President of @IERenergy and @AEA in Washington, DC. Our mission: promote energy realism and fight for consumers. Co-host of @TheUnregPodcast.

Washington, D.C.
Joined November 2008
Replying to @IERenergy
@IERenergy points out that #Massachusetts is the only New England that has an internal "cap and trade on top of being in RGGI. @https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2026/10/16/proposed_natural_gas_pipeline_expansion_forecast_to_lower_energy_bills_in_massachusetts_1211908.html
1
75
This 👇
RFS/RIN mandate adjustment (largest effect): Recent high RIN prices (~$1.75–2.40 for D6 ethanol RINs) create an estimated compliance cost of ~30–37¢/gal passed through into gasoline/diesel prices (EPRINC, IER, and related analyses cite ~27–37¢ or higher in peak 2026 periods; annual totals $50–60+ billion). This acts as a tax on petroleum fuels and a subsidy to ethanol. Rough removal of the RFS pass-through from gasoline and addition of the embedded RIN value to the ethanol-heavy E85 (~75% ethanol × ~$2 RIN) produces policy-adjusted pre-tax estimates of roughly ~$3.45–3.50/gal for regular and ~$3.10–3.20/gal for E85.⁠Instituteforenergyresearch Production credits (45Z) + energy density: Section 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit adds roughly $0.10–0.35/gal (typical corn ethanol range; higher with low-CI practices or CCS; one reported example ~$0.33). Adding a midpoint ~$0.20 on the ethanol portion raises the adjusted E85 figure by ~$0.15. On an energy basis (E85 ~70–75% of gasoline BTU content, ~73% used here), the policy- and credit-adjusted energy-equivalent cost of E85 rises to roughly $4.20–4.60/gal equivalent, comparable to or higher than the adjusted gasoline cost.
96
Another suggestion: The renewable-fuel obligation (aka tax) is embedded in wholesale diesel. A broad, time-limited waiver or lower RVO can lower the price by ~37 cents a gallon. Suspend the federal diesel tax (24 cents) and that 61 cents right there. Are you with me, @chuckgrassley?
A suggestion 4 Pres Trump: Since ur hearing frm Big Oil abt diesel prices & the problems w an embargo tell Big Oil 2reduce their prices 4 Americans/not charge global price This is an America 1st issue WHY B ENERGY INDEPENDENT IF WE ARENT GOING 2USE IT WHEN WE NEED IT
4
3
1
9
965
How about you share the language with us so we can decide for ourselves?
Permitting reform is one of the best things we can do for our country, and the package negotiated in the Senate is objectively good for our country. We should take it up and pass it this work period, instead of waiting and potentially missing our window.
4
146
How would we know? You won’t make it public.
The permitting deal is not dead.
1
5
363
Before President Trump took office, @TomJPyle laid out a bold vision for permitting reform. Now, Congress must go big - cut red tape, unleash American energy, and lower costs for Americans without favoring more expensive energy sources. washingtonexaminer.com/opini…
1
14
37
3,400
If the Administration is looking to lower the price of diesel without disrupting the markets and inducing shortages they should zero out the 2026 RVO obligation in the RFS.
“According to some, the ethanol mandate costs drivers and their families about 45 cents extra per gallon, or, if you prefer big numbers, the total annual economic cost is estimated to be about $88 billion each year,” Michael McKenna writes.
3
3
1
13
896
A U.S. diesel export ban would hit Mexico first: ~220k b/d of U.S. supply, inventories already under 6 days, heavy farm and trucking use. Central America and Ecuador/Peru would follow quickly. Brazil is more buffered but still exposed. Food and freight costs rise on both sides of the border. atlanticcouncil.org/dispatch…
1
124
This 👇
Green New Deal author @SenMarkey wanted to ban LNG exports “to lower household energy bills”. Stop being like Ed Markey. @LeaderJohnThune @timburchett @ChuckGrassley
1
1
6
819
A lot to unpack here, but I'll just focus on Venezuela. 1. Diesel prices are being driven by a product shortage, not a crude shortage. 2. Venezuelan barrels, even if they arrive, do not automatically become extra ultra-low-sulfur diesel. They have to be processed in the right units, and those units are already full. 3. Oil already in tanks and pipelines, and product already refined, does not reprice instantly just because a new source of crude exists on paper.
When individuals do it it’s gouging. When BIG OIL does it it’s business as usual.
12
11
50
57,377
AEA president @TomJPyle on @LAGovJeffLandry 's call for a diesel export ban. Via @politico: politico.com/news/2026/09/21…
1
171
.@ChuckGrassley knows a lot about government intervention in energy markets. 1. His beloved Wind Production Tax Credit has cost American taxpayers well over $300-400 billion. 2) His beloved RFS is currently adding around 40 cents to the cost of a gallon of gasoline. 3) His beloved biomass based diesel costs $4 PER GALLON MORE to make than petroleum diesel and he wants to mandate more. And because of how the RFS works, if wholesale diesel drops, the RIN will have to tax it higher to subsidize more costly biomass based diesel enough to make economic. So farmers won't even feel the benefit of lower wholesale diesel without an RFS reduction.
W diesel $6.57 in Iowa why doesn’t Pres Trump put an embargo on diesel exports like presidents in the 70s put embargoes on ag products bc food prices were inflated. High diesel prices ARE KILLING FARMERS INCOME #cornwatch #soybeanwatch
1
5
6
1,070
This position demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of fuel markets. Export bans, price gouging laws, production quotas, and price controls NEVER work.
The United States is the world’s largest exporter of diesel fuel. Yet, our domestic stockpiles are at their lowest level in 30 years. It’s time we tell these oil companies to prioritize American consumers. My new legislation will do just that.
2
134
This is why we are so fortunate to have @SecretaryWright at the helm of @ENERGY. Politicians like @timburchett should take heed.
I have been saying that an export ban on American diesel is a very bad idea, and I'm encouraged by @SecretaryWright's denouncement of the idea. Americans deserve affordable fuel, and we get that through supply; we need to increase our refineries and diesel production.
5
303
Respectfully, Governor, a diesel export ban is the wrong answer. It would mean less U.S. fuel production, tighter supplies, greater energy security risks, and higher prices. There are better ways to reduce costs, including RFS reform and fixing barriers that make it harder to move fuel where it's needed.
LET’S LOWER SOME FUEL COSTS NOW AND HELP THE ENTIRE U.S. ECONOMY with the Administration and Congress issuing a 90 day ban on U.S. diesel exports and making the small refinery exception permanent. @WhiteHouse, @realDonaldTrump, @SecretaryWright, @SpeakerJohnson, @LeaderJohnThune
1
2
4
333
Secretary @SecScottBessent is correct to identify Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) as "a malignancy within our legal and financial system.” He's not alone in applying that diagnosis. youtube.com/watch?v=rBZ5TYsX…
1
1
5
264
Yesterday, @epaleezeldin announced the repeal of federal greenhouse gas limits for coal- and natural gas- fired power plants. Administrator Zeldin also proposed rescinding every remaining greenhouse gas standard for the power sector. The limits required existing coal plants planning to operate past 2039 to meet a standard based on 90% carbon capture and storage (CCS) by 2032 and new baseload natural gas combustion turbines to meet a similar 90% CCS-based standard that would have been phased in by the early 2030s. @TomJPyle, President of the American Energy Alliance, issued the following statement:
1
1
123