Genghis Kohen

“Islamists without the Islamism label" is a growing trend in American politics. The majority of those who voted for Elsayed, Darializa, Mamdani, Kawas, Omar, and their like were not Muslims, but non-Muslim Americans who still cannot see beyond the labels. (To put things into perspective, American Muslims represent barely 1% of the population and obviously not all of them can vote, and not all of them support Islamists). The Islamists of today are not the long-bearded, short-gown, armed men. They are men and women who dress like you, studied in the same schools, and grew up in the same country as you. However, every step of the way, they are advancing Islamist objectives and goals, abusing the very democratic system that they oppose. What a sad irony! The electoral success of Islamist-aligned candidates in the United States is a reminder that we have to drop our obsession with labels.

No! It should not be acceptable for American politicians to use Arabic words in their electoral victory speeches, as El-Sayed in Michigan did, or to ask the crowds to chant "Allahu Akbar," as Hamawy in New Jersey did. I cannot see this as a democratic practice. In my mind, it is pretty similar to the Sheiks who gather Muslims to pray in public squares and use this to imply taking over the West. The Islamic regime in Iran is celebrating what they call the "acceleration" of "the process of US collapse" Put this next to the 1991 strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood to destroy the Western Civilization from within, and you will realize that: Something is seriously wrong here!!!

If you are struggling to understand what is happening in American politics right now, watch this: "Palestinization" is a concept that I developed two years ago to explain the framework that most electoral candidates, especially Islamist-aligned ones, use to align voter bases in the United States. We saw this so evidently in the campaign messaging of the current elections.