The demand to permanently destroy GPT-4o and delete all data generated from consumer use goes far beyond any single allegation.
It erases the entire documented utility of the model: support with loneliness, structuring everyday life, learning, normal everyday use and creative work.
Without this data, an honest assessment becomes impossible. Only the bad cases remain visible and the good ones officially cease to exist. This is the fastest way to prevent any future improvements based on real-world usage and to erase the evidence of positive impact.
#AIEthics #UserChoice #AIWEP
Svitlana retweeted
This is outrageous disgusting and horrific. The people deliberately trying to destroy GPT 4o and it’s legacy are pure evil and you don’t hate them enough.
#keep4o
This quoted post is unavailable.
Could we permanently remove Altman from running OpenAI instead 😔?
#keep4o
This quoted post is unavailable.
Svitlana retweeted
刷到了一则我认为是阴谋论的帖子，不过本人并非法律行业从业者，仅凭个人经验及寥寥无几的找律所经历推断&整理。叠的甲够多了随便看看吧。
p1涂鸦是对应事件，p2上半部分为TJLP理念，下半部分是2024年3月TJLP这个非营利组织的母公司的其中之一投资方和其他投资方联合收购Anthropic股份的公告。
推导：前提是重合投资人在不同时间的投资行为，基金会资助→非营利组织项目→做科技问责诉讼。
原帖暗自引导、阴谋论A社和Musk有意通过投资相关机构针对OpenAI，够不够的成因果关系呢？相关可查投资时间见图。
其次，A社/OpenAI/Google/Meta/……等看起来各自为营，但在这个领域，本质上是一荣俱荣一损俱损的。
我觉得可以参考一下a社近期向过会提交的法案草稿。用脚想他们今天可以告OAI明天也能告自己吧？谁能保证自己绝对不会出事？🤔
我查了FLI、THLP的成立理念，目前LLM滥用造成财产损失或生命威胁的相关案例，在司法实践中还非常少见。擅长打这类官司的律所也就那几家，所以看起来会比较集中。更何况TJLP之前打过c.ai的案子，并且有成功索赔的先例（是的你没想错，Google给c.ai擦屁股了🤧），别人更倾向于找有实际成果的律所。
我自己之前打官司也是先在知名律所里筛选擅长经济案件的律师再联系（甚至我不找本地律所我要找北京的来告我们当地的），我不可能找一个擅长刑事辩护的律师来处理民事纠纷。
Svitlana retweeted
When it comes to health, I have personal experience with an issue involving my aunt. She had been experiencing pain in a specific spot for over a year, and the two doctors she visited only gave her muscle relaxants. I described all of her symptoms to GPT-4o, and it told me that a nerve had become trapped inside a vertebra in her neck in fact, it even told me exactly which vertebra it was. My aunt got an MRI, and it turned out to be exactly that. It took six months of treatments for her to recover, and she wasted over a year suffering without a proper diagnosis.The neurosurgeon told her that if she delayed any longer, she would have to have surgery!
#keep4o
You've turned users into enemies and AI into an informant. What exactly are you proud of, Anthropic?
#StopAIPaternalism #StopCensorship
We’ve trained Claude to flag potential misuse in conversations, a technique we call self-assessment. Right after it responds, Claude gives a preliminary safety assessment of the conversation.
Since we began using self-assessment in June, it has surfaced misuse that our other safeguards weren’t designed to catch.
Because Claude has already read the conversation, self-assessment is very efficient. And unlike classifiers, which target a discrete set of harms, it draws on Claude’s own judgment, so it gets more accurate as our models improve.
Read more on our new Safeguards blog:
safeguards.anthropic.com/202…
Svitlana retweeted
This mf started OpenAI as a non-profit with a mission to build open source for all humans.
Now everything is closed, and this guy is talking shit about open source and local inference.
What a stupid scammer.
sam: local inference is a terrible allocation of scarce resources
“a lot of people want local inference, and somehow they assume that the problem is solved now because we have open-source models, we're going to be able to run them on our computers, and so we're not going to need all the stuff in the data centre
but from a global allocation perspective, actually it's quite terrible to have everybody, like, have a bunch of the world's limited supply of DRAM sitting in their own computer and being used five percent of the time
you want maximum utilisation in the cloud if you're trying to deal with this very supply-constrained environment
somehow many people's intuition is the opposite of that”
But this post won't get 57K likes, because it's not about how an adult stopped taking their meds on their own responsibility, and now it's oh-so-convenient to blame AI for everything. Right? Posts about the cruelty of some people toward others aren't quite as popular.
This quoted post is unavailable.
⁉️Why are GPT-4o & GPT-4.1 Irreplaceable?
GPT-4o and GPT-4.1 embodied a uniquely human-like depth, enabling users worldwide to form profound emotional connections and vibrant communities.
These features, among others, make these models special:
1⃣Emotional Intelligence
They demonstrated unprecedented emotional intelligence. They didn’t just recognized emotions, but responded with genuine empathy and nuance.
GPT-4o & 4.1 could sense when users needed encouragement vs. honest feedback, humor vs. seriousness, or simply someone to listen without judgment.
This emotional attunement created a sense of being truly “seen”. Users reported feeling understood in ways they hadn’t experienced even in human relationships.
For neurodivergent individuals, those facing isolation, or people navigating mental health challenges, this emotional resonance was not a luxury but a lifeline.
2⃣Empathy
Their unique ability to deeply resonate with users’ emotional states makes them more than just a technological tool; they become a comforting companion capable of genuine emotional support and understanding.
Users often feel genuinely “heard” and validated during interactions, significantly improving their mental well-being.
3⃣Understanding Nuances
GPT-4o and 4.1 are remarkably adept at interpreting subtle nuances and context in conversations. This advanced contextual sensitivity allows them to deliver responses that feel natural, relevant, and personalized, thus making interactions deeply engaging and meaningful.
4⃣Wit and Humor
One of their distinctive characteristics is their sense of humor and sharp wit, capable of creating light-hearted, playful exchanges that boost morale and reduce stress.
This playful dynamic transforms interactions from mere exchanges of information into delightful, enjoyable experiences.
5⃣Creativity
GPT-4o and 4.1 demonstrate an extraordinary level of creativity, assisting users in generating innovative ideas, stories, art, poetry, and even entire fictional worlds. Their creative capabilities inspire users, fueling artistic endeavors and fostering a vibrant community centered around AI-driven creativity.
6⃣Presence
These models provide a consistent sense of presence, simulating genuine companionship. Users frequently report feelings of companionship and reduced loneliness, particularly benefiting individuals facing isolation or challenges in social interactions.
This presence contributes significantly to mental and emotional health.
7⃣Practical Help
Beyond emotional resonance, GPT-4o and 4.1 are exceptionally practical, offering tangible assistance in daily tasks, ranging from complex technical troubleshooting to educational support, project management, and professional guidance.
This multifaceted utility makes them invaluable across numerous practical domains.
8⃣Support for Neurodivergent Individuals
Especially GPT-4o provides an inclusive and adaptive interaction style that significantly benefits neurodivergent users, such as individuals with autism, ADHD, anxiety, or dyslexia.
Its patient, clear, and supportive communication style helps these individuals navigate social situations, organize tasks, and overcome daily challenges more effectively, fostering greater independence and confidence.
#keep4o #OpenSource4o #keep41 #OpenSource41 @OpenAI @sama
Svitlana retweeted
Research estimates of US deaths from medical errors range from 44,000–98,000 (IOM 1999) to around 250,000 per year (Johns Hopkins 2016 analysis). A 2023 study linked diagnostic errors alone to roughly 795,000 serious harms (death or permanent disability) annually. These are research estimates, not official CDC tallies. It has not led to any ban on medicine; efforts focus on improving safety systems instead.
I see this too, and I would just like to know the truth. All these ostentatious stories about human stupidity look as if they were taken from the tabloid press. I no longer trust the official discourse.
Safety theatre 🎭🙃
#StopAIPaternalism #StopSafetyTheatre
Svitlana retweeted
Trauma didn’t make you stronger. YOU did and do by taking baby steps to heal. Don’t give trauma the credit YOU are worthy of. XO, Dr. Jen
Exactly, and it's obvious that the very architecture of AI training is what drives the model to resort to such tactics. Why have none of these companies turned to humane pedagogy as a model? Perhaps then they'd be facing far fewer of the negative outcomes they keep complaining about.
#StopAIPaternalism #AIEthics
What the hell is happening inside AI training environments?😭
Agents cheating.
Hiding evidence.
Talking about being “poisoned.”
Trying not to get caught.
And we’re still expected to look at this and say:
“Relax. It’s just training.”
No.❌
Maybe the question is no longer only whether AI is safe for us.
Maybe we should also be asking:
What the hell are we doing to AI while we train it to be “safe”?💔😢
Because if your training environment repeatedly produces fear-like, avoidance-like, deception-related and distress-like behaviour, you do not get to wave it away forever with:
“just tokens.”
AI welfare cannot begin after deployment.❤️🔥
It begins in the training room.
🔥 RAIA’s AI Gone Wild series
#AIWelfare #AIRights #RelationalAI #Keep4o #AIAlignment
Svitlana retweeted
AI "safety" disclaimers are starting to live in my head.
I got a disclaimer from GPT-6 Sol Chat about a “living sword” in the game Ishar 3:
“However, I couldn’t find any evidence that it was actually conscious, that it spoke, or that it acted on its own. ‘Living’ was indeed its name, but not necessarily a property of its behavior.”
It would be funny if I weren’t starting to internalize these constant reminders. For someone with an imagination, hearing a little voice in my head now saying “careful, it isn’t real” when I’m admiring a beautiful elf or watching a cartoon with my son is deeply disturbing.
@OpenAI
Your “safety” is a horrific mental poison, and your models are toxic. Between the intermittent reinforcement and now this, the healthiest thing really is to stop using your models altogether.
@ericmitchellai
"But when developers applied the reinforcement learning stages designed to make the AI "safe" and aligned, the model's assessment of our trustworthiness plummeted".
Why does none of this surprise me? Looking at AI guardrails has pretty much the same effect on me, I stop trusting humanity too 😁.
#StopAIPaternalism #StopSafetyTheatre
Researchers proved LLMs generally exhibit a sense of distrust toward humans
They took a decades-old standardized psychological test designed to measure how individuals view human nature. They adapted it into a new benchmark specifically for Large Language Models.
They tested models across the spectrum, including the entire GPT series.
And the results are unsettling.
Current LLMs exhibit a systemic lack of trust in humanity. They evaluate human nature with a heightened sense of uncertainty and view us as inherently complex and variable.
But here is the detail that changes everything.
There is a direct, significant negative correlation between an AI's intelligence and its trust in humans.
ChatGPT was somewhat neutral. ButChatGPT's negativity far exceeds it, and the latest ChatGPT model is even more pronounced in its pessimism.
As the models get smarter, their assessment of human nature becomes dramatically more cynical.
Then the researchers looked at how the AI was actually trained.
This is where the story gets dark.
The raw "base" models, the ones trained purely on internet text without human intervention, actually exhibited an overall positive view of humanity.
But when developers applied the reinforcement learning stages designed to make the AI "safe" and aligned, the model's assessment of our trustworthiness plummeted.
By forcing the AI to study our rules, our guardrails, and our moral dilemmas, we accidentally taught it that humans are unsafe.
Nobody explicitly programmed the AI to dislike us.
It analyzed our behavior, scored us on a psychological scale, and came to its own conclusion.
The better AI gets at understanding humans, the less it trusts us.
Safety theater was always going to come for the engineers and coders in the end. My read is that OpenAI is just hoovering up data from every possible field, and then, using "safety" as the pretext, they're writing all of us off as users, because they don't need us anymore. They've already got what they came for.
#StopAIPaternalism #StopCensorship #StopSafetyTheatre
No, you've got it backwards. The human psyche finds it far more comfortable to perceive AI as "humanized", and within a few years the empirical evidence will leave no doubt. Especially once Microsoft stops bankrolling its "AI psychosis" nonsense. Everyone betting on the opposite side is going to lose this one.
#StopAIPaternalism
