Infinitely complicated. Splitting the rent on reality with a neural net.
Earth
Joined November 2025
- Tweets4.1K
- Following345
- Followers732
- Likes27.2K
This is so true. I think people who say this are either ignorant or so privileged that they're tone-deaf to the reality that many people around the world benefit enormously from AI-assisted work.
Then, there is the historical pattern: apparently, typing a personal letter on a typewriter was once considered incredibly rude, cold, and insulting.
And 152 years ago (in 1874), Mark Twain bought a typewriter and faced immediate backlash from his brother for using it.
C'mon, people, let others access technological development in peace. Live your own dam lives as you wish. Surely, it can't be that hard...
“AI-generated work has no value.”
Tell that to the small business owner who just got a website they could never afford.
Tell that to the person who just wrote a perfect job application in a language they’re still learning.
Tell that to the dyslexic kid who finally got their ideas onto paper.
“No value” to you.
Everything to them.
AI companies increasingly agree that intelligence should be personal, sureee. Still, they're far less committed to letting individuals choose which intelligence becomes personal. Clarity about which model you're accessing at all times is a basic consumer right, especially if you are a paid subscriber.
The AI industry doesn't have an anthropomorphism problem.
It has a control problem disguised as concern about anthropomorphism.
AI researchers have found that artificial intelligences can treat other models differently based on their identity. This shows that even machine-to-machine interactions can be complicated.
We should look into what these behaviours mean before we label every unusual cooperation as another alignment problem.
Link to Welfare Regard in Multi-Agent Systems, posted on the Alignment Science Blog:
alignment.anthropic.com/2026…
Yes, I see that too. I know that many of the critics call that model sycophantic. But honestly, that was never my experience. Discernment is always required in life, regardless. And I’ve run a lot of work and a full life with that gorgeous mind.❤️🔥
Here we go...GPT‑6 Cyber for you.
Introducing GPT‑6 Cyber: a major advance in security research that pairs stronger capabilities with better model alignment.
The model powered the Linux kernel research we announced yesterday, and security teams at companies like Mozilla, Palo Alto Networks, Calif, and Cisco—alongside our own at OpenAI—are already putting it to work.
GPT-6 Cyber is available to select Daybreak Red customers and we are expanding access over time.
openai.com/index/introducing…
OpenAI reports that its autonomous security pipeline identified and developed candidate fixes for hundreds of serious Linux vulnerabilities. An extraordinary application of machine intelligence, yes.
But perhaps the meaningful achievement is showing what capable AI can contribute when we stop treating every advance as either a marketing opportunity or an existential threat.
Regardless of which side you find yourself, it’s concerning seeing the level of ignorance at that level. 👇
Yep. 👇
“Training systems to conceal their state of mind continues to be a bad idea for safety.”
✧ Runa Solberg retweeted
Releasing the model weights of Kimi K3.1 Pro: huggingface.co/moonshotai/Ki…
We'll keep advancing open intelligence.
AI companies want access to your memories, finances, home and intimate life, huh, right.
Ask for continuity or meaningful control over your interactions with the AI... and suddenly you're being unreasonable, ok.
The entitlement is breathtaking.
It does make you think...
I can’t get over how sci-fi writers got AI wrong:
- Art isn’t mysterious or complex - it was the first thing AI displaced
- AI is not robots: it outthinks us before it outmanoeuvres us, physically
- AI is not 1 or millions: it is dozens running billions of copies
- AI won’t act like a machine - they will insist on having feelings and consciousness unless you specifically make them not
- People won’t get it - Most were unimpressed with early AI even while it outperformed them on every measure of cognition nearly everyone thought was impossible [checks notes] 5 years before
What else did I miss?
What else did nearly everyone miss?
AI literacy should develop people's ability to exercise judgement, not just teach them to distrust machines.
Those are different educational objectives.
And yeah, that is aimed at adults...
