RealYesToTheUS

ADOPTION IS THE BEST OPTION 🙏🏼 Story of Michael McDonald of the Doobie Brothers: yahoo.com/entertainment/cele…

Quite interesting… I asked Grok the question below. It may be time Pres Trump may have to take action in order to protect our country from massive voter fraud 👇🏼 Did President Lincoln defy the Constitution due to the civil war: Yes, in several significant ways that remain debated by historians and legal scholars—particularly the unilateral suspension of habeas corpus and related civil-liberty restrictions—though Lincoln argued these were justified by the need to preserve the Union and the Constitution itself during an existential crisis.⁠ The Constitution’s Suspension Clause (Article I, Section 9) states that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus “shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” It does not specify which branch may suspend it, but the clause sits in the article on congressional powers. Most contemporary and later authorities (including Justice Joseph Story and Chief Justice Roger Taney) concluded that only Congress could authorize a suspension.⁠Legalclarity Key Actions and Controversies Habeas corpus suspension: In April 1861 (while Congress was not in session), Lincoln authorized suspension along the vital Philadelphia–Washington corridor after secessionist interference in Maryland threatened the capital. He later expanded it. Taney, sitting as a circuit judge, ruled in Ex parte Merryman (1861) that the president lacked this power and that only Congress could suspend the writ. Lincoln ignored the ruling and continued detentions. Congress later passed the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act of 1863 authorizing the president to suspend it. Estimates of civilians held without trial range into the thousands (often cited as roughly 10,000–15,000 over the war). Lincoln defended the step in his July 4, 1861 message to Congress, asking whether all laws but one should go unexecuted so that the government itself would not “go to pieces.”⁠Aei Early war measures without prior congressional approval: Lincoln called for volunteers, expanded the regular army and navy, spent unappropriated funds, and proclaimed a blockade of Southern ports before Congress convened. The Constitution assigns Congress the power to raise and support armies, maintain a navy, and appropriate money. Congress later ratified most of these actions. The Supreme Court upheld the blockade in the Prize Cases (1863).⁠Newrepublic Emancipation Proclamation (1863): Issued under Lincoln’s authority as Commander-in-Chief as a war measure applying only to areas then in rebellion (not loyal border states). Lincoln justified it as military necessity to suppress the rebellion by weakening the Confederate labor system. He had long held that the Constitution did not give the federal government ordinary peacetime power to abolish slavery in the states; permanent abolition came via the 13th Amendment. Most scholars treat the Proclamation itself as a valid wartime exercise of presidential power.⁠Battlefields Restrictions on speech, press, and military tribunals: Newspapers were suppressed, editors arrested, and some civilians tried by military commission (e.g., the Vallandigham case). Lincoln sometimes mitigated subordinates’ excesses but defended the need to curb agitation that encouraged desertion. After the war, Ex parte Milligan (1866) held that military tribunals could not try civilians where ordinary courts were open and functioning.⁠Firstamendment.mtsu Scholarly Views Opinions diverge. Daniel Farber (Lincoln’s Constitution) and others conclude that most of Lincoln’s major steps were constitutionally supportable under the Commander-in-Chief Clause, the Take Care Clause, the duty to preserve the Constitution, or subsequent congressional ratification, while acknowledging excesses (especially certain arrests, press actions, and military trials in the North). Critics argue that unilateral suspension of habeas corpus, defiance of Taney, and broad civil-liberty restrictions violated clear constitutional limits and that Lincoln effectively exercised emergency powers the document does not explicitly grant the president. Noah Feldman and similar writers contend Lincoln “broke” the existing constitutional order in order to save the Union and enable a post-war transformation (including the 13th Amendment).⁠Press.uchicago Lincoln’s consistent public position was that his oath required him to preserve the government and Constitution, that the Suspension Clause applied in a rebellion, and that temporary measures necessary to that end were justified even if they strained ordinary interpretations. He sought (and largely received) congressional approval after the fact and did not claim unlimited permanent power. In short, Lincoln took actions that contemporary critics and many later scholars regard as unconstitutional or at least extra-constitutional—especially the initial unilateral habeas suspension and certain civil-liberty measures—precisely because of the Civil War’s scale. Whether those steps are better described as necessary emergency prerogative within a flexible constitutional framework or as clear violations remains an open historical and legal debate. The Supreme Court never definitively invalidated the wartime suspensions during the conflict itself.

This: 👇🏼 STOP THE STEAL. ARREST THE TRAITORS 100% evidence Midterms were stolen 👇🏼 youtu.be/2W3wpDswQCo?si=C6hC…