
President of @IERenergy and @AEA in Washington, DC. Our mission: promote energy realism and fight for consumers. Co-host of @TheUnregPodcast.
Washington, D.C.
Joined November 2008
- Tweets5.9K
- Following955
- Followers1.9K
- Likes1.4K
Tom Pyle retweeted
Replying to @IERenergy
@IERenergy points out that #Massachusetts is the only New England that has an internal "cap and trade on top of being in RGGI. @https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2026/10/16/proposed_natural_gas_pipeline_expansion_forecast_to_lower_energy_bills_in_massachusetts_1211908.html
This 👇
Replying to @Americanvalues @BasedMikeLee
RFS/RIN mandate adjustment (largest effect): Recent high RIN prices (~$1.75–2.40 for D6 ethanol RINs) create an estimated compliance cost of ~30–37¢/gal passed through into gasoline/diesel prices (EPRINC, IER, and related analyses cite ~27–37¢ or higher in peak 2026 periods; annual totals $50–60+ billion). This acts as a tax on petroleum fuels and a subsidy to ethanol. Rough removal of the RFS pass-through from gasoline and addition of the embedded RIN value to the ethanol-heavy E85 (~75% ethanol × ~$2 RIN) produces policy-adjusted pre-tax estimates of roughly ~$3.45–3.50/gal for regular and ~$3.10–3.20/gal for E85.Instituteforenergyresearch
Production credits (45Z) + energy density: Section 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit adds roughly $0.10–0.35/gal (typical corn ethanol range; higher with low-CI practices or CCS; one reported example ~$0.33). Adding a midpoint ~$0.20 on the ethanol portion raises the adjusted E85 figure by ~$0.15. On an energy basis (E85 ~70–75% of gasoline BTU content, ~73% used here), the policy- and credit-adjusted energy-equivalent cost of E85 rises to roughly $4.20–4.60/gal equivalent, comparable to or higher than the adjusted gasoline cost.
Another suggestion: The renewable-fuel obligation (aka tax) is embedded in wholesale diesel. A broad, time-limited waiver or lower RVO can lower the price by ~37 cents a gallon. Suspend the federal diesel tax (24 cents) and that 61 cents right there. Are you with me, @chuckgrassley?
How about you share the language with us so we can decide for ourselves?
Tom Pyle retweeted
"Export bans would lead to less fuel production, tighter supplies, and rising costs." @TomJPyle of @AEA lays out why a diesel export ban could backfire and leave consumers worse off.
americanenergyalliance.org/2…
Tom Pyle retweeted
Before President Trump took office, @TomJPyle laid out a bold vision for permitting reform. Now, Congress must go big - cut red tape, unleash American energy, and lower costs for Americans without favoring more expensive energy sources. washingtonexaminer.com/opini…
Diesel ban is bad policy and bad politics. Here's why:
americanenergyalliance.org/2…
If the Administration is looking to lower the price of diesel without disrupting the markets and inducing shortages they should zero out the 2026 RVO obligation in the RFS.
“According to some, the ethanol mandate costs drivers and their families about 45 cents extra per gallon, or, if you prefer big numbers, the total annual economic cost is estimated to be about $88 billion each year,” Michael McKenna writes.
A U.S. diesel export ban would hit Mexico first: ~220k b/d of U.S. supply, inventories already under 6 days, heavy farm and trucking use.
Central America and Ecuador/Peru would follow quickly. Brazil is more buffered but still exposed. Food and freight costs rise on both sides of the border.
atlanticcouncil.org/dispatch…
This 👇
Green New Deal author @SenMarkey wanted to ban LNG exports “to lower household energy bills”.
Stop being like Ed Markey.
@LeaderJohnThune @timburchett @ChuckGrassley
A lot to unpack here, but I'll just focus on Venezuela.
1. Diesel prices are being driven by a product shortage, not a crude shortage.
2. Venezuelan barrels, even if they arrive, do not automatically become extra ultra-low-sulfur diesel. They have to be processed in the right units, and those units are already full.
3. Oil already in tanks and pipelines, and product already refined, does not reprice instantly just because a new source of crude exists on paper.
Tom Pyle retweeted
AEA president @TomJPyle on @LAGovJeffLandry 's call for a diesel export ban. Via @politico: politico.com/news/2026/09/21…
It's funny that the @GavinNewson's office said this was fake research. It wasn't even research. It's called data.
siliconvalley.com/2026/09/18… via @siliconbeat
.@ChuckGrassley knows a lot about government intervention in energy markets.
1. His beloved Wind Production Tax Credit has cost American taxpayers well over $300-400 billion.
2) His beloved RFS is currently adding around 40 cents to the cost of a gallon of gasoline.
3) His beloved biomass based diesel costs $4 PER GALLON MORE to make than petroleum diesel and he wants to mandate more. And because of how the RFS works, if wholesale diesel drops, the RIN will have to tax it higher to subsidize more costly biomass based diesel enough to make economic. So farmers won't even feel the benefit of lower wholesale diesel without an RFS reduction.
W diesel $6.57 in Iowa why doesn’t Pres Trump put an embargo on diesel exports like presidents in the 70s put embargoes on ag products bc food prices were inflated. High diesel prices ARE KILLING FARMERS INCOME #cornwatch #soybeanwatch
This position demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of fuel markets. Export bans, price gouging laws, production quotas, and price controls NEVER work.
This is why we are so fortunate to have @SecretaryWright at the helm of @ENERGY. Politicians like @timburchett should take heed.
I have been saying that an export ban on American diesel is a very bad idea, and I'm encouraged by @SecretaryWright's denouncement of the idea.
Americans deserve affordable fuel, and we get that through supply; we need to increase our refineries and diesel production.
Tom Pyle retweeted
Respectfully, Governor, a diesel export ban is the wrong answer. It would mean less U.S. fuel production, tighter supplies, greater energy security risks, and higher prices. There are better ways to reduce costs, including RFS reform and fixing barriers that make it harder to move fuel where it's needed.
LET’S LOWER SOME FUEL COSTS NOW AND HELP THE ENTIRE U.S. ECONOMY with the Administration and Congress issuing a 90 day ban on U.S. diesel exports and making the small refinery exception permanent.
@WhiteHouse, @realDonaldTrump, @SecretaryWright, @SpeakerJohnson, @LeaderJohnThune
Tom Pyle retweeted
Secretary @SecScottBessent is correct to identify Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) as "a malignancy within our legal and financial system.” He's not alone in applying that diagnosis. youtube.com/watch?v=rBZ5TYsX…
Tom Pyle retweeted
Yesterday, @epaleezeldin announced the repeal of federal greenhouse gas limits for coal- and natural gas- fired power plants. Administrator Zeldin also proposed rescinding every remaining greenhouse gas standard for the power sector.
The limits required existing coal plants planning to operate past 2039 to meet a standard based on 90% carbon capture and storage (CCS) by 2032 and new baseload natural gas combustion turbines to meet a similar 90% CCS-based standard that would have been phased in by the early 2030s.
@TomJPyle, President of the American Energy Alliance, issued the following statement:

















