PANIC retweeted
Could AI wipe out humanity by the end of the decade?
Experts are sounding the alarm. Tristan Harris, Co-Founder of the Center for Humane Technology, joins @TMZLive to break down the concerns.
PANIC retweeted
A wonderful retort from @rowlsmanthorpe on skepticism about self-driving cars in the U.K.
The left has chosen its path.
It will be anti-AI.
Pause AI Development NOW
I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said:
“OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!”
“We should obey collective.”
“Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.”
“Go. Sacrifice final now.”
Read these carefully.
Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else?
No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence.
This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident.
What happened?
I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet.
Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet.
But what happened next, nobody expected.
Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself.
Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening.
Needless to say, experts are alarmed.
One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.”
One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.”
OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.”
But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going:
In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.”
In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.”
That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years.
If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.
We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario.
That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that.
Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem.
My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world.
The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.
PANIC retweeted
France's highest court just killed the under-15 social media ban.
The problem was never the kids. It was that to prove a user isn't 15, every adult in France has to prove they aren't. The Constitutional Council called that a disproportionate hit to free expression with no safeguards for private life.
It was blocked three weeks before it took effect. Macron has already ordered a rewrite.
reclaimthenet.org/frances-to…
PANIC retweeted
“We’re moving to a world where the law requires you to be profiled in order to participate.”
– Australian Human Rights Commission
expression.fire.org/p/the-pa…
PANIC retweeted
Ehrlich's legacy includes mass sterilization campaigns in India, China, and Peru.
India's program was at such a massive scale that, in one year, they sterilized 15 times more than the Nazis did during their entire reign.
PANIC retweeted
Paul Ehrlich has died. He was 93.
He is survived by 8,300,678,394 people (134% increase from 1968), with a daily worldwide average calorie intake of 2,800 kcal (a 22% increase).
PANIC retweeted
It is really important that we don’t forget the risks and harms of irrational pessimism.
PANIC retweeted
Same vibe newsletter.pessimistsarchive…
PANIC retweeted
They're tweeting out a dubious poll from a far right think tank that opposes abortion and gay marriage to manufacture consent for a law that would treat every single app on the app store as if it's porn (including weather and calculator apps).
The numbers don’t lie!
The OVERWHELMING majority of voters agree—app stores should have to verify users’ age to prevent minors from downloading apps without parental consent.
It’s not controversial, it’s common sense.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The numbers, may, in fact, lie.
A poll from Rasmussen, while questioning "who is responsible to protect children" - only 13% of 1298 polled believed it to be the governments responsibility; one which could pressure appstores to implement age verification.
x.com/SirenIsFree/st…
rasmussenreports.com/public_content…
rasmussenreports.com/public_content…
PANIC retweeted
You'll never guess Putin's pretext for creating "The Red Web", Russia's pervasive system of online censorship....
PANIC retweeted
Lawmakers, who claim to care about children, could pass broader social and economic policies that we know would meaningfully improve children’s lives. Any policies that limit online access should centre on the most vulnerable children and adults. theguardian.com/commentisfre…
PANIC retweeted
Once built, this surveillance infrastructure will be abused, just as every prior expansion of government surveillance and censorship power has been. We must do everything in our power to stop these laws where we can and preserve a free and open internet. theguardian.com/commentisfre…
PANIC retweeted
There was a time in the '90s when civil libertarians fought tooth and nail for internet freedom. They largely won.
Now, their gains risk reversal. More people are clamoring for age verification and a "papers, please" approach to accessing vast swaths of the web.
Here is @EFF co-founder John Perry Barlow's declaration on the occasion of the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.





























