walkingonlego retweeted
the sort of thing that you have to slap a couple of times to get it to shut up.
walkingonlego retweeted
I remember a time long, long ago - last summer, to be precise - when people were condemned as hate-filled, far right bigots for saying this was the right course of action. I also remember how journalists at the time asked no hard questions about it. telegraph.co.uk/boxing/2025/…
walkingonlego retweeted
I'm enchanted to announce that since news of my legal fighting fund for women's sex-based rights spread on social media, the website has received a rush of wonderful applications. Standouts include 'suck my entire dick', 'fuck you stupid terfs' and 'JK Rowling is a dumb Nazi cunt.'
Trantasist, TerfAnnihilator, SeancjCasey (loving the KillYourselves handle!), the always wittily-named PhilMcCracken, JulieNoted and friends, I know you're eager to hear whether your applications have succeeded, but please be patient. You'll definitely be dealt with😘
walkingonlego retweeted
In light of recent open letters from academia and the arts criticising the UK's Supreme Court ruling on sex-based rights, it's possibly worth remembering that nobody sane believes, or has ever believed, that humans can change sex, or that binary sex isn't a material fact. These letters do nothing but remind us of what we know only too well: that pretending to believe these things has become an elitist badge of virtue.
I often wonder whether the signatories of such letters have to quieten their consciences before publicly boosting a movement intent on removing women's and girls' rights, which bullies gay people who admit openly they don't want opposite sex partners, and campaigns for the continued sterilisation of vulnerable and troubled kids. Do they feel any qualms at all while chanting the foundational lie of their religion: Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men?
I have no idea. All I know for sure is that it's a complete waste of time telling a gender activist that their favourite slogan is self-contradictory nonsense, because the lie is the whole point. They're not repeating it because it's true - they know full well it's not true - but because they believe they can make it true, sort of, if they force everyone else to agree. The foundational lie functions as both catechism and crucifix: the set form of words that obviates the tedious necessity of coming up with your own explanation of why you're one of the Godly, and an exorcist's weapon which will defeat demonic facts and reason, and promote the advance of righteous pseudoscience and sophistry.
Some argue that signatories of these sorts of letters are motivated by fear: fear for their careers, of course, but also fear of their co-religionists, who include angry, narcissistic men who threaten and sometimes enact violence on non-believers; back-stabbing colleagues ever ready to report wrongthink; the online shamers and doxxers and rape threateners, and, of course, the influential zealots in the upper echelons of liberal professions (though we can quibble whether they're actually liberal at all, given the draconian authoritarianism that seems to have engulfed so many). Gender ideology could give medieval Catholicism a run for its money when it comes to punishing heretics, so isn't it common sense to keep your head down and recite your Hail Mulvaneys?
But before we start feeling too sorry for any cowed and fearful TWAWites who're TERFy on the sly, let's not forget what a high proportion of them have willingly snatched up pitchforks and torches to join the inquisitional purges. Call me lacking in proper womanly sympathy, but I find the harm they've enabled and in some cases directly championed or funded - the hounding and shaming of vulnerable women, the forced loss of livelihoods, the unregulated medical experiment on minors - tends to dry up my tears at source.
History is littered with the debris of irrational and harmful belief systems that once seemed unassailable. As Orwell said, 'Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.' Gender ideology may have embedded itself deeply into our institutions, where it's been imposed, top-down, on the supposedly unenlightened, but it is not invulnerable.
Court losses are starting to stack up. The condescension, overreach, entitlement and aggression of gender activists is eroding public support daily. Women are fighting back and winning significant victories. Sporting bodies have miraculously awoken from their slumber and remembered that males tend to be larger, stronger and faster than females. Parts of the medical establishment are questioning cutting healthy breasts off teenaged girls is really the best way to fix their mental health problems.
One seemingly harmless little white lie - Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men - uttered in most cases without any real thought at all, and a few short years later, people who think of themselves as supremely virtuous are typing 'yes, rapists' pronouns are absolutely the hill I'll die on,' rubbing shoulders with those who call for women to be hanged and decapitated for wanting all-female rape crisis centres, and furiously denying clear and mounting evidence of the greatest medical scandal in a century.
I wonder if they ever ask themselves how they got here, and I wonder whether any of them will ever feel shame.
walkingonlego retweeted
The @BBC Statements on Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone. Its damning. bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/statem…
walkingonlego retweeted
Replying to @ScienceNews
All of these articles denying the reality of sex follow the same three-step formula:
1. Sex Spectrum Biological Principle
"Sex exists on a continuum between male and female."
2. Sex Spectrum Social Principle
"There are no criteria that will reliably sort people into male and female categories. Therefore, male and female are socially constructed."
3. Sex Spectrum Political Principle
"One’s internal sense of whether one is male, female, both, or neither (also known as gender identity) determines sex."
The biological principle represents the scientific shield of the sex spectrum because it serves as an effective defense for the social and political agendas behind it. It works as a deconstructive tool by using various sleight-of-hand tricks, with scientific language, to destabilize a person’s understanding of sex and the two sexes.
Once one’s understanding of male and female has been destabilized, the social principle acts as the bridge between the biological and political—that, in the view of the theorists, male and female are arbitrary social constructs which cannot be consistently defined.
Finally, the political principle lays out the real-world application of the sex spectrum argument—that because male and female are socially constructed, one’s internal sense of self is the most reasonable parameter for sex in most, if not all, spheres of life. This principle is then used to redefine male and female around subjective identity, replacing the definition of sex with one’s internal sense of self—most often referred to as gender identity.
walkingonlego retweeted
Replying to @fawfulfan
All embryos begin by developing undifferentiated gonads, undifferentiated genitalia, and a cloaca, before genetics differentiate our gonads into testes or ovaries, and our genitalia down the male or female path based on the gonad type.
There is no transforming of female anatomy into male anatomy. Being female is a specific path of differentiation just like being male.
Your claim makes no sense unless you want to argue that undifferentiated gonads, undifferentiated genitalia, and a cloaca are “female anatomy” which would be dumb.
walkingonlego retweeted
Replying to @fawfulfan
What on earth are you on about?
What is “female” about undifferentiated gonads that will become either testes or ovaries?
What is “female” about having both male and female internal genitalia precursors?
What is “female” about undifferentiated tissue that will become either male or female external genitalia?
walkingonlego retweeted
Wasn’t it Franklin Roosevelt who asked to be judged on the enemies he’d made? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy9q…
walkingonlego retweeted
The perpetually offended have flocked to create their own safe space haven and crashed it with unprecedented amounts of complaining.
walkingonlego retweeted
We want to let you know that we are proud to pay and here to stay @RachelReevesMP. In next week's Budget, to fix inequality and invest in a better Britain, please tax us, the super rich
walkingonlego retweeted
‘Counsellors at Beira’s Place in Edinburgh said strangulation and “breath play” had become so ubiquitous in online pornography that teenagers believed it was a routine sexual act they were expected to perform and enjoy.’ — @thetimes thetimes.com/uk/scotland/art…
walkingonlego retweeted
Replying to @MichaelRaduga
Future Micro Manager: “Why didn’t you reply to my Lucid Messages at 3am, 4am and 5am???”
Future Project manager: “Why did you miss our 3:45am Lucid Scrum??!”
walkingonlego retweeted
Fuck you.
AI is ushering in a new generation of creators that publishing should embrace, says Nadim Sadek 👇 thebookseller.com/comment/cr…

























