Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
That drug-addled, grifting little shit has been a wrong'un his entire, pathetic, traitorous life.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
You should be forced to resign from the Commons for openly & blatantly supporting a convicted violent crook. You've exposed your real attitude to law & order.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
Tommy Robinson pleaded not guilty & was tried in a Court of law, as per our legal system. 12 ordinary citizens (those people you claim to support) heard the evidence & 10 of them came to the conclusion that he was guilty of the charges. But yeah you carry on blaming “the system”.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
A jury of his peers found him guilty - and this just adds to his already long rap sheet. Assault, mortgage fraud, passport fraud, (which I would have thought you would care about), contempt of court and now harassment. He's a nasty piece of work and a thug.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
"The system has treated him unfairly."
He chose a jury trial. He said he wanted "12 members of the British public" to hear the evidence. They heard it for 11 hours and convicted him on both counts.
That's not the system. That's the public.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
How exactly? It was a jury trial. You know ... the type you were so desperate to defend a few months ago!
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
By “System” you mean Jury, right?
He got a fair trial, in a court of law judged by his peers.
Sounds fair to me?!
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
A far-right activist and multiple convicted criminal, Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was found guilty of harassing two Daily Mail journalists by a jury at Southwark Crown Court.
He was granted bail ahead of his sentencing, scheduled for 16 December.
Harassment causing fear of violence can carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, or up to 14 years if the offence is racially or religiously aggravated.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
It’s official, Restore Britain no longer support justice and law and order. They believe a jury verdict to be unfair despite being a jury verdict. As if the members of the jury are all part of “the system”. A vote for Restore is vote for selectively applied justice and anarchy.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
You absolute melt. 🤣 A jury found him guilty, not the bloody Taliban. Every time Tommy ends up in court, you lot act like Nelson Mandela’s been arrested again, I’ve seen less dramatic reactions at actual funerals.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @TheMeldrew @K4rmaRules
Replying to @Nigel_Farage
Why?
£5M Farage couldn't even be bothered to turn up in person.
No change there then, is there?
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @Nigel_Farage
Why you doing this, why weren't you in the chamber? Is being an MP not worth your time these days?
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @Nigel_Farage
Another day bunking off work fromage.
Britain's laziest MP.
TWO TIER
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @Nigel_Farage
Farage’s “rescue” looks like Trump’s playbook wrapped in a Union Jack: tax cut promises, welfare cuts and deregulation. A lower tax bill does not prove you are better off if support and protections disappear. Publish the full costings, including who loses.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @Nigel_Farage
Nigel didn't turn up and Jenrick said he wasn't going to watch it? Did you lie again?
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @The5th_estateUK
He's a bit hazy on the subject of corruption and donations
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Translation: I couldn’t be arsed to attend for prayers, so lost my right to that place; I thought I could just waltz in hours later because I’m an entitled prick: there was plenty of space but I prefer to play the victim and find a way to make Budget Day all about me.
Valerie Marshall retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
Serious question though:
The population isn't replenishing, and therefore aging. To reverse this through a booming economy will take literal decades.
That aging share of the population is growing while newly born Brits.... basically do not exist.
So an ever shrinking workforce is supposed to pay for an ever growing pensioner cohort?
And your suggestion is to shrink that workforce even more?
Makes zero sense.
"Brits" wanting net emigration - a kid wants ice cream 24/7. Doesn't mean its good for them.
























