Rust Trial

TB said he'd give tickets to homeless people to fill seats. Did he mean Tom?

Red carpet report! @GrantSmithEllis has cleaned up nicely for the event. So far my best dressed award goes to Towel Girlfriend. Lots of people posing for pics with Grant.

It's Shubert night! TomCPU is streaming. The elders are currently putting on glow sticks.

I'm still confused about this. What filters does he use?!

After an embarrassing exchange earlier today with @Nickyhaircuts Broken Faker has the audacity to insult Karen Read and her lawyers. What is she bringing to the table? Excuse me?!? She was a criminal defendant in two high profile trials. Trials your ass profited off of across the Atlantic along with your constant misrepresentations of criminal law, evidence, and procedure. See below for Baker's numbers. He should be thanking Karen for his paycheck. I'd tell him this myself but he has me blocked because (shocker!) he doesn't like when lawyers, especially those of the female variety, correct his ignorant misrepresentations of the law.

Receipts for the record where Aidan says SB was blackmailing MF.

Nothing about Judge Gildea's order compelling Yannetti to respond to the House Plaintiff's subpoena suggests corruption. Orders contrary to KR's position don't automatically equate to corruption. As a fellow FKR, please knock it off! The crucial element here is Karen Read's informed consent. What has KR consented to? Her five page Opposition says Yannetti can produce responsive materials so long as they don't fall within the protected attorney-client privilege and attorney work product categories. Those materials are entered on a priv log. They're not turned over. That is NOT what the Plaintiff's are asking for. The majority of requested documents don't fall under either category. Aidan Kearney, as a journalist, is not an agent covered by these protections. People screaming corruption are screaming against what Karen herself has approved. It's YANNETTI who appears to be broadly misrepresenting what Karen has consented to. He argues everything remotely confidential is off the table. That interpretation is much broader than Karen's position. People should be more concerned about that detail.

Partial judgement on the pleadings has been granted to LEO defendants on Counts I and II in Baldwin's federal 1983 suit. Reading now.

The Medical Examiner states under oath that they work for the deceased and the family left behind. (Thank you @GrantSmithEllis for the testimony.) Aidan Kearney, with zero professional training, education or experience on the subject, declares post-indictment: "ME's are government employees who do what other government employees want them to do." Is that so? How TF does he know? What experience does he have that supports his gross generalization (and incorrect) opinion here? He doesn't have any. It supports his narrative in one case therefore he declares the same applies to every case and ME out there.