Scott North retweeted
No Agenda Episode 1916 - "The Final Episode"
noagendashow.net/listen/1916
I have secured tickets to #SDCC 2027! Absolutely no better way to start the day!
Scott North retweeted
The Next Chapter Is Calling - We Get To Do This gcfm.link/sl/30Z07fec669e
On Episode 54 of We Get To Do This, Adam shares why the next chapter is calling him into kingdom work, and Pastor Jimmy walks through the winds of change.
Plus, AI in your fridge, Noah's Ark and a Daily Grind to live by!
We lost a legend today. Media deconstruction will never be the same. #RIP
John C. Dvorak
April 5th, 1946 - July 20th, 2026
mailchi.mp/nashownotes/rip-j…
Scott North retweeted
How to legally and lawfully GET RID OF ALL @Flock_Safety
🚨 Flock has a hidden weakness many don’t know: public records requests.
Activists have successfully forced at least 8 cities to shut down Flock programs, either by exposing unauthorized data access or showing the footage was publicly accessible.
One of the most effective ways to take down Flock cameras?
FOIA Freedom of Info Requests
PRA Public Records Requests
Credit to @JasonBassler1 for a template to file one in your city:
🚨 Flock has a hidden weakness many don’t know: public records requests.
Activists have successfully forced at least 8 cities to shut down Flock programs, either by exposing unauthorized data access or showing the footage was publicly accessible.
One of the most effective ways to take down Flock cameras? FOIA/PRA requests.
Here’s a template to file one in your city:
To the Custodian of Records:
Pursuant to the (your state here) Public Records Act (your state's public records act code.), I request access to and copies of the following public records relating to the (your local police) Police Department’s surveillance camera network reportedly consisting of more than 2,600 cameras deployed throughout the city.
Please provide records covering the period January 1, 2020 through present unless otherwise specified.
1. Policies and Legal Authority
All policies, procedures, memoranda, directives, or legal analyses governing:
-The deployment and operation of surveillance cameras within __________
-Any legal justification for the program under federal or state constitutional law
-Policies governing Fourth Amendment considerations or privacy protections
-Any City Council ordinances or resolutions authorizing the camera network
2. Contracts and Vendors
All contracts, agreements, memoranda of understanding, purchase orders, or amendments with vendors or service providers related to:
-Surveillance cameras
-Automated license plate readers
-Real-time crime centers
-Video analytics, facial recognition, or artificial intelligence
-Data storage or cloud services used for camera footage
Please include vendor proposals, RFP responses, and bid documents.
3. Camera Locations
Records identifying:
-The number and location of cameras deployed
-Maps, GIS datasets, or inventories of surveillance devices
-Any classification of cameras as public, private-partner, or third-party integrated cameras
(If precise coordinates are withheld, provide generalized location records or district-level inventories.)
4. Data Retention and Access
All records describing:
-Video retention schedules
-Policies for deletion or archiving of footage
-Which agencies or departments have access to the camera network
-Any data sharing agreements with other agencies including but not limited to:
-(your state) Highway Patrol -Federal agencies (FBI, DHS, ICE, etc.) -Regional task forces
5. Private Camera Integration Programs
All records relating to programs that integrate privately owned cameras into the police network, including:
-Agreements with homeowners, businesses, or HOAs
-Terms of participation
-Data access rights granted to the police department
6. Surveillance Technology Capabilities
Records describing whether the system includes or supports:
-Facial recognition
-License plate recognition
-Behavioral analytics
-Crowd detection
-Real-time monitoring centers
7. Crime Reduction Claims
All records, reports, studies, or internal analyses supporting claims that the surveillance network caused reductions in crime, including:
-Statistical reports
-Internal evaluations
-Communications discussing the effectiveness of the system
8. Communications
Emails, memoranda, and internal communications between (your city) Police Department personnel, City officials, or vendors referencing:
-Expansion of the camera network
-Privacy concerns
-Public opposition or legal review
Search terms should include: “camera network”, “surveillance cameras”, “real time crime center”, "Aerodome", "Raven", “ALPR”, “Flock”, “facial recognition”, and “camera integration”.
Format
Please provide records in electronic format via email or download link.
If any records are withheld, please provide the specific statutory exemption relied upon and produce all reasonably segregable portions of responsive documents.
Fee Waiver
This request concerns matters of significant public interest involving government surveillance and constitutional rights, and any fees should be waived or minimized.
I look forward to your response within the statutory timeframe.
The Fourth Amendment was written for a reason. The founders lived under a government that searched homes, seized papers, and invaded private life without justification. They built a wall against it. Washington has spent decades quietly tearing that wall down, one surveillance program, one secret court order, and one warrantless data purchase at a time.
My Fourth Amendment Restoration and Protection Act rebuilds it. Government exists to protect your rights, not trade them away to the highest bidder or the most powerful agency.
Scott North retweeted
Your phone’s location history is a record of your private life. The government should not be able to collect that information from innocent Americans without a warrant just because they happened to be near a crime.
This ruling is an important step toward restoring the warrant requirement for Americans’ sensitive data.
Second opinion is in Chatrie, on geofence warrants. The court holds that officers conducted a 4th Amendment search when they acquired location data from Google because an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cellphone location info.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/25…
Scott North retweeted
This is a dangerous anti-privacy bill (identity verification) that the House of Representatives might try to pass by voice vote this afternoon before many of us are even in town. Senators Mike Lee, Rand Paul, and Ron Wyden voted against a similar bill in the Senate two years ago.
The internet could change if the U.S. House passes the KIDS Act today to "protect children." Critics warn it could mean de facto age checks for everyone and weakened encrypted communications.
The KIDS Act is a package of around a dozen bills that pairs a revised Kids Online Safety Act with new age-verification, AI chatbot, and messaging rules.
Digital rights group EFF warns the design would pressure platforms to age-check all users, not just minors, since liability can attach when a service "should have known" a user's age, and flags new rules touching encrypted and disappearing messages. Sponsors Brett Guthrie (R) and Frank Pallone (D) say it's kids-safety protection and note KOSA's text says age verification isn't required.
Scott North retweeted
Here’s the roll call of members of Congress who betrayed the Constitution and the American people by voting yes on the KIDS Act.
The sickest part is that these people used “protecting kids” as an excuse to further insert government between parents and their children—all while establishing a surveillance infrastructure to monitor and control Americans of all ages.
Scott North retweeted
Forty-seven members of Congress skipped the vote on the KIDS Act, which establishes the infrastructure for mass surveillance of Americans online.
This bill needed a two-thirds majority to pass, so just 17 more no votes could have sunk it!
A couple members might have a legit excuse, but 47? No way. They bailed to avoid going on the record, even at the cost of furthering the surveillance state.
The memo that @TMobile should have sent today.
reddit.com/r/tmobile/comment…
Scott North retweeted
Creating a database that tracks the movements of hundreds of millions of people, and which the government can search at will without a warrant, is a bad idea.
Happy #NationalCameraDay
TIL about 'Audio Memory', Google's latest terrible idea, and that @TMobile is force-retiring my plan and raising my phone rates. Not a great day for personal mobile tech in my household.
Scott North retweeted
THE UK JUST MADE PRIVACY A CRIME.
The government wants a scanner built inside every phone in the country.
Scanning every citizen becomes the law. Refusing becomes 5 years in prison.
- The scanners would inspect every photo, message and video on your device before encryption
- Signal threatened to leave the UK entirely rather than build the backdoor
- Europe's age verification app built to "keep children safe" was hacked in under 2 minutes
- Another verification system leaked 70,000 IDs and selfies in a single breach
Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning. His own country turned it into law
BREAKING: The UK is drafting a law to scan every photo, video and message on every phone in the country.
Tech CEOs who refuse to implement this could face up to 5 years in prison.
The proposal would force companies to build device level scanners that inspect content before encryption.
That means:
• Every image scanned
• Every message inspected
• Every video analyzed
All directly on your phone.
Governments and companies pushing these safety” systems already have a terrible track record protecting user data.
Last month, Europe’s new age verification app, promoted as a way to "keep children safe," was hacked in under 2 minutes.
In another case, over 70,000 IDs and selfies linked to online verification systems were exposed in a major breach.
Now the UK wants even deeper access directly inside your device.
Once governments force surveillance tools into every phone, they can expand what gets monitored at any time.
Scott North retweeted
American law enforcement is hiding camera inside fake utility boxes
This box looks like an electric box. It even has an electric bolt symbol as a decoy. But it’s fake, inside is a camera that used by law enforcement to monitor the public
Law enforcement uses these decoy boxes attached to utility poles for surveillance
We are under unlawful surveillance and they courts when side with law enforcement over these cameras
In many US jurisdictions, long-term warrantless pole camera surveillance of public areas or homes from a distance has been upheld by courts
Insane
Scott North retweeted
The government isn't meant to search your things without a warrant.
So they buy your data instead, and pretend that searching their own databases doesn't count.
The 3rd-Party Doctrine needs to end.
surveillanceaccountability.c…
Scott North retweeted
These are the brand new disguised Automated License Plate Reader cameras in Arizona
The large yellow plastic barrels are camouflaged housings designed to look like construction equipment
They are being deployed in remote desert areas along highways
These new camouflaged cameras are a partnership between Flock and law enforcement and the plan is to use them extensively to track vehicle movement and broader surveillance
We are witnessing the surveillance state being established in America… this only ends in mass surveillance































