BSV is Bitcoin SPV is Freedom Anvil is Connectivity

Joined April 2025
Maxis telling you why Segwit/Lightning/Taproot/"Andy"Back aren't in the WhitePaper but BTC is still Bitcoin.
In 2015 Elizabeth Holmes was worth $4.5 billion. She told CBS she didn't own a TV because she worked every waking hour. When people questioned her blood tests, she had an answer ready. In the video below, she says that if your invention gets questioned, "that's a sign you've actually done something transformative." Her company Theranos claimed it could run hundreds of tests from one drop of blood. Walgreens put it in stores. Investors put in over $700 million. Henry Kissinger sat on her board. The machines never worked. Most tests were secretly run on regular lab equipment. Patients got wrong results about cancer, HIV and pregnancies. In 2022 she was convicted of fraud. She is serving more than 11 years in federal prison. The questions she called a sign of success were the truth the whole time. Was she a liar from the start, or a believer who couldn't admit she failed? Save the video and follow for more stories about how the rich really made their money.
1
5
227
checks out.
BTC is so gay that it just went under 80k.
5
133
Jek is back.
2
1
221
BTC is a crowded Theater waiting for someone to scream "Fire". One day the gears will lock as only a tiny fraction of BTC can move without clogging the Epstein dev machine. 🍿
"JUST IN," Pete? Cash App announced this Thursday afternoon. "THIS IS HOW YOU SCALE BTC" Cash App's own post: "Eligible Cash App customers can automatically move bitcoin to their paired Bitkey when their BTC balance reaches its chosen threshold." Bitkey is "the self-custody bitcoin wallet built by Block, Inc." Cash App is Block's too. Block's app, sending to Block's wallet. Moving coins off an app into a wallet you control is a real improvement. But a nicer withdraw button is not scaling. Every auto-withdraw is an on-chain transaction, and every one of them competes for the same blocks. The cap doesn't move with the user count. BIP 141: "The new rule is block weight ≤ 4,000,000." github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob… So what happens when every Cash App customer sets a threshold? Hint: they all bid for the same 4,000,000. My take: scaling means blocks that grow with the users, which is what big blocks were built to do. A button that sends more people into the same small block is a queue. Nice feature, Pete. That's not scaling. That's a waiting line! xitter.cf/pete_rizzo_/status/211…
2
96
BSVanon retweeted
$BSV #Bitcoinˢᵛ 🚨 BREAKING!!! Lightning News confirms the Bitcoin sent over radio waves with no internet to be the Original BitcoinSV and urges users not to fall for the BTC scam.
Replying to @LightningNewsX
IMPORTANT UPDATE: Video shows a Bitcoin SV transaction not Bitcoin (BTC). Don't fall for scams.
4
19
2
155
2,605
Replying to @SendBSV
Per hour billing is just the start. Once everything is metered by the second, you need payments smaller than a cent that still clear. $BSV does that on chain today, and Teranode sustained 1M TPS for two weeks. Cloud gaming is a micropayment business now.
1
2
123
Happy birthday @CsTominaga !!
1
3
58
BSVanon retweeted
I've been focused on development of my new AI harness/OS @EdwinPai so I haven't been on X for a while. The reason the mempool exists is to receive transactions so the first seen rule can be followed. Those transactions are then processed and added to blocks as quickly as possible. Teranode processes transactions and adds them to subtrees/blocks as soon as they are received so a mempool is no longer needed. The savings of immediate processing and subtree communication is superior to using a mempool because it's more efficient, and importantly, it accelerates the positive flywheel effect of node game theory: Nodes receive as many transactions as possible and build subtrees as quickly as possible while hashing as quickly as possible to win the next block with as many transactions as possible to get the biggest block reward they can. They are then incentivized to reinvest their earnings into their computing and networking infrastructure to be as competitive as possible and to earn as much profit per block as possible. The result of this is the holy grail of computing systems which is a system that gets more efficient the more it's used. It's the win-win-win relationship Satoshi carefully crafted in the original white paper: peer-to-peer electronic cash that's competitively maintained so individuals retain privacy, data provenance, and data ownership; the system gets cheaper and requires less energy to use as usage if it increases; and, node operators earn more while simultaneously being strongly incentivized to provide the best experience possible in order to earn more
3
3
8
222
bitcoin scales
3
2
38
840
The storage work behind each transaction Why write amplification and background maintenance belong in the mathematics of sustainable transaction capacity vi.ltd/update-2026-10-22-the…
4
8
47
1,861
Someone get the BTC Crowd some diapers.
1
1
8
194
BSVanon retweeted
Replying to @GavinMehl
1
2
7
200
BSV exists to see if bitcoin actually works. We didn’t even want it to exist. We want bitcoin to work despite the fact that people keep taking away its features and adding different ones across bitcoin-based blockchains.
1
11
186
BSVanon retweeted
You simply do not understand what is coming.
"If we don't do this by 2030, we're dead" -CSW 2018 We have 5 years left, and we already have Teranode Things are starting to move fast
8
29
215
68,908
1 MILLION TPS. Teranode just sustained 1M transactions per second for TWO WEEKS. BTC does 7. But tell me again how BSV does not scale. Dr. Wright built Bitcoin to be electronic cash for the world, not a museum piece. $BSV #BSV #Bitcoin #BTC
5
11
84
1,741
Wake up @elonmusk Only BSV is BITCOIN ONE MILLION TRANSACTIONS PER SECOND. BTC can’t do anything like that. BSV GIVES YOU WHAT YOU NEED. EMBRACE THE FUTURE.
Elon Musk to Walter Isaacson: "there will be still a currency," measured in "wattage and tonnage, mass and energy." In the quotes already: "That is exactly why $BTC works" Close. He's describing Bitcoin, but BTC doesn’t really work that way anymore… Satoshi, 2008: "In our case, it is CPU time and electricity that is expended." Same paper, page one, on middlemen: "cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions," meaning Satoshi care about small, cheap payments (like @elonmusk does!) So which chain can a robot actually spend on? Hint: the one that still has works like bitcoin, the one that scales. Teranode, in testing: a sustained 1 million TPS for two weeks across six nodes. aws.amazon.com/blogs/web3/ho… Teranode is live on mainnet today. My take: robots won't HODL. They'll pay per watt, per task, per second. Energy money you can't spend at machine speed isn't a currency. It's a big, inefficient battery.
3
6
48
1,009
BSVanon retweeted
Replying to @ProjectBabbage
Blaming CSW is playing victim
1
1
8
218
I'm wondering whether anyone in my network would be interested in collaborating on a research paper examining the relationship between ecology, fisheries and economics in Thailand. I'm looking for a potential co-author with a background in ecology, environmental economics, fisheries science or a combination of these disciplines, preferably with experience in academic research and publication. For the past two years, I've been collecting data in Phuket, monitoring crab populations, their growth and decline, and the apparent relationship between population fluctuations, human migration, tourism and changing economic activity. I'm also interested in the broader implications for fish populations, local fisheries, resource pressures and the economic costs associated with these changes. The objective is to move beyond simply documenting ecological fluctuations and examine the underlying relationships between human activity, population dynamics and economic consequences. In particular, I want to investigate whether changes in human population and economic activity are associated with measurable ecological effects, and what those effects mean for the sustainability and economics of local fisheries. I have the longitudinal observations and an economic research background. What I'm looking for is someone who can bring complementary ecological or fisheries expertise, help develop a rigorous analytical framework and contribute meaningfully to a publishable academic paper. I'm not looking for someone merely to add their name to a manuscript. I'm looking for a genuine research collaborator who is interested in the questions, willing to challenge the assumptions and keen to develop something academically substantial. If this is within your area of expertise, or you know someone who might be interested, I'd welcome a conversation.
5
5
34
2,432