The Countess (@TheCountessIE) header
The Countess (@TheCountessIE) profile picture

Women & children deserve privacy, dignity and safety. https://xitter.gq/t.co/oRyzHV8jFX

Ireland
Joined September 2020
Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)Photo by The Countess (@TheCountessIE)
CEO and Founder of The Countess, Laoise de Brún BL, @laoisedebrun discusses the news that the Minister for Justice will appeal the EU Commission decision to fine Ireland for what the Commission said was Ireland’s failure to comply with the EU Council 2008 framework on hate. Laoise explains the nuance of that Council framework and how Ireland has in fact complied. She also explores why the Council may wish to suppress debate and dissent. Laoise points out that one person’s fact might be another person’s hate, given that there is no definition of hatred in the currently shelved Hate Speech element of the Hate Crime Bill.
17
75
6
198
34,202
The Countess retweeted
Well done barrister @laoisedebrun 👏. She successfully defended a citizen against the might of the pro-Open Border state.
BREAKING: Kirk Loco has been acquitted! More details to come. Quick facts: - Charged over a tweet warning about a migrant incident on a bus - Gardaí raided his home at dawn - Police never took the girl's statement - Dragged back to court close to 10 times Here's my video from last week.
2
12
73
851
The Countess retweeted
Another of the many excellent Irish Catholic articles in this week’s edition. This second one is about more than the NGOs and Grannies controversy and that disgraceful video. It is also about the latest attempt to redefine gender. As always, well worth a purchase.
1
15
2
36
1,463
The Countess retweeted
Great news for Kirk @Polito_loco That's 2 years of suffering "the legal process" finally over. His legal team deserve a mention. Barrister Laoise de Brún @laoisedebrun, the founder & CEO of @TheCountessIE & solicitor Padraig Langsch of Langsch & Cunnane Solicitors.
BREAKING: Political commentator Kirk Loco has been cleared of criminal charges related to a tweet he sent about an allegation of sexual misconduct on a bus, which was linked to a migrant residing at Trudder House IPAS centre.
4
10
1
41
860
Congratulations @Polito_loco
BREAKING: Political commentator Kirk Loco has been cleared of criminal charges related to a tweet he sent about an allegation of sexual misconduct on a bus, which was linked to a migrant residing at Trudder House IPAS centre.
2
21
1
80
1,317
Kirk @Polito_loco had a great defence team in Pádraig Langsch and @laoisedebrun Censorship and lawfare have no place in a democratic society.
Wicklow man Kirk Loco, who was charged with sending a "grossly offensive" tweet about an alleged incident of exposure on a bus, was cleared after a judge found the State failed to prove its case. gript.ie/man-cleared-of-char…
7
32
614
The Countess retweeted
Wicklow man Kirk Loco, who was charged with sending a "grossly offensive" tweet about an alleged incident of exposure on a bus, was cleared after a judge found the State failed to prove its case. gript.ie/man-cleared-of-char…
24
92
8
666
20,729
Well done to Pádraig Langsch and @laoisedebrun for winning this case for @Polito_loco It’s not very nice to have such a charge levelled against you. The stress and strain, and the process IS the punishment in cases involving free speech & someone else’s interpretation of “harm or offence”
Replying to @ezralevant
And here's Kirk's solicitor, Pádraig Langsch, on the win. Video by @griptmedia.
5
26
1
132
3,662
Congratulations to @Polito_loco and @laoisedebrun for winning this case. A great result.
On the Kirk Loco case, which absolutely stinks of a politically motivated prosecution. But this time, the courts got it 100% correct: johnandsarah.ie/p/vamos-kirk
4
23
128
1,478
The Countess retweeted
One of the many excellent Irish Catholic articles in this weeks edition. This one is about NGOs and Grannies and that disgraceful video. Well worth a purchase.
2
23
58
1,207
The Countess retweeted
When you ask yourself why any Govt funded NGO would air the video about grandparents hugging their grandkids, you must realise that it is done to create the illusion that the Govt are actually doing something - they are NOT! The in-camera rule exists to protect children’s privacy and dignity, principles we strongly support. But when it produces near-total opacity around child-protection cases, it also keeps the public, parents, professionals & other potential victims in the dark about patterns of organised exploitation. High Court details of teenagers in Tusla care being targeted by groups of men, unable even to recognise themselves as victims, should not rely on a judge lifting the rule & an opinion column for them to surface. Without routine anonymised reporting & greater visibility of how the system is failing these children, systemic risks remain hidden, accountability is weakened, and predators face less scrutiny. Privacy for the child is non-negotiable. Secrecy that conceals the scale of adult predation & State incapacity is not. Women and children deserve both privacy and safety. Are our politicians delivering on that? You be the judge.
ARE WE WATCHING BRITAIN’S PAEDOPHILE GROOMING-GANG SCANDAL UNFOLD IN IRELAND — WITH THE VICTIMS BEING CHILDREN IN TUSLA CARE? In an opinion piece in today’s Irish Mail, Brenda Power warns of a shocking child-safety scandal involving vulnerable children in State care being targeted by sexual predators while the authorities responsible for protecting them struggle to keep them safe. Under the headline “Grooming gangs are the real threat, not grannies”, Power focuses on three cases involving teenagers in State care which recently came before High Court judge Mr Justice John Jordan. So concerned was the judge that he directed details to Children Minister Norma Foley, Justice Minister Jim O’Callaghan and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. One case concerns a 14-year-old girl who, Power writes, was being preyed upon by organised paedophile gangs. The teenager, from a deeply troubled background, reportedly believed the men exploiting her genuinely cared about her. Despite suffering physical symptoms associated with sexual activity with numerous men, the child was unable to recognise herself as a victim. Power argues that this illustrates the sinister nature of grooming: vulnerable children can be manipulated into interpreting exploitation as love and affection. A second teenage girl in Tusla care was also reported as being sexually exploited by a large number of men. The third case concerned a 16-year-old boy involved with an older criminal gang whom he regarded as friends and supporters. Gardaí had seized thousands of euro worth of drugs from him. Power links the cases to the shortage of special-care accommodation. Despite 26 designated beds, only 15 were available. But she argues that the debate must go much further than beds. The fundamental question is: who is sexually exploiting these children and what is being done to identify, investigate and prosecute them? Power draws a disturbing comparison with Britain’s grooming-gang scandals, where vulnerable girls, particularly children in care, were systematically targeted by groups of men. She argues Ireland should learn from what happened there rather than wait for a comparable scandal to become fully exposed here. She cites Irish Mail on Sunday reporting that organised criminal groups are exploiting the State’s inability to keep vulnerable children safe. Perpetrators allegedly contact children online, obtain information about residential care facilities and arrange meetings away from their placements. Power describes children initially being offered attention, affection, money, drugs or alcohol before being passed between perpetrators and subjected to increasingly serious sexual exploitation. What may appear to be children voluntarily meeting adults can instead involve grooming, manipulation and coercion. She strongly rejects any suggestion that children can meaningfully consent to their own exploitation. They must be recognised as victims rather than having their behaviour treated as the problem. Power also questions whether Ireland’s in-camera rule, while essential for protecting children’s privacy, can prevent proper public scrutiny of organised exploitation. Her broader argument is that the State risks concentrating on containing vulnerable children through secure beds and residential placements while insufficient attention is directed towards the adults allegedly exploiting them. Ireland, Power argues, must confront the possibility that organised grooming and sexual exploitation of children in State care is already occurring here. Her central message is stark: the vulnerable children are not the threat from which society needs protection; the adults grooming and exploiting them are.
4
92
1
308
3,766
The Countess retweeted
Our Govt can put out a video criticising grandparents hugging their grandkids, because they can’t protect vulnerable children in their care. It’s all smoke & mirrors. The in-camera rule exists to protect children’s privacy & dignity, principles we strongly support. But when it produces near-total opacity around child-protection cases, it also keeps the public, parents, professionals and other potential victims in the dark about patterns of organised exploitation. High Court details of teenagers in Tusla care being targeted by groups of men, unable even to recognise themselves as victims, should not rely on a judge lifting the rule and an opinion column for them to surface. Without routine anonymised reporting and greater visibility of how the system is failing these children, systemic risks remain hidden, accountability is weakened, and predators face less scrutiny. Privacy for the child is non-negotiable. Secrecy that conceals the scale of adult predation & State failure is not. Women & children deserve both privacy & safety, & our Govt is failing on both counts.
BRENDA POWER: There's a scandal happening that's a far more serious risk to our children than their grannies not asking for consent before a hug... and most people out there have no idea about how widespread the danger has become trib.al/Th01c1c
4
59
1
149
2,395
An Afghan national wanted in Switzerland for attempted homicide has been refused bail, after a High Court judge noted that the male has travelled illegally between different countries without any documentation using different names and different dates of birth. courtsnewsireland.ie/afghan-…
55
125
27
360
14,787
The Countess retweeted
Have foreign-born men (or men of foreign cultures) been suspected, or been convicted, of killing a disproportionately high number of the women killed by men in the Republic of Ireland in 2026? Perhaps conveniently for the pro-Open Borders establishment, the NGO industry and the left, An Garda Síochána historically doesn’t record or publish the nationality or origins of murder suspects. @TheCountessIE @JillKerby @CNolanOffaly @kenoflynnTD @Glinner
5
21
1
65
1,113
Our Govt can put out a video criticising grandparents hugging their grandkids, because they can’t protect vulnerable children in their care. It’s all smoke & mirrors. The in-camera rule exists to protect children’s privacy & dignity, principles we strongly support. But when it produces near-total opacity around child-protection cases, it also keeps the public, parents, professionals and other potential victims in the dark about patterns of organised exploitation. High Court details of teenagers in Tusla care being targeted by groups of men, unable even to recognise themselves as victims, should not rely on a judge lifting the rule and an opinion column for them to surface. Without routine anonymised reporting and greater visibility of how the system is failing these children, systemic risks remain hidden, accountability is weakened, and predators face less scrutiny. Privacy for the child is non-negotiable. Secrecy that conceals the scale of adult predation & State failure is not. Women & children deserve both privacy & safety, & our Govt is failing on both counts.
BRENDA POWER: There's a scandal happening that's a far more serious risk to our children than their grannies not asking for consent before a hug... and most people out there have no idea about how widespread the danger has become trib.al/Th01c1c
4
59
1
149
2,395
When you ask yourself why any Govt funded NGO would air the video about grandparents hugging their grandkids, you must realise that it is done to create the illusion that the Govt are actually doing something - they are NOT! The in-camera rule exists to protect children’s privacy and dignity, principles we strongly support. But when it produces near-total opacity around child-protection cases, it also keeps the public, parents, professionals & other potential victims in the dark about patterns of organised exploitation. High Court details of teenagers in Tusla care being targeted by groups of men, unable even to recognise themselves as victims, should not rely on a judge lifting the rule & an opinion column for them to surface. Without routine anonymised reporting & greater visibility of how the system is failing these children, systemic risks remain hidden, accountability is weakened, and predators face less scrutiny. Privacy for the child is non-negotiable. Secrecy that conceals the scale of adult predation & State incapacity is not. Women and children deserve both privacy and safety. Are our politicians delivering on that? You be the judge.
ARE WE WATCHING BRITAIN’S PAEDOPHILE GROOMING-GANG SCANDAL UNFOLD IN IRELAND — WITH THE VICTIMS BEING CHILDREN IN TUSLA CARE? In an opinion piece in today’s Irish Mail, Brenda Power warns of a shocking child-safety scandal involving vulnerable children in State care being targeted by sexual predators while the authorities responsible for protecting them struggle to keep them safe. Under the headline “Grooming gangs are the real threat, not grannies”, Power focuses on three cases involving teenagers in State care which recently came before High Court judge Mr Justice John Jordan. So concerned was the judge that he directed details to Children Minister Norma Foley, Justice Minister Jim O’Callaghan and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. One case concerns a 14-year-old girl who, Power writes, was being preyed upon by organised paedophile gangs. The teenager, from a deeply troubled background, reportedly believed the men exploiting her genuinely cared about her. Despite suffering physical symptoms associated with sexual activity with numerous men, the child was unable to recognise herself as a victim. Power argues that this illustrates the sinister nature of grooming: vulnerable children can be manipulated into interpreting exploitation as love and affection. A second teenage girl in Tusla care was also reported as being sexually exploited by a large number of men. The third case concerned a 16-year-old boy involved with an older criminal gang whom he regarded as friends and supporters. Gardaí had seized thousands of euro worth of drugs from him. Power links the cases to the shortage of special-care accommodation. Despite 26 designated beds, only 15 were available. But she argues that the debate must go much further than beds. The fundamental question is: who is sexually exploiting these children and what is being done to identify, investigate and prosecute them? Power draws a disturbing comparison with Britain’s grooming-gang scandals, where vulnerable girls, particularly children in care, were systematically targeted by groups of men. She argues Ireland should learn from what happened there rather than wait for a comparable scandal to become fully exposed here. She cites Irish Mail on Sunday reporting that organised criminal groups are exploiting the State’s inability to keep vulnerable children safe. Perpetrators allegedly contact children online, obtain information about residential care facilities and arrange meetings away from their placements. Power describes children initially being offered attention, affection, money, drugs or alcohol before being passed between perpetrators and subjected to increasingly serious sexual exploitation. What may appear to be children voluntarily meeting adults can instead involve grooming, manipulation and coercion. She strongly rejects any suggestion that children can meaningfully consent to their own exploitation. They must be recognised as victims rather than having their behaviour treated as the problem. Power also questions whether Ireland’s in-camera rule, while essential for protecting children’s privacy, can prevent proper public scrutiny of organised exploitation. Her broader argument is that the State risks concentrating on containing vulnerable children through secure beds and residential placements while insufficient attention is directed towards the adults allegedly exploiting them. Ireland, Power argues, must confront the possibility that organised grooming and sexual exploitation of children in State care is already occurring here. Her central message is stark: the vulnerable children are not the threat from which society needs protection; the adults grooming and exploiting them are.
4
92
1
308
3,766
The Countess retweeted
I was investigated by the NHS, called a transphobe and thought of suicide thetimes.com/article/cfde7b4…. When the topic of “trans healthcare” cannot be discussed openly, the results are doctors like Dr Redvers are ignored and children & young people are harmed. Dr Redvers was treated appallingly, for raising concerns, by the NHS. Instead of taking her concerns seriously, they caused huge damage to Dr Redvers mental health.
5
28
1
84
1,417
I was investigated by the NHS, called a transphobe and thought of suicide thetimes.com/article/cfde7b4…. When the topic of “trans healthcare” cannot be discussed openly, the results are doctors like Dr Redvers are ignored and children & young people are harmed. Dr Redvers was treated appallingly, for raising concerns, by the NHS. Instead of taking her concerns seriously, they caused huge damage to Dr Redvers mental health.
5
28
1
84
1,417
The Countess retweeted
Thank you. 💚🇮🇪
13
38
145
3,454
The Countess retweeted
Replying to @OCallaghanJim
@OCallaghanJim clearly disowns the CUAN attack upon grandparents. But no apology forthcoming. Reminds me of @NormaFoleyTD1 denials of @MaryCreedon4 exposure of @DCU SPHE sex games for schools debacle. Norma as ever refused to apologise.
6
11
277