TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner) header
TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner) profile picture

Making YouTube Easier!

London, England
Joined December 2019
Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)Photo by TubeSpanner (@TubeSpanner)
Writing scripts can be tough... but we all know that when you put the time in it can be well worth the effort. Your videos come across cleaner and you have more opportunities to ensure that your message is clean and on point. Which is why we offer your our Script Generator tool. Not only does it pre-write a script for you based on your input and needs but the finished product is completely editable and customizable AND... It can be recorded immediately on the TubeSpanner teleprompter within our new studio editor! Try it free for yourself at tubespanner.com and if you need some guidance we just released a new video detailing how to use the Script Generator! youtu.be/GN21QL2UlYk
1
2
46
The YouTube mobile app just got a refresh... which includes a tab dedicated specifically to livestreams happening at the time you are scrolling. The first of more improvements promised to be on the way very soon. It will be interesting to see the impact this has on streams going forward.
28
I had the distinct pleasure of enjoying dinner with @TheEmilyDBaker and @shellysavesthe at @vidsummit a few years ago... she is an absolute delight and a wonderful choice for this topic!
2
60
Just a reminder... nothing will cause your view count to explode more than getting out to vote today!
🤖 Made with AI
1
38
TubeSpanner retweeted
Imagine having to hunt and scavenge from the moment you wake up until exhaustion to survive and having to live by water sources so you don’t die of dehydration. And having to sleep in trees or caves so we don’t get murdered by other people or animals. Now, all we have to do is work (in air conditioning for a lot of us) and as a result we don’t have to worry about any of that. It’s so easy to forget how amazing everything is.
5
17
921
YouTube has announced that they are testing an option that will allow creators to attach up to three different thumbnail variations for a single video. Not for testing but for the different traffic feeds on YouTube. This has the potential to be one of the biggest opportunities for creators that YouTube has introduced. Specifically this gives creators the ability to cater discovery for different types of viewers. 1. Subscribers - People who have seen your work, know your face and are waiting for that next video to drop. 2. People who are searching for a specific video on a select topic with a particular viewing experience in mind. 3. Non-Subscribers who are randomly scrolling through their feed looking for a video who do not know you. If this goes through thumbnail design will have tripled in value. With the template feature of our Thumbnail Generator tool you can now save designs for each of these feeds and capitalize on this update by spending less time reworking different thumbnails and focusing more on what you do best... making great videos! Try it forever FREE here: tubespanner.com
2
73
an exhaustive and admirable deep dive into a retention issue courtesy of @MarioJoos. Well worth the read if you are really looking to dig deep.
They're willing to pay for advice, so we're giving it for free. A few hours ago, I was tagged in a message asking for advice about their YouTube channel. The hosts of a YouTube channel called “The Adventure Crews” would go to ask for more information about how to solve their retention curve. First, we took a look at the message they sent. The first thing that the host shared was some data from their last video. 73% of their viewers are 45+ Roughly 75% male / 25% female 7:01 average view duration on their latest video 32.7% average percentage viewed But there's something else they share right after this, which is the problem they are struggling to solve. They say “We're losing more than HALF of our viewers in the first 60 seconds. Our retention drops from roughly 93% to 49% in that first minute. And here's what's interesting: Once viewers make it through our intro, the retention curve levels out pretty consistently across our videos. We just need to figure out how to get more of them past that first minute.” So, let's solve this for them. First, let's look at the data they shared and add some nuance to understand which metrics are actually useful. The first piece of data is their demographics. Knowing that the majority of their audience is over 45 years old, with a split favoring males, is useful information when figuring out why certain things are working and why not. However, it doesn't necessarily solve our problem, so we're putting this information to the side for the actual analysis. Next, we have their average view duration and average percentage viewed. Their AVD and APV. The problem with these metrics is that they're heavily influenced by selection bias. We don't know who YouTube showed the video to, whether these were colder audiences, or how the audience differs from their other videos. On top of that, AVD is influenced by video length, making comparisons even more difficult. So while these numbers tell us something about viewer behavior, they don't necessarily tell us whether the video performed well or not. There are simply too many factors influencing them, so let's put these metrics to the side as well. And this brings us to their actual problem: losing more than half their viewers in the first 60 seconds. The same reasoning applies here. What matters isn't the actual percentage, but the behavior of the retention chart, which isn't something they shared. I don't really care what percentage we start with and end up with after 60 seconds. What I care about is: what were the moments where we lost people, and what were the moments where people kept on watching? Now, the intro isn't just about engagement. It's also the second decision point viewers use to decide whether they want to watch the video. In this case, it seems like YouTube is serving the video to people who are likely to click, but many of them are making their decision during the intro rather than before clicking. This could explain why the initial drop looks so aggressive. Later in their message, they ask whether the issue is storytelling, pacing, the way they're opening the video, or something they're completely overlooking. So, after looking at the first 60 seconds of their video, here are the five things I've noticed. 1. Make sure the intro follows a logical structure. Right now, we're giving the viewer a lot of information, but it's not presented in a logical order. We're jumping between teaser clips, context, narration, and different statements without really connecting them. This makes it difficult for the viewer to understand what we're trying to communicate. I would focus on restructuring the intro so that every piece of information builds on what we've previously established. 2. Make sure the visuals and narration support each other. There are several moments where the visuals don't really connect with what we're saying. For example, we're showing lobster fishing while talking about spending 48 hours on the island. We're also including statements from locals that don't necessarily add anything to the context we've already provided. I would make sure that every visual and statement has a clear purpose and helps the viewer understand the story. 3. Start the story closer to where the actual experience begins. After the intro, we're spending quite some time sitting in a car, talking about the island and explaining how we're getting there. The problem is that the story starts way too early. I would consider opening the actual video when we're standing in front of the boat or arriving at the isolated island. This immediately puts the viewer closer to the experience we're promising, rather than making them sit through information that isn't necessarily important. 4. Be more selective about the information we're giving the viewer. We're spending quite some time explaining how to get to the island, the different transportation options, and when the ferry operates. But we should ask ourselves whether the viewer actually needs this information to follow the story. Just because something happened during the experience doesn't mean we need to include it. I would focus on information that helps establish the situation. 5. Create more tension and make the tone match the experience. I think one of the biggest problems with the first minute is that everything feels extremely happy. We're presenting this remote, isolated island as somewhere difficult to live, but the music, narration, and overall presentation don't really communicate that. Everything feels quite relaxed. I would focus on creating more tension, emphasizing the isolation, and making the viewer curious about what we're going to discover. We need to establish why this experience is interesting and give the viewer something to look forward to.
22
Sometimes all it takes is to bring a smile to someone's face. @REDROMINA @MTLFORBRKFST thank you for your years of dedication to making @vidsummit such a fun environment. This is from last year but don't think we forgot.
2
3
5
159
oooooh... loving the purple guys! You are on a roll today! 💜
Your setup called. It wants a purple upgrade. 💜🎙️ Featuring the RØDE PSA1+ in purple, WS14 pop filter in purple (compatible with the PodMic and PodMic USB), and XLR cable in purple. Hit the link in our bio to learn more. 🔗
1
31
Who's in the mood for a livestream this morning! Stanley is! youtube.com/live/BZPP-UHlC3g…
4
151
Need an editor but unable to hire? We feel your pain. Which is why we have created the TubeSpanner Studio. Whether you need a finished product complete with b-roll, overlays and music or you simply want the rough cuts completed automatically so you can export to your favorite editing software TubeSpanner has you covered. Try it yourself by starting a free account today (no CC required) and let's get you back to doing what you do best.... ..being you. On camera. tubespanner.com
1
2
90
Anyone who votes anything but 'cat' has never been owned by a cat.
Playing around with Simulon today, video coming up later. As a preview: Mech Vs Cat. I know who I have my money on...
1
3
301
It's #TubeSpannerWinnerWednesdays and our community is working hard and achieving so much this week! And here are a few to celebrate! You can check out more milestones, and find your own, at tubespanner.com/winners ! #contentcreator #creatorcommunity Learn Grow Invest Community-youtube.com/@LearnGrowInvest Deadpan Jammy- youtube.com/@deadpanjammy Reaction Hacks-youtube.com/@reactionhacks
25
are we ready to actually revisit “college is a scam” with genuine honesty this time instead of reflexively defending institutions? Because that this point: College is a scam. Health Insurance is a scam. Taxes are a scam. And it’s very hard to argue against that with the experience of the average person who has lived through this economy the at any point in the last 20 years who is under 45… To such a degree the younger generation is advocating for full blown communism. 🤦🏾‍♂️ 🤦🏾‍♂️
Most California students still can’t read or do math at grade level, per NYP Just 49% met state standards in English this year, and only 38% in math. Among low-income students, nearly 3 in 4 didn’t meet the math standard.
9
2
31
2,374
Your interesting YouTube stat for the day; YouTube accounted for 14% of U.S. TV-viewing time in July... next highest was Netflix at 8%. This does not include views on phones or other devices. The takeaway; cater your content for a more-broad viewing audience. You don't need big expensive cameras or a production staff. But you should test your videos for how well they appear (and SOUND!) on a television. The audience is there, you just need to give them the presentation they need/deserve/expect.
61
Ooooh... I am always down for a fun experiment. Can't wait to see what Creator Coffee Talk has in store this morning!
25
TubeSpanner retweeted
The biggest lie in YouTube strategy: You should aim for 70% retention. It's a stupid rule that completely ignores how the algorithm works. Your retention percentage is heavily influenced by: (1) The type of video you make (2) The length of your video (3) Who was shown your video (4) Who clicked on your video (5) The structure of your video (6) The traffic source that brought viewers to your video (7) The device used to watch your video (8) The viewer segment against which retention is measured Yeah... this is why I keep saying that the only things worth looking at are your views and the behavior shown in your retention chart.
23
4
115
8,730