand for PRL, buying now gives you possible long exposure to:
- An AI-native store of value: people choosing PRL as an asset to hold
- Compute settlement: customers using PRL to purchase processing
- AI verification and accounting services: if their usage creates PRL payments or fees.
- Agent commerce: software using PRL to transact automatically
props to @papertrade_xyz for experimenting
setting out game rules / conditions for your product is tablestakes. it’s fair to assume that most capital in new products are mercenary, and expectations for these capital allocators are like an unspoken rule
even though non-transferability was announced to mitigate the aforementioned issues with incentives, it’s seemed as malicious because of the implications
trust is hard earned and once eroded, it’s unlikely to be gained back, not sure how 1000x leveragors are going to recoup their principal back
owning paper is owning a share in the house
this is only valuable insofar as the house is valuable. owning a lot of a dead house is worthless, and any design that would let the house stay at zero is a failed design.
when we went out, there were certain known problems with known timelines (builder codes) and some unsolved problems with unknown timelines. the perp attack described in the main was an unsolved problem, but we hoped to solve it as we made progress elsewhere. we knew it was impossible to set all the parameters and variables perfectly prelaunch - we are the first through the wall in a very adversarial environment - and i thought we would have more time to find solutions. unfortunately, the way things are advancing, we dont have six months until a large perp listing, its coming already. these were labelled as unsolved “good problems” and here we are. the market forced our hand into making the decision before we found a solution to the problem, and so for the health of the protocol the token is now non-transferrable. i want to thank all of the pre-market perp dexes, especially the hyperliquid ecosystem ones, who were in contact through this process. i am sorry I was not able to find a design for transferability that worked, i tried very hard.
ultimately, the success of papertrade relies on what it always has - whether the end product has user PMF. i have extreme confidence in the product we've built and continue to add to. i have had to personally self-exclude myself from similar products before because i used them too much. the token being transferable or not does not change whether a degen will longterm choose to trade on papertrade or not. the execution, site quality, mechanism, and economics of the trade will. papertrade is the fastest way to go from usdc in your wallet on any chain to a leveraged speculation exposure. providing clean, working, composability derivative liquidity in a permissionless environment is the vision.
thank you for your all your support since launch, and good luck to us
Gerald Wong retweeted
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies.
My observations:
1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively.
2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now.
3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention.
4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is.
5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now.
6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text.
They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it.
7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy.
8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies.
Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here.
9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens.
10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity!
11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it.
12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable.
13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think.
14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data.
15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open.
16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down.
17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building?
18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone.
19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good.
20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped.
21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense.
Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era.
Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways.
Happy to be home and locked in.
Until next time!
over the next 5yrs, the probability of a us debt crisis and the probability of any individual tech company getting existentially disrupted by ai are materially higher than the probability of ai/quantum breaking crypto
so sell ur btc, but sell it into what? cash and bonds that are going to 0? or tech companies facing existing threats while also in a giant reflexive bubble? or yet something else that u did 2hrs of “due diligence” and convinced urself u understand?
the point is, if u r spooked by the ai/quantum risk and sold ur coins, u r almost certainly misjudging magnitude of this risk vs the risks of other assets u r sold ur coins into.
Went to @blockworksDAS today and the team did a great job curating top quality panels.
I was honestly surprised by the turnout rate, the Jeff panel only had the room 20-30% filled and others were around 10-15%.
Super weird, I’m not sure what this says about institutional adoption.
I’d recommend watching their playback, lots of alpha shared
xitter.gq/blockworksdas/status/2…
DAS Asia is live from Singapore! Join us for insights from our Investor Track! xitter.gq/i/broadcasts/1qKDzWBgd…
I have done my research on @prlnet pearl-2:native and here’s the TLDR:
Bitcoin miners run hash calculations to compete for block rewards. This computation makes it expensive for miners to rewrite transaction history while securing the network but it produces no other useful output besides security.
Pearl replaces Bitcoin style hash mining with matrix multiplication (used in AI inference) proof of useful work so compute used for AI inference can also be used to mine Pearl. (more efficient)
Mining and selling PRL can allow AI operators to subsidize costs (assuming the additional cost of integrating and running Pearl are lower than the value of mining rewards).
Current buyers of purchasing newly minted PRL are effectively subsidizing cost for AI operators when they sell their rewards.
That’s currently what the Pearl network does and potential applications in the roadmap includes:
- Compute marketplace
- Verifiable inference
- Compute accounting
- Agent payments
So the current FDV of PRL is a reflection of the market expectations of Pearl being an AI monetary and settlement L1 and I think it’s underpriced at $2.7B
If the roadmap executes well and can create demand for PRL, buying now gives you possible long exposure to:
- An AI-native store of value: people choosing PRL as an asset to hold
- Compute settlement: customers using PRL to purchase processing
- AI verification and accounting services: if their usage creates PRL payments or fees.
- Agent commerce: software using PRL to transact automatically
Gerald Wong retweeted
LOL. CME announced at 5pm Friday that it’s dropping plans for 24/7 oil trading over concerns about… staffing. Thought nobody would notice.
As a foodie from Singapore, these are my BEST food places that you MUST visit for those attending @token2049 @blockworksDAS:
1. Wanton noodles: Chef Kang’s Noodle House
maps.app.goo.gl/W64iAK9yWnJm…
2. Salted egg chicken rice: Taste Good
maps.app.goo.gl/aJDMNXgojvNN…
3. Chicken rice: Nat’s Chicks
maps.app.goo.gl/xdzmmzpcB59z…
4. Laksa: Sungei Road Laksa
maps.app.goo.gl/fTJ7sXrE5ojZ…































