Tenaciter (@Tenaciter) header
Tenaciter (@Tenaciter) profile picture

This account is mostly for arguing with people who are wrong. Holds low-status opinions and values; hence blue tick. Followers ignored.

Fradswell
Joined February 2014
Tenaciter retweeted
In UK we've spent nearly £300,000,000,000 on subsidising 'renewable electricity' But over the weekend renewables produced next to nothing. We had to rely on the backup ways. And they worked. Without any wind and solar the lights stayed on. So why bother with wind and solar at all? We could junk them and save all that subsidy! And nobody would notice any difference in their electricity... subsidyclock.co.uk/
77
517
42
1,132
58,438
Tenaciter retweeted
I thought this peaked when I saw the captain’s costume and then the stuntman arrived
Everyone's talking about the John Lewis advert. But it’s nothing compared to this masterpiece from Thorne Travel. Power-walking travel agents. A flash mob. Pumping house music. And unofficial Disney characters. Every time you think they’ve run out of ideas, another one arrives.
9
14
3
281
27,619
Tenaciter retweeted
See my @thetimes letter on @TorstenBell 's nonsensical #CDC plans
34
80
9
415
30,235
“This austerity, is it in the room with us right now?”
👏 You can't cut your way to prosperity, because people pushed into poverty aren't productive. Two decades of austerity have destroyed the UK, its time to end the failed experiment & invest in our country again.
12
83
3
599
19,722
It isn't a privilege, it is called hard work. And it absolutely makes me a better person.
having the privilege to live without government assistance does not make you a better person.
32
116
3
3,635
46,154
The answer isn’t getting the right person into power. The answer is limiting power so that the person doesn’t matter.
305
1,262
137
8,076
142,630
We have to leave the European Convention on Human Rights. Read this.
15
35
1
499
11,458
Tenaciter retweeted
The electorate aren’t goldfish. Our memories are long enough to recall June 2024, when you declared that trans-identified men with penises should be able to use women’s public bathrooms. It took a Supreme Court ruling to force you to uphold women’s rights, and now you pose as our bold champion? Please.
The time for talk has long passed. This government is putting its money where its mouth is when it comes to supporting women and girls. We'll back practical action to confine misogyny to the history books - in public services, workplaces, and online. theguardian.com/society/2026…
614
7,569
153
50,105
896,874
In 1999 you had to earn over 4x the minimum wage to be considered a higher earner on the 40% rate. Today just 1.8x the minimum wage considered high earner! If the same minimum-wage-to-high-earner ratio was applied from 1999 you’d have to earn over £115k before hitting the 40% income tax rate. We’re seeing a level of wage compression that would make a Soviet era socialist blush.
39
248
11
1,480
35,342
Tenaciter retweeted
Taking home less than half your wage should never, ever be justified. You should never have to work for the state more than you work for yourself.
I read a piece in the FT this week about the price of being middle class in Britain now and it said a couple earning £436,000 combined take home £216,000. That’s a crazy amount of tax, and it doesn't include VAT on purchases, council tax, stamp duty or other taxes (I think does include pension contributions). I can’t stop thinking about it.
48
177
6
2,121
49,674
I earn £100 grand a year. I have a detached house. 2 cars and my wife is a full time home maker. I can just about afford this. I probably couldn’t afford the house I own if I was buying for the first time today. My salary puts me in the top 5% of earners in the UK. Top 5% to have a similar standard of living to Homer Simpson. That is a disgrace. We have a flatter salary distribution than Soviet Russia and the highest taxes and borrowing costs we’ve seen in generations. Success is almost impossible because our tax system means hard work makes you a stressed out tax cow, not wealthy and certainly not free. We need something radical. Less state. More family. Less handouts. More reward for risk. Instead. Tomorrow, Labour will offer another batch of policies which will send one message to aspirational Brits: why bother.
I read a piece in the FT this week about the price of being middle class in Britain now and it said a couple earning £436,000 combined take home £216,000. That’s a crazy amount of tax, and it doesn't include VAT on purchases, council tax, stamp duty or other taxes (I think does include pension contributions). I can’t stop thinking about it.
533
1,116
119
13,556
1,569,166
Putting an end to this would be the easiest win in politics. No more tax rises. Deficit down. GDP up. Popular with the public. But they can’t do it because of their lunatic, benefits-obsessed backbenchers.
The extraordinary rise in welfare spending continues It is going to rise by £19billon this year (5.7 per cent) to £353billion, equivalent to ***11.1%*** of GDP, reaching 12.3% in 2031 It is being driven by a rise in health and mentions benefit spending
16
123
3
890
26,715
Article in the Telegraph about how big charities are losing public support thanks to big salaries, political lobbying and DEI nonsense. Includes a few quotes from me. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
11
38
3
284
17,093
This is what AI is made for. Murtaugh is too old for this 💩 and Riggs has to find a new partner. I absolutely love how they brought in every character from that era and even combined two different characters for one actor in a couple different scenes. 🤣🤣🤣💥🔫
345
2,634
273
14,996
755,707
Libertarians don't believe every transaction is voluntary. They believe consent distinguishes voluntary transactions from coercion. Your landlord didn't create your need for shelter, and refusing to provide you with his property for free isn't coercion. You need food to survive, too. Does that make farmers your oppressors? Your argument isn't against exploitation. It's against the inconvenience of other people having rights.
Libertarians believe every transaction is voluntary, including paying a landlord half your income because the alternative is sleeping in your fucking car.
19
142
3
1,033
12,446
Tenaciter retweeted
Read the beginning of AJP Taylors history of 1914-1945 and weep.
🚨 BREAKING: John Healey will announce at the Budget that HMRC will be given powers to seize money directly from the bank accounts of people who fail to pay their tax
92
671
29
3,721
152,206
I know this isn't LinkedIn, but nonetheless, some professional news. After 18 years, five books, three dozen papers and thousands of articles, presentations, podcasts, videos, media appearances etc etc – I am leaving the IEA in a few weeks' time. I am, however, neither joining Novara Media, nor the Guardian, nor SOAS. I am not starting a podcast with Gary Stevenson either. I'll continue to promote extremely uncool, cringey low-status opinions in other ways. Watch this space.
150
51
18
1,878
229,722
Tenaciter retweeted
Absolutely stunning essay by @DouglasKMurray about the crisis in France. It includes this quote. thefp.com/p/douglas-murray-f…
130
1,348
83
7,325
287,437
Reminder: just yesterday we learned that: A) a former ISIS guard for a beheading squad came to yookay illegally on a boat, obviously because of the ECHR/HRA he can't be jailed or deported, living freely; B) SAS guys sent on missions to deal with ISIS beheaders were then arrested for MURDER for dealing with them; they were lied to by the military police; they have been told they can never be clear of the charges (because the ECHR/HRA means any time some lawyer like Jolyon or Hermer wants to team up with nutters on a ECHR case, the government will be forced to investigate again and remember Hermer's friend *invented* war crimes to bring cases against British soldiers, but obviously wasn't jailed, triples all round in the Inner Temple). So we're importing the jihadis at scale while prosecuting for murder SAS we rely on to defend us from the jihadis - and if you don't like this you're fascist and it's a reason to ban X in yookay. No you will not see Kemi-kasi campaign on these issues because the Tories agreed with Labour for 25 years that this combination is 'defending civilisation'. The Tories imported many of the jihadis now in the news, and the Tories approved all the worst officials and lawyers in SW1 bringing the lawfare cases, including against those who were given medals by the Queen for stopping IRA terrorist attacks - they now have to beg for cash for lawyers in their 70s/80s. And because Reform is a bin fire which can't maintain focus on anything for 2 minutes -- like Kemi-kasi -- you probably won't see anything sustained from them either.
293
2,626
129
11,422
377,842