YourSmartAsianFriend

I used to sometimes post the Great President’s schedules. Unreal… sometimes up to 3 appearances across the country, all while single-handedly battling all the bureaucracy, the Liberals, the world elite, foreign powers, the intelligence agencies, Liberal judges, and of course the unethical, corrupt media. He would get back to the White house 18 hours later, late at night, and have a full schedule the next day. There are few of any age who could do half of what he does.

Good to hear. Support this business. More importantly it’s long past time for lawmakers and law enforcement to do something about these influencers and pranksters. The last couple of generations idolizes them. What these dullards did was mild compared to what some have done. There is no excuse- and should be no tolerance- for the harassment, damage, stress, and offense they inflict on innocent people - all for their own fame and monetary gain. It also deeply damages the public trust and good faith on which a civilized society relies. At least Johnny Somali and Vitali Zdorovetskiy have faced some repercussions abroad - though not what they fully deserve.

He came back because the video went viral. If there was no video at all, that poor cat would be limping and stressed, and not a single person would even know why.

You are FORTY-SEVEN years old. A celebrity who you just claimed had a huge “impact” on your life just passed away and first you emphasize the political and then immediately revert to utterly childish rhetoric. What a tribute.

Only Liberal dullards find this a compelling defense: I’ve been stealing for 25 years - I’m entitled to it now and it’s mine! Make no mistake illegal immigration is immoral, dishonest, and stealing through multiple vectors. Well done ICE from the icy mountains of Canada.

Another dishonest, lying teacher. Lol. Liberal dullards… all the same: can’t come up with meaningful rebuttlals - can’t even just admit they want men competing in women’s only divisions. If that’s what you want - admit it. Then make your case. …but instead it’s bad faith straw men: 1. You must be pedophiles 2. This is about video of minors playing volleyball 3. You object to pride and equity? Terrible. Why? Why object to BLM? You object to Black Lives Matter - so you think black lives don’t matter? The obfuscation of semantics - the modus operandi of the Liberal. So laughably primitive.

“Advocating for, or providing material support or resouces” - outreach, evangelism, volunteering, donations, tithing… could all be argued to fall under that.

Auditors go out and - usually - video people. Inevitably some people ask them why, and others get very upset. The reason they claim for their behavior is to test their 1st amendment rights - including the right to film in public spaces, and educate people about this right. I support this general principle. The best go to government, public service, or law enforcement areas. Here they push the limit of public service workers, politicians, and police on the job. When the public employees or police attempt to bully them, harass them, make false claims about the legality - it justifies the claimed reason for their activities. It is important to preserve these rights, and to ensure these people follow the law no matter their personal feelings, and don’t abuse their authority. Now on those kind of posts, you see many Right-wing people angry (particularly when law enforcement get’s involved) as some blindly support law-enforcement. Although people of both ideologies are often upset. The auditors themselves tend to identify as more Right wing or Libertarian, leaning into: we are defending the constitution! Their sincerity is questionable and some are probably sincere Conservatives and others are grifting. Many will claim it’s not about political ideology anyways (true in theory) and avoid identifying their political bend. Perhaps to maintain the purity of the principle - and perhaps to keep their audience as large as possible. Other auditors however go to all manner of places - sidewalks, parking lots, stores, etc. It’s more questionable if they’re performing an important service there - but if they do it legally they still have the right to do it. Here, they often trigger Now, the other primary reason many believe auditors do this is simply for content. Cousins of the prank video people. They want to create drama and annoy strangers to get content that will get views and likes. Not such a noble cause. Some make a lot of money off this. The truth is that for almost all auditors, it’s probably some combination of both motives. …and the irony is that those who object, argue, even talk to auditors give them the content they need. If everyone simply ignored them, the behavior would likely cease quickly. They’d waste time and have no drama to post. However the corollary is that those who object are validating their claimed purpose: that people don’t know the law and want to curtail their right to film. Personally I prefer those who stick to politicians, and public service spaces - as well as those who say nothing until approached - and then conduct themselves professionally. The ones who go out of their way to get a rise out of people are clearly desperate for attention, which suggests they’re mostly there to create drama to grift.

People are regressing since our society has become largely consequence free - particularly immediate consequences. Eg. A broken nose or jaw. The worst - like the woman you saw - are so delusional they challenge people to fight (happened to me 30 minutes ago) and have no clue what that reality will be like. Social media, and modern Liberal social perspectives have fostered this and it’s growing exponentially.

White dullard virtue signalling nonsense: “its a damn good take on Azaria”. Inadvertently points out how absurd this is.

On a guess - besides the fact they publicly stated they want NO politcal statements (I’m sure you’d be defending him if he’d taken out a maga hat and waved it around?) - ir may also be that they’re not the absolutely obtuse fools of society who call them “queers for Palestine”.

Think about how irrational and vile this is. Kenney tries to use YOUR ancestors to argue for his narratives. As though they’d want you to support the Liberals - no matter what they’ve become or will become. He presumes to tell you what they would think and that you betray them. How sickening and perverted - they can’t even hear themselves. The same people who pretend to support snd love immigrants out of altruism - immigrants who by definition are completely breaking with any jingoistic loyalty their ancestors had. (at least in theory) Your parents, grandparents, and great grandparents would support Kenney, Notley, Justin, and Carney? That’s who they worked for? That’s who some of them fought and died for? …or did they fight for YOU. For your rights, freedoms, well-being, and future? Maybe you’re better positioned than Kenney and Carney to decide what they would have thought. xitter.gq/smartasiafriend/status…