shaene (@shaene) header
shaene (@shaene) profile picture

Head Writer/EP of #HelloKitty. Humanitas nominee. Writer of Invincible Fight Girl, #Avengers: Secret Wars, & #DC Super Hero Girls. @Shaene@socel.net

Los Angeles area
Joined May 2008
Photo by shaene (@shaene)Photo by shaene (@shaene)Photo by shaene (@shaene)Photo by shaene (@shaene)Photo by shaene (@shaene)Photo by shaene (@shaene)Photo by shaene (@shaene)Photo by shaene (@shaene)Photo by shaene (@shaene)
I'm starting a free newsletter to keep in touch with folks who are fans of things I love (& fans of stuff I've written for!) You'd be an inaugural member! Interested? Please sign up here! zc.vg/9S5gm #animation #action #scifi #anime #fantasy #superheroes #ComicCon
3
1
1
9
1,719
If I were on an SSRI, I'd want to know this, so I'm sharing. By the way, the account is geared towards women's health, but Google tells me there are related issues for men on SSRIs too.
60 to 70% of women taking SSRI antidepressants (Prozac, Zoloft, Lexapro, Celexa) experience difficulty reaching orgasm or complete inability to orgasm as a direct side effect of the medication. the number is not 10%. it is not "some women." it is the majority of users. the medication that treats depression by increasing serotonin simultaneously suppresses the dopamine and norepinephrine pathways that produce orgasm. the drug that fixes the brain's mood system breaks the brain's pleasure system. the mechanism: SSRIs increase serotonin availability in the synaptic cleft. serotonin reduces anxiety and stabilizes mood (the therapeutic effect). serotonin also directly suppresses dopamine release in the mesolimbic pathway (the reward/pleasure pathway) and reduces norepinephrine signaling (the arousal pathway). orgasm requires both dopamine (the buildup of pleasure) and norepinephrine (the physical arousal response). SSRIs suppress both while treating depression through a third pathway. the mood improves. the orgasm disappears. the delay or absence of orgasm on SSRIs is not psychological. it is pharmacological. the drug is chemically reducing the neurotransmitter activity required for the orgasm reflex. the woman who cannot orgasm on Zoloft is not "in her head." she is experiencing a documented, predictable, dose dependent side effect that her prescribing doctor may not have mentioned because sexual side effects are historically under discussed in psychiatric medication counseling. the cruelest irony: many women develop depression partially because of relationship dissatisfaction, body image issues, or sexual trauma. the medication treats the mood but eliminates the sexual function that is often central to the recovery. the woman starts feeling emotionally better but loses the ability to orgasm, which creates a new source of frustration, shame, and relationship strain. the drug treats one wound and opens another. the practical reality: if she is on an SSRI and struggling to orgasm, the first step is not a new technique. the first step is a conversation with her prescribing doctor about alternatives. bupropion (Wellbutrin) is an antidepressant that works through dopamine and norepinephrine rather than serotonin and has a significantly lower rate of sexual side effects. switching medications or adding bupropion alongside the SSRI is a well documented clinical strategy. the solution exists. it requires a medical conversation, not a bedroom adjustment. for women who remain on SSRIs by choice or necessity: higher stimulation intensity (vibrators), longer foreplay (30+ minutes), and timing sex 8 to 12 hours before the next SSRI dose (when blood levels are lowest) can improve orgasm accessibility. the strategies compensate for the suppressed neurotransmitter levels without replacing them. if she can't orgasm and she's on an SSRI, the answer is not "try harder" or "relax" or a new position. the answer is that her medication is pharmacologically suppressing the neurochemistry of orgasm in the majority of users and nobody told her that when they wrote the prescription. the conversation needs to move from the bedroom to the doctor's office. the solution is medical, not sexual.
33
My son is a senior in high school who works thirty hours a month at a sporting goods retailer. He submitted a written time-off request four weeks in advance for his high school graduation ceremony and family dinner. The supervisor signed the paper and pinned it to the bulletin board. When the weekly roster was posted, the store manager had scheduled him for a closing shift right through the exact hours of his graduation ceremony. When my son brought the signed approval sheet to the manager’s desk, the man shrugged and said: "Business needs change. If you don't show up for your shift, consider it job abandonment. In the real world, you learn that your job comes before personal plans." My son sat in the car in our driveway, completely defeated, genuinely believing he had to choose between walking across the graduation stage or keeping his job. I walked into the store with him, found the manager, and had my son hand over his nametag and uniform shirt on the spot. I looked the manager in the eye and said: "In the real world, you are a retail manager attempting to manipulate a teenager into missing a once-in-a-lifetime milestone he worked twelve years to earn, all to fold sweatpants on a Friday evening. His resignation is effective immediately." The manager stammered, turned red, and started offering to find shift coverage on the spot. We walked out. Teach your children early: an hourly job that demands you sacrifice your education, your milestones, and your self-worth does not value you as a human being. Never let an entry-level supervisor convince your child that their future is negotiable.
543
3,662
119
16,644
150,934
I love how Outlook immediately removes a meeting invite from my inbox the second I accept it. Because why would I ever need to reference the agenda, meeting link, or literally any of the information required to attend? Incredible design. No notes.
247
989
84
20,046
998,836
Shoutout to the people that do the awkward little jog when a car lets them cross the street. You are not moving any faster, but the effort is beautiful. I see you. I respect you.
1,675
9,372
552
122,856
1,694,926
This is what we mean by kids need to go outside and play.🥰
145
1,852
97
19,287
891,821
I did not know this was happening. :(
Replying to @latsot
I do strangulation exams as part of my job. I have taken extensive training in strangulation and am qualified to testify as an expert in strangulation cases. The general public has no idea how bad this epidemic has become, how many women and girls this is happening to, or how dangerous this is. I share facts about it sometimes like men who strangle women are twice as likely to be involved in a mass shooting or to kill a cop. Women who are strangled by their partners are 750% more likely to be killed by that partner. I tell people that death by strangulation can occur in just minutes, under a minute if you hit the right nerve bundles that lead to certain arrhythmias. I also tell them that a woman can die from a strangulation event up to one year after the event and that a pregnant woman who has been strangled is at high risk of pregnancy loss for weeks after the strangulation event. Strangulation can lead to brain damage, physical disability, stroke, pregnancy loss, and death. I tell people that there is no safe way to strangle and that nobody has the ability to consent to being murdered, and consent is not an excuse for murder, if someone were to consent to this it is incumbent on the would be murderer to use self discipline and restraint, because a person’s “consent” to being murdered is not going to be recognized by any court as a legitimate excuse. Nobody can consent to being killed. When I tell people these things, a very few are appreciative, mostly women, some are interested, men and women, and some attack me for being stupid and not knowing what I am talking about, apparently days of professional training and hundreds of exams performed mean nothing to the “experts” of X. Those that attack are mostly men. Some argue with me about dumb things, like my insistence to call strangulation what it is. Strangulation is not choking, choking is not strangulation, these are two different types of ways to block an airway but they are not the same. That is what people argue with me about the most. They insist on using incorrect language and then provide me with a weak google link picture of a choke hold to try to prove it’s the same. So then it becomes me explaining that a choke hold is called a chokehold but it is not choking it is strangulation and that blows their minds and I am met with silence or swears. This is an incredibly important issue that needs to be discussed but it is very contentious and the defenders of strangulation can turn into rabid dogs very quickly. Anyway, I just wanted to tell you that I really appreciate the effort you are taking here, that you are raising awareness and that you are using accurate language and data. It’s really important that we change the narrative around this subject. I would like to share this resource with you, I’m not sure if you are aware of them or not, but this was the group that did my training on strangulation. They go all over the US teaching medical professionals and law enforcement about strangulation and they have a ton of information and resources on their website. You might find them useful. Thank you for talking about this. strangulationtraininginstitu…
2
283
I met him once boarding a plane. We were stuck in line and i was like "ok..say something..fk do it.. do it...do it" in my head.. He turns once glances at me... smiles and nods... like "yeah i know you know who i am.." and i just go quiet...then he glances back and just says "ask away..." I did the usual "omfg love your work blah blah" and then he asked what I did and then just went into this rathole of how tech and creativity fascinate him and how people do things with computers and then we ended up talking about sheep properties and my life living in the outback... then he splintered off to his seat and mine.. Then we get to our destination, I get off and my wife is waiting for me with the kids and he gets off after me as he was ambushed with people wanting selfies... anyway I tell my wife "guess who's on the plane" and so she now wants to wait around, he then walks past us, nods at me and says "nice meeting you Scott" and continues.. The look my wife gave me at that point in time was like "WTF DID YOU DO.." Anyway. All i remember was here's one guy who could have just waived me off took the time to chat about nothing and still somehow gave me the "you matter too" vibe. Legend. Genuinely sad he's passed.
477
3,571
122
64,443
1,352,957
Offering concerts with real accommodations for immunocompromised folks? Quite amazing!
NYC Rapper Drew Empire @DrewEmpire718 wears N95s and organizes mask-required shows to stay healthy and to show solidarity to marginalized people with disabilities, compromised immune systems and #LongCOVID. Support #MaskTogetherAmerica #CleanAir
1
1
62
shaene retweeted
For myself, this is one of the most important pieces written about taking covid precautions when most people don’t. It resonated so deeply with me. I think it will resonate with many of the folks that I interact with here. @drseanmullen whn.global/stuck-in-the-midd…
18
190
12
620
14,398
Long COVID is defined as an symptomatic condition. However, COVID-19 can also cause organ damage without symptoms. New Paper: Spectrum of COVID-19: From Asymptomatic Organ Damage to Long COVID Syndrome #LongCovidAwarenessDay whn.global/scientific/spectr…
40
575
46
1,166
84,548
The research behind this is wild. Your sperm carries a set of instructions that tell your genes when to turn on and off. A Duke University study found that THC rewrites those instructions. The more weed in your system, the bigger the changes. It goes straight for the genes your future embryo needs in its first week of life. I had to read the "day 3 crash" part twice. For the first three days after fertilization, an embryo runs entirely on the mother's DNA. Day 3, the father's genes switch on. If those genes carry cannabis damage, the embryo just stops growing. Fertility doctors see this happen in their labs: embryos that fertilized fine and looked healthy on day 2 go completely still by day 5. Boston University tracked 1,535 couples trying to have a baby. Men who smoked weed once a week or more doubled their partner's miscarriage risk. That number held up even when the woman herself never touched cannabis. And the miscarriages clustered in the first 8 weeks, right when the father's damaged DNA would be doing the most harm. Duke also found that the specific genes THC alters in sperm overlap with genes linked to autism. One of those genes, called DLGAP2, helps brain cells communicate with each other. It was changed in cannabis users' sperm. When researchers bred THC-exposed male rats and checked their offspring, the same altered gene pattern showed up in the pups' brains. The damage crossed a generation. Weed has gotten way stronger over the last 30 years. THC content was about 4% in the 1990s but nearly quadrupled to 15% by 2018, and modern dispensary strains regularly sit at 20-30%. Concentrates go up to 95%. Quitting for about 11 weeks (one full cycle of sperm production) reverses some of the DNA changes. Not all of them. Duke's lead researcher says men should stop at least 6 months before trying for a baby. Half of your kid's genetic blueprint comes from you, and right now, THC is editing that blueprint before conception even happens.
Cannabis is detrimental to sperm: even if they can fertilize, there can be DNA damage. Many miscarriages and (in the case of IVF) “day 3 crashes” which is when paternal DNA normally kicks in, are cannabis related. Dr Natalie Crawford on the Huberman Lab podcast out now.
1,039
8,391
1,186
42,955
8,705,038
Microplastics have been found in human brains, blood, placentas, and testes across 1,300 species. An 18-year-old in Virginia just built a filter in her garage that removes 95.5% of them. The physics of how it works is worth understanding. Traditional water filters use solid membranes. Water passes through, particles get caught. The problem: microplastics range from 5mm down to 1 micrometer. Filters fine enough to catch the smallest particles clog constantly and need replacing. The maintenance cost makes them impractical for household use. Mia Heller built exactly this, over and over, after water tests in Warrenton, Virginia showed PFAS and microplastic contamination. Government agencies said no public funds were coming. Residents were on their own. Heller took a completely different approach. Her system uses ferrofluid, a liquid containing magnetic nanoparticles suspended in oil. The key insight is polarity. Microplastics and water have different polarities. Microplastics are more attracted to the oily ferrofluid than they are to water. So when ferrofluid enters contaminated water, the microplastics migrate toward it on their own. Then you apply a magnetic field. The ferrofluid is magnetic. The magnet pulls the ferrofluid out of the water, and all the attached microplastics come with it. The ferrofluid is recovered and reused at an 87.15% recycling rate. No membrane. No clogging. No constant filter replacements. She went through five prototypes before getting it working. The system filters about a liter at a time and fits under a kitchen sink. She also built her own turbidity sensor to verify the removal rate, rather than relying on visual inspection. Municipal drinking water plants achieve 70 to 97% microplastic removal depending on technology. Her garage prototype hits 95.52%. She won a $500 prize at the Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair for it. The constraint she already sees: ferrofluid is expensive to produce at scale. She designed the system for individual households, not treatment plants. But the mechanism, polarity and magnetism replacing physical filtration, is the kind of first-principles reasoning that makes the best engineering. Five prototypes. One garage. $500.
23
405
24
1,265
29,181
Your brain runs an authenticity detector, and AI just broke it. There's an fMRI study from Oxford where researchers showed people Rembrandt paintings. Same paintings, same canvas, same brushstrokes. The only variable: whether subjects were told "this is genuine" or "this is a copy." When told "copy," the frontopolar cortex lit up. That's the region your brain activates for complex evaluative judgments and prediction errors. When told "authentic," the orbitofrontal cortex activated instead. That's the reward center. Same painting. Completely different neurological experience. Your brain has two separate circuits for processing the same content depending on whether it believes a human made it. Now layer in what neuroscientists call the predictive coding framework. Your brain is constantly generating predictions about incoming sensory information. When the prediction matches reality, you process smoothly. When it doesn't, your brain fires a prediction error signal, which triggers heightened attention and cognitive load. That signal is the same mechanism behind the uncanny valley. Your visual cortex detects something 95% right, the prefrontal cortex flags a mismatch, and the result is unease. AI content has pushed this system into permanent overdrive. Every piece of writing, every image, every video now generates a low-grade prediction error because your brain can't confidently categorize it as human or machine. The cognitive load of constant authenticity assessment is real and measurable. Anxious hypervigilance research shows the brain amplifies these prediction error signals under uncertainty, which burns through attentional resources and impairs higher-order thinking. The comic nails the cultural observation. The neuroscience is darker. We trained an entire species to run threat detection on every piece of content they consume. The metabolic cost of never trusting what you see is not zero.
1
4
24
4,197
This may be why I'm a night owl!
Your brain at 2 AM writing a paper you started at 10 PM is operating in a neurochemical state that most productivity systems spend thousands of dollars trying to replicate. Sleep deprivation suppresses your prefrontal cortex. That's the region responsible for self-criticism, second-guessing, and the voice that says "this paragraph isn't good enough." At 2 AM, that voice goes quiet. Not because you've achieved some zen state. Because the hardware running it is shutting down for the night and you won't let it. Meanwhile the deadline is dumping norepinephrine and cortisol into your system, which narrows your attention to a single point. Your brain physically cannot multitask in that state. No checking your phone. No opening a new tab. The stress response has commandeered every available resource and pointed it at the Google Doc. Lowered inhibition plus chemically forced single-task focus. That combination is almost identical to what Csikszentmihalyi documented across 30 years of flow state research. Clear goal, immediate feedback, challenge matched to skill. A 12-page paper due in 8 hours hits all three criteria by accident. The lo-fi beats matter more than people think. Repetitive audio at 60-70 BPM synchronizes with resting heart rate and suppresses novelty-seeking circuits. You stop hearing it within minutes. It becomes an auditory wall that blocks interruption without costing you any cognitive load. It's the cheapest sensory deprivation chamber ever built. And the black coffee at midnight is pharmacologically different from your morning cup. Your adenosine levels have been building all day, so the caffeine is fighting a much stronger sleep signal. The subjective experience of "wired but calm" at 1 AM is a different drug interaction than alert-at-9-AM. Same molecule, completely different neurochemical environment. Every semester, twice a semester, four years straight. That's 40 sessions of accidental deep work before anyone had a name for it. The grade was an A- because the conditions were perfect. Not despite the chaos. Because of it.
25
🚨 Stanford researchers just exposed a weird side effect of AI that almost nobody is talking about. The paper is called “Artificial Hivemind.” And the core finding is unsettling. As language models get better, they also start sounding more and more the same. Not just within a single model. Across different models. Researchers built a dataset called INFINITY-CHAT with 26,000 real open-ended questions things like creative writing, brainstorming, opinions, and advice. Questions where there isn’t a single correct answer. In theory, these prompts should produce huge diversity. But the opposite happened. Two patterns showed up: 1) Intra-model repetition The same model keeps producing very similar answers across runs. 2) Inter-model homogeneity Completely different models generate strikingly similar responses. In other words: Instead of thousands of unique perspectives… We’re getting the same few ideas recycled over and over. The authors call this the “Artificial Hivemind.” It happens because most frontier models are trained on similar data, optimized with similar reward models, and aligned using similar human feedback. So even when you ask something open-ended like: • “Write a poem about time” • “Suggest creative startup ideas” • “Give life advice” Many models converge toward the same phrasing, metaphors, and reasoning patterns. The scary implication isn’t about AI quality. It’s about culture. If billions of people rely on the same systems for ideas, writing, brainstorming, and thinking… AI might slowly compress the diversity of human thought. Not because it’s trying to. But because the models themselves are drifting toward the same answers. That’s the real risk the paper highlights. Not that AI becomes smarter than humans. But that everyone starts thinking like the same machine.
396
1,527
420
4,258
390,584
A both funny and educational meme. Let me explain: In the first panel, Joey is excited because the hotel’s “free Wi-Fi” is extremely fast. Anyone who has stayed in hotels knows their Wi-Fi is usually slow, overloaded, and frustrating. So when a connection suddenly feels blazing fast, it feels like you got lucky. In the second panel, Joey checks his device and notices his IP address starts with 172.16.42.x. His expression instantly changes to shock — because that number means something very specific in cybersecurity. That IP range is the well-known default network configuration used by a device called a WiFi Pineapple. A WiFi Pineapple is a portable penetration-testing tool that attackers can use to create rogue Wi-Fi access points. It can imitate legitimate networks … like a hotel’s Wi-Fi and trick nearby devices into connecting to it instead of the real network. Once your device connects, the attacker effectively becomes the network in the middle, allowing them to observe or manipulate traffic passing through it. This is a classic Man in the Middle (MitM) attack. The reason the connection feels “fast” is simple: you’re probably one of the few people connected to it, and the attacker is letting your traffic pass through so they can monitor it. So if you ever connect to public Wi-Fi and notice an IP address like 172.16.42.x, there’s a good chance you’re not actually on the hotel’s network…. you might be connected to a rogue hotspot controlled by someone else.
😂 If you understand this, explain it
287
15,406
178
101,095
6,626,562
Today is day four of sitting bedside with my father. He’s stable. He’s going to be OK. But the truth is, had I not made the call to EMS and gotten him out of the rehab facility he was in, he may not still be with us. He fell and broke both his arm and ankle and needed rehab due to limited mobility. His arm surgery was major. Fifty-two stitches from shoulder to elbow. Because of that, proper wound care was critical. It wasn’t happening. While he was there, he developed an infection. When I visited Monday, his arm was bandaged, so I had no idea how bad it truly was. Then I learned he had a fever and wasn’t eating or drinking. I went back Tuesday. This time I asked to see the wound. What I saw is the gnarliest infection I’ve ever seen in my life. I took pictures. He told me they weren’t changing the bandages often enough, and some days they weren’t changing them at all. His bed linens and gown were dirty. I kept telling staff that with an open infection like that, he cannot be lying on dirty sheets. I took more pictures. That’s when I made the decision to call EMS and get him out of there and into the ER. Thankfully, the ER doctor acted immediately. Two IV antibiotics. A full round of tests. He’s having surgery today to reopen the arm, clean out the infection, and remove the hardware. In six weeks, he’ll need another surgery to reconstruct the bone, because the infection prevented proper healing. By some miracle, he wasn’t septic yet. If I showed you the deformity that infection caused to his arm, you’d lose your lunch. Moral of the story: Be an advocate for your loved ones. In hospitals. In nursing homes. In rehab facilities. Ask questions. Look closely. Speak up. Trust your gut. We are also filing a formal complaint with the state. I’m beyond grateful I listened to that inner voice. It might have saved my dad’s life.
I’m at the ER with my father today…pops isn’t doing well. I’ll get back to posting soon.
486
514
57
3,485
86,822
“My husband and I were dressed and ready to go out for a lovely evening of dinner and theater. Having been burgled in the past, we turned on a 'night light' and the answering machine, then put the cat in the backyard. When our cab arrived, we walked out our front door and our rather tubby cat scooted between our legs inside, then ran up the stairs. Because our cat likes to chase our budgie we really didn't want to leave them un-chaperoned so my husband ran inside to retrieve her and put her in the back yard again. Because I didn't want the taxi driver to know our house was going to be empty all evening, I explained to him that my husband would be out momentarily as he was just bidding goodnight to my mother. A few minutes later he got into the cab all hot and bothered, and said (to my growing horror and amusement) as the cab pulled away. "Sorry it took so long but the stupid bitch was hiding under the bed and i had to poke her ass with a coat hanger to get her to come out! She tried to take off so i grabbed her by the neck and wrapped her in a blanket so she wouldn't scratch me like she did last time. But it worked! I hauled her fat arse down the stairs and threw her into the backyard....she had better not shit in the vegetable garden again." The silence in the taxi was deafening....” ~ Robyn Markham
109
173
20
1,105
43,622
This is one of the most important studies in sleep science. Van Dongen et al. ran the experiment that changed how we understand chronic sleep restriction. They had subjects sleep 4h, 6h, or 8h nightly for 14 days, testing cognitive performance every 2 hours. The 6h group’s reaction time deficits by day 14 matched subjects who had been awake for 24 hours straight. The 4h group? They performed like someone awake 48 hours. But here’s what makes this study terrifying. The Stanford Sleepiness Scale ratings in Panel B plateau after day 3-4. Subjects stopped feeling more tired even as their cognitive performance continued deteriorating through day 14. Your subjective experience of fatigue is a lagging indicator that eventually just… stops updating. This explains why chronic undersleeping feels sustainable. You’ve adapted to feeling tired. Your prefrontal cortex hasn’t adapted to being impaired. The PVT (Psychomotor Vigilance Task) in Panel A measures lapses in attention. These are the moments where you’re staring at a screen and your brain simply checks out for 500ms. Every additional day of 6h sleep adds more lapses. The curve never flattens. Panel C and D show working memory and processing speed. Same pattern: continuous degradation with no subjective awareness. The practical implications: If you’re sleeping 6h and think you’re functioning fine, you’ve lost the internal calibration to know you’re not. The subjects in this study would have told you they felt “okay” while performing like they’d pulled an all-nighter. For anyone doing cognitively demanding work, this means you cannot trust how you feel. You need to track objective markers: error rates, decision latency, problem-solving throughput. Sleep need is biological, not negotiable. Most adults require 7-9 hours, and the research shows no population-level adaptation to chronic restriction. “I only need 6 hours” is almost always “I’ve forgotten what baseline cognition feels like.“
Competitive gamers: 6h of sleep is a hidden nerf. 6h/night for 2 weeks → reaction time & attention decline to the equivalent of pulling MULTIPLE all-nighters. Worst part: subjective fatigue plateaus, so you stop noticing. If you're not getting 7+ hours/night, you're trolling.
222
3,972
423
30,628
4,152,086