Sui Sierra Leone

After 12hrs of battle Testing the capability of the google #Antigravity IDE these are the feedbacks. I always wanted to build a mini game on chain using the @SuiNetwork stack so decided to use antigravity since it was being hyped. WHAT I LIKED... -The model gives details planing of what it about to do and allow user to comment on it. -It able to bundle comment in one prompt and update the plan does not proceed till you tell it to. -it can index docs when you provide to it. MY DISLIKES -The rate limit is too low it exhausts early does not allow heavy battle testing of efficiency - It very slow when planning does unnecessary looping of files. -Also slow at editing just little task it will be indexing a whole lot of unnecessary stuffs. -it could not build the game was exhausted bad to new data especially blockchain. I will rate it 40% not that good far behind #cursor and #copilot IDE. Anyway I did not want to end the game so deicided to use #copilot to complete it yeah and we did it successfully.. we built a running sonic onchain. All game asset are stored on @WalrusProtocol even the sound of the game also stored on wlarus. No external API just smart contract and frontend. I used the sui #Graphql to query the onchain date from the RPCs.. all game state is onchain because of SUI ptb we can aggregate all transaction and call just one tx at the end of the game and submit to the blockchain. Imagine every ring you claim or point gain you submit a transaction or even when you use a power up you sign a transaction while the game is going on poor UX.. with sui ptb that is no more an issue play game and sign once which i can further change to zk.. and this is fully gas sponsored users dont need gas to play, just connect wallet and play. So in short the google antigravity is not that a beast needs more work to be done on it.. link to game sonic-bice.vercel.app/ I also built an in-game name register like Ns. Cc.@kwekutech my feedback.