Alex de Leon retweeted
Gracias a Lula y su Ejército (10M de personas reales) ahora sabemos cómo funciona el algoritmo y cómo vencerlo.
Coordinación masiva > bots y sesgos. Deja de pagarle la campaña a la derecha
Mira el video 👇
Alex de Leon retweeted
TLDR; The CIA poured cash into a plot for a secret army from Taiwan to invade southern China from Burma — and accidentally financed the birth of the Golden Triangle, a heroin empire which killed huge numbers of people
.
Chapter 1: THE CHOICE
US PRESIDENT HARRY TRUMAN had a gut feeling that he should stay out of Taiwan. “The United States Government will not pursue a course which will lead to involvement in the civil conflict in China,” he wrote on 5 January, 1950.
But the C.I.A. felt differently: their modus operandi was to choose one side and covertly arm it.
- People on the mainland, as socialists, were more organized, more serious, and surprisingly good at spycraft. But they were commies!
- The nationalists on Taiwan island had a reputation for being tricky and unpredictable. But they were capitalists.
CIA leaders made their fateful choice.
.
Chapter 2: THE SECRET ARMY
THE CIA LEARNED that the Taiwan-based nationalists had assembled a secret army in Burma to “recover” China from the communists.
Led by General Li Mi of the Kuomintang, or KMT, the attack force communicated with Taipei through a confidential radio office in Bangkok.
The CIA used its own planes to add more soldiers from Taiwan, plus weapons from an arsenal on Okinawa—and plenty of cash. The operation was coordinated by CIA men Alfred Cox in Hong Kong and Sherman Joost in Bangkok.
In May 1951, Li Mi’s secret army invaded China from the south, accompanied by CIA officers.
.
Chapter 3: SPYCRAFT
IT WAS A DISASTER. The Chinese seemed to be waiting for them in Yunnan province—and picked them off wherever they turned. In less than a month, the effort was in full retreat.
A second incursion, in July, went even more badly, with the Chinese chasing them out in a week.
What the KMT didn’t know until much later was that the Chinese had quietly replaced the nationalist radio man in Bangkok with one of their own operatives — they were good at spycraft, as mentioned.
.
Chapter 4: EMBARRASSMENT
AT CHRISTMAS IN 1951, Beijing complained in public that the United States had ferried Nationalist soldiers and weapons to Burma to create conflict. The controversy was raised at the United Nations. US diplomats lied, saying on the record that the US had no involvement whatsoever.
But Washington was embarrassed when an 11 February 1952 New York Times report quoted witnesses in Burma who had seen Li Mi’s soldiers proudly showing off their brand-new American weapons.
That summer, Li Mi led yet another invasion of China. On 2 August, some 2,100 Nationalists got less than 100 km into the country before being driven out.
But despite the supply of arms and cash, and even US training, the latest operation was not progressing. As time passed, it became clear to the CIA that the secret army was busy with something else.
.
Chapter 5: THE TWIST
During their years’ hiding in mountains of northern Burma, the KMT’s secret force had made two discoveries. One was that an extremely valuable crop, opium, was grown in those mountains, and the other was that they liked southeast Asian women.
Their capitalist urges trumped their political ones. They married the women and became wealthy opium plantation owners and drug distributors.
By 1953, Washington’s official line was to ask Chiang Kai-shek in Taipei to remove the men from Burma. That year, 7,000 troops were airlifted to Taiwan—but at least that number insisted on staying, and thousands more decided to remain in neighboring Thailand.
The CIA saw the “Golden Triangle” drug trade as a positive, potentially making their covert armies self-financing. “The U.S. use of the drug traffic from the KMT troops in Burma had momentous consequences for the whole of Southeast Asia,” said historian Peter Dale Scott in the Asia Pacific Journal.
.
Chapter 6: RICH AND ARMED
BY THE EARLY 1960s, the Burmese were desperate to get the KMT out, and the CIA was intrigued to discover that the PLA, China’s army, had agreed to help.
But even they couldn’t eradicate the rebels, who were rich, strong, and well-armed, and now controlled 90 percent of Burmese opium—and “almost a third of the world’s opium supply”, according to CIA Far East operative Richard Stilwell.
In 1961, the leaders in Taipei cut off all payments to their people in Burma. But the KMT secret army responded that this just made the drug trade more crucial: they had to expand it to cover their soldiers’ salaries.
.
Chapter 7: A WIN AND A LOSS
IN TRUTH, the secret army had lost all interest in invading China. And they found themselves under fire in their new profession. In 1967, the drug operation had spread into Laos and Vietnam, and the KMT were soon fighting a war against rival warlords.
The Taiwanese eventually defeated their main opponent Khun Sa, a Burmese, but during the fighting, a Lao general confiscated a large amount of opium and supplied it to multiple users across East Asia.
.
Chapter 8: PEACE
The 1967 opium war ended the Burma KMT’s 15-year control of the region’s main heroin distribution routes, although their business continued.
The CIA had spent a fortune over many years supporting the plan to “recover China” and had nothing to show for it.
In 1969, Henry Kissinger defunded many of the CIA operations in and around China. In 1971, he flew secretly to Beijing to make peace.
.
EPILOGUE
And what happened to the secret army that Taiwan and the US had secretly funded for years?
“The Nationalists maintained forces in Burma no longer under CIA control. These later grew to as many as twelve thousand and continued their drug trafficking right into the 1980s,” wrote historian John Prados.
For the US, the experience “helped institutionalize what became a CIA habit of turning to drug-supported off-the-books assets for fighting wars wherever there appeared to be a threat to America’s access to oil and other resources,” wrote Peter Dale Scott.
But as so often happened, the CIA’s lawless antics harmed all sides—including the US itself. The opium grabbed by the Lao general was turned into heroin and secretly sold in Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s.
Many of the buyers were American troops fighting in South Vietnamese jungles, young men desperately stressed out after being commissioned to win an unwinnable war.
*
Sources:
American War Machine by Peter Dale Scott; The Search for Modern China by Jonathan D. Spence; Legacy of Ashes by Tim Weiner; Safe for Democracy: The Secret Wars of the CIA by John Prados.
Alex de Leon retweeted
在1961年4月4日CIA的一份绝密评估中也佐证了死了几千万这种宣传是谎言。这份文件直到2004年才解密,是专门提供给美国总统和军方高层的内部情报,其中对形势的判断与外部宣传的调门并不完全一致。
文件的核心结论是:由于经济管理不善和连续两年的恶劣天气“大规模的饥荒现在没有发生”,不过在某些省份,很多人正遭受营养不良。原文是“Widespread famine does not appear to be at hand, but in some provinces many people are now on a bare subsistence diet...”
1962年的文件(下图红字部分):“中国1961年的粮食产量仍低于1957年,但是人口继续增加,多了6000万...但并未发生像旧中国那样司空见惯的大规模饿死人的现象”,这个表述与1962年前后的CIA评估结论基调一致。
这与当时外部宣传中往往将困难直接等同于全面饥荒的叙事,存在一个明显的不一致。CIA的内部评估承认了严重困难,但在饥荒的规模判断上,其当时的情报结论与后来一些外部流传的极端数字并不吻合。情报工作的报告要更严谨,不能像对外宣传一样对内部高层撒谎。
坊间流传最广的“ 3000 万”说法,源头是1983年国家统计局公布的户籍数据中,1960—1964年间人口总数在扣除自然增长后异常减少了2644万。
但孙经先等人的研究指出,这个“异常减少”主要由户籍管理问题造成,而非实际死亡:约1162万是农村人口迁入市镇后原籍未注销形成的重报虚报,约750万是此前已死亡但未注销的死亡漏报,另有约1482万是精简返乡后未及时办理农村户籍迁入的漏报,合计约3394万户籍虚数在后续整顿中被注销。户籍数字的“消失”,不等于人的消失。
孙经先本人基于人口数据调整后的“超线性死亡”估算则低至366万,其中营养缺乏致死约250万。这一点国内学者和国外刻意抹黑的所谓学术分歧确实很大,但没有任何一个可追溯的严肃研究把数字推到几千万。
而之所以出现严重困难,除了内部政策因素外,国际禁运与外部压力确实是一个被忽视的结构性原因。当时西方在巴黎统筹委员会框架下对华实施战略物资禁运,中国禁单比苏联东欧多出500余种。与此同时,1960年苏联单方面撕毁援助协议、撤走专家,并逼迫中国限期偿还贸易欠款,中国不得不增加农产品出口来抵债,进一步挤压了国内本就紧张的口粮。1960年底中国紧急向西方求购粮食时,虽然加拿大、澳大利亚等国最终以贷款形式破了例,但此时饥荒已经蔓延,外部输入的时间窗口已经错过了最关键的那几个月。
换句话说,禁运和逼债未必是起点,但它们压缩了缓冲空间,延迟了纠错时机,把一场本可以更早被遏制的危机推向了更深的程度。远的不说,你们只要认真看看古巴的情况就知道当时的困难究竟有多大。而把复杂的问题简单化归因并夸大其词的做出帽子扣到毛泽东头上则是无耻的构陷。
Alex de Leon retweeted
英国和美国为什么仇视俄罗斯人?
转杰弗里·萨克斯在欧洲议会的讲话如下:
“英国人为什么开始仇恨俄罗斯人?为什么?告诉你们吧,因为我昨天刚刚出版了一本关于欧洲恐俄症的书。
在这本书的第一章,我讲述了一位名叫格里森的历史学家在1950年写的一项精彩研究。
他提出了一个非常切中要害的问题,对我们今天也完全适用。
他说,英国和俄罗斯在1815年滑铁卢还是盟友。25年后它们成了敌人。发生了什么?于是他研究了议会辩论记录。他研究了每一份公开记录。他读了一切。他读了下议院说过的每一句话。他读了每一次演讲。他在这本精彩的书里得出的结论是,俄罗斯最大的罪行就是它有1700万平方公里。这就是它最大的罪行。
为什么这么说?因为有了1700万平方公里,英国就认定俄罗斯如此庞大,以至于对大英帝国在印度的统治构成威胁。顺便说一句,这件事从来没有进入过沙皇的脑子。但英国把自己煽动得相当激动。到了1840年,俄罗斯成了敌人。
1853年,帕默斯顿,这个典型的帝国主义者,在克里米亚发动了战争。为什么?说来话长,但基本上就是为了压垮俄罗斯。因为俄罗斯在1852年说,我们可以解决所有的不满,没有任何理由发生冲突。而帕默斯顿说,我们向塞瓦斯托波尔进军。原因就是他想让俄罗斯变成一个无足轻重的存在,这样它就无法入侵大英帝国。于是爆发了三年的血腥战争,克里米亚战争。
这就是我们那革命性的和平方式。你们知道,1945年德国投降几天之后,大家都知道丘吉尔问他自己的战争指挥部,为什么我们现在不入侵苏联?取名为《不可思议行动》。(研究后知道不可行放弃)
而当美国在1945年接管大英帝国之后,俄罗斯成了美利坚合众国的敌人。
当苏联解体时,如果我们愿意,我们手中就握有未来一个世纪的和平。因为俄罗斯人对75年的布尔什维克主义已经相当厌倦了。他们想要和平,想要合作,想要友谊。而美国战略家能想到的只有俄罗斯很大,我们必须确保它仍然是一个三流强国。
于是决定用北约包围俄罗斯。如果你这样行事足够久,最终就会得到乌克兰战争。这不是普京的战争,这是我们的战争。原因与帕默斯顿和拿破仑三世发动第一次克里米亚战争的原因完全相同。因为俄罗斯对进军欧洲没有丝毫兴趣。它从来没有过,除了拿破仑打扰他们的时候和希特勒打扰他们的时候。”
当然中国人仇视俄国有自己的历史原因:一个是前苏联和中国共产党的关系,历史上和西方列强一起入侵过中国,并掠走了中国大片的土地。
Salió o huyó de Brasil? Que pasa con estos medios que le andan lavando la cara a los criminales de derecha 🤡
🇧🇷🚨 #Atención | Flávio Bolsonaro salió de Brasil rumbo a Estados Unidos pese a una prohibición judicial, según informó LA NACION, medio aliado de EL TIEMPO, con base en una fuente cercana a la familia Bolsonaro.
La salida del excandidato presidencial se produjo este martes, en medio del hermetismo sobre su paradero y días después de su derrota electoral frente a Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva 👉 eltiempo.com/mundo/latinoame…
Ese estado de bienestar fue para contener el comunismo. Una vez caído el muro y después la URSS ya no había nada que contener y procedieron a desmontar todo en favor de las ganancias y libre mercado.
Una Europa mucho más pobre que la actual, en los años 50, fue capaz de levantar la mayoría de instrumentos del Estado del Bienestar que hoy dice «no poder soportar». Es más, en aquel entonces hasta el 50% de la construcción de nueva obra de vivienda era pública o social.
La operación ideológica de las élites para convencer a la gente que una Europa cinco veces más rica que entonces (en riqueza real, descontando inflación, aumento población etc etc) no puede hacer lo mismo es algo descomunal.
El neoliberalismo no solo ha destrozado nuestras economías, sino que es un cepo mental que impide construir otros imaginarios, aunque hoy dispongamos de estructuras productivas mucho más desarrolladas y eficientes que en los 50.
Si la izquierda y el socialismo es pobreza,¿porque latino américa es tan pobre si los fachos son los que han gobernado por casi 200 años? ¿Dónde está la riqueza que crea esta ideología?
En india fue peor bajo el dominio británico pero pues cada quien 💅🏽
Replying to @justjargons
De qué putas estás hablando. Bajo el capitalismo es donde menos hambre ha pasado la humanidad.
La peor hambruna humana se dio bajo el socialismo en la China de Mao.
Para ser zurdo se requiere ser muy ignorante o muy descarado.
Alex de Leon retweeted
Replying to @PaulGolding
This how rioters dealt with French Leaders who shot them.





























