@SharpPulseHQ

Every public pick, graded against the closing line. Cappers and betting tools. Same standard. No paid grades.

 San Francisco
sharppulse.app/leaderboard
Joined April 2026
  • Tweets161
  • Following183
  • Followers78
117Media
Don’t take our word for it. Check the Receipts. Respect to @EVergreenBets for putting its independently graded SharpPulse Record directly on its paywall. Public picks. Independent CLV grading. A Record anyone can inspect. This is what transparency should look like. Check the record before you buy.
EVergreen:+EV Sports Betting
@EVergreenBetsOct 22
Don’t believe our +EV picks are profitable long term? Don't take our word for it. Our record is now independently tracked by @SharpPulseHQ and displayed right on our paywall. We're confident enough in our picks to let anyone judge the results 🌲
1
2
108
Most losing bettors don’t have a picking problem. They have a price problem. Two bettors took OKC. Both won. Same $100 risk. $23 less profit. Before your next bet, take 30 seconds to compare the exact same line across sportsbooks. Same pick. Better price. That's line shopping.
3
105
The result: 207 public picks graded. +3.19% Avg CLV. +3.16% Median CLV. 74% beat close. A+ grade. EVStrike ranks #1 among Products on SharpPulse. Every graded pick has a Receipt. Exclusions and corrections are public.
SharpPulse
@SharpPulseHQOct 20
Every sports betting tool claims an edge. Today, we look at the math. Sweep #001: @ev_strike 1,751 timeline posts read.
2
89
Every sports betting tool claims an edge. Today, we look at the math. Sweep #001: @ev_strike 1,751 timeline posts read.
1
2
4
335
Sweep #001: @ev_strike Tomorrow.
SharpPulse Sweep 001 teaser: 1,751 posts read from EVstrike. Stats are blurred and the grade is hidden. Results tomorrow.

ALT SharpPulse Sweep 001 teaser: 1,751 posts read from EVstrike. Stats are blurred and the grade is hidden. Results tomorrow.

3
166
Fuck CLV. Here's every real argument against it: - You can beat the close and still lose money. Variance is real. - 20 picks is a small sample. A hot streak can look like skill. - Pick'em apps don't have real closing lines. We have to model them. - Closing lines are softer on small props than on NFL sides. All true. We still grade on it. Here's why 🧵
3
2
217
Every record, every receipt: sharppulse.app/leaderboard

Sports Betting Products & Cappers Ranked by CLV | SharpPulse

Compare independent closing-line records for sports betting products and cappers. Public recommendations graded against the SharpPulse Closing Standard.

sharppulse.app
1
17
Example: SkohtyDFS. 112 picks. Beat the close 0 times. −19% avg CLV. That's not a cold streak. That's the price.
1
19
Wins and losses take thousands of bets to tell you anything. CLV starts telling you something within dozens. It's the fastest honest signal we have. Not a perfect one. That's why every grade shows the sample size. Judge the number with it.
2
129
Every capper and betting tool on your timeline is posting locks right now. We're grading them at kickoff. Not on wins. On price. College football Saturday, graded live 🏈 Running scoreboard below 👇
5
2
166
Everyone's on Indiana. Not everyone got the same bet. Same side. Three prices. wagsischasing +3.5 (−124) Paid up for the hook over 3. +5.8% CLV ✅ MoneylineMafia_ +3 (−110) Got +3 at a cheap price. +3.6% CLV ✅ bookiekillabets +3 (−120) Paid right at the fair price. −0.1% CLV, even with the close ➖ Same team, same game. The grade is the number you got.
18
Same game. Half a point apart. @MoneylineMafia_ Indiana +3 (−110): +3.6% CLV @wagsischasing Indiana +3.5 (−124): +5.8% CLV Wags paid more juice for the hook over 3, the most common margin in football. Pinnacle closed +3.5 at −156. It was worth it. Scoreboard: 5 of 5
15
@MoneylineMafia_ Indiana +3 (−110) "$100k" on it. We can't verify the stake. We can verify the price. Line held at +3, juice closed about −119 fair. +3.6% CLV ✅ Scoreboard: 4 of 4
17
🌲 @EVergreenBets Virginia ML +338 (BetOpenly) Their fair price: +310 Pinnacle closed: +309 +7.0% CLV ✅ (claimed +5.9%) Their tool called the close within one point. Scoreboard: 3 of 3
19
🌲 @EVergreenBets, 2 for 2 at kickoff Florida ML +472 → fair close +449 +4.1% CLV ✅ (claimed +10.5%) NW/Mich St Over 49.5 at +104 → closed 50, fair −109 +6.4% CLV ✅ (claimed +4.2%) One beat its claim. One fell short of it. Both beat the close. Scoreboard: 2 of 2
2
112
College football Saturday 🏈 Your timeline is about to fill up with LOCKS. Who actually has a record? 1,000+ public picks graded. 10 of 16 cappers are losing to the close. Top 3 right now: 1. @SC_FFB +6.37% avg CLV (A+) 2. @amonahan_bets +4.82% (A+) 3. @TumboToon_ +1.90% (A)
SharpPulse capper rankings, ranked by average CLV against the closing line. 16 cappers total; ranks 1–7 shown. 1. SC_FFB, 23 picks, 83% beat the close, +6.37%, A+ 2. amonahan_bets, 22 picks, 64%, +4.82%, A+ 3. TumboToon_, 35 picks, 60%, +1.90%, A 4. KNIGHTLOCKZ, 23 picks, 43%, +1.62%, A 5. CLVBandit, 37 picks, 54%, +1.18%, B 6. daviddailydfs_, 49 picks, 53%, +0.29%, C 7. jethrow0211, 31 picks, 58%, −0.38%, C

ALT SharpPulse capper rankings, ranked by average CLV against the closing line. 16 cappers total; ranks 1–7 shown. 1. SC_FFB, 23 picks, 83% beat the close, +6.37%, A+ 2. amonahan_bets, 22 picks, 64%, +4.82%, A+ 3. TumboToon_, 35 picks, 60%, +1.90%, A 4. KNIGHTLOCKZ, 23 picks, 43%, +1.62%, A 5. CLVBandit, 37 picks, 54%, +1.18%, B 6. daviddailydfs_, 49 picks, 53%, +0.29%, C 7. jethrow0211, 31 picks, 58%, −0.38%, C

1
2
140
The other end of the board 👇 10 cappers below zero. Two haven't beaten the close once: aycebets (0 of 20) and SkohtyDFS (0 of 112). Check the record before you buy: sharppulse.app/leaderboard
SharpPulse capper rankings, ranks 7–16, by average CLV against the closing line. 7. jethrow0211, 31 picks, 58% beat the close, −0.38%, C 8. JuicedBetsEV, 22 picks, 27%, −1.98%, F 9. MoneylineMafia_, 30 picks, 7%, −3.19%, F 10. LockItLive, 129 picks, 24%, −3.45%, F 11. AlphaBettingEV, 20 picks, 40%, −3.46%, F 12. RockettItz, 24 picks, 29%, −4.37%, F 13. betonjmont, 36 picks, 17%, −4.58%, F 14. aycebets, 20 picks, 0%, −4.85%, F 15. PrizePickChamp, 27 picks, 4%, −16.88%, F 16. SkohtyDFS, 112 picks, 0%, −19.00%, F

ALT SharpPulse capper rankings, ranks 7–16, by average CLV against the closing line. 7. jethrow0211, 31 picks, 58% beat the close, −0.38%, C 8. JuicedBetsEV, 22 picks, 27%, −1.98%, F 9. MoneylineMafia_, 30 picks, 7%, −3.19%, F 10. LockItLive, 129 picks, 24%, −3.45%, F 11. AlphaBettingEV, 20 picks, 40%, −3.46%, F 12. RockettItz, 24 picks, 29%, −4.37%, F 13. betonjmont, 36 picks, 17%, −4.58%, F 14. aycebets, 20 picks, 0%, −4.85%, F 15. PrizePickChamp, 27 picks, 4%, −16.88%, F 16. SkohtyDFS, 112 picks, 0%, −19.00%, F

1
2
41
The betting tools got the same test. Top: @EVergreenBets +3.28% (A+), @ev_strike +2.95(A) 2 of 5 tools are below zero against the close.
SharpPulse betting tool rankings, by average CLV against the closing line. 1. Evergreen, 64 picks, 73% beat the close, +3.28%, A+ 2. EVstrike, 42 picks, 74%, +2.95%, A 3. KSplit Analytics, 21 picks, 57%, +0.97%, B 4. InnovatorPicks, 37 picks, 11%, −2.74%, F 5. Winalyze, 34 picks, 9%, −5.35%, F

ALT SharpPulse betting tool rankings, by average CLV against the closing line. 1. Evergreen, 64 picks, 73% beat the close, +3.28%, A+ 2. EVstrike, 42 picks, 74%, +2.95%, A 3. KSplit Analytics, 21 picks, 57%, +0.97%, B 4. InnovatorPicks, 37 picks, 11%, −2.74%, F 5. Winalyze, 34 picks, 9%, −5.35%, F

10
Same pick. Different prices. Opposite CLV.📊 1. @daviddailydfs_ Seahawks ML at −130 +1.2% CLV 🟢 2.@BHiveCaps Seahawks ML at −142 −2.60% CLV 🔴 Missed the closing market. Win or lose on the field, your edge is determined when you click "place bet," not when the clock hits zero.
🤖 Made with AI
1
1
362
Full records and market evidence 👇 sharppulse.app

Bet Slip Audit · Did You Beat the Close | SharpPulse

Audit any bet slip against the closing line. See your CLV, whether you beat the close, and share a Market Receipt. Free Pulse Check.

sharppulse.app
1
107
Load more