Replying to @DTfromGB
The warden let me go to Europe with the boys. So even if I was imprisoned, it’s not bad. Haha.
Replying to @epictrades1
Goldman is an inverse play typically. They need some more liquidity is my guess. They are constantly consistent.
Not hate, just my experience over decades. They pimped retail Etoys when they were dumping. That was my first real screwing
Replying to @meowmeowdj
Sell premium along the way.
Best going forward 👊
I like $IREN in theory….
But, less than a year runway on existing capital. Certainly a new raise is coming sooner than later. Old saying holds true.
I’ll pay more to know more.
Replying to @SpacBobby
Did the thesis change?
This is the honest question?
Not being disrespectful!
Did the Spectrum purchase by $SPCX change things?
Why or Why Not?
$QS 52 week low.
I’m long $2p still.
$QS looks / trades terribly.
Only looking at $1.7m in upcoming revenue & burning cash for years. 2-3 year $ runway means a new equity raise is around the corner. Likely coupled with a reverse split. They usually go hand & hand. Expect new price discovery to bring significant drop from there. My 2 cents. F.D.
I’m Long, the long dated 2027p.
Selling $50p ITM $ASTS midday today expirations seemed scary until they closed out of the money.
I like that trade now.
Replying to @SpacGuru @Reformed_Trader
My thoughts. Not Me thoughts.
I’m not an old school English knight.
Replying to @Reformed_Trader
Beware of the future financings they will need. I believe a new financing and possible reverse split is extremely likely. I say this out of respect for you, and I do follow your account. I own Jan $2p for this reason. I’m wrong plenty, and I alway wish all of us successful trades. Just felt I should share me thoughts







